You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@airflow.apache.org by "Wicklund, Bryon" <br...@optum.com> on 2018/05/01 18:57:26 UTC
Airflow 1.10.0
Hey I was wondering if you had a date in mind or an estimate for when Airflow 1.10.0 will be released?
Thanks!
-Bryon
This e-mail, including attachments, may include confidential and/or
proprietary information, and may be used only by the person or entity
to which it is addressed. If the reader of this e-mail is not the intended
recipient or his or her authorized agent, the reader is hereby notified
that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this e-mail is
prohibited. If you have received this e-mail in error, please notify the
sender by replying to this message and delete this e-mail immediately.
Re: Airflow 1.10.0
Posted by Naik Kaxil <k....@reply.com>.
Yes it does make sense. I will try to help out in testing.
On 15/06/2018, 18:01, "Bolke de Bruin" <bd...@gmail.com> wrote:
Ok to kick this a bit forward. I can spend 1 hour every day coming week to get 1.10 out. This means I will rebranch 1.10 from master coming Monday. Every day until Friday I will make a new package (not a release) that says please test this and report issues. Friday I will kick off a vote for Release.
Does that make sense?
Cheers
Bolke
> On 15 Jun 2018, at 15:04, James Meickle <jm...@quantopian.com.INVALID> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I have a sandbox cluster at work (3 EC2 VMs + Celery on Elasticache) that I
> have been running 1.10 on. This is because we want to test in advance the
> Kubernetes operator and RBAC. Happy to lend some assistance with that.
>
> -James M.
>
> On Fri, Jun 15, 2018 at 6:28 AM, Driesprong, Fokko <fo...@driesprong.frl>
> wrote:
>
>> Hi all,
>>
>> As you might know, I'm a consultant at GoDataDriven and I just changed to a
>> different project. At this project they are not using Airflow (yet), so for
>> me it is hard to test the RC's etc. I'm willing to help in the process, but
>> currently I'm struggling to find time for the project on the side
>> (including Airflow).
>>
>> Cheers, Fokko
>>
>> 2018-06-13 23:28 GMT+02:00 Bolke de Bruin <bd...@gmail.com>:
>>
>>> Same here and will be for a while still :-(. So unfortunately 1.10 is a
>>> bit stalled.
>>>
>>> B,
>>>
>>>> On 13 Jun 2018, at 17:16, Chris Riccomini <cr...@apache.org>
>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Hey Fokko,
>>>>
>>>> Sorry that I've been MIA for a while. Just wanted to check in on 1.10,
>>> and
>>>> its current status.
>>>>
>>>> Cheers,
>>>> Chris
>>>>
>>>> On Tue, May 1, 2018 at 11:18 PM Driesprong, Fokko <fokko@driesprong.frl
>>>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Hi Bryon,
>>>>>
>>>>> We'll be releasing the RC's soon. If there aren't much issues with the
>>>>> RC's, it will be released quickly. But we need the community to test
>>> these.
>>>>>
>>>>> Cheers, Fokko
>>>>>
>>>>> 2018-05-01 20:57 GMT+02:00 Wicklund, Bryon <bryon.wicklund@optum.com
>>> :
>>>>>
>>>>>> Hey I was wondering if you had a date in mind or an estimate for when
>>>>>> Airflow 1.10.0 will be released?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Thanks!
>>>>>> -Bryon
>>>>>>
>>>>>> This e-mail, including attachments, may include confidential and/or
>>>>>> proprietary information, and may be used only by the person or entity
>>>>>> to which it is addressed. If the reader of this e-mail is not the
>>>>> intended
>>>>>> recipient or his or her authorized agent, the reader is hereby
>> notified
>>>>>> that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this e-mail is
>>>>>> prohibited. If you have received this e-mail in error, please notify
>>> the
>>>>>> sender by replying to this message and delete this e-mail
>> immediately.
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
Kaxil Naik
Data Reply
2nd Floor, Nova South
160 Victoria Street, Westminster
London SW1E 5LB - UK
phone: +44 (0)20 7730 6000
k.naik@reply.com
www.reply.com
Re: Airflow 1.10.0
Posted by Bolke de Bruin <bd...@gmail.com>.
Wont get to it today, but will be able to do tomorrow.
B.
