You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to solr-user@lucene.apache.org by Luis Cappa Banda <lu...@gmail.com> on 2012/11/15 10:19:10 UTC
SolrJ: atomic updates.
Hello everyone,
I´ve tested atomic updates via Ajax calls and now I´m starting with atomic
updates via SolrJ... but the way I´m proceeding doesn´t seem to work well.
Here is the snippet:
*SolrInputDocument do = ne SolrInputDocument();*
*doc.addField("id", "myId");*
*
*
*Map<String, List<String>> operation = new HashMap<String, List<String>>();*
*operation.put("set", [[a list of String elements]]); // I want a set
operation to override field values.*
*doc.addField("fieldName", operation);*
*
*
*cloudSolrServer.add(doc); // Atomic update operation.*
And after updating the resultant doc is as follows:
*doc: {*
*
*
*...*
*
*
*fieldName: [ "{set=values}"*
*],*
*
*
*...*
*
*
*}*
In other words, the map which includes the "set" operation and the field
values is String formatted and that String is used to update the field, :-/
What is the correct way to update just one or more fields with SolrJ?
Regards,
--
- Luis Cappa
Re: SolrJ: atomic updates.
Posted by Luis Cappa Banda <lu...@gmail.com>.
Uhm, after setting both Response and Request Writers it worked OK with *
HttpSolrServer*. I´ve tried to find a way to set BinaryResponseParser and
BinaryRequestWriter with *CloudServer *(or even via *LbHttpSolrServer*) but
I found nothing.
Suggestions? :-/
- Luis Cappa.
2012/11/15 Sami Siren <ss...@gmail.com>
> Try setting Request writer to binary like this:
>
> server.setParser(new BinaryResponseParser());
> server.setRequestWriter(new BinaryRequestWriter());
>
> Or then instead of string array use ArrayList<String>() that contains your
> strings as the value for the map
>
>
> On Thu, Nov 15, 2012 at 3:58 PM, Luis Cappa Banda <luiscappa@gmail.com
> >wrote:
>
> > Hi, Sami.
> >
> > Doing some tests I´ve used the same code as you and did a quick
> execution:
> >
> >
> > *HttpSolrServer server = new HttpSolrServer("
> > http://localhost:8080/solrserver/core1<
> > http://localhost:10080/newscover_es/items_es>
> > ");*
> >
> > * *
> > * try {*
> > * *
> > * HashMap editTags = new HashMap();*
> > * editTags.put("set", new String[]{"tag1","tag2","tag3"});*
> > * doc.addField("myField", editTags);*
> > * server.add(doc);*
> > * server.commit(true, true);*
> > * *
> > * } catch (SolrServerException e) {*
> > * e.printStackTrace();*
> > * } catch (IOException e) {*
> > * e.printStackTrace();*
> > * }*
> > *
> > *
> > *
> > *
> > And the resultant doc is wrong:
> >
> > <response>
> >
> > <lst name="responseHeader">
> >
> > <int name="status">0</int>
> >
> > <int name="QTime">1</int>
> >
> > <lst name="params">
> >
> > <str name="q">*:*</str>
> >
> > </lst>
> >
> > </lst>
> >
> > <result name="response" numFound="1" start="0">
> >
> > <doc>
> >
> > <str name="i_id">50a0f1f90cf226fb5677fe13</str>
> >
> > <arr name="myField">
> >
> > *<str>[Ljava.lang.String;@7d5e90cb</str> ---> toString() from String[]
> > array.*
> >
> > </arr>
> >
> > <long name="_version_">1418710023780958208</long>
> >
> > </doc>
> >
> > </result>
> >
> > </response>
> >
> >
> >
> > So is definetely executing toString() method in both *HttpSolrServer
> *and *
> > CloudServer*. Tips:
> >
> >
> > - I´m using* Solrj 4.0.0 *artifact version in a *Maven *project.
> > - The fields to be updated are *dynamicFields*.
> > - I´m using Java jdk6.
> >
> > Alternatives:
> >
> > - I´m doing something wrong and I´m so stupid that I can´t see it, :-(
> > - The way I update fields is not the correct one.
> > - There is a general bug with atomic updates via SolrJ.
> >
> >
> > Regards,
> >
> >
> > - Luis Cappa.
> >
> >
> > 2012/11/15 Luis Cappa Banda <lu...@gmail.com>
> >
> > > I´ll have a look to Solr source code and try to fix the bug. If I
> succeed
> > > I´ll update JIRA issue with it, :-)
> > >
> > >
> > > 2012/11/15 Sami Siren <ss...@gmail.com>
> > >
> > >> Actually it seems that xml/binary request writers only behave
> > differently
> > >> when using array[] as the value. if I use ArrayList it also works with
> > the
> > >> xml format (4.1 branch). Still it's annoying that the two request
> > writers
> > >> behave differently so I guess it's worth adding the jira anyway.
> > >>
> > >> The Affects version should be 4.0.
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> On Thu, Nov 15, 2012 at 1:42 PM, Luis Cappa Banda <
> luiscappa@gmail.com
> > >> >wrote:
> > >>
> > >> > Hello, Sami.
> > >> >
> > >> > It will be the first issue that I open so, should I create it under
> > Solr
> > >> > 4.0 version or in Solr 4.1.0 one?
> > >> >
> > >> > Thanks,
> > >> >
> > >> > - Luis Cappa.
