You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to users@cxf.apache.org by Aki Yoshida <el...@gmail.com> on 2013/07/16 20:56:45 UTC
Re: Removing Addressing Property ReplyTo
I am moving this thread from dev@cxf to users@cxf.
One approach to remove the replyTo element is to use the transform
feature at the particular endpoint or at the bus where you want to
remove the header for the outgoing messages.
You can take a look at this example:
http://cxf.apache.org/docs/transformationfeature.html#TransformationFeature-Droppingoutputandinputelements
For your case, that means you set the property as
<entry key="{http://www.w3.org/2005/08/addressing}ReplyTo" value=""/>
regards, aki
2013/7/16 Rodel <ro...@gmail.com>:
> I've been searching for ways to remove the WSA Addressing Property ReplyTo
> from the Client Outbound as the WebService does not require ReplyTo for
> synchronous messages.
>
> I've created outbound interceptors (from simple to saaj) and tried many
> Phases but to no avail. Any help will be very much appreciated.
>
> Simple Outbound Interceptor:
>
> public class GP10ErrataWSASoapOutInterceptor extends BaseWSSoapInterceptor{
>
> public GP10ErrataWSASoapOutInterceptor() {
> super(Phase.WRITE);
> this.addBefore(SoapOutInterceptor.class.getName());
> }
>
> private static final Logger LOGGER = Logger
> .getLogger(GP10ErrataWSASoapOutInterceptor.class.getName());
>
> private AddressingPropertiesImpl maps;
>
> @Override
> protected void processMessage(SoapMessage message) {
> LOGGER.debug("<<<<<<<< processMessage() START >>>>>>>>");
> maps = getMAPs(message, true, true);
> List <Header> list = new ArrayList<Header>(message.getHeaders());
> List <Header> origList = message.getHeaders();
> if (maps!=null && maps.getReplyTo() != null &&
> maps.getReplyTo().getAddress() != null
> && maps.getReplyTo().getAddress().getValue() != null) {
> String address = maps.getReplyTo().getAddress().getValue();
> // if reply to contains "anonymous", it means the reply to was not set
> boolean isAnonymous = address.contains("/anonymous") ||
> address.contains("/none");
> LOGGER.debug("<<<<<<<< isAnonymous : "+isAnonymous);
>
> if (isAnonymous) {
> LOGGER.debug("<<<<<<<< isAnonymous >>>>>>>>");
> Header replyTo = null;
> for (Header header : list) {
> if (header.getName().getLocalPart().equals("ReplyTo"))
> replyTo = header;
> }
> list.remove(replyTo);
>
> for (Header h: list)
> System.out.println(h.getName());
>
> // do something silly... enforced removal of
> all list and setting in the new list
> message.getHeaders().removeAll(origList);
> message.getHeaders().addAll(list);
> }
> }
>
> LOGGER.debug(">>>>>>>> processMessage() ENDED <<<<<<<<");
> }
> }
>
>
> public abstract class BaseWSSoapInterceptor extends AbstractSoapInterceptor{
>
>
> private static final Logger LOGGER = Logger
> .getLogger(BaseWSSoapInterceptor.class.getName());
>
> public BaseWSSoapInterceptor(String phase) {
> super(phase);
> }
>
> public void handleMessage(SoapMessage message) throws Fault {
> LOGGER.debug("<<<<<<<< handleMessage() START >>>>>>>>");
> processMessage(message);
> LOGGER.debug(">>>>>>>> handleMessage() ENDED <<<<<<<<");
> }
>
> /**
> * This method needs to be overriden by the child class to do specific
> processing
> * @param message
> */
> protected abstract void processMessage(SoapMessage message);
>
> protected AddressingPropertiesImpl getMAPs(SoapMessage message,
> boolean isProviderContext, boolean isOutbound) {
> AddressingPropertiesImpl maps = null;
> maps = ContextUtils
> .retrieveMAPs(message, isProviderContext, isOutbound);
> if (maps!=null)
> LOGGER.info("MAPs retrieved from message {" + maps.toString() + "}");
> else LOGGER.info("No WS Addressing SOAP Header Found...");
> return maps;
> }
>
> }
>
>
>
>
>
> --
> View this message in context: http://cxf.547215.n5.nabble.com/Removing-Addressing-Property-ReplyTo-tp5730963.html
> Sent from the cxf-dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Re: Removing Addressing Property ReplyTo
Posted by Aki Yoshida <el...@gmail.com>.
Hi Rodel,
that is strange.
there is a unit test case in cxf that handles exactly this use case.
http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/cxf/trunk/api/src/test/java/org/apache/cxf/staxutils/transform/OutTransformWriterTest's
testNamespacedAttributeDropElement does exactly this ReplyTo removal.
which cxf version are you using? And can you share the configuration?
regards, aki
2013/7/17 Rodel Talampas <ro...@gmail.com>:
> Hi Aki,
>
> Thanks for the reply. I was able to make it work but it also removes the
> next tag after it.
> e.g.
>
> Action
> MessageId
> To
> ReplyTo
> From
>
> When i remove the replyto, the from is also removed.
> I tried to remove Action, and ALL of the header attributes where removed.
>
> Any clarification will be of help.