> On 15 Jun 2018, at 22:23, Craig Rodrigues <ro...@crodrigues.org> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> To move things along even faster, instead of creating new packages, you can
> even tell people to
> put something like this in a requirements.txt file:
>
> git+
> https://github.com/apache/incubator-airflow@v1-10-test#egg=apache-airflow[celery,crypto,emr,hive,hdfs,ldap,mysql,postgres,redis,slack,s3]
> <https://github.com/rodrigc/incubator-airflow@master#egg=apache-airflow[celery,crypto,emr,hive,hdfs,ldap,mysql,postgres,redis,slack,s3]>
>
> and then "pip install -r requirements.txt".
>
> I found that to be an effective way to quickly test the branch and provide
> feedback without waiting for packages.
>
> --
> Craig
>
> On Fri, Jun 15, 2018 at 10:01 AM Bolke de Bruin <bd...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Ok to kick this a bit forward. I can spend 1 hour every day coming week to
>> get 1.10 out. This means I will rebranch 1.10 from master coming Monday.
>> Every day until Friday I will make a new package (not a release) that says
>> please test this and report issues. Friday I will kick off a vote for
>> Release.
>>
>> Does that make sense?
>>
>> Cheers
>> Bolke
>>
>>
Re: Airflow 1.10.0
Posted by Craig Rodrigues <ro...@crodrigues.org>.
Hi,
To move things along even faster, instead of creating new packages, you can
even tell people to
put something like this in a requirements.txt file:
git+
https://github.com/apache/incubator-airflow@v1-10-test#egg=apache-airflow[celery,crypto,emr,hive,hdfs,ldap,mysql,postgres,redis,slack,s3]
<https://github.com/rodrigc/incubator-airflow@master#egg=apache-airflow[celery,crypto,emr,hive,hdfs,ldap,mysql,postgres,redis,slack,s3]>
and then "pip install -r requirements.txt".
I found that to be an effective way to quickly test the branch and provide
feedback without waiting for packages.
--
Craig
On Fri, Jun 15, 2018 at 10:01 AM Bolke de Bruin <bd...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Ok to kick this a bit forward. I can spend 1 hour every day coming week to
> get 1.10 out. This means I will rebranch 1.10 from master coming Monday.
> Every day until Friday I will make a new package (not a release) that says
> please test this and report issues. Friday I will kick off a vote for
> Release.
>
> Does that make sense?
>
> Cheers
> Bolke
>
>
Re: Airflow 1.10.0
Posted by Bolke de Bruin <bd...@gmail.com>.
Ok to kick this a bit forward. I can spend 1 hour every day coming week to get 1.10 out. This means I will rebranch 1.10 from master coming Monday. Every day until Friday I will make a new package (not a release) that says please test this and report issues. Friday I will kick off a vote for Release.
Does that make sense?
Cheers
Bolke
> On 15 Jun 2018, at 15:04, James Meickle <jm...@quantopian.com.INVALID> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I have a sandbox cluster at work (3 EC2 VMs + Celery on Elasticache) that I
> have been running 1.10 on. This is because we want to test in advance the
> Kubernetes operator and RBAC. Happy to lend some assistance with that.
>
> -James M.
>
> On Fri, Jun 15, 2018 at 6:28 AM, Driesprong, Fokko <fo...@driesprong.frl>
> wrote:
>
>> Hi all,
>>
>> As you might know, I'm a consultant at GoDataDriven and I just changed to a
>> different project. At this project they are not using Airflow (yet), so for
>> me it is hard to test the RC's etc. I'm willing to help in the process, but
>> currently I'm struggling to find time for the project on the side
>> (including Airflow).
>>
>> Cheers, Fokko
>>
>> 2018-06-13 23:28 GMT+02:00 Bolke de Bruin <bd...@gmail.com>:
>>
>>> Same here and will be for a while still :-(. So unfortunately 1.10 is a
>>> bit stalled.
>>>
>>> B,
>>>
>>>> On 13 Jun 2018, at 17:16, Chris Riccomini <cr...@apache.org>
>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Hey Fokko,
>>>>
>>>> Sorry that I've been MIA for a while. Just wanted to check in on 1.10,
>>> and
>>>> its current status.
>>>>
>>>> Cheers,
>>>> Chris
>>>>
>>>> On Tue, May 1, 2018 at 11:18 PM Driesprong, Fokko <fokko@driesprong.frl
>>>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Hi Bryon,
>>>>>
>>>>> We'll be releasing the RC's soon. If there aren't much issues with the
>>>>> RC's, it will be released quickly. But we need the community to test
>>> these.
>>>>>
>>>>> Cheers, Fokko
>>>>>
>>>>> 2018-05-01 20:57 GMT+02:00 Wicklund, Bryon <bryon.wicklund@optum.com
>>> :
>>>>>
>>>>>> Hey I was wondering if you had a date in mind or an estimate for when
>>>>>> Airflow 1.10.0 will be released?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Thanks!