> > >> >
> > >> > 2012/11/15 Sami Siren <ss...@gmail.com>
> > >> >
> > >> > > On Thu, Nov 15, 2012 at 11:51 AM, Luis Cappa Banda <
> > >> luiscappa@gmail.com
> > >> > > >wrote:
> > >> > >
> > >> > > > Thread update:
> > >> > > >
> > >> > > > When I use a simple:
> > >> > > >
> > >> > > > *Map operation = new HashMap();*
> > >> > > >
> > >> > > >
> > >> > > > Instead of:
> > >> > > >
> > >> > > > *Map<String, List<String>> operation = new HashMap<String,
> > >> > > > List<String>>();*
> > >> > > >
> > >> > > >
> > >> > > > The result looks better, but it´s still wrong:
> > >> > > >
> > >> > > > fieldName: [
> > >> > > > "[Value1, Value2]"
> > >> > > > ],
> > >> > > >
> > >> > > >
> > >> > > > However, List<String> value is received as a simple String
> > >> "[Value1,
> > >> > > > Value2]". In other words, SolrJ is internally executing a
> > toString()
> > >> > > > operation to the List<Sring>. Is impossible to update
> atomically a
> > >> > > > multivalued field with a List of values in just one atomic
> update
> > >> > > > operation?
> > >> > > >
> > >> > >
> > >> > > Seems to be working fine here with HttpSolrServer /
> > >> BinaryRequestWriter;
> > >> > >
> > >> > > HashMap editTags = new HashMap();
> > >> > > editTags.put("set", new String[]{"tag1","tag2","tag3"});
> > >> > > doc = new SolrInputDocument();
> > >> > > doc.addField("id", "unique");
> > >> > > doc.addField("tags_ss", editTags);
> > >> > > server.add(doc);
> > >> > > server.commit(true, true);
> > >> > > resp = server.query(q);
> > >> > >
> > >> >
> System.out.println(resp.getResults().get(0).getFirstValue("tags_ss"));
> > >> > >
> > >> > > prints "tag1"
> > >> > >
> > >> > > ArrayList<String> as a value works the same way as String[].
> > >> > >
> > >> > > When using xml (RequestWriter) I can see the problem that you are
> > >> > > describing, can you add a jira for that?
> > >> > >
> > >> > > --
> > >> > > Sami SIren
> > >> > >
> > >> > >
> > >> > >
> > >> > >
> > >> > >
> > >> > > >
> > >> > > > Regards,
> > >> > > >
> > >> > > >
> > >> > > > - Luis Cappa.
> > >> > > >
> > >> > > > 2012/11/15 Luis Cappa Banda <lu...@gmail.com>
> > >> > > >
> > >> > > > > Hello everyone,
> > >> > > > >
> > >> > > > > I´ve tested atomic updates via Ajax calls and now I´m starting
> > >> with
> > >> > > > atomic
> > >> > > > > updates via SolrJ... but the way I´m proceeding doesn´t seem
> to
> > >> work
> > >> > > > well.
> > >> > > > > Here is the snippet:
> > >> > > > >
> > >> > > > > *SolrInputDocument do = ne SolrInputDocument();*
> > >> > > > > *doc.addField("id", "myId");*
> > >> > > > > *
> > >> > > > > *
> > >> > > > > *Map<String, List<String>> operation = new HashMap<String,
> > >> > > > > List<String>>();*
> > >> > > > > *operation.put("set", [[a list of String elements]]); // I
> > want a
> > >> > set
> > >> > > > > operation to override field values.*
> > >> > > > > *doc.addField("fieldName", operation);*
> > >> > > > > *
> > >> > > > > *
> > >> > > > > *cloudSolrServer.add(doc); // Atomic update operation.*
> > >> > > > >
> > >> > > > >
> > >> > > > > And after updating the resultant doc is as follows:
> > >> > > > >
> > >> > > > > *doc: {*
> > >> > > > > *
> > >> > > > > *
> > >> > > > > *...*
> > >> > > > > *
> > >> > > > > *
> > >> > > > > *fieldName: [ "{set=values}"*
> > >> > > > > *],*
> > >> > > > > *
> > >> > > > > *
> > >> > > > > *...*
> > >> > > > >
> > >> > > > > *
> > >> > > > > *
> > >> > > > >
> > >> > > > > *}*
> > >> > > > >
> > >> > > > > In other words, the map which includes the "set" operation and
> > the
> > >> > > field
> > >> > > > > values is String formatted and that String is used to update
> the
> > >> > field,
> > >> > > > :-/
> > >> > > > >
> > >> > > > > What is the correct way to update just one or more fields with
> > >> SolrJ?
> > >> > > > >
> > >> > > > >
> > >> > > > > Regards,
> > >> > > > >
> > >> > > > > --
> > >> > > > >
> > >> > > > > - Luis Cappa
> > >> > > > >
> > >> > > > >
> > >> > > >
> > >> > > >
> > >> > > > --
> > >> > > >
> > >> > > > - Luis Cappa
> > >> > > >
> > >> > >
> > >> >
> > >> >
> > >> >
> > >> > --
> > >> >
> > >> > - Luis Cappa
> > >> >
> > >>
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > >
> > > - Luis Cappa
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
> > --
> >
> > - Luis Cappa
> >
>
--
- Luis Cappa
Re: SolrJ: atomic updates.
Posted by Sami Siren <ss...@gmail.com>.
Try setting Request writer to binary like this:
server.setParser(new BinaryResponseParser());
server.setRequestWriter(new BinaryRequestWriter());
Or then instead of string array use ArrayList<String>() that contains your
strings as the value for the map
On Thu, Nov 15, 2012 at 3:58 PM, Luis Cappa Banda <lu...@gmail.com>wrote:
> Hi, Sami.
