You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@lucene.apache.org by Anshum Gupta <an...@anshumgupta.net> on 2016/04/30 23:25:56 UTC

[VOTE] Release Lucene/Solr 5.5.1

Please vote for the RC1 release candidate for Lucene/Solr 5.5.1.

Artifacts:
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/lucene/lucene-solr-5.5.1-RC1-revc08f17bca0d9cbf516874d13d221ab100e5b7d58

Smoke tester:

  python3 -u dev-tools/scripts/smokeTestRelease.py
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/lucene/lucene-solr-5.5.1-RC1-revc08f17bca0d9cbf516874d13d221ab100e5b7d58


Here's my +1:

SUCCESS! [0:26:44.452268]

-- 
Anshum Gupta

Re: [VOTE] Release Lucene/Solr 5.5.1

Posted by Michael McCandless <lu...@mikemccandless.com>.
Good idea ;)

Mike McCandless

http://blog.mikemccandless.com

On Wed, May 4, 2016 at 4:45 PM, Joel Bernstein <jo...@gmail.com> wrote:

> 3 bugs fixes in Lucene! We should preface this with Lucene is riddled with
> bugs!
>
> Joel Bernstein
> http://joelsolr.blogspot.com/
>
> On Wed, May 4, 2016 at 4:04 PM, Michael McCandless <
> lucene@mikemccandless.com> wrote:
>
>> Oh sorry I thought there were 0 changes ;)
>>
>> Mike McCandless
>>
>> http://blog.mikemccandless.com
>>
>> On Wed, May 4, 2016 at 3:16 PM, Anshum Gupta <an...@anshumgupta.net>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Mike, there were 3 bug fixes as per the change log. Also, no fixes != no
>>> bugs :).
>>>
>>> On Wed, May 4, 2016 at 11:50 AM, Michael McCandless <
>>> lucene@mikemccandless.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> I think there were no Lucene changes in this release vs 5.5.0?
>>>>
>>>> So maybe the release notes should simply say:
>>>>
>>>>   Lucene is perfect and has no bugs.
>>>>
>>>> Mike McCandless
>>>>
>>>> http://blog.mikemccandless.com
>>>>
>>>> On Wed, May 4, 2016 at 1:39 PM, Anshum Gupta <an...@anshumgupta.net>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Here is a draft of the release notes. Feel free to edit and fix
>>>>> something that I missed,
>>>>>
>>>>> Lucene: https://wiki.apache.org/lucene-java/ReleaseNote551
>>>>> Solr: https://wiki.apache.org/solr/ReleaseNote551
>>>>>
>>>>> On Wed, May 4, 2016 at 12:06 AM, Adrien Grand <jp...@gmail.com>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> +1 SUCCESS! [0:57:52.080980]
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Le mar. 3 mai 2016 à 19:36, Anshum Gupta <an...@anshumgupta.net> a
>>>>>> écrit :
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> FYI, we generally don't consider weekends for the 72 hour window so
>>>>>>> we'd be waiting until Wednesday to close this one out.
>>>>>>> Thought I'd let everyone who's waiting know about this.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Sat, Apr 30, 2016 at 2:25 PM, Anshum Gupta <
>>>>>>> anshum@anshumgupta.net> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Please vote for the RC1 release candidate for Lucene/Solr 5.5.1.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Artifacts:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/lucene/lucene-solr-5.5.1-RC1-revc08f17bca0d9cbf516874d13d221ab100e5b7d58
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Smoke tester:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>   python3 -u dev-tools/scripts/smokeTestRelease.py
>>>>>>>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/lucene/lucene-solr-5.5.1-RC1-revc08f17bca0d9cbf516874d13d221ab100e5b7d58
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Here's my +1:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> SUCCESS! [0:26:44.452268]
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>> Anshum Gupta
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>> Anshum Gupta
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> --
>>>>> Anshum Gupta
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> Anshum Gupta
>>>
>>
>>
>

Re: [VOTE] Release Lucene/Solr 5.5.1

Posted by Joel Bernstein <jo...@gmail.com>.
3 bugs fixes in Lucene! We should preface this with Lucene is riddled with
bugs!