>>>>>> -Bryon
>>>>>>
>>>>>> This e-mail, including attachments, may include confidential and/or
>>>>>> proprietary information, and may be used only by the person or entity
>>>>>> to which it is addressed. If the reader of this e-mail is not the
>>>>> intended
>>>>>> recipient or his or her authorized agent, the reader is hereby
>> notified
>>>>>> that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this e-mail is
>>>>>> prohibited. If you have received this e-mail in error, please notify
>>> the
>>>>>> sender by replying to this message and delete this e-mail
>> immediately.
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
Re: Airflow 1.10.0
Posted by James Meickle <jm...@quantopian.com.INVALID>.
Hi,
I have a sandbox cluster at work (3 EC2 VMs + Celery on Elasticache) that I
have been running 1.10 on. This is because we want to test in advance the
Kubernetes operator and RBAC. Happy to lend some assistance with that.
-James M.
On Fri, Jun 15, 2018 at 6:28 AM, Driesprong, Fokko <fo...@driesprong.frl>
wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> As you might know, I'm a consultant at GoDataDriven and I just changed to a
> different project. At this project they are not using Airflow (yet), so for
> me it is hard to test the RC's etc. I'm willing to help in the process, but
> currently I'm struggling to find time for the project on the side
> (including Airflow).
>
> Cheers, Fokko
>
> 2018-06-13 23:28 GMT+02:00 Bolke de Bruin <bd...@gmail.com>:
>
> > Same here and will be for a while still :-(. So unfortunately 1.10 is a
> > bit stalled.
> >
> > B,
> >
> > > On 13 Jun 2018, at 17:16, Chris Riccomini <cr...@apache.org>
> wrote:
> > >
> > > Hey Fokko,
> > >
> > > Sorry that I've been MIA for a while. Just wanted to check in on 1.10,
> > and
> > > its current status.
> > >
> > > Cheers,
> > > Chris
> > >
> > > On Tue, May 1, 2018 at 11:18 PM Driesprong, Fokko <fokko@driesprong.frl
> >
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > >> Hi Bryon,
> > >>
> > >> We'll be releasing the RC's soon. If there aren't much issues with the
> > >> RC's, it will be released quickly. But we need the community to test
> > these.
> > >>
> > >> Cheers, Fokko
> > >>
> > >> 2018-05-01 20:57 GMT+02:00 Wicklund, Bryon <bryon.wicklund@optum.com
> >:
> > >>
> > >>> Hey I was wondering if you had a date in mind or an estimate for when
> > >>> Airflow 1.10.0 will be released?
> > >>>
> > >>> Thanks!
> > >>> -Bryon
> > >>>
> > >>> This e-mail, including attachments, may include confidential and/or
> > >>> proprietary information, and may be used only by the person or entity
> > >>> to which it is addressed. If the reader of this e-mail is not the
> > >> intended
> > >>> recipient or his or her authorized agent, the reader is hereby
> notified
> > >>> that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this e-mail is
> > >>> prohibited. If you have received this e-mail in error, please notify
> > the
> > >>> sender by replying to this message and delete this e-mail
> immediately.
> > >>>
> > >>
> >
> >
>
Re: Airflow 1.10.0
Posted by "Driesprong, Fokko" <fo...@driesprong.frl>.
Hi all,
As you might know, I'm a consultant at GoDataDriven and I just changed to a
different project. At this project they are not using Airflow (yet), so for
me it is hard to test the RC's etc. I'm willing to help in the process, but
currently I'm struggling to find time for the project on the side
(including Airflow).
Cheers, Fokko
2018-06-13 23:28 GMT+02:00 Bolke de Bruin <bd...@gmail.com>:
> Same here and will be for a while still :-(. So unfortunately 1.10 is a
> bit stalled.
>
> B,
>
> > On 13 Jun 2018, at 17:16, Chris Riccomini <cr...@apache.org> wrote:
> >
> > Hey Fokko,
> >
> > Sorry that I've been MIA for a while. Just wanted to check in on 1.10,
> and
> > its current status.
> >
> > Cheers,
> > Chris
> >
> > On Tue, May 1, 2018 at 11:18 PM Driesprong, Fokko <fo...@driesprong.frl>
> > wrote:
> >
> >> Hi Bryon,
> >>
> >> We'll be releasing the RC's soon. If there aren't much issues with the
> >> RC's, it will be released quickly. But we need the community to test
> these.