>
> Doing some tests I´ve used the same code as you and did a quick execution:
>
>
> *HttpSolrServer server = new HttpSolrServer("
> http://localhost:8080/solrserver/core1<
> http://localhost:10080/newscover_es/items_es>
> ");*
>
> * *
> * try {*
> * *
> * HashMap editTags = new HashMap();*
> * editTags.put("set", new String[]{"tag1","tag2","tag3"});*
> * doc.addField("myField", editTags);*
> * server.add(doc);*
> * server.commit(true, true);*
> * *
> * } catch (SolrServerException e) {*
> * e.printStackTrace();*
> * } catch (IOException e) {*
> * e.printStackTrace();*
> * }*
> *
> *
> *
> *
> And the resultant doc is wrong:
>
> <response>
>
> <lst name="responseHeader">
>
> <int name="status">0</int>
>
> <int name="QTime">1</int>
>
> <lst name="params">
>
> <str name="q">*:*</str>
>
> </lst>
>
> </lst>
>
> <result name="response" numFound="1" start="0">
>
> <doc>
>
> <str name="i_id">50a0f1f90cf226fb5677fe13</str>
>
> <arr name="myField">
>
> *<str>[Ljava.lang.String;@7d5e90cb</str> ---> toString() from String[]
> array.*
>
> </arr>
>
> <long name="_version_">1418710023780958208</long>
>
> </doc>
>
> </result>
>
> </response>
>
>
>
> So is definetely executing toString() method in both *HttpSolrServer *and *
> CloudServer*. Tips:
>
>
> - I´m using* Solrj 4.0.0 *artifact version in a *Maven *project.
> - The fields to be updated are *dynamicFields*.
> - I´m using Java jdk6.
>
> Alternatives:
>
> - I´m doing something wrong and I´m so stupid that I can´t see it, :-(
> - The way I update fields is not the correct one.
> - There is a general bug with atomic updates via SolrJ.
>
>
> Regards,
>
>
> - Luis Cappa.
>
>
> 2012/11/15 Luis Cappa Banda <lu...@gmail.com>
>
> > I´ll have a look to Solr source code and try to fix the bug. If I succeed
> > I´ll update JIRA issue with it, :-)
> >
> >
> > 2012/11/15 Sami Siren <ss...@gmail.com>
> >
> >> Actually it seems that xml/binary request writers only behave
> differently
> >> when using array[] as the value. if I use ArrayList it also works with
> the
> >> xml format (4.1 branch). Still it's annoying that the two request
> writers
> >> behave differently so I guess it's worth adding the jira anyway.
> >>
> >> The Affects version should be 4.0.
> >>
> >>
> >> On Thu, Nov 15, 2012 at 1:42 PM, Luis Cappa Banda <luiscappa@gmail.com
> >> >wrote:
> >>
> >> > Hello, Sami.
> >> >
> >> > It will be the first issue that I open so, should I create it under
> Solr
> >> > 4.0 version or in Solr 4.1.0 one?
> >> >
> >> > Thanks,
> >> >
> >> > - Luis Cappa.
> >> >
> >> > 2012/11/15 Sami Siren <ss...@gmail.com>
> >> >
> >> > > On Thu, Nov 15, 2012 at 11:51 AM, Luis Cappa Banda <
> >> luiscappa@gmail.com
> >> > > >wrote:
> >> > >
> >> > > > Thread update:
> >> > > >
> >> > > > When I use a simple:
> >> > > >
> >> > > > *Map operation = new HashMap();*
> >> > > >
> >> > > >
> >> > > > Instead of:
> >> > > >
> >> > > > *Map<String, List<String>> operation = new HashMap<String,
> >> > > > List<String>>();*
> >> > > >
> >> > > >
> >> > > > The result looks better, but it´s still wrong:
> >> > > >
> >> > > > fieldName: [
> >> > > > "[Value1, Value2]"
> >> > > > ],
> >> > > >
> >> > > >
> >> > > > However, List<String> value is received as a simple String
> >> "[Value1,
> >> > > > Value2]". In other words, SolrJ is internally executing a
> toString()
> >> > > > operation to the List<Sring>. Is impossible to update atomically a
> >> > > > multivalued field with a List of values in just one atomic update
> >> > > > operation?
> >> > > >
> >> > >
> >> > > Seems to be working fine here with HttpSolrServer /
> >> BinaryRequestWriter;
> >> > >
> >> > > HashMap editTags = new HashMap();
> >> > > editTags.put("set", new String[]{"tag1","tag2","tag3"});
> >> > > doc = new SolrInputDocument();
> >> > > doc.addField("id", "unique");
> >> > > doc.addField("tags_ss", editTags);
> >> > > server.add(doc);
> >> > > server.commit(true, true);
> >> > > resp = server.query(q);
> >> > >
> >> > System.out.println(resp.getResults().get(0).getFirstValue("tags_ss"));
> >> > >
> >> > > prints "tag1"
> >> > >
> >> > > ArrayList<String> as a value works the same way as String[].
> >> > >
> >> > > When using xml (RequestWriter) I can see the problem that you are
> >> > > describing, can you add a jira for that?
> >> > >
> >> > > --
> >> > > Sami SIren
> >> > >
> >> > >
> >> > >
> >> > >
> >> > >
> >> > > >
> >> > > > Regards,
> >> > > >
> >> > > >
> >> > > > - Luis Cappa.
> >> > > >
> >> > > > 2012/11/15 Luis Cappa Banda <lu...@gmail.com>
> >> > > >
> >> > > > > Hello everyone,
> >> > > > >
> >> > > > > I´ve tested atomic updates via Ajax calls and now I´m starting
> >> with
> >> > > > atomic
> >> > > > > updates via SolrJ... but the way I´m proceeding doesn´t seem to
> >> work
> >> > > > well.
> >> > > > > Here is the snippet:
> >> > > > >
> >> > > > > *SolrInputDocument do = ne SolrInputDocument();*
> >> > > > > *doc.addField("id", "myId");*
> >> > > > > *
> >> > > > > *
> >> > > > > *Map<String, List<String>> operation = new HashMap<String,
> >> > > > > List<String>>();*
> >> > > > > *operation.put("set", [[a list of String elements]]); // I
> want a
> >> > set
> >> > > > > operation to override field values.*
> >> > > > > *doc.addField("fieldName", operation);*
> >> > > > > *
> >> > > > > *
> >> > > > > *cloudSolrServer.add(doc); // Atomic update operation.*
> >> > > > >
> >> > > > >
> >> > > > > And after updating the resultant doc is as follows:
> >> > > > >
> >> > > > > *doc: {*
> >> > > > > *
> >> > > > > *
> >> > > > > *...*
> >> > > > > *
> >> > > > > *
> >> > > > > *fieldName: [ "{set=values}"*
> >> > > > > *],*
> >> > > > > *
> >> > > > > *
> >> > > > > *...*
> >> > > > >
> >> > > > > *
> >> > > > > *
> >> > > > >
> >> > > > > *}*
> >> > > > >
> >> > > > > In other words, the map which includes the "set" operation and
> the
> >> > > field
> >> > > > > values is String formatted and that String is used to update the
> >> > field,
> >> > > > :-/
> >> > > > >
> >> > > > > What is the correct way to update just one or more fields with
> >> SolrJ?
