You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to user@uima.apache.org by Jens Grivolla <j+...@grivolla.net> on 2014/01/14 18:11:06 UTC
Re: next UIMA workshop?
Hello, there's only 5 days remaining to submit the workshop proposal.
Please anybody interested get in touch.
I sent a mail to the GATE user list to get some input from them. The
proposal draft is here:
https://github.com/jgrivolla/coling2014-nlp-framework-workshop/blob/master/proposal.md
-- Jens
On 19/12/13 13:29, Jens Grivolla wrote:
> On 19/12/13 13:08, Peter Klügl wrote:
>> Am 19.12.2013 12:31, schrieb Jens Grivolla:
>>> Ok, it's time to seriously get started on this.
>>>
>>> I guess we can start with the GSCL workshop description, and maybe
>>> make it more inclusive for other frameworks (GATE, etc.)
>>>
>>> We need a couple of organizers (me, Renaud, ...?) and a potential PC
>>> (again, start with the one from GSCL) preferably with a few already
>>> confirmed PC members (Richard, ...)
>>>
>>
>> If the workshop is more inclusive for other frameworks, maybe it's
>> reasonable to ask one of the GATE people whether they want to
>> co-organize the workshop.
>
> Yes, we definitely would need to reach out to them. First we need to
> decide: do we want a more focused workshop (just UIMA), or are the
> problems faced by GATE users (and others) sufficiently similar that we
> can learn from each other?
>
> If we want to get the GATE people in there: does anybody have contacts
> in that community?
>
>> I won't be able to help with the organization, but maybe as a part of
>> the PC.
>
> I take that as having you as a confirmed PC member ;-)
>
>> I can also not promise that I will submit something, but I will motivate
>> our working group.
>
> Ok, that's great.
>
> I started the draft proposal here:
> https://github.com/jgrivolla/coling2014-nlp-framework-workshop
>
> Thanks,
> Jens
>
>
Re: next UIMA workshop?
Posted by Marshall Schor <ms...@schor.com>.
On 4/9/2014 12:15 PM, Jens Grivolla wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 31, 2014 at 10:12 PM, Marshall Schor <ms...@schor.com> wrote:
>
>> On 3/26/2014 9:44 AM, Jens Grivolla wrote:
>>> Finally, despite the fact that UIMA does not appear in the title anymore,
>>> would it be possible to have an announcement on the UIMA web page?
>> I think so (unless others disagree). Can you draft something?
>>
> I tried to prepare a draft for svnpubsub to see how it fits with the UIMA
> site (without linking to it at first, of course), and created
> uima-website/xdocs/coling14.xml
> It then seems that I need to rebuild the site on my machine with ANT and
> push the resulting changes in docs/, which I did. The resulting page can
> be seen at http://uima.apache.org/coling14.html and looks more or less ok.
>
> I hope I didn't do anything wrong by committing directly to the site, but I
> didn't find a good way to try it in the actual page layout and show the
> results otherwise. In any case it's not linked from anywhere and shouldn't
> affect any other parts of the site.
Seems fine to me :-). Please see about linking to it (perhaps from News and the
left-hand nav bar under Events and Conferences). Thanks! -Marshall
> -- Jens
>
Re: next UIMA workshop?
Posted by Jens Grivolla <j+...@grivolla.net>.
On Mon, Mar 31, 2014 at 10:12 PM, Marshall Schor <ms...@schor.com> wrote:
>
> On 3/26/2014 9:44 AM, Jens Grivolla wrote:
> > Finally, despite the fact that UIMA does not appear in the title anymore,
> > would it be possible to have an announcement on the UIMA web page?
>
> I think so (unless others disagree). Can you draft something?
>
I tried to prepare a draft for svnpubsub to see how it fits with the UIMA
site (without linking to it at first, of course), and created
uima-website/xdocs/coling14.xml
It then seems that I need to rebuild the site on my machine with ANT and
push the resulting changes in docs/, which I did. The resulting page can
be seen at http://uima.apache.org/coling14.html and looks more or less ok.
I hope I didn't do anything wrong by committing directly to the site, but I
didn't find a good way to try it in the actual page layout and show the
results otherwise. In any case it's not linked from anywhere and shouldn't
affect any other parts of the site.
-- Jens
Re: next UIMA workshop?
Posted by Marshall Schor <ms...@schor.com>.
On 3/26/2014 9:44 AM, Jens Grivolla wrote:
> Hi all, I have just posted the (more or less) final CFP on uima-user and
> uima-dev.
>
> Feel free to distribute the CFP to anybody you think would be interested.
