You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to user@geronimo.apache.org by "Zakharov, Vasily M" <va...@intel.com> on 2006/07/13 17:46:29 UTC
Where's the GUI Installer?
Hi, all,
What's about a GUI installer in G1.1 release? Was it "discontinued" or
something?
In M5 it was available on the site, in 1.0 it was built automatically,
but in 1.1 I couldn't even find an installer jar after build...
Thank you!
Vasily Zakharov
Intel Middleware Products Division
-----Original Message-----
From: Dave Colasurdo [mailto:davecola@earthlink.net]
Sent: Thursday, July 13, 2006 5:52 PM
To: user@geronimo.apache.org
Subject: Re: Geronimo clustering
Krish,
Very strange.. Is it always the last value that you store in the
session that is available after failover? In other words, when both
sessions are started, and you are stuck to server1.. If you add five
different name value pairs to the session (prop1=a, prop2=b, prop3=c,
prop4=d, prop5=e).. Now stop server1 .. and Add prop6=f to the session
..Does only prop5 and prop6 show up on server2?
Are you seeing data in the session other than prop6?
Seems that there are are several possibilities as to where the problem
could happen:
1) Session data isn't being properly replicated between the nodes
(believe this is independent of any mod-jk configuration)
2) Failed over request is not finding the original session..
3) Failed over request finds the session but not all of the session data
I do see a few minor differences in our configs
e.g.
worker.loadbalancer.balanced_workers -vs-
worker.loadbalancer.balance_workers
I don't use the following properties:
worker.loadbalancer.sticky_session_force (hmm, may want to remove this
and see if it has any affect)
worker.maintain ,socket_timeout, socket_keepalive
Will send you my full configuration.
-Dave-
Krishnakumar B wrote:
> Hi Dave,
>
> Thanks for ur note. I am able to get this to work but still face one
> issue.I put three values in session in server1. I shutdown server1.
> When i refresh the browser i get the page from server2 but it has only
> the last value. I am using the tomcat cluster example [
> servlets-examples-cluster ]
>
> I dont get the No engine jvmRoute attribute configured WARN messages.
>
> I have updated the config.xml.
> <gbean name="TomcatEngine">
> <attribute name="initParams">name=Geronimo
> jvmRoute=node2</attribute>
> </gbean>
> and
> <gbean name="TomcatEngine">
> <attribute name="initParams">name=Geronimo
> jvmRoute=node1</attribute>
> </gbean>
>
>
> I have put IPs in plan.
> I get the same messages as u have listed in the mail
>
> My workers.properties
>
> worker.list=loadbalancer,status
> worker.maintain=60
>
> worker.node1.type=ajp13
> worker.node1.host=yy.yy.yy.yy
> worker.node1.port=8009
> worker.node1.socket_timeout=60
> worker.node1.socket_keepalive=true
> worker.node1.lbfactor=1
>
> worker.node2.type=ajp13
> worker.node2.host=xx.xx.xx.xx
> worker.node2.port=8009
> worker.node2.socket_timeout=60
> worker.node2.socket_keepalive=true
> worker.node2.lbfactor=1
>
> worker.loadbalancer.type=lb
> worker.loadbalancer.balanced_workers=node1,node2
> worker.loadbalancer.sticky_session=1
> worker.loadbalancer.sticky_session_force=0
> worker.status.type=status
>
> and
>
> httpd.conf ( Added these lines at end of existing httpd.conf )
>
> LoadModule jk_module modules/mod_jk.so
>
> #
> # The following can be added anywhere after the above LoadModule
statement.
> #
> <IfModule mod_jk.c>
> JkWorkersFile conf/workers.properties
> JkLogFile logs/mod_jk.log
> JkLogLevel info
> JkLogStampFormat "[%a %b %d %H:%M:%S %Y] "
> JkOptions +ForwardKeySize +ForwardURICompat
> -ForwardDirectories
> JkRequestLogFormat "%w %V %T"
>
> <Location /*/WEB-INF/*>
> AllowOverride None
> deny from all
> </Location>
>
> <Location /*/META-INF/*>
> AllowOverride None
> deny from all
> </Location>
>
> # forward ALL web requests to our mod_jk loadbalancer workers
> JkMount /* loadbalancer
>
> </IfModule>
>
> Thanks for ur help.
>
> Regards
> Krish
>
>
> n 7/13/06, Dave Colasurdo <da...@earthlink.net> wrote:
>> Ahh, just remembered one other issue I encountered, extra whitespace
>> after the IP addresses in config.xml seemed to mess things up. You
>> should also make sure that is ok in your copy..
>>
>> -Dave-
>>
>> Dave Colasurdo wrote:
>> > Also, if you are using your own application .. Do you have the
webapp
>> > marked as distributable in web.xml?