> >> > > > >
> >> > > > >
> >> > > > > Regards,
> >> > > > >
> >> > > > > --
> >> > > > >
> >> > > > > - Luis Cappa
> >> > > > >
> >> > > > >
> >> > > >
> >> > > >
> >> > > > --
> >> > > >
> >> > > > - Luis Cappa
> >> > > >
> >> > >
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > --
> >> >
> >> > - Luis Cappa
> >> >
> >>
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> >
> > - Luis Cappa
> >
> >
>
>
> --
>
> - Luis Cappa
>
Re: SolrJ: atomic updates.
Posted by Luis Cappa Banda <lu...@gmail.com>.
Hi, Sami.
Doing some tests I´ve used the same code as you and did a quick execution:
*HttpSolrServer server = new HttpSolrServer("
http://localhost:8080/solrserver/core1<http://localhost:10080/newscover_es/items_es>
");*
* *
* try {*
* *
* HashMap editTags = new HashMap();*
* editTags.put("set", new String[]{"tag1","tag2","tag3"});*
* doc.addField("myField", editTags);*
* server.add(doc);*
* server.commit(true, true);*
* *
* } catch (SolrServerException e) {*
* e.printStackTrace();*
* } catch (IOException e) {*
* e.printStackTrace();*
* }*
*
*
*
*
And the resultant doc is wrong:
<response>
<lst name="responseHeader">
<int name="status">0</int>
<int name="QTime">1</int>
<lst name="params">
<str name="q">*:*</str>
</lst>
</lst>
<result name="response" numFound="1" start="0">
<doc>
<str name="i_id">50a0f1f90cf226fb5677fe13</str>
<arr name="myField">
*<str>[Ljava.lang.String;@7d5e90cb</str> ---> toString() from String[]
array.*
</arr>
<long name="_version_">1418710023780958208</long>
</doc>
</result>
</response>
So is definetely executing toString() method in both *HttpSolrServer *and *
CloudServer*. Tips:
- I´m using* Solrj 4.0.0 *artifact version in a *Maven *project.
- The fields to be updated are *dynamicFields*.
- I´m using Java jdk6.
Alternatives:
- I´m doing something wrong and I´m so stupid that I can´t see it, :-(
- The way I update fields is not the correct one.
- There is a general bug with atomic updates via SolrJ.
Regards,
- Luis Cappa.
2012/11/15 Luis Cappa Banda <lu...@gmail.com>
> I´ll have a look to Solr source code and try to fix the bug. If I succeed
> I´ll update JIRA issue with it, :-)
>
>
> 2012/11/15 Sami Siren <ss...@gmail.com>
>
>> Actually it seems that xml/binary request writers only behave differently
>> when using array[] as the value. if I use ArrayList it also works with the
>> xml format (4.1 branch). Still it's annoying that the two request writers
>> behave differently so I guess it's worth adding the jira anyway.
>>
>> The Affects version should be 4.0.
>>
>>
>> On Thu, Nov 15, 2012 at 1:42 PM, Luis Cappa Banda <luiscappa@gmail.com
>> >wrote:
>>
>> > Hello, Sami.
>> >
>> > It will be the first issue that I open so, should I create it under Solr
>> > 4.0 version or in Solr 4.1.0 one?
>> >
>> > Thanks,
>> >
>> > - Luis Cappa.
>> >
>> > 2012/11/15 Sami Siren <ss...@gmail.com>
>> >
>> > > On Thu, Nov 15, 2012 at 11:51 AM, Luis Cappa Banda <
>> luiscappa@gmail.com
>> > > >wrote:
>> > >
>> > > > Thread update:
>> > > >
>> > > > When I use a simple:
>> > > >
>> > > > *Map operation = new HashMap();*
>> > > >
>> > > >
>> > > > Instead of:
>> > > >
>> > > > *Map<String, List<String>> operation = new HashMap<String,
>> > > > List<String>>();*
>> > > >
>> > > >
>> > > > The result looks better, but it´s still wrong:
>> > > >
>> > > > fieldName: [
>> > > > "[Value1, Value2]"
>> > > > ],
>> > > >
>> > > >
>> > > > However, List<String> value is received as a simple String
>> "[Value1,
>> > > > Value2]". In other words, SolrJ is internally executing a toString()
>> > > > operation to the List<Sring>. Is impossible to update atomically a
>> > > > multivalued field with a List of values in just one atomic update
>> > > > operation?
>> > > >
>> > >
>> > > Seems to be working fine here with HttpSolrServer /
>> BinaryRequestWriter;
>> > >
>> > > HashMap editTags = new HashMap();
>> > > editTags.put("set", new String[]{"tag1","tag2","tag3"});
>> > > doc = new SolrInputDocument();
>> > > doc.addField("id", "unique");
>> > > doc.addField("tags_ss", editTags);
>> > > server.add(doc);
>> > > server.commit(true, true);
>> > > resp = server.query(q);
>> > >
>> > System.out.println(resp.getResults().get(0).getFirstValue("tags_ss"));
>> > >
>> > > prints "tag1"
>> > >
>> > > ArrayList<String> as a value works the same way as String[].