> While this has been merged with a different workshop and thus has a somewhat
> wider scope than just UIMA, I still view this as a followup to the the UIMA
> workshop at GSCL and would hope to have similarly interesting contributions
> from the UIMA community.
>
> If you are a PC member, or willing to be one, please contact me off-list with
> the email address and affiliation that you would like me to use for this purpose.
>
> Finally, despite the fact that UIMA does not appear in the title anymore,
> would it be possible to have an announcement on the UIMA web page?
I think so (unless others disagree). Can you draft something?
-Marshall
>
> -- Jens
>
> On 05/02/14 11:46, Jens Grivolla wrote:
>> We have been asked to merge our workshop with a similar one focusing on
>> "open infrastructures". The result is a "Workshop on Open
>> Infrastructures and Analysis Frameworks for HLT".
>>
>> We will now start to build a common CFP from the two proposals. All
>> contributions are welcome:
>> https://github.com/jgrivolla/coling2014-nlp-framework-workshop/blob/master/cfp.md
>>
>>
>>
>> -- Jens
>>
>> On 19/01/14 15:40, Jens Grivolla wrote:
>>> I have sent the proposal, we'll see what they say...
>>>
>>> -- Jens
>>>
>>> On 17/01/14 15:02, Jens Grivolla wrote:
>>>> On 15/01/14 20:51, Richard Eckart de Castilho wrote:
>>>>> On 15.01.2014, at 15:10, Jens Grivolla
>>>>> <j+...@grivolla.net> wrote:
>>>>>> The CFP itself must still be rewritten to be less UIMA-centric, other
>>>>>> than that this is starting to look quite good.
>>>>
>>>> GATE developer Mark A. Greenwood did the rewrite and sent me a pull
>>>> request on Github.
>>>>
>>>>> For example, the topic "experience reports combining UIMA-based
>>>>> components from different sources, as well as solutions to
>>>>> interoperability issues" could be reworded as:
>>>>>
>>>>> 1) experience reports combining language analysis components from
>>>>> different sources, as well as solutions to interoperability issues
>>>>>
>>>>> 2) experience reports combining different frameworks (e.g.
>>>>> GATE/UIMA/WebLicht/etc.), as well as solutions to interoperability
>>>>> issues
>>>>
>>>> I put both in there as separate points.
>>>>
>>>>> I think both aspects would be interesting. I'm a little afraid that 1)
>>>>> might end up iterating the existing of frameworks like UIMA, while 2)
>>>>> would end up referring over web-services or semantic web stuff for
>>>>> interoperability - which may not be very interesting. I'd be more
>>>>> interested in issues and solutions exist beyond this, e.g. with
>>>>> regards to the interchangability of components. What problems exist
>>>>> when e.g. one parser component in a workflow is replaced with a
>>>>> different one? How can these be solved? (Cf. Noh and Padó, 2013 [1]).
>>>>
>>>> Agree. Subtle semantic differences between alternative components can
>>>> be more challenging than the technical integration. I'm not sure how to
>>>> put that in the CFP without it getting very verbose, though.
>>>>
>>>>> I think one more topic could be added:
>>>>>
>>>>> - "combining annotation type systems in processing frameworks (GATE,
>>>>> UIMA, etc.) with standardization efforts, such as done in the ISO
>>>>> TC37/SC4 or TEI contexts."
>>>>
>>>> Done. Thanks for your input.
>>>>
>>>> As always, the current state of the proposal can be seen on Github:
>>>> https://github.com/jgrivolla/coling2014-nlp-framework-workshop/blob/master/proposal.md
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> I think the current version is pretty close to final. If there are any
>>>> more suggestions hurry up, the deadline is approaching.
>>>>
>>>> -- Jens
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>
>
>
>
Re: next UIMA workshop?
Posted by Jens Grivolla <j+...@grivolla.net>.
Hi all, I have just posted the (more or less) final CFP on uima-user and
uima-dev.
Feel free to distribute the CFP to anybody you think would be
interested. While this has been merged with a different workshop and
thus has a somewhat wider scope than just UIMA, I still view this as a
followup to the the UIMA workshop at GSCL and would hope to have
similarly interesting contributions from the UIMA community.
If you are a PC member, or willing to be one, please contact me off-list
with the email address and affiliation that you would like me to use for
this purpose.
Finally, despite the fact that UIMA does not appear in the title
anymore, would it be possible to have an announcement on the UIMA web page?
-- Jens
On 05/02/14 11:46, Jens Grivolla wrote:
> We have been asked to merge our workshop with a similar one focusing on
> "open infrastructures". The result is a "Workshop on Open
> Infrastructures and Analysis Frameworks for HLT".
