You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
- johnzon-mapper polymorphism vs JSON-B 3 polymorphism - posted by Markus Jung <ma...@markus-jung.dev> on 2023/04/07 20:45:55 UTC, 12 replies.
- [jira] [Created] (JOHNZON-396) JsonStreamParserImpl has a memory leak problem - posted by "liucongcong (Jira)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2023/04/09 04:50:00 UTC, 0 replies.
- [jira] [Updated] (JOHNZON-396) JsonStreamParserImpl has a memory leak problem - posted by "liucongcong (Jira)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2023/04/09 04:51:00 UTC, 1 replies.
- [jira] [Commented] (JOHNZON-396) JsonStreamParserImpl has a memory leak problem - posted by "Romain Manni-Bucau (Jira)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2023/04/09 07:40:00 UTC, 0 replies.
- Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Johnzon-1.2.20 - posted by Jean-Louis MONTEIRO <je...@gmail.com> on 2023/04/11 12:42:06 UTC, 1 replies.
- [GitHub] [johnzon] rmannibucau commented on a diff in pull request #100: Implement JSON-B 3 Polymorphism - posted by "rmannibucau (via GitHub)" <gi...@apache.org> on 2023/04/17 07:40:40 UTC, 4 replies.
- [GitHub] [johnzon] tandraschko commented on pull request #100: Implement JSON-B 3 Polymorphism - posted by "tandraschko (via GitHub)" <gi...@apache.org> on 2023/04/18 11:24:50 UTC, 0 replies.
- [GitHub] [johnzon] jungm commented on a diff in pull request #100: Implement JSON-B 3 Polymorphism - posted by "jungm (via GitHub)" <gi...@apache.org> on 2023/04/18 13:57:27 UTC, 4 replies.
- [GitHub] [johnzon] jungm commented on pull request #100: Implement JSON-B 3 Polymorphism - posted by "jungm (via GitHub)" <gi...@apache.org> on 2023/04/19 12:05:37 UTC, 0 replies.
- [VOTE RESULT] Release Apache Johnzon-1.2.20 - posted by Jean-Louis MONTEIRO <je...@gmail.com> on 2023/04/20 10:18:11 UTC, 0 replies.
- Apache Johnzon 1.2.20 available - posted by Jean-Louis Monteiro <jl...@tomitribe.com> on 2023/04/20 10:36:50 UTC, 0 replies.
- [GitHub] [johnzon] rmannibucau merged pull request #100: Implement JSON-B 3 Polymorphism - posted by "rmannibucau (via GitHub)" <gi...@apache.org> on 2023/04/20 11:54:38 UTC, 0 replies.
- [GitHub] [johnzon] jungm commented on pull request #98: WIP Jakarta EE 10 TCK setup - posted by "jungm (via GitHub)" <gi...@apache.org> on 2023/04/20 12:15:16 UTC, 1 replies.
- [GitHub] [johnzon] rmannibucau commented on pull request #98: WIP Jakarta EE 10 TCK setup - posted by "rmannibucau (via GitHub)" <gi...@apache.org> on 2023/04/20 12:17:41 UTC, 1 replies.
- [GitHub] [johnzon] jungm opened a new pull request, #101: TCKs in github actions - posted by "jungm (via GitHub)" <gi...@apache.org> on 2023/04/21 13:15:25 UTC, 0 replies.
- [GitHub] [johnzon] rmannibucau commented on pull request #101: TCKs in github actions - posted by "rmannibucau (via GitHub)" <gi...@apache.org> on 2023/04/21 13:20:53 UTC, 2 replies.
- [GitHub] [johnzon] jungm commented on pull request #101: TCKs in github actions - posted by "jungm (via GitHub)" <gi...@apache.org> on 2023/04/21 13:25:30 UTC, 2 replies.
- [GitHub] [johnzon] hboutemy opened a new pull request, #102: switch packaging to pom - posted by "hboutemy (via GitHub)" <gi...@apache.org> on 2023/04/24 16:41:29 UTC, 0 replies.
- [GitHub] [johnzon] rmannibucau merged pull request #102: switch packaging to pom - posted by "rmannibucau (via GitHub)" <gi...@apache.org> on 2023/04/24 18:01:23 UTC, 0 replies.
- assembly typo? - posted by Romain Manni-Bucau <rm...@gmail.com> on 2023/04/24 18:02:46 UTC, 5 replies.
- [GitHub] [johnzon] jeanouii commented on pull request #101: TCKs in github actions - posted by "jeanouii (via GitHub)" <gi...@apache.org> on 2023/04/24 18:05:36 UTC, 1 replies.
- [GitHub] [johnzon] jeanouii commented on pull request #98: WIP Jakarta EE 10 TCK setup - posted by "jeanouii (via GitHub)" <gi...@apache.org> on 2023/04/24 18:06:21 UTC, 4 replies.
- [GitHub] [johnzon] jeanouii closed pull request #89: Ensure Snippet works as intended for other JsonGenerator implementations - posted by "jeanouii (via GitHub)" <gi...@apache.org> on 2023/04/24 18:31:08 UTC, 0 replies.
- [GitHub] [johnzon] jungm opened a new pull request, #103: don't serialize BigInteger/BigDecimal as strings in jsonb - posted by "jungm (via GitHub)" <gi...@apache.org> on 2023/04/25 18:27:40 UTC, 0 replies.
- Undefined CDI behaviour in TCKs? - posted by Markus Jung <ma...@markus-jung.dev> on 2023/04/25 19:16:29 UTC, 3 replies.
- [GitHub] [johnzon] rmannibucau commented on a diff in pull request #103: don't serialize BigInteger/BigDecimal as strings in jsonb - posted by "rmannibucau (via GitHub)" <gi...@apache.org> on 2023/04/25 19:32:46 UTC, 0 replies.
- [GitHub] [johnzon] jungm opened a new pull request, #104: Workaround so TCKs detect when OWB isn't started - posted by "jungm (via GitHub)" <gi...@apache.org> on 2023/04/26 06:24:57 UTC, 0 replies.
- [GitHub] [johnzon] jungm commented on a diff in pull request #103: don't serialize BigInteger/BigDecimal as strings in jsonb - posted by "jungm (via GitHub)" <gi...@apache.org> on 2023/04/28 12:35:34 UTC, 0 replies.
- [GitHub] [johnzon] jungm commented on pull request #103: don't serialize BigInteger/BigDecimal as strings in jsonb - posted by "jungm (via GitHub)" <gi...@apache.org> on 2023/04/28 15:49:31 UTC, 0 replies.