>> >
>> > -Dave-
>> >
>> > Dave Colasurdo wrote:
>> >> Krish,
>> >>
>> >> I downloaded fresh copies of G1.1 and tried clustering again. I
did
>> >> not see the behavior you are describing. Failover of session data
>> >> worked as expected. I suspect the "No engine jvmRoute attribute
>> >> configured" error in your run is significant. Perhaps this is
somehow
>> >> misconfigured... Did you stop the server before updating
config.xml?
>> >> Are the IP addresses correct in the each deployment plan and agree
>> >> with the settings in the webserver configuration?
>> >>
>> >> Are you hitting the webserver port 80 and not 8080 ..
>> >> http://YourHost/servlets-examples-cluster
>> >>
>> >> Please attach your config.xml files and deployment plans and
webserver
>> >> config.
>> >>
>> >> BTW, Here are the logs from my run:
>> >>
>> >> Replaced node1 IP address with xx.xx.xx.xx in logs below
>> >> Replaced node2 IP address with yy.yy.yy.yy in logs below
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> *1)* Starting the first node (node 98 - aka server1)
>> >>
>> >> [snip]
>> >> [*********************> ] 93% 13s Starting
>> >> geronimo/servlets-examp...14:18:34,5
>> >> 46 INFO [SimpleTcpCluster] Cluster is about to start
>> >> 14:18:34,562 INFO [SimpleTcpCluster] Add Default ClusterListener
at
>> >> cluster /servlets-examples-cluster
>> >> 14:18:34,578 INFO [ReplicationTransmitter] Start ClusterSender at
>> >> cluster geronimo:type=Cluster with name
geronimo:type=ClusterSender
>> >> 14:18:34,593 INFO [McastService] Setting multihome multicast
>> >> interface to:/xx.xx.xx.xx
>> >> 14:18:34,593 INFO [McastService] Sleeping for 2000 secs to
establish
>> >> cluster membership
>> >> [*********************> ] 93% 15s Starting
>> >> geronimo/servlets-examp...14:18:36,609 INFO [McastService]
membership
>> >> mbean registered (geronimo:type=ClusterMembership)
>> >> 14:18:36,609 INFO [JvmRouteBinderValve] JvmRouteBinderValve
started
>> >> [*********************> ] 93% 16s Starting
>> >> geronimo/servlets-examp...14:18:36,984 INFO [DeltaManager]
Register
>> >> manager /servlets-examples-cluster to cluster element unknown with
>> >> name /servlets-examples-cluster
>> >> 14:18:36,984 INFO [DeltaManager] Starting clustering manager at
>> >> /servlets-examples-cluster
>> >> 14:18:36,984 INFO [DeltaManager] Manager
>> >> [/servlets-examples-cluster]: skipping state transfer. No members
>> >> active in cluster group.
>> >> [***********************] 100% 16s Startup complete
>> >>
>> >> [snip]
>> >>
>> >> *2)* Starting the second node (node 99 - aka server 2)
>> >>
>> >> [snip]
>> >> Starting Geronimo Application Server v1.1
>> >> [*********************> ] 93% 22s Starting
>> >> geronimo/servlets-examp...14:19:27,220 INFO [SimpleTcpCluster]
>> >> Cluster is about to start
>> >> 14:19:27,236 INFO [SimpleTcpCluster] Add Default ClusterListener
at
>> >> cluster /servlets-examples-cluster
>> >> 14:19:27,267 INFO [ReplicationTransmitter] Start ClusterSender at
>> >> cluster geronimo:type=Cluster with name
geronimo:type=ClusterSender
>> >> 14:19:27,283 INFO [McastService] Setting multihome multicast
>> >> interface to:/yy.yy.yy.yy
>> >> 14:19:27,298 INFO [McastService] Sleeping for 2000 secs to
establish
>> >> cluster membership
>> >> [*********************> ] 93% 23s Starting
>> >> geronimo/servlets-examp...14:19:27,454 INFO [SimpleTcpCluster]
>> >> Replication member
>> >>
>>
added:org.apache.catalina.cluster.mcast.McastMember[tcp://xx.xx.xx.xx:40
01,catalina,xx.xx.xx.xx,4001,
>>
>> >> alive=50500]
>> >> [*********************> ] 93% 24s Starting
>> >> geronimo/servlets-examp...14:19:29,2
>> >> 98 INFO [McastService] membership mbean registered
>> >> (geronimo:type=ClusterMembership)
>> >> 14:19:29,314 INFO [JvmRouteBinderValve] JvmRouteBinderValve
started
>> >> 14:19:29,423 INFO [DeltaManager] Register manager
>> >> /servlets-examples-cluster to cluster element unknown with name
>> >> /servlets-examples-cluster
>> >> 14:19:29,423 INFO [DeltaManager] Starting clustering manager at
>> >> /servlets-examples-cluster
>> >> [*********************> ] 93% 25s Starting
>> >> geronimo/servlets-examp...14:19:29,454 WARN [DeltaManager]
Manager
>> >> [/servlets-examples-cluster], requesting session state from
>> >>
>>
org.apache.catalina.cluster.mcast.McastMember[tcp://xx.xx.xx.xx:4001,cat
alina,xx.xx.xx.xx,4001,
>>
>> >> alive=52000]. This operation will timeout if no session state has
been
>> >> received within 60 seconds.
