You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@johnzon.apache.org by Romain Manni-Bucau <rm...@gmail.com> on 2023/04/24 18:02:46 UTC
assembly typo?
Hi all,
In our distro archive we now have jakarta API, was it intended or is it a
gluton sed result (I expected only apache artifacts to be there but there
can be a reason)?
If intended why jsonp and not jsonb?
<dependency>
<groupId>jakarta.json</groupId>
<artifactId>jakarta.json-api</artifactId>
<version>${jakarta-jsonp-api.version}</version>
<scope>compile</scope>
</dependency>
<dependency>
<groupId>jakarta.json</groupId>
<artifactId>jakarta.json-api</artifactId>
<version>${jakarta-jsonp-api.version}</version>
<scope>compile</scope>
<classifier>sources</classifier>
</dependency>
<dependency>
<groupId>jakarta.json</groupId>
<artifactId>jakarta.json-api</artifactId>
<version>${jakarta-jsonp-api.version}</version>
<scope>compile</scope>
<classifier>javadoc</classifier>
</dependency>
Romain Manni-Bucau
@rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog
<https://rmannibucau.metawerx.net/> | Old Blog
<http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github <https://github.com/rmannibucau> |
LinkedIn <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau> | Book
<https://www.packtpub.com/application-development/java-ee-8-high-performance>
Re: assembly typo?
Posted by Jean-Louis Monteiro <jl...@tomitribe.com>.
I agree
Le lun. 24 avr. 2023, 21:54, Romain Manni-Bucau <rm...@gmail.com> a
écrit :
> sounds good (I don't use these zips so while consistent it is ok for me
> ;)).
>
> Romain Manni-Bucau
> @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog
> <https://rmannibucau.metawerx.net/> | Old Blog
> <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github <
> https://github.com/rmannibucau> |
> LinkedIn <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau> | Book
> <
> https://www.packtpub.com/application-development/java-ee-8-high-performance
> >
>
>
> Le lun. 24 avr. 2023 à 21:50, Jean-Louis Monteiro <
> jlmonteiro@tomitribe.com>
> a écrit :
>
> > Qh I get your point. Thanks
> >
> > I'd say, we can create a lib/ directory and add them there for
> convenience?
> > --
> > Jean-Louis Monteiro
> > http://twitter.com/jlouismonteiro
> > http://www.tomitribe.com
> >
> >
> > On Mon, Apr 24, 2023 at 9:01 PM Romain Manni-Bucau <
> rmannibucau@gmail.com>
> > wrote:
> >
> > > The point is not if it works but do we deliver it as part of the
> johnzon
> > > release (in our distro).
> > > Since we don't own them I didn't expect them to be there but if we want
> > to
> > > provide them for convenience it can be possible (but maybe more as
> > runtime
> > > than sources? not sure what we would do in this option to be honest).
> > >
> > > Romain Manni-Bucau
> > > @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog
> > > <https://rmannibucau.metawerx.net/> | Old Blog
> > > <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github <
> > > https://github.com/rmannibucau> |
> > > LinkedIn <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau> | Book
> > > <
> > >
> >
> https://www.packtpub.com/application-development/java-ee-8-high-performance
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> > > Le lun. 24 avr. 2023 à 20:22, Jean-Louis Monteiro <
> > > jlmonteiro@tomitribe.com>
> > > a écrit :
> > >
> > > > To me, we should have both JSON-B and JOSN-P.
> > > > So I think this is a bug.
> > > >
> > > > Regarding Apache spec jars versus Eclipse Jakarta spec jars, I don't
> > see
> > > > any value in duplicating spec jars. The available versions from
> Eclipse
> > > > work unless I'm missing something.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > > Jean-Louis Monteiro
> > > > http://twitter.com/jlouismonteiro
> > > > http://www.tomitribe.com
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > On Mon, Apr 24, 2023 at 8:03 PM Romain Manni-Bucau <
> > > rmannibucau@gmail.com>
> > > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > Hi all,
> > > > >
> > > > > In our distro archive we now have jakarta API, was it intended or
> is
> > > it a
> > > > > gluton sed result (I expected only apache artifacts to be there but
> > > there
> > > > > can be a reason)?
> > > > > If intended why jsonp and not jsonb?