>> > >
>> > > When using xml (RequestWriter) I can see the problem that you are
>> > > describing, can you add a jira for that?
>> > >
>> > > --
>> > > Sami SIren
>> > >
>> > >
>> > >
>> > >
>> > >
>> > > >
>> > > > Regards,
>> > > >
>> > > >
>> > > > - Luis Cappa.
>> > > >
>> > > > 2012/11/15 Luis Cappa Banda <lu...@gmail.com>
>> > > >
>> > > > > Hello everyone,
>> > > > >
>> > > > > I´ve tested atomic updates via Ajax calls and now I´m starting
>> with
>> > > > atomic
>> > > > > updates via SolrJ... but the way I´m proceeding doesn´t seem to
>> work
>> > > > well.
>> > > > > Here is the snippet:
>> > > > >
>> > > > > *SolrInputDocument do = ne SolrInputDocument();*
>> > > > > *doc.addField("id", "myId");*
>> > > > > *
>> > > > > *
>> > > > > *Map<String, List<String>> operation = new HashMap<String,
>> > > > > List<String>>();*
>> > > > > *operation.put("set", [[a list of String elements]]); // I want a
>> > set
>> > > > > operation to override field values.*
>> > > > > *doc.addField("fieldName", operation);*
>> > > > > *
>> > > > > *
>> > > > > *cloudSolrServer.add(doc); // Atomic update operation.*
>> > > > >
>> > > > >
>> > > > > And after updating the resultant doc is as follows:
>> > > > >
>> > > > > *doc: {*
>> > > > > *
>> > > > > *
>> > > > > *...*
>> > > > > *
>> > > > > *
>> > > > > *fieldName: [ "{set=values}"*
>> > > > > *],*
>> > > > > *
>> > > > > *
>> > > > > *...*
>> > > > >
>> > > > > *
>> > > > > *
>> > > > >
>> > > > > *}*
>> > > > >
>> > > > > In other words, the map which includes the "set" operation and the
>> > > field
>> > > > > values is String formatted and that String is used to update the
>> > field,
>> > > > :-/
>> > > > >
>> > > > > What is the correct way to update just one or more fields with
>> SolrJ?
>> > > > >
>> > > > >
>> > > > > Regards,
>> > > > >
>> > > > > --
>> > > > >
>> > > > > - Luis Cappa
>> > > > >
>> > > > >
>> > > >
>> > > >
>> > > > --
>> > > >
>> > > > - Luis Cappa
>> > > >
>> > >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > --
>> >
>> > - Luis Cappa
>> >
>>
>
>
>
> --
>
> - Luis Cappa
>
>
--
- Luis Cappa
Re: SolrJ: atomic updates.
Posted by Luis Cappa Banda <lu...@gmail.com>.
I´ll have a look to Solr source code and try to fix the bug. If I succeed
I´ll update JIRA issue with it, :-)
2012/11/15 Sami Siren <ss...@gmail.com>
> Actually it seems that xml/binary request writers only behave differently
> when using array[] as the value. if I use ArrayList it also works with the
> xml format (4.1 branch). Still it's annoying that the two request writers
> behave differently so I guess it's worth adding the jira anyway.
>
> The Affects version should be 4.0.
>
>
> On Thu, Nov 15, 2012 at 1:42 PM, Luis Cappa Banda <luiscappa@gmail.com
> >wrote:
>
> > Hello, Sami.
> >
> > It will be the first issue that I open so, should I create it under Solr
> > 4.0 version or in Solr 4.1.0 one?
> >
> > Thanks,
> >
> > - Luis Cappa.
> >
> > 2012/11/15 Sami Siren <ss...@gmail.com>
> >
> > > On Thu, Nov 15, 2012 at 11:51 AM, Luis Cappa Banda <
> luiscappa@gmail.com
> > > >wrote:
> > >
> > > > Thread update:
> > > >
> > > > When I use a simple:
> > > >
> > > > *Map operation = new HashMap();*
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Instead of:
> > > >
> > > > *Map<String, List<String>> operation = new HashMap<String,
> > > > List<String>>();*
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > The result looks better, but it´s still wrong:
> > > >
> > > > fieldName: [
> > > > "[Value1, Value2]"
> > > > ],
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > However, List<String> value is received as a simple String "[Value1,
> > > > Value2]". In other words, SolrJ is internally executing a toString()
> > > > operation to the List<Sring>. Is impossible to update atomically a
> > > > multivalued field with a List of values in just one atomic update
> > > > operation?
> > > >
> > >
> > > Seems to be working fine here with HttpSolrServer /
> BinaryRequestWriter;
> > >
> > > HashMap editTags = new HashMap();
> > > editTags.put("set", new String[]{"tag1","tag2","tag3"});
> > > doc = new SolrInputDocument();
> > > doc.addField("id", "unique");
> > > doc.addField("tags_ss", editTags);
> > > server.add(doc);
> > > server.commit(true, true);
> > > resp = server.query(q);
> > >
> > System.out.println(resp.getResults().get(0).getFirstValue("tags_ss"));
> > >
> > > prints "tag1"
> > >
> > > ArrayList<String> as a value works the same way as String[].
> > >
> > > When using xml (RequestWriter) I can see the problem that you are
> > > describing, can you add a jira for that?
> > >
> > > --
> > > Sami SIren
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > >
> > > > Regards,
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > - Luis Cappa.
> > > >
> > > > 2012/11/15 Luis Cappa Banda <lu...@gmail.com>
> > > >
> > > > > Hello everyone,
> > > > >
> > > > > I´ve tested atomic updates via Ajax calls and now I´m starting with
> > > > atomic
> > > > > updates via SolrJ... but the way I´m proceeding doesn´t seem to
> work
> > > > well.
