CACTUS-151

[Magnus Grimsell <ma...@idainfront.se>]

Some issues that has come up while refactoring cactus to use cargo.

* I've made a new AntMonitor to be used instead of AntLog when using Cargo. I did a new class since I don't want to refactor the container part right now. AntLog will still be used when accessing the org.apache.cactus.integration.ant.container api.

* The CactusTask uses the DeployableFile interface which does not exist in Cargo. What's your view on this?

*********************
Magnus Grimsell
Ida Infront Ab
magnus.grimsell@idainfront.se


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: cactus-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: cactus-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org

RE: CACTUS-151

[Vincent Massol <vm...@pivolis.com>]

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Magnus Grimsell [mailto:magnus.grimsell@idainfront.se]
> Sent: lundi 21 février 2005 17:05
> To: cactus-dev@jakarta.apache.org
> Subject: CACTUS-151
> 
> Some issues that has come up while refactoring cactus to use cargo.
> 
> * I've made a new AntMonitor to be used instead of AntLog when using
> Cargo. 

Cool. I think this class could be stored in Cargo.

> I did a new class since I don't want to refactor the container part
> right now. AntLog will still be used when accessing the
> org.apache.cactus.integration.ant.container api.

No pb.

> 
> * The CactusTask uses the DeployableFile interface which does not exist in
> Cargo. What's your view on this?

In the future we'll need to move to using a Cargo Deployable (WAR, EAR).
What is the relationship with the deployment API (I would need to check the
code)? Do we need to pass a Deployable to the deployment API?

I'll have a look later on, I have to run now.

Thanks
-Vincent



---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: cactus-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: cactus-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org