Joel Bernstein
http://joelsolr.blogspot.com/

On Wed, May 4, 2016 at 4:04 PM, Michael McCandless <
lucene@mikemccandless.com> wrote:

> Oh sorry I thought there were 0 changes ;)
>
> Mike McCandless
>
> http://blog.mikemccandless.com
>
> On Wed, May 4, 2016 at 3:16 PM, Anshum Gupta <an...@anshumgupta.net>
> wrote:
>
>> Mike, there were 3 bug fixes as per the change log. Also, no fixes != no
>> bugs :).
>>
>> On Wed, May 4, 2016 at 11:50 AM, Michael McCandless <
>> lucene@mikemccandless.com> wrote:
>>
>>> I think there were no Lucene changes in this release vs 5.5.0?
>>>
>>> So maybe the release notes should simply say:
>>>
>>>   Lucene is perfect and has no bugs.
>>>
>>> Mike McCandless
>>>
>>> http://blog.mikemccandless.com
>>>
>>> On Wed, May 4, 2016 at 1:39 PM, Anshum Gupta <an...@anshumgupta.net>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Here is a draft of the release notes. Feel free to edit and fix
>>>> something that I missed,
>>>>
>>>> Lucene: https://wiki.apache.org/lucene-java/ReleaseNote551
>>>> Solr: https://wiki.apache.org/solr/ReleaseNote551
>>>>
>>>> On Wed, May 4, 2016 at 12:06 AM, Adrien Grand <jp...@gmail.com>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> +1 SUCCESS! [0:57:52.080980]
>>>>>
>>>>> Le mar. 3 mai 2016 à 19:36, Anshum Gupta <an...@anshumgupta.net> a
>>>>> écrit :
>>>>>
>>>>>> FYI, we generally don't consider weekends for the 72 hour window so
>>>>>> we'd be waiting until Wednesday to close this one out.
>>>>>> Thought I'd let everyone who's waiting know about this.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Sat, Apr 30, 2016 at 2:25 PM, Anshum Gupta <anshum@anshumgupta.net
>>>>>> > wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Please vote for the RC1 release candidate for Lucene/Solr 5.5.1.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Artifacts:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/lucene/lucene-solr-5.5.1-RC1-revc08f17bca0d9cbf516874d13d221ab100e5b7d58
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Smoke tester:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>   python3 -u dev-tools/scripts/smokeTestRelease.py
>>>>>>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/lucene/lucene-solr-5.5.1-RC1-revc08f17bca0d9cbf516874d13d221ab100e5b7d58
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Here's my +1:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> SUCCESS! [0:26:44.452268]
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>> Anshum Gupta
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> --
>>>>>> Anshum Gupta
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> Anshum Gupta
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Anshum Gupta
>>
>
>

Re: [VOTE] Release Lucene/Solr 5.5.1

Posted by Michael McCandless <lu...@mikemccandless.com>.
Oh sorry I thought there were 0 changes ;)

Mike McCandless

http://blog.mikemccandless.com

On Wed, May 4, 2016 at 3:16 PM, Anshum Gupta <an...@anshumgupta.net> wrote:

> Mike, there were 3 bug fixes as per the change log. Also, no fixes != no
> bugs :).
>
> On Wed, May 4, 2016 at 11:50 AM, Michael McCandless <
> lucene@mikemccandless.com> wrote:
>
>> I think there were no Lucene changes in this release vs 5.5.0?
>>
>> So maybe the release notes should simply say:
>>
>>   Lucene is perfect and has no bugs.
>>
>> Mike McCandless
>>
>> http://blog.mikemccandless.com
>>
>> On Wed, May 4, 2016 at 1:39 PM, Anshum Gupta <an...@anshumgupta.net>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Here is a draft of the release notes. Feel free to edit and fix
>>> something that I missed,
>>>
>>> Lucene: https://wiki.apache.org/lucene-java/ReleaseNote551
>>> Solr: https://wiki.apache.org/solr/ReleaseNote551
>>>
>>> On Wed, May 4, 2016 at 12:06 AM, Adrien Grand <jp...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> +1 SUCCESS! [0:57:52.080980]
>>>>
>>>> Le mar. 3 mai 2016 à 19:36, Anshum Gupta <an...@anshumgupta.net> a
>>>> écrit :
>>>>
>>>>> FYI, we generally don't consider weekends for the 72 hour window so
>>>>> we'd be waiting until Wednesday to close this one out.
>>>>> Thought I'd let everyone who's waiting know about this.
>>>>>
>>>>> On Sat, Apr 30, 2016 at 2:25 PM, Anshum Gupta <an...@anshumgupta.net>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Please vote for the RC1 release candidate for Lucene/Solr 5.5.1.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Artifacts:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/lucene/lucene-solr-5.5.1-RC1-revc08f17bca0d9cbf516874d13d221ab100e5b7d58
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Smoke tester:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>   python3 -u dev-tools/scripts/smokeTestRelease.py
>>>>>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/lucene/lucene-solr-5.5.1-RC1-revc08f17bca0d9cbf516874d13d221ab100e5b7d58
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Here's my +1:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> SUCCESS! [0:26:44.452268]
>>>>>>
>>>>>> --
>>>>>> Anshum Gupta
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> --
>>>>> Anshum Gupta
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> Anshum Gupta
>>>
>>
>>
>
>
> --
> Anshum Gupta
>