>> >> [*********************> ] 93% 25s Starting
>> >> geronimo/servlets-examp...14:19:30,001 INFO [DeltaManager]
Manager
>> >> [/servlets-examples-cluster]; session state send
>> >> at 7/12/06 2:19 PM received in 578 ms.
>> >> [***********************] 100% 25s Startup complete
>> >> [snip]
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> *3)* Added to Node1 console log when node2 is started
>> >>
>> >> 14:19:28,953 INFO [SimpleTcpCluster] Replication member
>> >>
>>
added:org.apache.catalina.cluster.mcast.McastMember[tcp://yy.yy.yy.yy:40
01,catalina,yy.yy.yy.yy,4001,
>>
>> >> alive=0]
>> >>
>> >> *4)* Nothing is reflected in the console log when when adding
values
>> >> to the session via the servlet.
>> >>
>> >> *5)* This gets added to node2 console when node1 is stopped..
>> >>
>> >> 14:24:40,720 INFO [SimpleTcpCluster] Received member
>> >>
>>
disappeared:org.apache.caalina.cluster.mcast.McastMember[tcp://xx.xx.xx.
xx:4001,catalina,xx.xx.xx.xx,4
>>
>> >>
>> >> 01, alive=360688]
>> >>
>> >> *6)* Failover of session data works as expected..
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> -Dave-
>> >>
>> >> Krishnakumar B wrote:
>> >>> hi Dave,
>> >>>
>> >>> Thanks for ur note.
>> >>>
>> >>> I have done these checks. I get these messages in second cluster
>> >>> member where failover occurs.
>> >>>
>> >>> 14:53:21,003 INFO [DeltaManager] Manager
>> >>> [/servlets-examples-cluster]: skipping state transfer. No members
>> >>> active in cluster group.
>> >>> 15:10:34,700 WARN [JvmRouteBinderValve] No engine jvmRoute
attribute
>> >>> configured
>> >>> 15:10:34,720 WARN [JvmRouteBinderValve] No engine jvmRoute
attribute
>> >>> configured
>> >>>
>> >>> Does this mean something is wrong? I get one session value
>> failover to
>> >>> second server. All cluster members are active.
>> >>>
>> >>> Regards
>> >>> Krish
>> >>>
>> >>> I have configured jvmRoute
>> >>> On 7/11/06, Dave Colasurdo <da...@earthlink.net> wrote:
>> >>>> Krish,
>> >>>>
>> >>>> A few things to check..
>> >>>>
>> >>>> 1) jvmRoute is unique for each node
>> >>>> 2) The value used in jvmRoute agrees with the value set in the
>> mod-jk
>> >>>> configuration (e.g. jvmRoute=node1, jvmRoute=node2, and
>> >>>> worker.loadbalancer.balance_workers=node1,node2,
>> >>>> worker.node1.port=8009,
>> >>>> etc.)
>> >>>> 3) Deployment plan for each node has the correct IP address for
each
>> >>>> node (in 2 spots in the xml)
>> >>>> 4) You are using the most recent deployment *5.5.15* deployment
plan
>> >>>> that includes JVMRouteBinderValve... Latest plan and
instructions
>> >>>> available at: http://cwiki.apache.org/GMOxDOC11/clustering.html
>> >>>> 5) Verify that both machines are truly on the same subnet..
Both
>> >>>> machines should use the same subnet mask. The network portion
of
>> the
>> >>>> addresses should be identical when the subnet mask is bitwise
ANDed
>> >>>> with
>> >>>> each of the individual IP addresses.
>> >>>> 6) You are using the same browser instance for the whole test.
>> Clear
>> >>>> the cookie cache in the browser before the test.
>> >>>>
>> >>>> -Dave-
>> >>>>
>> >>>>
>> >>>> Krishnakumar B wrote:
>> >>>> > hi,
>> >>>> >
>> >>>> > Have set the required properties in app, jvmRoute etc..
>> >>>> >
>> >>>> > The log shows this
>> >>>> >
>> >>>> > 16:46:03,810 INFO [JvmRouteBinderValve] JvmRouteBinderValve
>> started
>> >>>> > 16:46:04,175 INFO [DeltaManager] Register manager
>> >>>> > /servlet-examples-cluster to cluster element unknown with name
>> >>>> > /servlet-examples-cluster
>> >>>> > 16:46:04,176 INFO [DeltaManager] Starting clustering manager
at
>> >>>> > /servlet-examples-cluster
>> >>>> > 16:46:04,176 INFO [DeltaManager] Manager
>> >>>> [/servlet-examples-cluster]:
>> >>>> > skipping state transfer. No members active in cluster group.