> > > > > Here is the snippet:
> > > > >
> > > > > *SolrInputDocument do = ne SolrInputDocument();*
> > > > > *doc.addField("id", "myId");*
> > > > > *
> > > > > *
> > > > > *Map<String, List<String>> operation = new HashMap<String,
> > > > > List<String>>();*
> > > > > *operation.put("set", [[a list of String elements]]); // I want a
> > set
> > > > > operation to override field values.*
> > > > > *doc.addField("fieldName", operation);*
> > > > > *
> > > > > *
> > > > > *cloudSolrServer.add(doc); // Atomic update operation.*
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > And after updating the resultant doc is as follows:
> > > > >
> > > > > *doc: {*
> > > > > *
> > > > > *
> > > > > *...*
> > > > > *
> > > > > *
> > > > > *fieldName: [ "{set=values}"*
> > > > > *],*
> > > > > *
> > > > > *
> > > > > *...*
> > > > >
> > > > > *
> > > > > *
> > > > >
> > > > > *}*
> > > > >
> > > > > In other words, the map which includes the "set" operation and the
> > > field
> > > > > values is String formatted and that String is used to update the
> > field,
> > > > :-/
> > > > >
> > > > > What is the correct way to update just one or more fields with
> SolrJ?
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > Regards,
> > > > >
> > > > > --
> > > > >
> > > > > - Luis Cappa
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > >
> > > > - Luis Cappa
> > > >
> > >
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> >
> > - Luis Cappa
> >
>
--
- Luis Cappa
Re: SolrJ: atomic updates.
Posted by Sami Siren <ss...@gmail.com>.
Actually it seems that xml/binary request writers only behave differently
when using array[] as the value. if I use ArrayList it also works with the
xml format (4.1 branch). Still it's annoying that the two request writers
behave differently so I guess it's worth adding the jira anyway.
The Affects version should be 4.0.
On Thu, Nov 15, 2012 at 1:42 PM, Luis Cappa Banda <lu...@gmail.com>wrote:
> Hello, Sami.
>
> It will be the first issue that I open so, should I create it under Solr
> 4.0 version or in Solr 4.1.0 one?
>
> Thanks,
>
> - Luis Cappa.
>
> 2012/11/15 Sami Siren <ss...@gmail.com>
>
> > On Thu, Nov 15, 2012 at 11:51 AM, Luis Cappa Banda <luiscappa@gmail.com
> > >wrote:
> >
> > > Thread update:
> > >
> > > When I use a simple:
> > >
> > > *Map operation = new HashMap();*
> > >
> > >
> > > Instead of:
> > >
> > > *Map<String, List<String>> operation = new HashMap<String,
> > > List<String>>();*
> > >
> > >
> > > The result looks better, but it´s still wrong:
> > >
> > > fieldName: [
> > > "[Value1, Value2]"
> > > ],
> > >
> > >
> > > However, List<String> value is received as a simple String "[Value1,
> > > Value2]". In other words, SolrJ is internally executing a toString()
> > > operation to the List<Sring>. Is impossible to update atomically a
> > > multivalued field with a List of values in just one atomic update
> > > operation?
> > >
> >
> > Seems to be working fine here with HttpSolrServer / BinaryRequestWriter;
> >
> > HashMap editTags = new HashMap();
> > editTags.put("set", new String[]{"tag1","tag2","tag3"});
> > doc = new SolrInputDocument();
> > doc.addField("id", "unique");
> > doc.addField("tags_ss", editTags);
> > server.add(doc);
> > server.commit(true, true);
> > resp = server.query(q);
> >
> System.out.println(resp.getResults().get(0).getFirstValue("tags_ss"));
> >
> > prints "tag1"
> >
> > ArrayList<String> as a value works the same way as String[].
> >
> > When using xml (RequestWriter) I can see the problem that you are
> > describing, can you add a jira for that?
> >
> > --
> > Sami SIren
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > >
> > > Regards,
> > >
> > >
> > > - Luis Cappa.
> > >
> > > 2012/11/15 Luis Cappa Banda <lu...@gmail.com>
> > >
> > > > Hello everyone,
> > > >
> > > > I´ve tested atomic updates via Ajax calls and now I´m starting with
> > > atomic
> > > > updates via SolrJ... but the way I´m proceeding doesn´t seem to work
> > > well.
> > > > Here is the snippet:
> > > >
> > > > *SolrInputDocument do = ne SolrInputDocument();*
> > > > *doc.addField("id", "myId");*
> > > > *
> > > > *
> > > > *Map<String, List<String>> operation = new HashMap<String,
> > > > List<String>>();*
> > > > *operation.put("set", [[a list of String elements]]); // I want a
> set
> > > > operation to override field values.*
> > > > *doc.addField("fieldName", operation);*
> > > > *
> > > > *
> > > > *cloudSolrServer.add(doc); // Atomic update operation.*
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > And after updating the resultant doc is as follows:
> > > >
> > > > *doc: {*
> > > > *
> > > > *
> > > > *...*
> > > > *
> > > > *
> > > > *fieldName: [ "{set=values}"*
> > > > *],*
> > > > *
> > > > *
> > > > *...*
> > > >
> > > > *
> > > > *
> > > >
> > > > *}*
> > > >
> > > > In other words, the map which includes the "set" operation and the
> > field
> > > > values is String formatted and that String is used to update the
> field,
> > > :-/
> > > >
> > > > What is the correct way to update just one or more fields with SolrJ?
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Regards,
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > >
> > > > - Luis Cappa
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > >
> > > - Luis Cappa
> > >
> >
>
>
>
> --
>
> - Luis Cappa
>
Re: SolrJ: atomic updates.
Posted by Luis Cappa Banda <lu...@gmail.com>.
Ok, done:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-4080
Regards,
- Luis Cappa.
2012/11/15 Luis Cappa Banda <lu...@gmail.com>
> Hello, Sami.
>
> It will be the first issue that I open so, should I create it under Solr
> 4.0 version or in Solr 4.1.0 one?
>
> Thanks,
>
> - Luis Cappa.
