You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@activemq.apache.org by James Strachan <ja...@gmail.com> on 2006/08/09 13:41:13 UTC
Java Service Wrapper or Commons Daemon?
Anyone have any experience of these 2 solutions to know which one is
the best to use when creating a windows/unix service?
http://wrapper.tanukisoftware.org/doc/english/introduction.html
http://jakarta.apache.org/commons/daemon/index.html
It'd be nice to have a service for ActiveMQ - am just not sure which
one we should use.
Clearly the latter is also hosted at Apache so we're more likely to be
able to patch it if it has issues. The latter is also used by Tomcat
so is very well used.
Anyone used both before who could offer feedback?
--
James
-------
http://radio.weblogs.com/0112098/
Re: Java Service Wrapper or Commons Daemon?
Posted by -=Kobye=- <ww...@gmail.com>.
more important ,it's very easy to use.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
I love Java!
I love Sports!
I love this Game !
QQ:33093778
MSN:sportsbaby1980@hotmail.com
home:http://www.jsports.org
blog:http://blog.csdn.net/jsports
http://blog.matrix.org.cn/page/jsports
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
Re: Java Service Wrapper or Commons Daemon?
Posted by -=Kobye=- <ww...@gmail.com>.
javaservice is very good in window
jboss and activemq and james work well using javaservice as windows
service.
I run jboss and activemq and james in this way.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
I love Java!
I love Sports!
I love this Game !
QQ:33093778
MSN:sportsbaby1980@hotmail.com
home:http://www.jsports.org
blog:http://blog.csdn.net/jsports
http://blog.matrix.org.cn/page/jsports
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
Re: Java Service Wrapper or Commons Daemon?
Posted by James Strachan <ja...@gmail.com>.
On 8/9/06, Guillaume Nodet <gn...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I've never used commons-daemon, but JSW is very cool and
> works nicely. Is there any specific features not covered by JSW
> that we would need ?
No not really - I just wondered if anyone had used both and could
recommend one over the other.
James
> On 8/9/06, James Strachan <ja...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > Anyone have any experience of these 2 solutions to know which one is
> > the best to use when creating a windows/unix service?
> >
> > http://wrapper.tanukisoftware.org/doc/english/introduction.html
> > http://jakarta.apache.org/commons/daemon/index.html
> >
> > It'd be nice to have a service for ActiveMQ - am just not sure which
> > one we should use.
> >
> > Clearly the latter is also hosted at Apache so we're more likely to be
> > able to patch it if it has issues. The latter is also used by Tomcat
> > so is very well used.
> >
> > Anyone used both before who could offer feedback?
> >
> > --
> >
> > James
> > -------
> > http://radio.weblogs.com/0112098/
> >
>
>
>
> --
> Cheers,
> Guillaume Nodet
>
>
--
James
-------
http://radio.weblogs.com/0112098/
Re: Java Service Wrapper or Commons Daemon?
Posted by Guillaume Nodet <gn...@gmail.com>.
I've never used commons-daemon, but JSW is very cool and
works nicely. Is there any specific features not covered by JSW
that we would need ?
On 8/9/06, James Strachan <ja...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Anyone have any experience of these 2 solutions to know which one is
> the best to use when creating a windows/unix service?
>
> http://wrapper.tanukisoftware.org/doc/english/introduction.html
> http://jakarta.apache.org/commons/daemon/index.html
>
> It'd be nice to have a service for ActiveMQ - am just not sure which
> one we should use.
>
> Clearly the latter is also hosted at Apache so we're more likely to be
> able to patch it if it has issues. The latter is also used by Tomcat
> so is very well used.
>
> Anyone used both before who could offer feedback?
>
> --
>
> James
> -------
> http://radio.weblogs.com/0112098/
>
--
Cheers,
Guillaume Nodet
Re: Java Service Wrapper or Commons Daemon?
Posted by Dain Sundstrom <da...@iq80.com>.
I've never used the commons daemon stuff, but everyone I know uses
jsw, so I think it is the obvious choice.
-dain
On Aug 9, 2006, at 12:50 PM, Jason Dillon wrote:
> I guess :-P
>
> Well, lemme know what you guys end up using, cause we will do the
> same for Geronimo.
>
> --jason
>
>
> On Aug 9, 2006, at 12:40 PM, James Strachan wrote:
>
>> On 8/9/06, Jason Dillon <ja...@planet57.com> wrote:
>>> Both of these look like then use natives... which I don't really
>>> understand. For windows... sure, but do they need natives for POSIX
>>> systems?
>>
>> Yes - they are used to do things like monitor, kill and restart JVMs
>> if they hang up etc.
>>
>> --
>>
>> James
>> -------
>> http://radio.weblogs.com/0112098/
Re: Java Service Wrapper or Commons Daemon?
Posted by Jason Dillon <ja...@planet57.com>.
I guess :-P
Well, lemme know what you guys end up using, cause we will do the
same for Geronimo.
--jason
On Aug 9, 2006, at 12:40 PM, James Strachan wrote:
> On 8/9/06, Jason Dillon <ja...@planet57.com> wrote:
>> Both of these look like then use natives... which I don't really
>> understand. For windows... sure, but do they need natives for POSIX
>> systems?
>
> Yes - they are used to do things like monitor, kill and restart JVMs
> if they hang up etc.
>
> --
>
> James
> -------
> http://radio.weblogs.com/0112098/
Re: Java Service Wrapper or Commons Daemon?
Posted by James Strachan <ja...@gmail.com>.
On 8/9/06, Jason Dillon <ja...@planet57.com> wrote:
> Both of these look like then use natives... which I don't really
> understand. For windows... sure, but do they need natives for POSIX
> systems?
Yes - they are used to do things like monitor, kill and restart JVMs
if they hang up etc.
--
James
-------
http://radio.weblogs.com/0112098/
Re: Java Service Wrapper or Commons Daemon?
Posted by Jason Dillon <ja...@planet57.com>.
Both of these look like then use natives... which I don't really
understand. For windows... sure, but do they need natives for POSIX
systems?
--jason
On Aug 9, 2006, at 4:41 AM, James Strachan wrote:
> Anyone have any experience of these 2 solutions to know which one is
> the best to use when creating a windows/unix service?
>
> http://wrapper.tanukisoftware.org/doc/english/introduction.html
> http://jakarta.apache.org/commons/daemon/index.html
>
> It'd be nice to have a service for ActiveMQ - am just not sure which
> one we should use.
>
> Clearly the latter is also hosted at Apache so we're more likely to be
> able to patch it if it has issues. The latter is also used by Tomcat
> so is very well used.
>
> Anyone used both before who could offer feedback?
>
> --
>
> James
> -------
> http://radio.weblogs.com/0112098/