>> >>>> >
>> >>>> > Does this message mean something is not correct.
>> >>>> > 16:46:04,176 INFO [DeltaManager] Manager
>> >>>> [/servlet-examples-cluster]:
>> >>>> > skipping state transfer. No members active in cluster group.
>> >>>> >
>> >>>> > I still get only 1 value replicated.
>> >>>> >
>> >>>> > Regards
>> >>>> > Krish
>> >>>> >
>> >>>> >
>> >>>> > On 7/10/06, Santosh Koti <Sa...@infosys.com> wrote:
>> >>>> >>
>> >>>> >>
>> >>>> >> Hi Krishna,
>> >>>> >>
>> >>>> >> Well , can u do this way:
>> >>>> >>
>> >>>> >> 1) Stop both ur servers
>> >>>> >> 2) Start server server1
>> >>>> >> 3) Aftter server server1 is up, start ur server 2
>> >>>> >> 4) in ur server2 startup console, u should something like
>> >>>> >> deltamanager[/contextroot]...
>> >>>> >>
>> >>>> >> 5)Chk ur app...?
>> >>>> >> 6) Have u set jvmroute in config.xml of server2..?
>> >>>> >>
>> >>>> >> PS: U shd not get smething like jvmRoute2 bind /whatever
>> else...?!!
>> >>>> >>
>> >>>> >>
>> >>>> >>
>> >>>> >> Thanks,
>> >>>> >> Santosh.
>> >>>> >> "Don't talk about yourself; it will be done when you leave. "
>> >>>> >>
>> >>>> >>
>> >>>> >> -----Original Message-----
>> >>>> >> From: Krishnakumar B [mailto:www.bkk@gmail.com]
>> >>>> >> Sent: Monday, July 10, 2006 3:55 PM
>> >>>> >> To: user@geronimo.apache.org
>> >>>> >> Subject: Geronimo clustering
>> >>>> >>
>> >>>> >> Hi,
>> >>>> >>
>> >>>> >> I am trying out geronimo clustering example. I seem to have a
>> >>>> problem
>> >>>> >> with Session Failover.
>> >>>> >>
>> >>>> >> I am using Apache HTTP server 2.0.58 and mod_jk 1.2.15 and
>> >>>> geronimo 1.1
>> >>>> >>
>> >>>> >> I create two session variables in server 1 - server1-1 = 1 &
>> >>>> server1-2 =
>> >>>> >> 2
>> >>>> >> I stop server1. Only server1-2 = 2 replicated in server 2.
>> >>>> >> Now i add a new variable in server2 server2-1 = 1
>> >>>> >> Now i start server1
>> >>>> >> Now i stop server2
>> >>>> >> I should have server1-1=1, server1-2=2 and server2-1=1 in
server1
>> >>>> >> Instead i have only server2-1=1 in server1
>> >>>> >>
>> >>>> >> I am not sure if i am doing something wrong. I have set
>> jvmRoute in
>> >>>> >> config.xml, given correct IP address in cluster application
>> plan and
>> >>>> >> setup workers.properties.
>> >>>> >>
>> >>>> >> I get these messages in server2
>> >>>> >> 15:38:37,452 WARN [JvmRouteBinderValve] No engine jvmRoute
>> >>>> attribute
>> >>>> >> configured!
>> >>>> >> and
>> >>>> >> 15:30:57,791 INFO [DeltaManager] Manager
>> >>>> >> [/servlets-examples-cluster]: skipping state transfer. No
members
>> >>>> >> active in cluster group.
>> >>>> >> though both members of cluster are up and i am able to ping
both
>> >>>> >> machines. there are in same subnet.
>> >>>> >>
>> >>>> >> Thanks for any pointers...
>> >>>> >>
>> >>>> >> Regards
>> >>>> >> Krish
>> >>>> >>
>> >>>> >> **************** CAUTION - Disclaimer *****************
>> >>>> >> This e-mail contains PRIVILEGED AND CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION
>> >>>> intended
>> >>>> >> solely for the use of the addressee(s). If you are not the
>> intended
>> >>>> >> recipient, please notify the sender by e-mail and delete the
>> >>>> original
>> >>>> >> message. Further, you are not to copy, disclose, or
distribute
>> this
>> >>>> >> e-mail or its contents to any other person and any such
>> actions are
>> >>>> >> unlawful. This e-mail may contain viruses. Infosys has taken
>> every
>> >>>> >> reasonable precaution to minimize this risk, but is not
liable
>> >>>> for any
>> >>>> >> damage you may sustain as a result of any virus in this
>> e-mail. You
>> >>>> >> should carry out your own virus checks before opening the
>> e-mail or
>> >>>> >> attachment. Infosys reserves the right to monitor and review
the
>> >>>> >> content of all messages sent to or from this e-mail address.