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > <dependency>
> > > > > <groupId>jakarta.json</groupId>
> > > > > <artifactId>jakarta.json-api</artifactId>
> > > > > <version>${jakarta-jsonp-api.version}</version>
> > > > > <scope>compile</scope>
> > > > > </dependency>
> > > > > <dependency>
> > > > > <groupId>jakarta.json</groupId>
> > > > > <artifactId>jakarta.json-api</artifactId>
> > > > > <version>${jakarta-jsonp-api.version}</version>
> > > > > <scope>compile</scope>
> > > > > <classifier>sources</classifier>
> > > > > </dependency>
> > > > > <dependency>
> > > > > <groupId>jakarta.json</groupId>
> > > > > <artifactId>jakarta.json-api</artifactId>
> > > > > <version>${jakarta-jsonp-api.version}</version>
> > > > > <scope>compile</scope>
> > > > > <classifier>javadoc</classifier>
> > > > > </dependency>
> > > > >
> > > > > Romain Manni-Bucau
> > > > > @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog
> > > > > <https://rmannibucau.metawerx.net/> | Old Blog
> > > > > <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github <
> > > > > https://github.com/rmannibucau> |
> > > > > LinkedIn <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau> | Book
> > > > > <
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> https://www.packtpub.com/application-development/java-ee-8-high-performance
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
>
Re: assembly typo?
Posted by Romain Manni-Bucau <rm...@gmail.com>.
sounds good (I don't use these zips so while consistent it is ok for me ;)).
Romain Manni-Bucau
@rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog
<https://rmannibucau.metawerx.net/> | Old Blog
<http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github <https://github.com/rmannibucau> |
LinkedIn <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau> | Book
<https://www.packtpub.com/application-development/java-ee-8-high-performance>
Le lun. 24 avr. 2023 à 21:50, Jean-Louis Monteiro <jl...@tomitribe.com>
a écrit :
> Qh I get your point. Thanks
>
> I'd say, we can create a lib/ directory and add them there for convenience?
> --
> Jean-Louis Monteiro
> http://twitter.com/jlouismonteiro
> http://www.tomitribe.com
>
>
> On Mon, Apr 24, 2023 at 9:01 PM Romain Manni-Bucau <rm...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> > The point is not if it works but do we deliver it as part of the johnzon
> > release (in our distro).
> > Since we don't own them I didn't expect them to be there but if we want
> to
> > provide them for convenience it can be possible (but maybe more as
> runtime
> > than sources? not sure what we would do in this option to be honest).
> >
> > Romain Manni-Bucau
> > @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog
> > <https://rmannibucau.metawerx.net/> | Old Blog
> > <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github <
> > https://github.com/rmannibucau> |
> > LinkedIn <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau> | Book
> > <
> >
> https://www.packtpub.com/application-development/java-ee-8-high-performance
> > >
> >
> >
> > Le lun. 24 avr. 2023 à 20:22, Jean-Louis Monteiro <
> > jlmonteiro@tomitribe.com>
> > a écrit :
> >
> > > To me, we should have both JSON-B and JOSN-P.
> > > So I think this is a bug.
> > >
> > > Regarding Apache spec jars versus Eclipse Jakarta spec jars, I don't
> see
> > > any value in duplicating spec jars. The available versions from Eclipse
> > > work unless I'm missing something.
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > Jean-Louis Monteiro
> > > http://twitter.com/jlouismonteiro
> > > http://www.tomitribe.com
> > >
> > >
> > > On Mon, Apr 24, 2023 at 8:03 PM Romain Manni-Bucau <
> > rmannibucau@gmail.com>
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > > > Hi all,
> > > >
> > > > In our distro archive we now have jakarta API, was it intended or is
> > it a
> > > > gluton sed result (I expected only apache artifacts to be there but
> > there
> > > > can be a reason)?
> > > > If intended why jsonp and not jsonb?