> >>
> >> Cheers, Fokko
> >>
> >> 2018-05-01 20:57 GMT+02:00 Wicklund, Bryon <br...@optum.com>:
> >>
> >>> Hey I was wondering if you had a date in mind or an estimate for when
> >>> Airflow 1.10.0 will be released?
> >>>
> >>> Thanks!
> >>> -Bryon
> >>>
> >>> This e-mail, including attachments, may include confidential and/or
> >>> proprietary information, and may be used only by the person or entity
> >>> to which it is addressed. If the reader of this e-mail is not the
> >> intended
> >>> recipient or his or her authorized agent, the reader is hereby notified
> >>> that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this e-mail is
> >>> prohibited. If you have received this e-mail in error, please notify
> the
> >>> sender by replying to this message and delete this e-mail immediately.
> >>>
> >>
>
>
Re: Airflow 1.10.0
Posted by Bolke de Bruin <bd...@gmail.com>.
Same here and will be for a while still :-(. So unfortunately 1.10 is a bit stalled.
B,
> On 13 Jun 2018, at 17:16, Chris Riccomini <cr...@apache.org> wrote:
>
> Hey Fokko,
>
> Sorry that I've been MIA for a while. Just wanted to check in on 1.10, and
> its current status.
>
> Cheers,
> Chris
>
> On Tue, May 1, 2018 at 11:18 PM Driesprong, Fokko <fo...@driesprong.frl>
> wrote:
>
>> Hi Bryon,
>>
>> We'll be releasing the RC's soon. If there aren't much issues with the
>> RC's, it will be released quickly. But we need the community to test these.
>>
>> Cheers, Fokko
>>
>> 2018-05-01 20:57 GMT+02:00 Wicklund, Bryon <br...@optum.com>:
>>
>>> Hey I was wondering if you had a date in mind or an estimate for when
>>> Airflow 1.10.0 will be released?
>>>
>>> Thanks!
>>> -Bryon
>>>
>>> This e-mail, including attachments, may include confidential and/or
>>> proprietary information, and may be used only by the person or entity
>>> to which it is addressed. If the reader of this e-mail is not the
>> intended
>>> recipient or his or her authorized agent, the reader is hereby notified
>>> that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this e-mail is
>>> prohibited. If you have received this e-mail in error, please notify the
>>> sender by replying to this message and delete this e-mail immediately.
>>>
>>
Re: Airflow 1.10.0
Posted by Chris Riccomini <cr...@apache.org>.
Hey Fokko,
Sorry that I've been MIA for a while. Just wanted to check in on 1.10, and
its current status.
Cheers,
Chris
On Tue, May 1, 2018 at 11:18 PM Driesprong, Fokko <fo...@driesprong.frl>
wrote:
> Hi Bryon,
>
> We'll be releasing the RC's soon. If there aren't much issues with the
> RC's, it will be released quickly. But we need the community to test these.
>
> Cheers, Fokko
>
> 2018-05-01 20:57 GMT+02:00 Wicklund, Bryon <br...@optum.com>:
>
> > Hey I was wondering if you had a date in mind or an estimate for when
> > Airflow 1.10.0 will be released?
> >
> > Thanks!
> > -Bryon
> >
> > This e-mail, including attachments, may include confidential and/or
> > proprietary information, and may be used only by the person or entity
> > to which it is addressed. If the reader of this e-mail is not the
> intended
> > recipient or his or her authorized agent, the reader is hereby notified
> > that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this e-mail is
> > prohibited. If you have received this e-mail in error, please notify the
> > sender by replying to this message and delete this e-mail immediately.
> >
>
Re: Airflow 1.10.0
Posted by "Driesprong, Fokko" <fo...@driesprong.frl>.
Hi Bryon,
We'll be releasing the RC's soon. If there aren't much issues with the
RC's, it will be released quickly. But we need the community to test these.
Cheers, Fokko
2018-05-01 20:57 GMT+02:00 Wicklund, Bryon <br...@optum.com>:
> Hey I was wondering if you had a date in mind or an estimate for when
> Airflow 1.10.0 will be released?
>
> Thanks!
> -Bryon
>
> This e-mail, including attachments, may include confidential and/or
> proprietary information, and may be used only by the person or entity
> to which it is addressed. If the reader of this e-mail is not the intended
> recipient or his or her authorized agent, the reader is hereby notified
> that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this e-mail is
> prohibited. If you have received this e-mail in error, please notify the
> sender by replying to this message and delete this e-mail immediately.
>