>
> We will now start to build a common CFP from the two proposals. All
> contributions are welcome:
> https://github.com/jgrivolla/coling2014-nlp-framework-workshop/blob/master/cfp.md
>
>
> -- Jens
>
> On 19/01/14 15:40, Jens Grivolla wrote:
>> I have sent the proposal, we'll see what they say...
>>
>> -- Jens
>>
>> On 17/01/14 15:02, Jens Grivolla wrote:
>>> On 15/01/14 20:51, Richard Eckart de Castilho wrote:
>>>> On 15.01.2014, at 15:10, Jens Grivolla
>>>> <j+...@grivolla.net> wrote:
>>>>> The CFP itself must still be rewritten to be less UIMA-centric, other
>>>>> than that this is starting to look quite good.
>>>
>>> GATE developer Mark A. Greenwood did the rewrite and sent me a pull
>>> request on Github.
>>>
>>>> For example, the topic "experience reports combining UIMA-based
>>>> components from different sources, as well as solutions to
>>>> interoperability issues" could be reworded as:
>>>>
>>>> 1) experience reports combining language analysis components from
>>>> different sources, as well as solutions to interoperability issues
>>>>
>>>> 2) experience reports combining different frameworks (e.g.
>>>> GATE/UIMA/WebLicht/etc.), as well as solutions to interoperability
>>>> issues
>>>
>>> I put both in there as separate points.
>>>
>>>> I think both aspects would be interesting. I'm a little afraid that 1)
>>>> might end up iterating the existing of frameworks like UIMA, while 2)
>>>> would end up referring over web-services or semantic web stuff for
>>>> interoperability - which may not be very interesting. I'd be more
>>>> interested in issues and solutions exist beyond this, e.g. with
>>>> regards to the interchangability of components. What problems exist
>>>> when e.g. one parser component in a workflow is replaced with a
>>>> different one? How can these be solved? (Cf. Noh and Padó, 2013 [1]).
>>>
>>> Agree. Subtle semantic differences between alternative components can
>>> be more challenging than the technical integration. I'm not sure how to
>>> put that in the CFP without it getting very verbose, though.
>>>
>>>> I think one more topic could be added:
>>>>
>>>> - "combining annotation type systems in processing frameworks (GATE,
>>>> UIMA, etc.) with standardization efforts, such as done in the ISO
>>>> TC37/SC4 or TEI contexts."
>>>
>>> Done. Thanks for your input.
>>>
>>> As always, the current state of the proposal can be seen on Github:
>>> https://github.com/jgrivolla/coling2014-nlp-framework-workshop/blob/master/proposal.md
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> I think the current version is pretty close to final. If there are any
>>> more suggestions hurry up, the deadline is approaching.
>>>
>>> -- Jens
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>
>
>
Re: next UIMA workshop?
Posted by Jens Grivolla <j+...@grivolla.net>.
We have been asked to merge our workshop with a similar one focusing on
"open infrastructures". The result is a "Workshop on Open
Infrastructures and Analysis Frameworks for HLT".
We will now start to build a common CFP from the two proposals. All
contributions are welcome:
https://github.com/jgrivolla/coling2014-nlp-framework-workshop/blob/master/cfp.md
-- Jens
On 19/01/14 15:40, Jens Grivolla wrote:
> I have sent the proposal, we'll see what they say...
>
> -- Jens
>
> On 17/01/14 15:02, Jens Grivolla wrote:
>> On 15/01/14 20:51, Richard Eckart de Castilho wrote:
>>> On 15.01.2014, at 15:10, Jens Grivolla
>>> <j+...@grivolla.net> wrote:
>>>> The CFP itself must still be rewritten to be less UIMA-centric, other
>>>> than that this is starting to look quite good.
>>
>> GATE developer Mark A. Greenwood did the rewrite and sent me a pull
>> request on Github.
>>
>>> For example, the topic "experience reports combining UIMA-based
>>> components from different sources, as well as solutions to
>>> interoperability issues" could be reworded as:
>>>
>>> 1) experience reports combining language analysis components from
>>> different sources, as well as solutions to interoperability issues
>>>
>>> 2) experience reports combining different frameworks (e.g.
>>> GATE/UIMA/WebLicht/etc.), as well as solutions to interoperability
>>> issues
>>
>> I put both in there as separate points.