>> >>>> Messages
>> >>>> >> sent to or from this e-mail address may be stored on the
Infosys
>> >>>> >> e-mail system.
>> >>>> >> ***INFOSYS******** End of Disclaimer ********INFOSYS***
>> >>>> >>
>> >>>> >
>> >>>> >
>> >>>>
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >
>> >
>>
>
>
Re: Where's the GUI Installer?
Posted by Aaron Mulder <am...@alumni.princeton.edu>.
On 7/17/06, David Jencks <da...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> No one was interested in updating it for all the changes between 1.0
> and 1.1 so we have dropped it at least for now. I think that with
> the new plugin capabilities the concept of how the installer might
> work needs to be rethought. We might have a "no-choice" installer
> that installs a micro-geronimo and then use the plugin capabilities
> to install everything else. However, this would need an entirely new
> way to customize the plugins from the installer and also plugin-
> ization of many more configurations/modules that go into the current
> geronimo pre-built servers.
In truth, not much "pluginization" is required, since the plugin
installer can be coerced to install plain CAR files. I think the
overall install experience should be pretty much unchanged (select
features, configure e.g. ports for selected features, install selected
features and apply customizations). We'd just need to change the
"install" process to generate a plugin list with the selected
"features" and write the configuration settings for the selected
features to config.xml. And decide whether to install from the
internet or provide a local repository to install the plugins from.
I don't mean to trivialize this, since there will be some work
required to figure out how to get IzPack to write out the config files
we need and so on, but I don't think the amount of work is
fundamentally different than it was before.
Thanks,
Aaron
> > In M5 it was available on the site, in 1.0 it was built automatically,
> > but in 1.1 I couldn't even find an installer jar after build...
> >
> > Thank you!
> >
> > Vasily Zakharov
> > Intel Middleware Products Division
> >
> >
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Dave Colasurdo [mailto:davecola@earthlink.net]
> > Sent: Thursday, July 13, 2006 5:52 PM
> > To: user@geronimo.apache.org
> > Subject: Re: Geronimo clustering
> >
> > Krish,
> >
> > Very strange.. Is it always the last value that you store in the
> > session that is available after failover? In other words, when both
> > sessions are started, and you are stuck to server1.. If you add five
> > different name value pairs to the session (prop1=a, prop2=b, prop3=c,
> > prop4=d, prop5=e).. Now stop server1 .. and Add prop6=f to the
> > session
> > ..Does only prop5 and prop6 show up on server2?
> >
> > Are you seeing data in the session other than prop6?
> >
> > Seems that there are are several possibilities as to where the problem
> > could happen:
> > 1) Session data isn't being properly replicated between the nodes
> > (believe this is independent of any mod-jk configuration)
> > 2) Failed over request is not finding the original session..
> > 3) Failed over request finds the session but not all of the session
> > data
> >
> >
> > I do see a few minor differences in our configs
> >
> > e.g.
> > worker.loadbalancer.balanced_workers -vs-
> > worker.loadbalancer.balance_workers
> >
> > I don't use the following properties:
> > worker.loadbalancer.sticky_session_force (hmm, may want to remove this
> > and see if it has any affect)
> > worker.maintain ,socket_timeout, socket_keepalive
> >
> > Will send you my full configuration.
> >
> > -Dave-
> >
> > Krishnakumar B wrote:
> >> Hi Dave,
> >>
> >> Thanks for ur note. I am able to get this to work but still face one
> >> issue.I put three values in session in server1. I shutdown server1.
> >> When i refresh the browser i get the page from server2 but it has
> >> only
> >> the last value. I am using the tomcat cluster example [
> >> servlets-examples-cluster ]
> >>
> >> I dont get the No engine jvmRoute attribute configured WARN messages.
> >>
> >> I have updated the config.xml.
> >> <gbean name="TomcatEngine">
> >> <attribute name="initParams">name=Geronimo
> >> jvmRoute=node2</attribute>
> >> </gbean>
> >> and
> >> <gbean name="TomcatEngine">
> >> <attribute name="initParams">name=Geronimo
> >> jvmRoute=node1</attribute>
> >> </gbean>
> >>
> >>
> >> I have put IPs in plan.