>
> Regards,
> Rodel
>
>
>
>
> On Wed, Jul 17, 2013 at 2:56 AM, Aki Yoshida <el...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> I am moving this thread from dev@cxf to users@cxf.
>>
>> One approach to remove the replyTo element is to use the transform
>> feature at the particular endpoint or at the bus where you want to
>> remove the header for the outgoing messages.
>>
>> You can take a look at this example:
>>
>> http://cxf.apache.org/docs/transformationfeature.html#TransformationFeature-Droppingoutputandinputelements
>>
>> For your case, that means you set the property as
>> <entry key="{http://www.w3.org/2005/08/addressing}ReplyTo" value=""/>
>>
>> regards, aki
>>
>> 2013/7/16 Rodel <ro...@gmail.com>:
>> > I've been searching for ways to remove the WSA Addressing Property
>> > ReplyTo
>> > from the Client Outbound as the WebService does not require ReplyTo for
>> > synchronous messages.
>> >
>> > I've created outbound interceptors (from simple to saaj) and tried many
>> > Phases but to no avail. Any help will be very much appreciated.
>> >
>> > Simple Outbound Interceptor:
>> >
>> > public class GP10ErrataWSASoapOutInterceptor extends
>> > BaseWSSoapInterceptor{
>> >
>> > public GP10ErrataWSASoapOutInterceptor() {
>> > super(Phase.WRITE);
>> > this.addBefore(SoapOutInterceptor.class.getName());
>> > }
>> >
>> > private static final Logger LOGGER = Logger
>> >
>> > .getLogger(GP10ErrataWSASoapOutInterceptor.class.getName());
>> >
>> > private AddressingPropertiesImpl maps;
>> >
>> > @Override
>> > protected void processMessage(SoapMessage message) {
>> > LOGGER.debug("<<<<<<<< processMessage() START
>> > >>>>>>>>");
>> > maps = getMAPs(message, true, true);
>> > List <Header> list = new
>> > ArrayList<Header>(message.getHeaders());
>> > List <Header> origList = message.getHeaders();
>> > if (maps!=null && maps.getReplyTo() != null &&
>> > maps.getReplyTo().getAddress() != null
>> > &&
>> > maps.getReplyTo().getAddress().getValue() != null) {
>> > String address =
>> > maps.getReplyTo().getAddress().getValue();
>> > // if reply to contains "anonymous", it means
>> > the reply to was not set
>> > boolean isAnonymous =
>> > address.contains("/anonymous") ||
>> > address.contains("/none");
>> > LOGGER.debug("<<<<<<<< isAnonymous :
>> > "+isAnonymous);
>> >
>> > if (isAnonymous) {
>> > LOGGER.debug("<<<<<<<< isAnonymous
>> > >>>>>>>>");
>> > Header replyTo = null;
>> > for (Header header : list) {
>> > if
>> > (header.getName().getLocalPart().equals("ReplyTo"))
>> > replyTo = header;
>> > }
>> > list.remove(replyTo);
>> >
>> > for (Header h: list)
>> > System.out.println(h.getName());
>> >
>> > // do something silly... enforced
>> > removal of
>> > all list and setting in the new list
>> >
>> > message.getHeaders().removeAll(origList);
>> > message.getHeaders().addAll(list);
>> > }
>> > }
>> >
>> > LOGGER.debug(">>>>>>>> processMessage() ENDED
>> > <<<<<<<<");
>> > }
>> > }
>> >
>> >
>> > public abstract class BaseWSSoapInterceptor extends
>> > AbstractSoapInterceptor{
>> >
>> >
>> > private static final Logger LOGGER = Logger
>> >
>> > .getLogger(BaseWSSoapInterceptor.class.getName());
>> >
>> > public BaseWSSoapInterceptor(String phase) {
>> > super(phase);
>> > }
>> >
>> > public void handleMessage(SoapMessage message) throws Fault {
>> > LOGGER.debug("<<<<<<<< handleMessage() START >>>>>>>>");
>> > processMessage(message);
>> > LOGGER.debug(">>>>>>>> handleMessage() ENDED <<<<<<<<");
>> > }
>> >
>> > /**
>> > * This method needs to be overriden by the child class to do
>> > specific
>> > processing
>> > * @param message
>> > */
>> > protected abstract void processMessage(SoapMessage message);
>> >
>> > protected AddressingPropertiesImpl getMAPs(SoapMessage message,
>> > boolean isProviderContext, boolean isOutbound) {
>> > AddressingPropertiesImpl maps = null;
>> > maps = ContextUtils
>> > .retrieveMAPs(message,
>> > isProviderContext, isOutbound);
>> > if (maps!=null)
>> > LOGGER.info("MAPs retrieved from message {" +
>> > maps.toString() + "}");
>> > else LOGGER.info("No WS Addressing SOAP Header
>> > Found...");
>> > return maps;
>> > }
>> >
>> > }
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > --
>> > View this message in context:
>> > http://cxf.547215.n5.nabble.com/Removing-Addressing-Property-ReplyTo-tp5730963.html
>> > Sent from the cxf-dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>
>
>
>
> --
> Thanks,
> Rodel Talampas
> LinkedIn: http://sg.linkedin.com/pub/rodel-talampas/32/187/ba4