>>
>>> I think both aspects would be interesting. I'm a little afraid that 1)
>>> might end up iterating the existing of frameworks like UIMA, while 2)
>>> would end up referring over web-services or semantic web stuff for
>>> interoperability - which may not be very interesting. I'd be more
>>> interested in issues and solutions exist beyond this, e.g. with
>>> regards to the interchangability of components. What problems exist
>>> when e.g. one parser component in a workflow is replaced with a
>>> different one? How can these be solved? (Cf. Noh and Padó, 2013 [1]).
>>
>> Agree. Subtle semantic differences between alternative components can
>> be more challenging than the technical integration. I'm not sure how to
>> put that in the CFP without it getting very verbose, though.
>>
>>> I think one more topic could be added:
>>>
>>> - "combining annotation type systems in processing frameworks (GATE,
>>> UIMA, etc.) with standardization efforts, such as done in the ISO
>>> TC37/SC4 or TEI contexts."
>>
>> Done. Thanks for your input.
>>
>> As always, the current state of the proposal can be seen on Github:
>> https://github.com/jgrivolla/coling2014-nlp-framework-workshop/blob/master/proposal.md
>>
>>
>>
>> I think the current version is pretty close to final. If there are any
>> more suggestions hurry up, the deadline is approaching.
>>
>> -- Jens
>>
>>
>
>
>
Re: next UIMA workshop?
Posted by Jens Grivolla <j+...@grivolla.net>.
I have sent the proposal, we'll see what they say...
-- Jens
On 17/01/14 15:02, Jens Grivolla wrote:
> On 15/01/14 20:51, Richard Eckart de Castilho wrote:
>> On 15.01.2014, at 15:10, Jens Grivolla
>> <j+...@grivolla.net> wrote:
>>> The CFP itself must still be rewritten to be less UIMA-centric, other
>>> than that this is starting to look quite good.
>
> GATE developer Mark A. Greenwood did the rewrite and sent me a pull
> request on Github.
>
>> For example, the topic "experience reports combining UIMA-based
>> components from different sources, as well as solutions to
>> interoperability issues" could be reworded as:
>>
>> 1) experience reports combining language analysis components from
>> different sources, as well as solutions to interoperability issues
>>
>> 2) experience reports combining different frameworks (e.g.
>> GATE/UIMA/WebLicht/etc.), as well as solutions to interoperability issues
>
> I put both in there as separate points.
>
>> I think both aspects would be interesting. I'm a little afraid that 1)
>> might end up iterating the existing of frameworks like UIMA, while 2)
>> would end up referring over web-services or semantic web stuff for
>> interoperability - which may not be very interesting. I'd be more
>> interested in issues and solutions exist beyond this, e.g. with
>> regards to the interchangability of components. What problems exist
>> when e.g. one parser component in a workflow is replaced with a
>> different one? How can these be solved? (Cf. Noh and Padó, 2013 [1]).
>
> Agree. Subtle semantic differences between alternative components can
> be more challenging than the technical integration. I'm not sure how to
> put that in the CFP without it getting very verbose, though.
>
>> I think one more topic could be added:
>>
>> - "combining annotation type systems in processing frameworks (GATE,
>> UIMA, etc.) with standardization efforts, such as done in the ISO
>> TC37/SC4 or TEI contexts."
>
> Done. Thanks for your input.
>
> As always, the current state of the proposal can be seen on Github:
> https://github.com/jgrivolla/coling2014-nlp-framework-workshop/blob/master/proposal.md
>
>
> I think the current version is pretty close to final. If there are any
> more suggestions hurry up, the deadline is approaching.
>
> -- Jens
>
>
Re: next UIMA workshop?
Posted by Jens Grivolla <j+...@grivolla.net>.
On 15/01/14 20:51, Richard Eckart de Castilho wrote:
> On 15.01.2014, at 15:10, Jens Grivolla <j+...@grivolla.net> wrote:
>> The CFP itself must still be rewritten to be less UIMA-centric, other than that this is starting to look quite good.
GATE developer Mark A. Greenwood did the rewrite and sent me a pull
request on Github.
> For example, the topic "experience reports combining UIMA-based components from different sources, as well as solutions to interoperability issues" could be reworded as:
>
> 1) experience reports combining language analysis components from different sources, as well as solutions to interoperability issues
>
> 2) experience reports combining different frameworks (e.g. GATE/UIMA/WebLicht/etc.), as well as solutions to interoperability issues
I put both in there as separate points.
> I think both aspects would be interesting. I'm a little afraid that 1) might end up iterating the existing of frameworks like UIMA, while 2) would end up referring over web-services or semantic web stuff for interoperability - which may not be very interesting. I'd be more interested in issues and solutions exist beyond this, e.g. with regards to the interchangability of components. What problems exist when e.g. one parser component in a workflow is replaced with a different one? How can these be solved? (Cf. Noh and Padó, 2013 [1]).