> >> I get the same messages as u have listed in the mail
> >>
> >> My workers.properties
> >>
> >> worker.list=loadbalancer,status
> >> worker.maintain=60
> >>
> >> worker.node1.type=ajp13
> >> worker.node1.host=yy.yy.yy.yy
> >> worker.node1.port=8009
> >> worker.node1.socket_timeout=60
> >> worker.node1.socket_keepalive=true
> >> worker.node1.lbfactor=1
> >>
> >> worker.node2.type=ajp13
> >> worker.node2.host=xx.xx.xx.xx
> >> worker.node2.port=8009
> >> worker.node2.socket_timeout=60
> >> worker.node2.socket_keepalive=true
> >> worker.node2.lbfactor=1
> >>
> >> worker.loadbalancer.type=lb
> >> worker.loadbalancer.balanced_workers=node1,node2
> >> worker.loadbalancer.sticky_session=1
> >> worker.loadbalancer.sticky_session_force=0
> >> worker.status.type=status
> >>
> >> and
> >>
> >> httpd.conf ( Added these lines at end of existing httpd.conf )
> >>
> >> LoadModule jk_module modules/mod_jk.so
> >>
> >> #
> >> # The following can be added anywhere after the above LoadModule
> > statement.
> >> #
> >> <IfModule mod_jk.c>
> >> JkWorkersFile conf/workers.properties
> >> JkLogFile logs/mod_jk.log
> >> JkLogLevel info
> >> JkLogStampFormat "[%a %b %d %H:%M:%S %Y] "
> >> JkOptions +ForwardKeySize +ForwardURICompat
> >> -ForwardDirectories
> >> JkRequestLogFormat "%w %V %T"
> >>
> >> <Location /*/WEB-INF/*>
> >> AllowOverride None
> >> deny from all
> >> </Location>
> >>
> >> <Location /*/META-INF/*>
> >> AllowOverride None
> >> deny from all
> >> </Location>
> >>
> >> # forward ALL web requests to our mod_jk loadbalancer workers
> >> JkMount /* loadbalancer
> >>
> >> </IfModule>
> >>
> >> Thanks for ur help.
> >>
> >> Regards
> >> Krish
> >>
> >>
> >> n 7/13/06, Dave Colasurdo <da...@earthlink.net> wrote:
> >>> Ahh, just remembered one other issue I encountered, extra whitespace
> >>> after the IP addresses in config.xml seemed to mess things up. You
> >>> should also make sure that is ok in your copy..
> >>>
> >>> -Dave-
> >>>
> >>> Dave Colasurdo wrote:
> >>>> Also, if you are using your own application .. Do you have the
> > webapp
> >>>> marked as distributable in web.xml?
> >>>>
> >>>> -Dave-
> >>>>
> >>>> Dave Colasurdo wrote:
> >>>>> Krish,
> >>>>>
> >>>>> I downloaded fresh copies of G1.1 and tried clustering again. I
> > did
> >>>>> not see the behavior you are describing. Failover of session data
> >>>>> worked as expected. I suspect the "No engine jvmRoute attribute
> >>>>> configured" error in your run is significant. Perhaps this is
> > somehow
> >>>>> misconfigured... Did you stop the server before updating
> > config.xml?
> >>>>> Are the IP addresses correct in the each deployment plan and agree
> >>>>> with the settings in the webserver configuration?
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Are you hitting the webserver port 80 and not 8080 ..
> >>>>> http://YourHost/servlets-examples-cluster
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Please attach your config.xml files and deployment plans and
> > webserver
> >>>>> config.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> BTW, Here are the logs from my run:
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Replaced node1 IP address with xx.xx.xx.xx in logs below
> >>>>> Replaced node2 IP address with yy.yy.yy.yy in logs below
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>> *1)* Starting the first node (node 98 - aka server1)
> >>>>>
> >>>>> [snip]
> >>>>> [*********************> ] 93% 13s Starting
> >>>>> geronimo/servlets-examp...14:18:34,5
> >>>>> 46 INFO [SimpleTcpCluster] Cluster is about to start
> >>>>> 14:18:34,562 INFO [SimpleTcpCluster] Add Default ClusterListener
> > at
> >>>>> cluster /servlets-examples-cluster
> >>>>> 14:18:34,578 INFO [ReplicationTransmitter] Start ClusterSender at
> >>>>> cluster geronimo:type=Cluster with name
> > geronimo:type=ClusterSender
> >>>>> 14:18:34,593 INFO [McastService] Setting multihome multicast
> >>>>> interface to:/xx.xx.xx.xx
> >>>>> 14:18:34,593 INFO [McastService] Sleeping for 2000 secs to
> > establish
> >>>>> cluster membership
> >>>>> [*********************> ] 93% 15s Starting
> >>>>> geronimo/servlets-examp...14:18:36,609 INFO [McastService]
> > membership
> >>>>> mbean registered (geronimo:type=ClusterMembership)
> >>>>> 14:18:36,609 INFO [JvmRouteBinderValve] JvmRouteBinderValve
> > started
> >>>>> [*********************> ] 93% 16s Starting
> >>>>> geronimo/servlets-examp...14:18:36,984 INFO [DeltaManager]
> > Register
> >>>>> manager /servlets-examples-cluster to cluster element unknown with
> >>>>> name /servlets-examples-cluster
> >>>>> 14:18:36,984 INFO [DeltaManager] Starting clustering manager at
> >>>>> /servlets-examples-cluster
> >>>>> 14:18:36,984 INFO [DeltaManager] Manager
> >>>>> [/servlets-examples-cluster]: skipping state transfer. No members
> >>>>> active in cluster group.
