You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@harmony.apache.org by Mark Hindess <ma...@googlemail.com> on 2007/02/09 08:27:39 UTC
Re: [classlib]Recommend to use a newer version of mx4j.
See:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HARMONY-1901
I'd still like to know why the new release is not mentioned on the
home page and is not on ibiblio. But if someone is going to write the
(non-trivial because you can't just grab the jar from ibiblio) patch to
change to use 3.0.2 then I'd probably apply it.
-Mark.
On 9 February 2007 at 14:09, "Leo Li" <li...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Hi, all:
> I am just trying to run jboss tests on Harmony. But one problem is that
> there seems to be a bug in mx4j-3.0.1 we currently used. I have reported it
> as HARMONY-3147.
> However, it is ok with the mx4j-3.0.2. And I have tried it on my
> machine and it can pass Harmony tests.
> So I recommend to replace the one with the latest version.
> If no one objects, I will give a patch to fix it.
>
> Good luck!
> --
> Leo Li
> China Software Development Lab, IBM
>
> ------=_Part_41476_20162926.1171001344675--
>
Re: [classlib]Recommend to use a newer version of mx4j.
Posted by "Geir Magnusson Jr." <ge...@pobox.com>.
+1
On Feb 9, 2007, at 2:27 AM, Mark Hindess wrote:
>
> See:
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HARMONY-1901
>
> I'd still like to know why the new release is not mentioned on the
> home page and is not on ibiblio. But if someone is going to write the
> (non-trivial because you can't just grab the jar from ibiblio)
> patch to
> change to use 3.0.2 then I'd probably apply it.
>
> -Mark.
>
> On 9 February 2007 at 14:09, "Leo Li" <li...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> Hi, all:
>> I am just trying to run jboss tests on Harmony. But one
>> problem is that
>> there seems to be a bug in mx4j-3.0.1 we currently used. I have
>> reported it
>> as HARMONY-3147.
>> However, it is ok with the mx4j-3.0.2. And I have tried it
>> on my
>> machine and it can pass Harmony tests.
>> So I recommend to replace the one with the latest version.
>> If no one objects, I will give a patch to fix it.
>>
>> Good luck!
>> --
>> Leo Li
>> China Software Development Lab, IBM
>>
>> ------=_Part_41476_20162926.1171001344675--
>>
>
>
Re: [classlib]Recommend to use a newer version of mx4j.
Posted by Leo Li <li...@gmail.com>.
Hi, Mark:
I have made a little modification to download mx4j-3.0.2 directly from
source forge since it is not available right now on ibiblio.
The patch is ready of HARMONY-3147.
Hope I have not missed something in the patch.
Besides, if it is OK, I have thought of extracting some steps that can
be define as a macro thus maybe we can reuse it, especially to download zips
from sourceforge.:)
Good luck!
On 2/9/07, Mark Hindess <ma...@googlemail.com> wrote:
>
>
> See:
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HARMONY-1901
>
> I'd still like to know why the new release is not mentioned on the
> home page and is not on ibiblio. But if someone is going to write the
> (non-trivial because you can't just grab the jar from ibiblio) patch to
> change to use 3.0.2 then I'd probably apply it.
>
> -Mark.
>
> On 9 February 2007 at 14:09, "Leo Li" <li...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > Hi, all:
> > I am just trying to run jboss tests on Harmony. But one problem is
> that
> > there seems to be a bug in mx4j-3.0.1 we currently used. I have reported
> it
> > as HARMONY-3147.
> > However, it is ok with the mx4j-3.0.2. And I have tried it on my
> > machine and it can pass Harmony tests.
> > So I recommend to replace the one with the latest version.
> > If no one objects, I will give a patch to fix it.
> >
> > Good luck!
> > --
> > Leo Li
> > China Software Development Lab, IBM
> >
> > ------=_Part_41476_20162926.1171001344675--
> >
>
>
>
--
Leo Li
China Software Development Lab, IBM
Re: [classlib]Recommend to use a newer version of mx4j.
Posted by Leo Li <li...@gmail.com>.
Hi, Mark:
Maybe I have made a mistake.:)
Is it possible to use a script to download it directly from
sourceforge?
On 2/9/07, Leo Li <li...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Hi, Mark:
> Thank you for pointing out that.
> I am still curious why the release of new version is not mentioned
> on mx4j's homepage.:)
> I will make a patch to fix it.
>
>
> On 2/9/07, Mark Hindess <ma...@googlemail.com> wrote:
> >
> >
> > See:
> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HARMONY-1901
> >
> > I'd still like to know why the new release is not mentioned on the
> > home page and is not on ibiblio. But if someone is going to write the
> > (non-trivial because you can't just grab the jar from ibiblio) patch to
> > change to use 3.0.2 then I'd probably apply it.
> >
> > -Mark.
> >
> > On 9 February 2007 at 14:09, "Leo Li" <li...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > Hi, all:
> > > I am just trying to run jboss tests on Harmony. But one problem
> > is that
> > > there seems to be a bug in mx4j-3.0.1 we currently used. I have
> > reported it
> > > as HARMONY-3147.
> > > However, it is ok with the mx4j-3.0.2. And I have tried it on my
> > > machine and it can pass Harmony tests.
> > > So I recommend to replace the one with the latest version.
> > > If no one objects, I will give a patch to fix it.
> > >
> > > Good luck!
> > > --
> > > Leo Li
> > > China Software Development Lab, IBM
> > >
> > > ------=_Part_41476_20162926.1171001344675--
> > >
> >
> >
> >
>
>
> --
> Leo Li
> China Software Development Lab, IBM
>
--
Leo Li
China Software Development Lab, IBM
Re: [classlib]Recommend to use a newer version of mx4j.
Posted by Leo Li <li...@gmail.com>.
Hi, Mark:
Thank you for pointing out that.
I am still curious why the release of new version is not mentioned
on mx4j's homepage.:)
I will make a patch to fix it.
On 2/9/07, Mark Hindess <ma...@googlemail.com> wrote:
>
>
> See:
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HARMONY-1901
>
> I'd still like to know why the new release is not mentioned on the
> home page and is not on ibiblio. But if someone is going to write the
> (non-trivial because you can't just grab the jar from ibiblio) patch to
> change to use 3.0.2 then I'd probably apply it.
>
> -Mark.
>
> On 9 February 2007 at 14:09, "Leo Li" <li...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > Hi, all:
> > I am just trying to run jboss tests on Harmony. But one problem is
> that
> > there seems to be a bug in mx4j-3.0.1 we currently used. I have reported
> it
> > as HARMONY-3147.
> > However, it is ok with the mx4j-3.0.2. And I have tried it on my
> > machine and it can pass Harmony tests.
> > So I recommend to replace the one with the latest version.
> > If no one objects, I will give a patch to fix it.
> >
> > Good luck!
> > --
> > Leo Li
> > China Software Development Lab, IBM
> >
> > ------=_Part_41476_20162926.1171001344675--
> >
>
>
>
--
Leo Li
China Software Development Lab, IBM