Re: [VOTE] Release Lucene/Solr 5.5.1

Posted by Anshum Gupta <an...@anshumgupta.net>.
Mike, there were 3 bug fixes as per the change log. Also, no fixes != no
bugs :).

On Wed, May 4, 2016 at 11:50 AM, Michael McCandless <
lucene@mikemccandless.com> wrote:

> I think there were no Lucene changes in this release vs 5.5.0?
>
> So maybe the release notes should simply say:
>
>   Lucene is perfect and has no bugs.
>
> Mike McCandless
>
> http://blog.mikemccandless.com
>
> On Wed, May 4, 2016 at 1:39 PM, Anshum Gupta <an...@anshumgupta.net>
> wrote:
>
>> Here is a draft of the release notes. Feel free to edit and fix something
>> that I missed,
>>
>> Lucene: https://wiki.apache.org/lucene-java/ReleaseNote551
>> Solr: https://wiki.apache.org/solr/ReleaseNote551
>>
>> On Wed, May 4, 2016 at 12:06 AM, Adrien Grand <jp...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> +1 SUCCESS! [0:57:52.080980]
>>>
>>> Le mar. 3 mai 2016 à 19:36, Anshum Gupta <an...@anshumgupta.net> a
>>> écrit :
>>>
>>>> FYI, we generally don't consider weekends for the 72 hour window so
>>>> we'd be waiting until Wednesday to close this one out.
>>>> Thought I'd let everyone who's waiting know about this.
>>>>
>>>> On Sat, Apr 30, 2016 at 2:25 PM, Anshum Gupta <an...@anshumgupta.net>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Please vote for the RC1 release candidate for Lucene/Solr 5.5.1.
>>>>>
>>>>> Artifacts:
>>>>>
>>>>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/lucene/lucene-solr-5.5.1-RC1-revc08f17bca0d9cbf516874d13d221ab100e5b7d58
>>>>>
>>>>> Smoke tester:
>>>>>
>>>>>   python3 -u dev-tools/scripts/smokeTestRelease.py
>>>>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/lucene/lucene-solr-5.5.1-RC1-revc08f17bca0d9cbf516874d13d221ab100e5b7d58
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Here's my +1:
>>>>>
>>>>> SUCCESS! [0:26:44.452268]
>>>>>
>>>>> --
>>>>> Anshum Gupta
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> Anshum Gupta
>>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Anshum Gupta
>>
>
>


-- 
Anshum Gupta

Re: [VOTE] Release Lucene/Solr 5.5.1

Posted by Walter Underwood <wu...@wunderwood.org>.
> On May 4, 2016, at 11:50 AM, Michael McCandless <lu...@mikemccandless.com> wrote:
> 
>   Lucene is perfect and has no bugs.

The correct form of that statement is “the Lucene test suite is inadequate.” :-)

wunder
Walter Underwood
wunder@wunderwood.org
http://observer.wunderwood.org/  (my blog)


Re: [VOTE] Release Lucene/Solr 5.5.1

Posted by Michael McCandless <lu...@mikemccandless.com>.
I think there were no Lucene changes in this release vs 5.5.0?

So maybe the release notes should simply say:

  Lucene is perfect and has no bugs.

Mike McCandless

http://blog.mikemccandless.com

On Wed, May 4, 2016 at 1:39 PM, Anshum Gupta <an...@anshumgupta.net> wrote:

> Here is a draft of the release notes. Feel free to edit and fix something
> that I missed,
>
> Lucene: https://wiki.apache.org/lucene-java/ReleaseNote551
> Solr: https://wiki.apache.org/solr/ReleaseNote551
>
> On Wed, May 4, 2016 at 12:06 AM, Adrien Grand <jp...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> +1 SUCCESS! [0:57:52.080980]
>>
>> Le mar. 3 mai 2016 à 19:36, Anshum Gupta <an...@anshumgupta.net> a
>> écrit :
>>
>>> FYI, we generally don't consider weekends for the 72 hour window so we'd
>>> be waiting until Wednesday to close this one out.
>>> Thought I'd let everyone who's waiting know about this.
>>>
>>> On Sat, Apr 30, 2016 at 2:25 PM, Anshum Gupta <an...@anshumgupta.net>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Please vote for the RC1 release candidate for Lucene/Solr 5.5.1.
>>>>
>>>> Artifacts:
>>>>
>>>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/lucene/lucene-solr-5.5.1-RC1-revc08f17bca0d9cbf516874d13d221ab100e5b7d58
>>>>
>>>> Smoke tester:
>>>>
>>>>   python3 -u dev-tools/scripts/smokeTestRelease.py
>>>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/lucene/lucene-solr-5.5.1-RC1-revc08f17bca0d9cbf516874d13d221ab100e5b7d58
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Here's my +1:
>>>>
>>>> SUCCESS! [0:26:44.452268]
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> Anshum Gupta
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> Anshum Gupta
>>>
>>
>
>
> --
> Anshum Gupta
>

Re: [VOTE] Release Lucene/Solr 5.5.1

Posted by Anshum Gupta <an...@anshumgupta.net>.
Here is a draft of the release notes. Feel free to edit and fix something
that I missed,

Lucene: https://wiki.apache.org/lucene-java/ReleaseNote551
Solr: https://wiki.apache.org/solr/ReleaseNote551

On Wed, May 4, 2016 at 12:06 AM, Adrien Grand <jp...@gmail.com> wrote:

> +1 SUCCESS! [0:57:52.080980]
>
> Le mar. 3 mai 2016 à 19:36, Anshum Gupta <an...@anshumgupta.net> a
> écrit :
>
>> FYI, we generally don't consider weekends for the 72 hour window so we'd
>> be waiting until Wednesday to close this one out.
>> Thought I'd let everyone who's waiting know about this.
>>
>> On Sat, Apr 30, 2016 at 2:25 PM, Anshum Gupta <an...@anshumgupta.net>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Please vote for the RC1 release candidate for Lucene/Solr 5.5.1.
>>>
>>> Artifacts:
>>>
>>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/lucene/lucene-solr-5.5.1-RC1-revc08f17bca0d9cbf516874d13d221ab100e5b7d58
>>>
>>> Smoke tester:
>>>
>>>   python3 -u dev-tools/scripts/smokeTestRelease.py
>>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/lucene/lucene-solr-5.5.1-RC1-revc08f17bca0d9cbf516874d13d221ab100e5b7d58
>>>
>>>
>>> Here's my +1:
>>>
>>> SUCCESS! [0:26:44.452268]
>>>
>>> --
>>> Anshum Gupta
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Anshum Gupta
>>
>


-- 
Anshum Gupta

Re: [VOTE] Release Lucene/Solr 5.5.1

Posted by Adrien Grand <jp...@gmail.com>.
+1 SUCCESS! [0:57:52.080980]

Le mar. 3 mai 2016 à 19:36, Anshum Gupta <an...@anshumgupta.net> a écrit :

> FYI, we generally don't consider weekends for the 72 hour window so we'd
> be waiting until Wednesday to close this one out.
> Thought I'd let everyone who's waiting know about this.
>
> On Sat, Apr 30, 2016 at 2:25 PM, Anshum Gupta <an...@anshumgupta.net>
> wrote:
>
>> Please vote for the RC1 release candidate for Lucene/Solr 5.5.1.
>>
>> Artifacts:
>>
>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/lucene/lucene-solr-5.5.1-RC1-revc08f17bca0d9cbf516874d13d221ab100e5b7d58
>>
>> Smoke tester:
>>
>>   python3 -u dev-tools/scripts/smokeTestRelease.py
>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/lucene/lucene-solr-5.5.1-RC1-revc08f17bca0d9cbf516874d13d221ab100e5b7d58
>>
>>
>> Here's my +1:
>>
>> SUCCESS! [0:26:44.452268]
>>
>> --
>> Anshum Gupta
>>
>
>
>
> --
> Anshum Gupta
>

Re: [VOTE] Release Lucene/Solr 5.5.1

Posted by Anshum Gupta <an...@anshumgupta.net>.
FYI, we generally don't consider weekends for the 72 hour window so we'd be
waiting until Wednesday to close this one out.
Thought I'd let everyone who's waiting know about this.