Agree. Subtle semantic differences between alternative components can
be more challenging than the technical integration. I'm not sure how to
put that in the CFP without it getting very verbose, though.
> I think one more topic could be added:
>
> - "combining annotation type systems in processing frameworks (GATE, UIMA, etc.) with standardization efforts, such as done in the ISO TC37/SC4 or TEI contexts."
Done. Thanks for your input.
As always, the current state of the proposal can be seen on Github:
https://github.com/jgrivolla/coling2014-nlp-framework-workshop/blob/master/proposal.md
I think the current version is pretty close to final. If there are any
more suggestions hurry up, the deadline is approaching.
-- Jens
Re: next UIMA workshop?
Posted by Richard Eckart de Castilho <re...@apache.org>.
On 15.01.2014, at 15:10, Jens Grivolla <j+...@grivolla.net> wrote:
> Just a quick update: the proposal is progressing nicely, with very positive response from the GATE people. In fact, it will be co-organised by a GATE core team member and several core developers are on the PC.
Great!
> The CFP itself must still be rewritten to be less UIMA-centric, other than that this is starting to look quite good.
>
> Any input is welcome, so if you have any suggestions hurry up...
The current covered topics look very interesting. Now, I believe, it depends on how they are reworded to accommodate other processing frameworks, such as GATE.
For example, the topic "experience reports combining UIMA-based components from different sources, as well as solutions to interoperability issues" could be reworded as:
1) experience reports combining language analysis components from different sources, as well as solutions to interoperability issues
2) experience reports combining different frameworks (e.g. GATE/UIMA/WebLicht/etc.), as well as solutions to interoperability issues
I think both aspects would be interesting. I'm a little afraid that 1) might end up iterating the existing of frameworks like UIMA, while 2) would end up referring over web-services or semantic web stuff for interoperability - which may not be very interesting. I'd be more interested in issues and solutions exist beyond this, e.g. with regards to the interchangability of components. What problems exist when e.g. one parser component in a workflow is replaced with a different one? How can these be solved? (Cf. Noh and Padó, 2013 [1]).
I think one more topic could be added:
- "combining annotation type systems in processing frameworks (GATE, UIMA, etc.) with standardization efforts, such as done in the ISO TC37/SC4 or TEI contexts."
Cheers,
-- Richard
[1] http://ceur-ws.org/Vol-1038/paper_3.pdf
Re: next UIMA workshop?
Posted by Jens Grivolla <j+...@grivolla.net>.
Just a quick update: the proposal is progressing nicely, with very
positive response from the GATE people. In fact, it will be
co-organised by a GATE core team member and several core developers are
on the PC.
The CFP itself must still be rewritten to be less UIMA-centric, other
than that this is starting to look quite good.
Any input is welcome, so if you have any suggestions hurry up...
-- Jens
On 15/01/14 10:41, Jens Grivolla wrote:
> Thanks, fixed.
>
> On 14/01/14 19:04, Peter Klügl wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> Just a small correction:
>> The last workshop had nine paper presentations and one invited talk.
>>
>> Best,
>>
>> Peter
>>
>> Am 14.01.2014 18:11, schrieb Jens Grivolla:
>>> Hello, there's only 5 days remaining to submit the workshop proposal.
>>> Please anybody interested get in touch.
>>>
>>> I sent a mail to the GATE user list to get some input from them. The
>>> proposal draft is here:
>>> https://github.com/jgrivolla/coling2014-nlp-framework-workshop/blob/master/proposal.md
>>>
>>>
>>> -- Jens
>>>
>>> On 19/12/13 13:29, Jens Grivolla wrote:
>>>> On 19/12/13 13:08, Peter Klügl wrote:
>>>>> Am 19.12.2013 12:31, schrieb Jens Grivolla:
>>>>>> Ok, it's time to seriously get started on this.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I guess we can start with the GSCL workshop description, and maybe
>>>>>> make it more inclusive for other frameworks (GATE, etc.)
>>>>>>
>>>>>> We need a couple of organizers (me, Renaud, ...?) and a potential PC
>>>>>> (again, start with the one from GSCL) preferably with a few already
>>>>>> confirmed PC members (Richard, ...)
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> If the workshop is more inclusive for other frameworks, maybe it's
>>>>> reasonable to ask one of the GATE people whether they want to
>>>>> co-organize the workshop.
