You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@commons.apache.org by Jason R Lee <jr...@novocorp.com> on 2002/03/11 23:20:02 UTC
Db bean issue
Hello anyone who's out there,
I have an 'issue' that is rearing its head again and wld like to get anyones take on it. It concerns beans & db and the lack (or maybe not) of a kinda jakarta proj/framework like struts, but addresses the back end.
I know, there's EJB, etc... But, after working on EJB and non-EJB projects, I'm not convinved EJB is any more scalable or distributable than a good implementation of data aware beans - or something along those lines.
I helped design a quite popular, big air travel site that took a non-EJB approach and worked well and scaled across 15 Sun boxes without a hitch. However, the implementation was a little complex and now that I'm working on another project, I'd like to have the same thing at a simpler level.
So I guess I'm just kinda saying hi to the Commons proj and trying to see if anyone has thought about this issue. Especially since there is no Jakarta sub-project or Commons portion addressing this issue.
Thanks and hi,
- Jason
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: <ma...@jakarta.apache.org>
For additional commands, e-mail: <ma...@jakarta.apache.org>
Re: Db bean issue
Posted by Bryan Field-Elliot <br...@netmeme.org>.
Try this:
http://netmeme.org/simper
Bryan
On Mon, 2002-03-11 at 15:20, Jason R Lee wrote:
> Hello anyone who's out there,
>
> I have an 'issue' that is rearing its head again and wld like to get anyones take on it. It concerns beans & db and the lack (or maybe not) of a kinda jakarta proj/framework like struts, but addresses the back end.
>
> I know, there's EJB, etc... But, after working on EJB and non-EJB projects, I'm not convinved EJB is any more scalable or distributable than a good implementation of data aware beans - or something along those lines.
>
> I helped design a quite popular, big air travel site that took a non-EJB approach and worked well and scaled across 15 Sun boxes without a hitch. However, the implementation was a little complex and now that I'm working on another project, I'd like to have the same thing at a simpler level.
>
> So I guess I'm just kinda saying hi to the Commons proj and trying to see if anyone has thought about this issue. Especially since there is no Jakarta sub-project or Commons portion addressing this issue.
>
> Thanks and hi,
>
> - Jason
>
>
> --
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: <ma...@jakarta.apache.org>
> For additional commands, e-mail: <ma...@jakarta.apache.org>
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: <ma...@jakarta.apache.org>
For additional commands, e-mail: <ma...@jakarta.apache.org>
Re: Db bean issue
Posted by John McNally <jm...@collab.net>.
jakarta-turbine-torque
john mcnally
Jason R Lee wrote:
>
> Hello anyone who's out there,
>
> I have an 'issue' that is rearing its head again and wld like to get anyones take on it. It concerns beans & db and the lack (or maybe not) of a kinda jakarta proj/framework like struts, but addresses the back end.
>
> I know, there's EJB, etc... But, after working on EJB and non-EJB projects, I'm not convinved EJB is any more scalable or distributable than a good implementation of data aware beans - or something along those lines.
>
> I helped design a quite popular, big air travel site that took a non-EJB approach and worked well and scaled across 15 Sun boxes without a hitch. However, the implementation was a little complex and now that I'm working on another project, I'd like to have the same thing at a simpler level.
>
> So I guess I'm just kinda saying hi to the Commons proj and trying to see if anyone has thought about this issue. Especially since there is no Jakarta sub-project or Commons portion addressing this issue.
>
> Thanks and hi,
>
> - Jason
>
> --
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: <ma...@jakarta.apache.org>
> For additional commands, e-mail: <ma...@jakarta.apache.org>
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: <ma...@jakarta.apache.org>
For additional commands, e-mail: <ma...@jakarta.apache.org>