Fwd: [jira] [Commented] (OPENJPA-1744) Support JDO

[Craig L Russell <cr...@oracle.com>]

FYI...

Craig

Begin forwarded message:

> From: "Michael Dick (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org>
> Date: March 31, 2011 2:45:05 PM PDT
> To: dev@openjpa.apache.org
> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (OPENJPA-1744) Support JDO
> Reply-To: dev@openjpa.apache.org
>
>
>    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OPENJPA-1744?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13014225 
> #comment-13014225 ]
>
> Michael Dick commented on OPENJPA-1744:
> ---------------------------------------
>
> Most of the nonrelational support is still in place - a rudimentary  
> xml store was part of the initial code drop and is (afaik) still  
> usable.
>
> Implementing a different spec on top of the OpenJPA kernel would be  
> a significant undertaking. Is there anything specific to JDO that  
> makes it more (or less) usable with non relational stores? I'm  
> looking for pros and cons of adding JDO over implementing a hadoop /  
> big table store that uses JPA interfaces?
>
>> Support JDO
>> -----------
>>
>>                Key: OPENJPA-1744
>>                URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ 
>> OPENJPA-1744
>>            Project: OpenJPA
>>         Issue Type: Improvement
>>           Reporter: Matthew T. Adams
>>
>> OpenJPA came from Kodo, which was a JDO implementation at the time  
>> the code was forked.  This request is to bring compliance with the  
>> latest JDO specification back to the implementation so that it can  
>> be used with nonrelational backends like Google BigTable, Hadoop,  
>> etc.
>
> --
> This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
> For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

Craig L Russell
Architect, Oracle
http://db.apache.org/jdo
408 276-5638 mailto:Craig.Russell@oracle.com
P.S. A good JDO? O, Gasp!