>>>>
>>>> Yes, we definitely would need to reach out to them. First we need to
>>>> decide: do we want a more focused workshop (just UIMA), or are the
>>>> problems faced by GATE users (and others) sufficiently similar that we
>>>> can learn from each other?
>>>>
>>>> If we want to get the GATE people in there: does anybody have contacts
>>>> in that community?
>>>>
>>>>> I won't be able to help with the organization, but maybe as a part of
>>>>> the PC.
>>>>
>>>> I take that as having you as a confirmed PC member ;-)
>>>>
>>>>> I can also not promise that I will submit something, but I will
>>>>> motivate
>>>>> our working group.
>>>>
>>>> Ok, that's great.
>>>>
>>>> I started the draft proposal here:
>>>> https://github.com/jgrivolla/coling2014-nlp-framework-workshop
>>>>
>>>> Thanks,
>>>> Jens
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>
>
>
Re: next UIMA workshop?
Posted by Jens Grivolla <j+...@grivolla.net>.
Thanks, fixed.
On 14/01/14 19:04, Peter Klügl wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Just a small correction:
> The last workshop had nine paper presentations and one invited talk.
>
> Best,
>
> Peter
>
> Am 14.01.2014 18:11, schrieb Jens Grivolla:
>> Hello, there's only 5 days remaining to submit the workshop proposal.
>> Please anybody interested get in touch.
>>
>> I sent a mail to the GATE user list to get some input from them. The
>> proposal draft is here:
>> https://github.com/jgrivolla/coling2014-nlp-framework-workshop/blob/master/proposal.md
>>
>> -- Jens
>>
>> On 19/12/13 13:29, Jens Grivolla wrote:
>>> On 19/12/13 13:08, Peter Klügl wrote:
>>>> Am 19.12.2013 12:31, schrieb Jens Grivolla:
>>>>> Ok, it's time to seriously get started on this.
>>>>>
>>>>> I guess we can start with the GSCL workshop description, and maybe
>>>>> make it more inclusive for other frameworks (GATE, etc.)
>>>>>
>>>>> We need a couple of organizers (me, Renaud, ...?) and a potential PC
>>>>> (again, start with the one from GSCL) preferably with a few already
>>>>> confirmed PC members (Richard, ...)
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> If the workshop is more inclusive for other frameworks, maybe it's
>>>> reasonable to ask one of the GATE people whether they want to
>>>> co-organize the workshop.
>>>
>>> Yes, we definitely would need to reach out to them. First we need to
>>> decide: do we want a more focused workshop (just UIMA), or are the
>>> problems faced by GATE users (and others) sufficiently similar that we
>>> can learn from each other?
>>>
>>> If we want to get the GATE people in there: does anybody have contacts
>>> in that community?
>>>
>>>> I won't be able to help with the organization, but maybe as a part of
>>>> the PC.
>>>
>>> I take that as having you as a confirmed PC member ;-)
>>>
>>>> I can also not promise that I will submit something, but I will
>>>> motivate
>>>> our working group.
>>>
>>> Ok, that's great.
>>>
>>> I started the draft proposal here:
>>> https://github.com/jgrivolla/coling2014-nlp-framework-workshop
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>> Jens
>>>
>>>
>>
>
>
Re: next UIMA workshop?
Posted by Peter Klügl <pk...@uni-wuerzburg.de>.
Hi,
Just a small correction:
The last workshop had nine paper presentations and one invited talk.
Best,
Peter
Am 14.01.2014 18:11, schrieb Jens Grivolla:
> Hello, there's only 5 days remaining to submit the workshop proposal.
> Please anybody interested get in touch.
>
> I sent a mail to the GATE user list to get some input from them. The
> proposal draft is here:
> https://github.com/jgrivolla/coling2014-nlp-framework-workshop/blob/master/proposal.md
>
> -- Jens
>
> On 19/12/13 13:29, Jens Grivolla wrote:
>> On 19/12/13 13:08, Peter Klügl wrote:
>>> Am 19.12.2013 12:31, schrieb Jens Grivolla:
>>>> Ok, it's time to seriously get started on this.
>>>>
>>>> I guess we can start with the GSCL workshop description, and maybe
>>>> make it more inclusive for other frameworks (GATE, etc.)
>>>>
>>>> We need a couple of organizers (me, Renaud, ...?) and a potential PC
>>>> (again, start with the one from GSCL) preferably with a few already
>>>> confirmed PC members (Richard, ...)
>>>>
>>>
>>> If the workshop is more inclusive for other frameworks, maybe it's
>>> reasonable to ask one of the GATE people whether they want to
>>> co-organize the workshop.