>
>
> 2012/11/15 Sami Siren <ss...@gmail.com>
>
>> On Thu, Nov 15, 2012 at 11:51 AM, Luis Cappa Banda <luiscappa@gmail.com
>> >wrote:
>>
>> > Thread update:
>> >
>> > When I use a simple:
>> >
>> > *Map operation = new HashMap();*
>> >
>> >
>> > Instead of:
>> >
>> > *Map<String, List<String>> operation = new HashMap<String,
>> > List<String>>();*
>> >
>> >
>> > The result looks better, but it´s still wrong:
>> >
>> > fieldName: [
>> > "[Value1, Value2]"
>> > ],
>> >
>> >
>> > However, List<String> value is received as a simple String "[Value1,
>> > Value2]". In other words, SolrJ is internally executing a toString()
>> > operation to the List<Sring>. Is impossible to update atomically a
>> > multivalued field with a List of values in just one atomic update
>> > operation?
>> >
>>
>> Seems to be working fine here with HttpSolrServer / BinaryRequestWriter;
>>
>> HashMap editTags = new HashMap();
>> editTags.put("set", new String[]{"tag1","tag2","tag3"});
>> doc = new SolrInputDocument();
>> doc.addField("id", "unique");
>> doc.addField("tags_ss", editTags);
>> server.add(doc);
>> server.commit(true, true);
>> resp = server.query(q);
>> System.out.println(resp.getResults().get(0).getFirstValue("tags_ss"));
>>
>> prints "tag1"
>>
>> ArrayList<String> as a value works the same way as String[].
>>
>> When using xml (RequestWriter) I can see the problem that you are
>> describing, can you add a jira for that?
>>
>> --
>> Sami SIren
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> >
>> > Regards,
>> >
>> >
>> > - Luis Cappa.
>> >
>> > 2012/11/15 Luis Cappa Banda <lu...@gmail.com>
>> >
>> > > Hello everyone,
>> > >
>> > > I´ve tested atomic updates via Ajax calls and now I´m starting with
>> > atomic
>> > > updates via SolrJ... but the way I´m proceeding doesn´t seem to work
>> > well.
>> > > Here is the snippet:
>> > >
>> > > *SolrInputDocument do = ne SolrInputDocument();*
>> > > *doc.addField("id", "myId");*
>> > > *
>> > > *
>> > > *Map<String, List<String>> operation = new HashMap<String,
>> > > List<String>>();*
>> > > *operation.put("set", [[a list of String elements]]); // I want a set
>> > > operation to override field values.*
>> > > *doc.addField("fieldName", operation);*
>> > > *
>> > > *
>> > > *cloudSolrServer.add(doc); // Atomic update operation.*
>> > >
>> > >
>> > > And after updating the resultant doc is as follows:
>> > >
>> > > *doc: {*
>> > > *
>> > > *
>> > > *...*
>> > > *
>> > > *
>> > > *fieldName: [ "{set=values}"*
>> > > *],*
>> > > *
>> > > *
>> > > *...*
>> > >
>> > > *
>> > > *
>> > >
>> > > *}*
>> > >
>> > > In other words, the map which includes the "set" operation and the
>> field
>> > > values is String formatted and that String is used to update the
>> field,
>> > :-/
>> > >
>> > > What is the correct way to update just one or more fields with SolrJ?
>> > >
>> > >
>> > > Regards,
>> > >
>> > > --
>> > >
>> > > - Luis Cappa
>> > >
>> > >
>> >
>> >
>> > --
>> >
>> > - Luis Cappa
>> >
>>
>
>
>
> --
>
> - Luis Cappa
>
>
--
- Luis Cappa
Re: SolrJ: atomic updates.
Posted by Luis Cappa Banda <lu...@gmail.com>.
Hello, Sami.
It will be the first issue that I open so, should I create it under Solr
4.0 version or in Solr 4.1.0 one?
Thanks,
- Luis Cappa.
2012/11/15 Sami Siren <ss...@gmail.com>
> On Thu, Nov 15, 2012 at 11:51 AM, Luis Cappa Banda <luiscappa@gmail.com
> >wrote:
>
> > Thread update:
> >
> > When I use a simple:
> >
> > *Map operation = new HashMap();*
> >
> >
> > Instead of:
> >
> > *Map<String, List<String>> operation = new HashMap<String,
> > List<String>>();*
> >
> >
> > The result looks better, but it´s still wrong:
> >
> > fieldName: [
> > "[Value1, Value2]"
> > ],
> >
> >
> > However, List<String> value is received as a simple String "[Value1,
> > Value2]". In other words, SolrJ is internally executing a toString()
> > operation to the List<Sring>. Is impossible to update atomically a
> > multivalued field with a List of values in just one atomic update
> > operation?
> >
>
> Seems to be working fine here with HttpSolrServer / BinaryRequestWriter;
>
> HashMap editTags = new HashMap();
> editTags.put("set", new String[]{"tag1","tag2","tag3"});
> doc = new SolrInputDocument();
> doc.addField("id", "unique");
> doc.addField("tags_ss", editTags);
> server.add(doc);
> server.commit(true, true);
> resp = server.query(q);
> System.out.println(resp.getResults().get(0).getFirstValue("tags_ss"));
>
> prints "tag1"
>
> ArrayList<String> as a value works the same way as String[].
>
> When using xml (RequestWriter) I can see the problem that you are
> describing, can you add a jira for that?
>
> --
> Sami SIren
>
>
>
>
>
> >
> > Regards,
> >
> >
> > - Luis Cappa.
> >
> > 2012/11/15 Luis Cappa Banda <lu...@gmail.com>
> >
> > > Hello everyone,
> > >
> > > I´ve tested atomic updates via Ajax calls and now I´m starting with
> > atomic
> > > updates via SolrJ... but the way I´m proceeding doesn´t seem to work
> > well.