> >>>>> [***********************] 100% 16s Startup complete
> >>>>>
> >>>>> [snip]
> >>>>>
> >>>>> *2)* Starting the second node (node 99 - aka server 2)
> >>>>>
> >>>>> [snip]
> >>>>> Starting Geronimo Application Server v1.1
> >>>>> [*********************> ] 93% 22s Starting
> >>>>> geronimo/servlets-examp...14:19:27,220 INFO [SimpleTcpCluster]
> >>>>> Cluster is about to start
> >>>>> 14:19:27,236 INFO [SimpleTcpCluster] Add Default ClusterListener
> > at
> >>>>> cluster /servlets-examples-cluster
> >>>>> 14:19:27,267 INFO [ReplicationTransmitter] Start ClusterSender at
> >>>>> cluster geronimo:type=Cluster with name
> > geronimo:type=ClusterSender
> >>>>> 14:19:27,283 INFO [McastService] Setting multihome multicast
> >>>>> interface to:/yy.yy.yy.yy
> >>>>> 14:19:27,298 INFO [McastService] Sleeping for 2000 secs to
> > establish
> >>>>> cluster membership
> >>>>> [*********************> ] 93% 23s Starting
> >>>>> geronimo/servlets-examp...14:19:27,454 INFO [SimpleTcpCluster]
> >>>>> Replication member
> >>>>>
> >>>
> > added:org.apache.catalina.cluster.mcast.McastMember[tcp://
> > xx.xx.xx.xx:40
> > 01,catalina,xx.xx.xx.xx,4001,
> >>>
> >>>>> alive=50500]
> >>>>> [*********************> ] 93% 24s Starting
> >>>>> geronimo/servlets-examp...14:19:29,2
> >>>>> 98 INFO [McastService] membership mbean registered
> >>>>> (geronimo:type=ClusterMembership)
> >>>>> 14:19:29,314 INFO [JvmRouteBinderValve] JvmRouteBinderValve
> > started
> >>>>> 14:19:29,423 INFO [DeltaManager] Register manager
> >>>>> /servlets-examples-cluster to cluster element unknown with name
> >>>>> /servlets-examples-cluster
> >>>>> 14:19:29,423 INFO [DeltaManager] Starting clustering manager at
> >>>>> /servlets-examples-cluster
> >>>>> [*********************> ] 93% 25s Starting
> >>>>> geronimo/servlets-examp...14:19:29,454 WARN [DeltaManager]
> > Manager
> >>>>> [/servlets-examples-cluster], requesting session state from
> >>>>>
> >>>
> > org.apache.catalina.cluster.mcast.McastMember[tcp://xx.xx.xx.xx:
> > 4001,cat
> > alina,xx.xx.xx.xx,4001,
> >>>
> >>>>> alive=52000]. This operation will timeout if no session state has
> > been
> >>>>> received within 60 seconds.
> >>>>> [*********************> ] 93% 25s Starting
> >>>>> geronimo/servlets-examp...14:19:30,001 INFO [DeltaManager]
> > Manager
> >>>>> [/servlets-examples-cluster]; session state send
> >>>>> at 7/12/06 2:19 PM received in 578 ms.
> >>>>> [***********************] 100% 25s Startup complete
> >>>>> [snip]
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>> *3)* Added to Node1 console log when node2 is started
> >>>>>
> >>>>> 14:19:28,953 INFO [SimpleTcpCluster] Replication member
> >>>>>
> >>>
> > added:org.apache.catalina.cluster.mcast.McastMember[tcp://
> > yy.yy.yy.yy:40
> > 01,catalina,yy.yy.yy.yy,4001,
> >>>
> >>>>> alive=0]
> >>>>>
> >>>>> *4)* Nothing is reflected in the console log when when adding
> > values
> >>>>> to the session via the servlet.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> *5)* This gets added to node2 console when node1 is stopped..
> >>>>>
> >>>>> 14:24:40,720 INFO [SimpleTcpCluster] Received member
> >>>>>
> >>>
> > disappeared:org.apache.caalina.cluster.mcast.McastMember[tcp://
> > xx.xx.xx.
> > xx:4001,catalina,xx.xx.xx.xx,4
> >>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>> 01, alive=360688]
> >>>>>
> >>>>> *6)* Failover of session data works as expected..