>>
>> Yes, we definitely would need to reach out to them. First we need to
>> decide: do we want a more focused workshop (just UIMA), or are the
>> problems faced by GATE users (and others) sufficiently similar that we
>> can learn from each other?
>>
>> If we want to get the GATE people in there: does anybody have contacts
>> in that community?
>>
>>> I won't be able to help with the organization, but maybe as a part of
>>> the PC.
>>
>> I take that as having you as a confirmed PC member ;-)
>>
>>> I can also not promise that I will submit something, but I will
>>> motivate
>>> our working group.
>>
>> Ok, that's great.
>>
>> I started the draft proposal here:
>> https://github.com/jgrivolla/coling2014-nlp-framework-workshop
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Jens
>>
>>
>
Re: next UIMA workshop?
Posted by Michael Tanenblatt <sl...@park-slope.net>.
OK, that’s reasonable—the last UIMA workshop I was at was at LREC in 2010, and there were a bunch of posters, which i why I asked.
On Jan 14, 2014, at 12:54 PM, Jens Grivolla <j+...@grivolla.net> wrote:
> As I understand it, poster presentations are only used as a way to offload submissions that didn't make it as a "full paper". I don't think that such a distinction is useful for this workshop and would prefer to have oral presentations for all interesting contributions.
>
> If we expected to have significantly more contributions that can fit into the schedule then concentrating some of them into a poster session might make sense, but I don't think this is the case.
>
> If on the other hand posters were used to get additional visibility outside of the workshop then this could be interesting...
>
> -- Jens
>
> On 14/01/14 18:36, Michael Tanenblatt wrote:
>> I’ll certainly be on the Program Committee, and am willing to help in any ways that I am able. Regarding the proposal, overall it looks pretty reasonable, but what is the reason for limiting to oral presentations and omitting posters?
>>
>> ..m
>>
>> On Jan 14, 2014, at 12:11 PM, Jens Grivolla <j+...@grivolla.net> wrote:
>>
>>> Hello, there's only 5 days remaining to submit the workshop proposal. Please anybody interested get in touch.
>>>
>>> I sent a mail to the GATE user list to get some input from them. The proposal draft is here: https://github.com/jgrivolla/coling2014-nlp-framework-workshop/blob/master/proposal.md
>>>
>>> -- Jens
>>>
>>> On 19/12/13 13:29, Jens Grivolla wrote:
>>>> On 19/12/13 13:08, Peter Klügl wrote:
>>>>> Am 19.12.2013 12:31, schrieb Jens Grivolla:
>>>>>> Ok, it's time to seriously get started on this.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I guess we can start with the GSCL workshop description, and maybe
>>>>>> make it more inclusive for other frameworks (GATE, etc.)
>>>>>>
>>>>>> We need a couple of organizers (me, Renaud, ...?) and a potential PC
>>>>>> (again, start with the one from GSCL) preferably with a few already
>>>>>> confirmed PC members (Richard, ...)
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> If the workshop is more inclusive for other frameworks, maybe it's
>>>>> reasonable to ask one of the GATE people whether they want to
>>>>> co-organize the workshop.
>>>>
>>>> Yes, we definitely would need to reach out to them. First we need to
>>>> decide: do we want a more focused workshop (just UIMA), or are the
>>>> problems faced by GATE users (and others) sufficiently similar that we
>>>> can learn from each other?
>>>>
>>>> If we want to get the GATE people in there: does anybody have contacts
>>>> in that community?
>>>>
>>>>> I won't be able to help with the organization, but maybe as a part of
>>>>> the PC.
>>>>
>>>> I take that as having you as a confirmed PC member ;-)
>>>>
>>>>> I can also not promise that I will submit something, but I will motivate
>>>>> our working group.
>>>>
>>>> Ok, that's great.
>>>>
>>>> I started the draft proposal here:
>>>> https://github.com/jgrivolla/coling2014-nlp-framework-workshop
>>>>
>>>> Thanks,
>>>> Jens
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>
>
Re: next UIMA workshop?
Posted by Jens Grivolla <j+...@grivolla.net>.
As I understand it, poster presentations are only used as a way to
offload submissions that didn't make it as a "full paper". I don't think
that such a distinction is useful for this workshop and would prefer to
have oral presentations for all interesting contributions.
If we expected to have significantly more contributions that can fit
into the schedule then concentrating some of them into a poster session
might make sense, but I don't think this is the case.
If on the other hand posters were used to get additional visibility
outside of the workshop then this could be interesting...