> > > Here is the snippet:
> > >
> > > *SolrInputDocument do = ne SolrInputDocument();*
> > > *doc.addField("id", "myId");*
> > > *
> > > *
> > > *Map<String, List<String>> operation = new HashMap<String,
> > > List<String>>();*
> > > *operation.put("set", [[a list of String elements]]); // I want a set
> > > operation to override field values.*
> > > *doc.addField("fieldName", operation);*
> > > *
> > > *
> > > *cloudSolrServer.add(doc); // Atomic update operation.*
> > >
> > >
> > > And after updating the resultant doc is as follows:
> > >
> > > *doc: {*
> > > *
> > > *
> > > *...*
> > > *
> > > *
> > > *fieldName: [ "{set=values}"*
> > > *],*
> > > *
> > > *
> > > *...*
> > >
> > > *
> > > *
> > >
> > > *}*
> > >
> > > In other words, the map which includes the "set" operation and the
> field
> > > values is String formatted and that String is used to update the field,
> > :-/
> > >
> > > What is the correct way to update just one or more fields with SolrJ?
> > >
> > >
> > > Regards,
> > >
> > > --
> > >
> > > - Luis Cappa
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
> > --
> >
> > - Luis Cappa
> >
>
--
- Luis Cappa
Re: SolrJ: atomic updates.
Posted by Sami Siren <ss...@gmail.com>.
On Thu, Nov 15, 2012 at 11:51 AM, Luis Cappa Banda <lu...@gmail.com>wrote:
> Thread update:
>
> When I use a simple:
>
> *Map operation = new HashMap();*
>
>
> Instead of:
>
> *Map<String, List<String>> operation = new HashMap<String,
> List<String>>();*
>
>
> The result looks better, but it´s still wrong:
>
> fieldName: [
> "[Value1, Value2]"
> ],
>
>
> However, List<String> value is received as a simple String "[Value1,
> Value2]". In other words, SolrJ is internally executing a toString()
> operation to the List<Sring>. Is impossible to update atomically a
> multivalued field with a List of values in just one atomic update
> operation?
>
Seems to be working fine here with HttpSolrServer / BinaryRequestWriter;
HashMap editTags = new HashMap();
editTags.put("set", new String[]{"tag1","tag2","tag3"});
doc = new SolrInputDocument();
doc.addField("id", "unique");
doc.addField("tags_ss", editTags);
server.add(doc);
server.commit(true, true);
resp = server.query(q);
System.out.println(resp.getResults().get(0).getFirstValue("tags_ss"));
prints "tag1"
ArrayList<String> as a value works the same way as String[].
When using xml (RequestWriter) I can see the problem that you are
describing, can you add a jira for that?
--
Sami SIren
>
> Regards,
>
>
> - Luis Cappa.
>
> 2012/11/15 Luis Cappa Banda <lu...@gmail.com>
>
> > Hello everyone,
> >
> > I´ve tested atomic updates via Ajax calls and now I´m starting with
> atomic
> > updates via SolrJ... but the way I´m proceeding doesn´t seem to work
> well.
> > Here is the snippet:
> >
> > *SolrInputDocument do = ne SolrInputDocument();*
> > *doc.addField("id", "myId");*
> > *
> > *
> > *Map<String, List<String>> operation = new HashMap<String,
> > List<String>>();*
> > *operation.put("set", [[a list of String elements]]); // I want a set
> > operation to override field values.*
> > *doc.addField("fieldName", operation);*
> > *
> > *
> > *cloudSolrServer.add(doc); // Atomic update operation.*
> >
> >
> > And after updating the resultant doc is as follows:
> >
> > *doc: {*
> > *
> > *
> > *...*
> > *
> > *
> > *fieldName: [ "{set=values}"*
> > *],*
> > *
> > *
> > *...*
> >
> > *
> > *
> >
> > *}*
> >
> > In other words, the map which includes the "set" operation and the field
> > values is String formatted and that String is used to update the field,
> :-/
> >
> > What is the correct way to update just one or more fields with SolrJ?
> >
> >
> > Regards,
> >
> > --
> >
> > - Luis Cappa
> >
> >
>
>
> --
>
> - Luis Cappa
>
Re: SolrJ: atomic updates.
Posted by Luis Cappa Banda <lu...@gmail.com>.
Thread update:
When I use a simple:
*Map operation = new HashMap();*
Instead of:
*Map<String, List<String>> operation = new HashMap<String, List<String>>();*
The result looks better, but it´s still wrong:
fieldName: [
"[Value1, Value2]"
],
However, List<String> value is received as a simple String "[Value1,
Value2]". In other words, SolrJ is internally executing a toString()
operation to the List<Sring>. Is impossible to update atomically a
multivalued field with a List of values in just one atomic update
operation?
Regards,
- Luis Cappa.
2012/11/15 Luis Cappa Banda <lu...@gmail.com>
> Hello everyone,
>
> I´ve tested atomic updates via Ajax calls and now I´m starting with atomic
> updates via SolrJ... but the way I´m proceeding doesn´t seem to work well.
> Here is the snippet:
>
> *SolrInputDocument do = ne SolrInputDocument();*
> *doc.addField("id", "myId");*
> *
> *
> *Map<String, List<String>> operation = new HashMap<String,
> List<String>>();*
> *operation.put("set", [[a list of String elements]]); // I want a set
> operation to override field values.*
> *doc.addField("fieldName", operation);*
> *
> *
> *cloudSolrServer.add(doc); // Atomic update operation.*
>
>
> And after updating the resultant doc is as follows:
>
> *doc: {*
> *
> *
> *...*
> *
> *
> *fieldName: [ "{set=values}"*
> *],*
> *
> *
> *...*
>
> *
> *
>
> *}*
>
> In other words, the map which includes the "set" operation and the field
> values is String formatted and that String is used to update the field, :-/
>
> What is the correct way to update just one or more fields with SolrJ?
>
>
> Regards,
>
> --
>
> - Luis Cappa
>
>
--
- Luis Cappa