Using a . in urn in xsd namespace results in truncated package-name

[atokle <at...@gmail.com>]

We use an urn in the namespace of the wsdl and the xsd's that contains a
version number. 
For the wsdl the number "1.0" result in the java-package "1_0". Thats fine.
But for the xsd the java-package is truncated to "1", and we loose the minor
version.

Is it possible to specify that it should use the same rules for the
package-name for the xsd-types too

--
View this message in context: http://cxf.547215.n5.nabble.com/Using-a-in-urn-in-xsd-namespace-results-in-truncated-package-name-tp4824414p4824414.html
Sent from the cxf-user mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Re: Using a . in urn in xsd namespace results in truncated package-name

[Daniel Kulp <dk...@apache.org>]

On Tuesday, September 20, 2011 3:58:18 PM atokle wrote:
> We use an urn in the namespace of the wsdl and the xsd's that contains a
> version number.
> For the wsdl the number "1.0" result in the java-package "1_0". Thats fine.
> But for the xsd the java-package is truncated to "1", and we loose the minor
> version.
> 
> Is it possible to specify that it should use the same rules for the
> package-name for the xsd-types too

This is all part of the JAXB spec and is a big long complicated process.   If 
you grab the PDF spec, section D.5.1 outlines how a namespaced URI is to be 
mapped to a package name.   It's 2 pages long so I won't repeat it here.   You 
can down it from:

http://jcp.org/en/jsr/detail?id=222



--
Daniel Kulp
dkulp@apache.org
http://dankulp.com/blog
Talend - http://www.talend.com

Re: Using a . in urn in xsd namespace results in truncated package-name

[Jari Fredriksson <ja...@iki.fi>]

21.9.2011 1:58, atokle kirjoitti:
> We use an urn in the namespace of the wsdl and the xsd's that contains a
> version number. 
> For the wsdl the number "1.0" result in the java-package "1_0". Thats fine.
> But for the xsd the java-package is truncated to "1", and we loose the minor
> version.
> 
> Is it possible to specify that it should use the same rules for the
> package-name for the xsd-types too
> 

That is strange. I get v1_0 for xsd-types too. I have the version
written as "V1.0" in the schema.


-- 

Q:	Why do mountain climbers rope themselves together?
A:	To prevent the sensible ones from going home.