-- Jens
On 14/01/14 18:36, Michael Tanenblatt wrote:
> I’ll certainly be on the Program Committee, and am willing to help in any ways that I am able. Regarding the proposal, overall it looks pretty reasonable, but what is the reason for limiting to oral presentations and omitting posters?
>
> ..m
>
> On Jan 14, 2014, at 12:11 PM, Jens Grivolla <j+...@grivolla.net> wrote:
>
>> Hello, there's only 5 days remaining to submit the workshop proposal. Please anybody interested get in touch.
>>
>> I sent a mail to the GATE user list to get some input from them. The proposal draft is here: https://github.com/jgrivolla/coling2014-nlp-framework-workshop/blob/master/proposal.md
>>
>> -- Jens
>>
>> On 19/12/13 13:29, Jens Grivolla wrote:
>>> On 19/12/13 13:08, Peter Klügl wrote:
>>>> Am 19.12.2013 12:31, schrieb Jens Grivolla:
>>>>> Ok, it's time to seriously get started on this.
>>>>>
>>>>> I guess we can start with the GSCL workshop description, and maybe
>>>>> make it more inclusive for other frameworks (GATE, etc.)
>>>>>
>>>>> We need a couple of organizers (me, Renaud, ...?) and a potential PC
>>>>> (again, start with the one from GSCL) preferably with a few already
>>>>> confirmed PC members (Richard, ...)
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> If the workshop is more inclusive for other frameworks, maybe it's
>>>> reasonable to ask one of the GATE people whether they want to
>>>> co-organize the workshop.
>>>
>>> Yes, we definitely would need to reach out to them. First we need to
>>> decide: do we want a more focused workshop (just UIMA), or are the
>>> problems faced by GATE users (and others) sufficiently similar that we
>>> can learn from each other?
>>>
>>> If we want to get the GATE people in there: does anybody have contacts
>>> in that community?
>>>
>>>> I won't be able to help with the organization, but maybe as a part of
>>>> the PC.
>>>
>>> I take that as having you as a confirmed PC member ;-)
>>>
>>>> I can also not promise that I will submit something, but I will motivate
>>>> our working group.
>>>
>>> Ok, that's great.
>>>
>>> I started the draft proposal here:
>>> https://github.com/jgrivolla/coling2014-nlp-framework-workshop
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>> Jens
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>
>
Re: next UIMA workshop?
Posted by Michael Tanenblatt <sl...@park-slope.net>.
I’ll certainly be on the Program Committee, and am willing to help in any ways that I am able. Regarding the proposal, overall it looks pretty reasonable, but what is the reason for limiting to oral presentations and omitting posters?
..m
On Jan 14, 2014, at 12:11 PM, Jens Grivolla <j+...@grivolla.net> wrote:
> Hello, there's only 5 days remaining to submit the workshop proposal. Please anybody interested get in touch.
>
> I sent a mail to the GATE user list to get some input from them. The proposal draft is here: https://github.com/jgrivolla/coling2014-nlp-framework-workshop/blob/master/proposal.md
>
> -- Jens
>
> On 19/12/13 13:29, Jens Grivolla wrote:
>> On 19/12/13 13:08, Peter Klügl wrote:
>>> Am 19.12.2013 12:31, schrieb Jens Grivolla:
>>>> Ok, it's time to seriously get started on this.
>>>>
>>>> I guess we can start with the GSCL workshop description, and maybe
>>>> make it more inclusive for other frameworks (GATE, etc.)
>>>>
>>>> We need a couple of organizers (me, Renaud, ...?) and a potential PC
>>>> (again, start with the one from GSCL) preferably with a few already
>>>> confirmed PC members (Richard, ...)
>>>>
>>>
>>> If the workshop is more inclusive for other frameworks, maybe it's
>>> reasonable to ask one of the GATE people whether they want to
>>> co-organize the workshop.
>>
>> Yes, we definitely would need to reach out to them. First we need to
>> decide: do we want a more focused workshop (just UIMA), or are the
>> problems faced by GATE users (and others) sufficiently similar that we
>> can learn from each other?
>>
>> If we want to get the GATE people in there: does anybody have contacts
>> in that community?
>>
>>> I won't be able to help with the organization, but maybe as a part of
>>> the PC.
>>
>> I take that as having you as a confirmed PC member ;-)
>>
>>> I can also not promise that I will submit something, but I will motivate
>>> our working group.
>>
>> Ok, that's great.
>>
>> I started the draft proposal here:
>> https://github.com/jgrivolla/coling2014-nlp-framework-workshop
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Jens
>>
>>
>
>