On Sat, Apr 30, 2016 at 2:25 PM, Anshum Gupta <an...@anshumgupta.net>
wrote:

> Please vote for the RC1 release candidate for Lucene/Solr 5.5.1.
>
> Artifacts:
>
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/lucene/lucene-solr-5.5.1-RC1-revc08f17bca0d9cbf516874d13d221ab100e5b7d58
>
> Smoke tester:
>
>   python3 -u dev-tools/scripts/smokeTestRelease.py
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/lucene/lucene-solr-5.5.1-RC1-revc08f17bca0d9cbf516874d13d221ab100e5b7d58
>
>
> Here's my +1:
>
> SUCCESS! [0:26:44.452268]
>
> --
> Anshum Gupta
>



-- 
Anshum Gupta

Re: [VOTE] Release Lucene/Solr 5.5.1

Posted by Noble Paul <no...@gmail.com>.
I couldn't reproduce it with repeated runs. This is a mock test and the
failure says , "no SolrAuth header present, which will not happen in a real
test. it has to be something with the mock itself. This should not hold up
the release

On Mon, May 2, 2016 at 9:59 PM, Noble Paul <no...@gmail.com> wrote:

> I shall dig into this
>
> On Mon, May 2, 2016 at 9:17 PM, Yonik Seeley <ys...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> +1
>>
>> -Yonik
>>
>>
>> On Sat, Apr 30, 2016 at 5:25 PM, Anshum Gupta <an...@anshumgupta.net>
>> wrote:
>> > Please vote for the RC1 release candidate for Lucene/Solr 5.5.1.
>> >
>> > Artifacts:
>> >
>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/lucene/lucene-solr-5.5.1-RC1-revc08f17bca0d9cbf516874d13d221ab100e5b7d58
>> >
>> > Smoke tester:
>> >
>> >   python3 -u dev-tools/scripts/smokeTestRelease.py
>> >
>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/lucene/lucene-solr-5.5.1-RC1-revc08f17bca0d9cbf516874d13d221ab100e5b7d58
>> >
>> >
>> > Here's my +1:
>> >
>> > SUCCESS! [0:26:44.452268]
>> >
>> > --
>> > Anshum Gupta
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@lucene.apache.org
>>
>>
>
>
> --
> -----------------------------------------------------
> Noble Paul
>



-- 
-----------------------------------------------------
Noble Paul

Re: [VOTE] Release Lucene/Solr 5.5.1

Posted by Noble Paul <no...@gmail.com>.
I shall dig into this

On Mon, May 2, 2016 at 9:17 PM, Yonik Seeley <ys...@gmail.com> wrote:

> +1
>
> -Yonik
>
>
> On Sat, Apr 30, 2016 at 5:25 PM, Anshum Gupta <an...@anshumgupta.net>
> wrote:
> > Please vote for the RC1 release candidate for Lucene/Solr 5.5.1.
> >
> > Artifacts:
> >
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/lucene/lucene-solr-5.5.1-RC1-revc08f17bca0d9cbf516874d13d221ab100e5b7d58
> >
> > Smoke tester:
> >
> >   python3 -u dev-tools/scripts/smokeTestRelease.py
> >
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/lucene/lucene-solr-5.5.1-RC1-revc08f17bca0d9cbf516874d13d221ab100e5b7d58
> >
> >
> > Here's my +1:
> >
> > SUCCESS! [0:26:44.452268]
> >
> > --
> > Anshum Gupta
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@lucene.apache.org
>
>


-- 
-----------------------------------------------------
Noble Paul

Re: [VOTE] Release Lucene/Solr 5.5.1

Posted by Yonik Seeley <ys...@gmail.com>.
+1

-Yonik


On Sat, Apr 30, 2016 at 5:25 PM, Anshum Gupta <an...@anshumgupta.net> wrote:
> Please vote for the RC1 release candidate for Lucene/Solr 5.5.1.
>
> Artifacts:
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/lucene/lucene-solr-5.5.1-RC1-revc08f17bca0d9cbf516874d13d221ab100e5b7d58
>
> Smoke tester:
>
>   python3 -u dev-tools/scripts/smokeTestRelease.py
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/lucene/lucene-solr-5.5.1-RC1-revc08f17bca0d9cbf516874d13d221ab100e5b7d58
>
>
> Here's my +1:
>
> SUCCESS! [0:26:44.452268]
>
> --
> Anshum Gupta

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@lucene.apache.org


Re: [VOTE] Release Lucene/Solr 5.5.1

Posted by Steve Rowe <sa...@gmail.com>.
+1

Docs, changes and javadocs look good.