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > <dependency>
> > > > <groupId>jakarta.json</groupId>
> > > > <artifactId>jakarta.json-api</artifactId>
> > > > <version>${jakarta-jsonp-api.version}</version>
> > > > <scope>compile</scope>
> > > > </dependency>
> > > > <dependency>
> > > > <groupId>jakarta.json</groupId>
> > > > <artifactId>jakarta.json-api</artifactId>
> > > > <version>${jakarta-jsonp-api.version}</version>
> > > > <scope>compile</scope>
> > > > <classifier>sources</classifier>
> > > > </dependency>
> > > > <dependency>
> > > > <groupId>jakarta.json</groupId>
> > > > <artifactId>jakarta.json-api</artifactId>
> > > > <version>${jakarta-jsonp-api.version}</version>
> > > > <scope>compile</scope>
> > > > <classifier>javadoc</classifier>
> > > > </dependency>
> > > >
> > > > Romain Manni-Bucau
> > > > @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog
> > > > <https://rmannibucau.metawerx.net/> | Old Blog
> > > > <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github <
> > > > https://github.com/rmannibucau> |
> > > > LinkedIn <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau> | Book
> > > > <
> > > >
> > >
> >
> https://www.packtpub.com/application-development/java-ee-8-high-performance
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
>
Re: assembly typo?
Posted by Jean-Louis Monteiro <jl...@tomitribe.com>.
Qh I get your point. Thanks
I'd say, we can create a lib/ directory and add them there for convenience?
--
Jean-Louis Monteiro
http://twitter.com/jlouismonteiro
http://www.tomitribe.com
On Mon, Apr 24, 2023 at 9:01 PM Romain Manni-Bucau <rm...@gmail.com>
wrote:
> The point is not if it works but do we deliver it as part of the johnzon
> release (in our distro).
> Since we don't own them I didn't expect them to be there but if we want to
> provide them for convenience it can be possible (but maybe more as runtime
> than sources? not sure what we would do in this option to be honest).
>
> Romain Manni-Bucau
> @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog
> <https://rmannibucau.metawerx.net/> | Old Blog
> <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github <
> https://github.com/rmannibucau> |
> LinkedIn <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau> | Book
> <
> https://www.packtpub.com/application-development/java-ee-8-high-performance
> >
>
>
> Le lun. 24 avr. 2023 à 20:22, Jean-Louis Monteiro <
> jlmonteiro@tomitribe.com>
> a écrit :
>
> > To me, we should have both JSON-B and JOSN-P.
> > So I think this is a bug.
> >
> > Regarding Apache spec jars versus Eclipse Jakarta spec jars, I don't see
> > any value in duplicating spec jars. The available versions from Eclipse
> > work unless I'm missing something.
> >
> >
> > --
> > Jean-Louis Monteiro
> > http://twitter.com/jlouismonteiro
> > http://www.tomitribe.com
> >
> >
> > On Mon, Apr 24, 2023 at 8:03 PM Romain Manni-Bucau <
> rmannibucau@gmail.com>
> > wrote:
> >
> > > Hi all,
> > >
> > > In our distro archive we now have jakarta API, was it intended or is
> it a
> > > gluton sed result (I expected only apache artifacts to be there but
> there
> > > can be a reason)?
> > > If intended why jsonp and not jsonb?
> > >
> > >
> > > <dependency>
> > > <groupId>jakarta.json</groupId>
> > > <artifactId>jakarta.json-api</artifactId>
> > > <version>${jakarta-jsonp-api.version}</version>
> > > <scope>compile</scope>
> > > </dependency>
> > > <dependency>
> > > <groupId>jakarta.json</groupId>
> > > <artifactId>jakarta.json-api</artifactId>
> > > <version>${jakarta-jsonp-api.version}</version>
> > > <scope>compile</scope>
> > > <classifier>sources</classifier>
> > > </dependency>
> > > <dependency>
> > > <groupId>jakarta.json</groupId>
> > > <artifactId>jakarta.json-api</artifactId>
> > > <version>${jakarta-jsonp-api.version}</version>
> > > <scope>compile</scope>
> > > <classifier>javadoc</classifier>
> > > </dependency>
> > >
> > > Romain Manni-Bucau
> > > @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog
> > > <https://rmannibucau.metawerx.net/> | Old Blog
> > > <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github <
> > > https://github.com/rmannibucau> |
> > > LinkedIn <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau> | Book
> > > <
> > >
> >
> https://www.packtpub.com/application-development/java-ee-8-high-performance
> > > >
> > >
> >
>
Re: assembly typo?
Posted by Romain Manni-Bucau <rm...@gmail.com>.
The point is not if it works but do we deliver it as part of the johnzon
release (in our distro).
Since we don't own them I didn't expect them to be there but if we want to
provide them for convenience it can be possible (but maybe more as runtime
than sources? not sure what we would do in this option to be honest).
Romain Manni-Bucau
@rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog
<https://rmannibucau.metawerx.net/> | Old Blog
<http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github <https://github.com/rmannibucau> |
LinkedIn <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau> | Book
<https://www.packtpub.com/application-development/java-ee-8-high-performance>
Le lun. 24 avr. 2023 à 20:22, Jean-Louis Monteiro <jl...@tomitribe.com>
a écrit :
> To me, we should have both JSON-B and JOSN-P.
> So I think this is a bug.
>
> Regarding Apache spec jars versus Eclipse Jakarta spec jars, I don't see
> any value in duplicating spec jars. The available versions from Eclipse
> work unless I'm missing something.
>
>
> --
> Jean-Louis Monteiro
> http://twitter.com/jlouismonteiro
> http://www.tomitribe.com
>
>
> On Mon, Apr 24, 2023 at 8:03 PM Romain Manni-Bucau <rm...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> > Hi all,
> >
> > In our distro archive we now have jakarta API, was it intended or is it a
> > gluton sed result (I expected only apache artifacts to be there but there
> > can be a reason)?
> > If intended why jsonp and not jsonb?
> >
> >
> > <dependency>
> > <groupId>jakarta.json</groupId>
> > <artifactId>jakarta.json-api</artifactId>
> > <version>${jakarta-jsonp-api.version}</version>
> > <scope>compile</scope>
> > </dependency>
> > <dependency>
> > <groupId>jakarta.json</groupId>
> > <artifactId>jakarta.json-api</artifactId>
> > <version>${jakarta-jsonp-api.version}</version>
> > <scope>compile</scope>
> > <classifier>sources</classifier>
> > </dependency>
> > <dependency>
> > <groupId>jakarta.json</groupId>
> > <artifactId>jakarta.json-api</artifactId>
> > <version>${jakarta-jsonp-api.version}</version>
> > <scope>compile</scope>
> > <classifier>javadoc</classifier>
> > </dependency>
> >
> > Romain Manni-Bucau
> > @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog
> > <https://rmannibucau.metawerx.net/> | Old Blog
> > <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github <
> > https://github.com/rmannibucau> |
> > LinkedIn <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau> | Book
> > <
> >
> https://www.packtpub.com/application-development/java-ee-8-high-performance
> > >
> >
>
Re: assembly typo?
Posted by Jean-Louis Monteiro <jl...@tomitribe.com>.
To me, we should have both JSON-B and JOSN-P.
So I think this is a bug.
Regarding Apache spec jars versus Eclipse Jakarta spec jars, I don't see
any value in duplicating spec jars. The available versions from Eclipse
work unless I'm missing something.
--
Jean-Louis Monteiro
http://twitter.com/jlouismonteiro
http://www.tomitribe.com
On Mon, Apr 24, 2023 at 8:03 PM Romain Manni-Bucau <rm...@gmail.com>
wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> In our distro archive we now have jakarta API, was it intended or is it a
> gluton sed result (I expected only apache artifacts to be there but there
> can be a reason)?
> If intended why jsonp and not jsonb?
>
>
> <dependency>
> <groupId>jakarta.json</groupId>
> <artifactId>jakarta.json-api</artifactId>
> <version>${jakarta-jsonp-api.version}</version>
> <scope>compile</scope>
> </dependency>
> <dependency>
> <groupId>jakarta.json</groupId>
> <artifactId>jakarta.json-api</artifactId>
> <version>${jakarta-jsonp-api.version}</version>
> <scope>compile</scope>
> <classifier>sources</classifier>
> </dependency>
> <dependency>
> <groupId>jakarta.json</groupId>
> <artifactId>jakarta.json-api</artifactId>
> <version>${jakarta-jsonp-api.version}</version>
> <scope>compile</scope>
> <classifier>javadoc</classifier>
> </dependency>
>
> Romain Manni-Bucau
> @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog
> <https://rmannibucau.metawerx.net/> | Old Blog
> <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github <
> https://github.com/rmannibucau> |
> LinkedIn <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau> | Book
> <
> https://www.packtpub.com/application-development/java-ee-8-high-performance
> >
>