The smoke tester passed for me (with java8): SUCCESS! [0:45:46.037606]

--
Steve
www.lucidworks.com

> On Apr 30, 2016, at 5:25 PM, Anshum Gupta <an...@anshumgupta.net> wrote:
> 
> Please vote for the RC1 release candidate for Lucene/Solr 5.5.1.
> 
> Artifacts:
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/lucene/lucene-solr-5.5.1-RC1-revc08f17bca0d9cbf516874d13d221ab100e5b7d58
> 
> Smoke tester:
> 
>   python3 -u dev-tools/scripts/smokeTestRelease.py https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/lucene/lucene-solr-5.5.1-RC1-revc08f17bca0d9cbf516874d13d221ab100e5b7d58
> 
> 
> Here's my +1:
> 
> SUCCESS! [0:26:44.452268]
> 
> -- 
> Anshum Gupta


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@lucene.apache.org


Re: [VOTE] Release Lucene/Solr 5.5.1

Posted by Timothy Potter <th...@gmail.com>.
+1 SUCCESS! [0:51:00.367685]

On Sat, Apr 30, 2016 at 3:25 PM, Anshum Gupta <an...@anshumgupta.net> wrote:
> Please vote for the RC1 release candidate for Lucene/Solr 5.5.1.
>
> Artifacts:
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/lucene/lucene-solr-5.5.1-RC1-revc08f17bca0d9cbf516874d13d221ab100e5b7d58
>
> Smoke tester:
>
>   python3 -u dev-tools/scripts/smokeTestRelease.py
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/lucene/lucene-solr-5.5.1-RC1-revc08f17bca0d9cbf516874d13d221ab100e5b7d58
>
>
> Here's my +1:
>
> SUCCESS! [0:26:44.452268]
>
> --
> Anshum Gupta

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@lucene.apache.org


Re: [VOTE] Release Lucene/Solr 5.5.1

Posted by Anshum Gupta <an...@anshumgupta.net>.
I can't reproduce that failure even with the seed. I don't think it's a
blocker and we should be good to go.

@Noble: Considering you have a better grip on this test, can you confirm ?

I think we should track this in a JIRA. Perhaps just an epic with sub-tasks
about failing tests is what we need right now to get a grip on the tests
situation.

On Mon, May 2, 2016 at 8:07 AM, Shai Erera <se...@gmail.com> wrote:

> When I ran the smoke tester for the first time, I encountered this test
> failure:
>
> [junit4] Suite: org.apache.solr.security.TestPKIAuthenticationPlugin
> [junit4] 2> Creating dataDir:
> /tmp/smoke_lucene_5.5.1_c08f17bca0d9cbf516874d13d221ab100e5b7d58_3/unpack/solr-5.5.1/solr/build/solr-core/test/J3/temp/solr.security.TestPKIAuthenticationPlugin_4643E7DFA3C28AD5-001/init-core-data-001
> [junit4] 2> 48028 INFO
> (SUITE-TestPKIAuthenticationPlugin-seed#[4643E7DFA3C28AD5]-worker) [ ]
> o.a.s.SolrTestCaseJ4 Randomized ssl (true) and clientAuth (false)
> [junit4] 2> 48031 INFO
> (TEST-TestPKIAuthenticationPlugin.test-seed#[4643E7DFA3C28AD5]) [ ]
> o.a.s.SolrTestCaseJ4 ###Starting test
> [junit4] 2> 48323 ERROR
> (TEST-TestPKIAuthenticationPlugin.test-seed#[4643E7DFA3C28AD5]) [ ]
> o.a.s.s.PKIAuthenticationPlugin No SolrAuth header present
> [junit4] 2> 48377 ERROR
> (TEST-TestPKIAuthenticationPlugin.test-seed#[4643E7DFA3C28AD5]) [ ]
> o.a.s.s.PKIAuthenticationPlugin Invalid key
> [junit4] 2> 48377 INFO
> (TEST-TestPKIAuthenticationPlugin.test-seed#[4643E7DFA3C28AD5]) [ ]
> o.a.s.SolrTestCaseJ4 ###Ending test
> [junit4] 2> NOTE: reproduce with: ant test
> -Dtestcase=TestPKIAuthenticationPlugin -Dtests.method=test
> -Dtests.seed=4643E7DFA3C28AD5 -Dtests.locale=ja-JP
> -Dtests.timezone=Australia/Lindeman -Dtests.asserts=true
> -Dtests.file.encoding=US-ASCII
> [junit4] ERROR 0.35s J3 | TestPKIAuthenticationPlugin.test <<<
> [junit4] > Throwable #1: java.lang.NullPointerException
> [junit4] > at
> __randomizedtesting.SeedInfo.seed([4643E7DFA3C28AD5:CE17D8050D3EE72D]:0)
> [junit4] > at
> org.apache.solr.security.TestPKIAuthenticationPlugin.test(TestPKIAuthenticationPlugin.java:156)
> [junit4] > at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:745)
> [junit4] 2> 48379 INFO
> (SUITE-TestPKIAuthenticationPlugin-seed#[4643E7DFA3C28AD5]-worker) [ ]
> o.a.s.SolrTestCaseJ4 ###deleteCore
> [junit4] 2> NOTE: leaving temporary files on disk at:
> /tmp/smoke_lucene_5.5.1_c08f17bca0d9cbf516874d13d221ab100e5b7d58_3/unpack/solr-5.5.1/solr/build/solr-core/test/J3/temp/solr.security.TestPKIAuthenticationPlugin_4643E7DFA3C28AD5-001
> [junit4] 2> NOTE: test params are: codec=Asserting(Lucene54): {},
> docValues:{}, sim=DefaultSimilarity, locale=ja-JP,
> timezone=Australia/Lindeman
> [junit4] 2> NOTE: Linux 4.2.0-30-generic amd64/Oracle Corporation 1.7.0_80
> (64-bit)/cpus=8,threads=1,free=161219560,total=432537600
> [junit4] 2> NOTE: All tests run in this JVM: [TestAtomicUpdateErrorCases,
> TestDefaultStatsCache, TestFiltering, PluginInfoTest,
> HdfsWriteToMultipleCollectionsTest, DistributedFacetPivotSmallAdvancedTest,
> ConnectionManagerTest, TestJoin, ShardRoutingTest,
> WrapperMergePolicyFactoryTest, IndexSchemaRuntimeFieldTest,
> TestClassNameShortening, SimpleCollectionCreateDeleteTest,
> TestManagedResource, BigEndianAscendingWordDeserializerTest,
> HdfsRestartWhileUpdatingTest, TestSolrDeletionPolicy1, TestConfigReload,
> TestSolrJ, TestIndexingPerformance, TestInitQParser,
> AlternateDirectoryTest, TestConfigOverlay, TestCSVResponseWriter,
> SpatialRPTFieldTypeTest, SolrIndexSplitterTest, DistributedVersionInfoTest,
> TestSmileRequest, TestPKIAuthenticationPlugin]
>
> Second time it passed. I didn't have time to dig into the failure, so I
> can't tell if it should hold off the release. What do you think?
>
> Shai
>
> On Sun, May 1, 2016 at 12:26 AM Anshum Gupta <an...@anshumgupta.net>
> wrote:
>
>> Please vote for the RC1 release candidate for Lucene/Solr 5.5.1.
>>
>> Artifacts:
>>
>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/lucene/lucene-solr-5.5.1-RC1-revc08f17bca0d9cbf516874d13d221ab100e5b7d58
>>
>> Smoke tester:
>>
>>   python3 -u dev-tools/scripts/smokeTestRelease.py
>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/lucene/lucene-solr-5.5.1-RC1-revc08f17bca0d9cbf516874d13d221ab100e5b7d58
>>
>>
>> Here's my +1:
>>
>> SUCCESS! [0:26:44.452268]
>>
>>
>> --
>> Anshum Gupta
>>
>


-- 
Anshum Gupta

Re: [VOTE] Release Lucene/Solr 5.5.1

Posted by Shai Erera <se...@gmail.com>.
When I ran the smoke tester for the first time, I encountered this test
failure:

[junit4] Suite: org.apache.solr.security.TestPKIAuthenticationPlugin
[junit4] 2> Creating dataDir:
/tmp/smoke_lucene_5.5.1_c08f17bca0d9cbf516874d13d221ab100e5b7d58_3/unpack/solr-5.5.1/solr/build/solr-core/test/J3/temp/solr.security.TestPKIAuthenticationPlugin_4643E7DFA3C28AD5-001/init-core-data-001
[junit4] 2> 48028 INFO
(SUITE-TestPKIAuthenticationPlugin-seed#[4643E7DFA3C28AD5]-worker) [ ]
o.a.s.SolrTestCaseJ4 Randomized ssl (true) and clientAuth (false)
[junit4] 2> 48031 INFO
(TEST-TestPKIAuthenticationPlugin.test-seed#[4643E7DFA3C28AD5]) [ ]
o.a.s.SolrTestCaseJ4 ###Starting test
[junit4] 2> 48323 ERROR
(TEST-TestPKIAuthenticationPlugin.test-seed#[4643E7DFA3C28AD5]) [ ]
o.a.s.s.PKIAuthenticationPlugin No SolrAuth header present
[junit4] 2> 48377 ERROR
(TEST-TestPKIAuthenticationPlugin.test-seed#[4643E7DFA3C28AD5]) [ ]
o.a.s.s.PKIAuthenticationPlugin Invalid key
[junit4] 2> 48377 INFO
(TEST-TestPKIAuthenticationPlugin.test-seed#[4643E7DFA3C28AD5]) [ ]
o.a.s.SolrTestCaseJ4 ###Ending test
[junit4] 2> NOTE: reproduce with: ant test
-Dtestcase=TestPKIAuthenticationPlugin -Dtests.method=test
-Dtests.seed=4643E7DFA3C28AD5 -Dtests.locale=ja-JP
-Dtests.timezone=Australia/Lindeman -Dtests.asserts=true
-Dtests.file.encoding=US-ASCII
[junit4] ERROR 0.35s J3 | TestPKIAuthenticationPlugin.test <<<
[junit4] > Throwable #1: java.lang.NullPointerException
[junit4] > at
__randomizedtesting.SeedInfo.seed([4643E7DFA3C28AD5:CE17D8050D3EE72D]:0)
[junit4] > at
org.apache.solr.security.TestPKIAuthenticationPlugin.test(TestPKIAuthenticationPlugin.java:156)
[junit4] > at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:745)
[junit4] 2> 48379 INFO
(SUITE-TestPKIAuthenticationPlugin-seed#[4643E7DFA3C28AD5]-worker) [ ]
o.a.s.SolrTestCaseJ4 ###deleteCore
[junit4] 2> NOTE: leaving temporary files on disk at:
/tmp/smoke_lucene_5.5.1_c08f17bca0d9cbf516874d13d221ab100e5b7d58_3/unpack/solr-5.5.1/solr/build/solr-core/test/J3/temp/solr.security.TestPKIAuthenticationPlugin_4643E7DFA3C28AD5-001
[junit4] 2> NOTE: test params are: codec=Asserting(Lucene54): {},
docValues:{}, sim=DefaultSimilarity, locale=ja-JP,
timezone=Australia/Lindeman
[junit4] 2> NOTE: Linux 4.2.0-30-generic amd64/Oracle Corporation 1.7.0_80
(64-bit)/cpus=8,threads=1,free=161219560,total=432537600
[junit4] 2> NOTE: All tests run in this JVM: [TestAtomicUpdateErrorCases,
TestDefaultStatsCache, TestFiltering, PluginInfoTest,
HdfsWriteToMultipleCollectionsTest, DistributedFacetPivotSmallAdvancedTest,
ConnectionManagerTest, TestJoin, ShardRoutingTest,
WrapperMergePolicyFactoryTest, IndexSchemaRuntimeFieldTest,
TestClassNameShortening, SimpleCollectionCreateDeleteTest,
TestManagedResource, BigEndianAscendingWordDeserializerTest,
HdfsRestartWhileUpdatingTest, TestSolrDeletionPolicy1, TestConfigReload,
TestSolrJ, TestIndexingPerformance, TestInitQParser,
AlternateDirectoryTest, TestConfigOverlay, TestCSVResponseWriter,
SpatialRPTFieldTypeTest, SolrIndexSplitterTest, DistributedVersionInfoTest,
TestSmileRequest, TestPKIAuthenticationPlugin]

Second time it passed. I didn't have time to dig into the failure, so I
can't tell if it should hold off the release. What do you think?

Shai

On Sun, May 1, 2016 at 12:26 AM Anshum Gupta <an...@anshumgupta.net> wrote:

> Please vote for the RC1 release candidate for Lucene/Solr 5.5.1.
>
> Artifacts:
>
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/lucene/lucene-solr-5.5.1-RC1-revc08f17bca0d9cbf516874d13d221ab100e5b7d58
>
> Smoke tester:
>
>   python3 -u dev-tools/scripts/smokeTestRelease.py
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/lucene/lucene-solr-5.5.1-RC1-revc08f17bca0d9cbf516874d13d221ab100e5b7d58
>
>
> Here's my +1:
>
> SUCCESS! [0:26:44.452268]
>
>
> --
> Anshum Gupta
>