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>> -Dave-
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Krishnakumar B wrote:
> >>>>>> hi Dave,
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Thanks for ur note.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> I have done these checks. I get these messages in second cluster
> >>>>>> member where failover occurs.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> 14:53:21,003 INFO [DeltaManager] Manager
> >>>>>> [/servlets-examples-cluster]: skipping state transfer. No members
> >>>>>> active in cluster group.
> >>>>>> 15:10:34,700 WARN [JvmRouteBinderValve] No engine jvmRoute
> > attribute
> >>>>>> configured
> >>>>>> 15:10:34,720 WARN [JvmRouteBinderValve] No engine jvmRoute
> > attribute
> >>>>>> configured
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Does this mean something is wrong? I get one session value
> >>> failover to
> >>>>>> second server. All cluster members are active.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Regards
> >>>>>> Krish
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> I have configured jvmRoute
> >>>>>> On 7/11/06, Dave Colasurdo <da...@earthlink.net> wrote:
> >>>>>>> Krish,
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> A few things to check..
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> 1) jvmRoute is unique for each node
> >>>>>>> 2) The value used in jvmRoute agrees with the value set in the
> >>> mod-jk
> >>>>>>> configuration (e.g. jvmRoute=node1, jvmRoute=node2, and
> >>>>>>> worker.loadbalancer.balance_workers=node1,node2,
> >>>>>>> worker.node1.port=8009,
> >>>>>>> etc.)
> >>>>>>> 3) Deployment plan for each node has the correct IP address for
> > each
> >>>>>>> node (in 2 spots in the xml)
> >>>>>>> 4) You are using the most recent deployment *5.5.15* deployment
> > plan
> >>>>>>> that includes JVMRouteBinderValve... Latest plan and
> > instructions
> >>>>>>> available at: http://cwiki.apache.org/GMOxDOC11/clustering.html
> >>>>>>> 5) Verify that both machines are truly on the same subnet..
> > Both
> >>>>>>> machines should use the same subnet mask. The network portion
> > of
> >>> the
> >>>>>>> addresses should be identical when the subnet mask is bitwise
> > ANDed
> >>>>>>> with
> >>>>>>> each of the individual IP addresses.
> >>>>>>> 6) You are using the same browser instance for the whole test.
> >>> Clear
> >>>>>>> the cookie cache in the browser before the test.
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> -Dave-
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> Krishnakumar B wrote:
> >>>>>>>> hi,
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> Have set the required properties in app, jvmRoute etc..
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> The log shows this
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> 16:46:03,810 INFO [JvmRouteBinderValve] JvmRouteBinderValve
> >>> started
> >>>>>>>> 16:46:04,175 INFO [DeltaManager] Register manager
> >>>>>>>> /servlet-examples-cluster to cluster element unknown with name
> >>>>>>>> /servlet-examples-cluster
> >>>>>>>> 16:46:04,176 INFO [DeltaManager] Starting clustering manager
> > at
> >>>>>>>> /servlet-examples-cluster
> >>>>>>>> 16:46:04,176 INFO [DeltaManager] Manager
> >>>>>>> [/servlet-examples-cluster]:
> >>>>>>>> skipping state transfer. No members active in cluster group.
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> Does this message mean something is not correct.
> >>>>>>>> 16:46:04,176 INFO [DeltaManager] Manager
> >>>>>>> [/servlet-examples-cluster]:
> >>>>>>>> skipping state transfer. No members active in cluster group.
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> I still get only 1 value replicated.
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> Regards
> >>>>>>>> Krish
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> On 7/10/06, Santosh Koti <Sa...@infosys.com> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> Hi Krishna,
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> Well , can u do this way:
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> 1) Stop both ur servers
> >>>>>>>>> 2) Start server server1
> >>>>>>>>> 3) Aftter server server1 is up, start ur server 2
> >>>>>>>>> 4) in ur server2 startup console, u should something like
> >>>>>>>>> deltamanager[/contextroot]...
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> 5)Chk ur app...?
> >>>>>>>>> 6) Have u set jvmroute in config.xml of server2..?
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> PS: U shd not get smething like jvmRoute2 bind /whatever
> >>> else...?!!
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> Thanks,
> >>>>>>>>> Santosh.
> >>>>>>>>> "Don't talk about yourself; it will be done when you leave. "
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> -----Original Message-----
> >>>>>>>>> From: Krishnakumar B [mailto:www.bkk@gmail.com]
> >>>>>>>>> Sent: Monday, July 10, 2006 3:55 PM
> >>>>>>>>> To: user@geronimo.apache.org
> >>>>>>>>> Subject: Geronimo clustering
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> Hi,
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> I am trying out geronimo clustering example. I seem to have a
> >>>>>>> problem
> >>>>>>>>> with Session Failover.
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> I am using Apache HTTP server 2.0.58 and mod_jk 1.2.15 and
> >>>>>>> geronimo 1.1
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> I create two session variables in server 1 - server1-1 = 1 &
> >>>>>>> server1-2 =
> >>>>>>>>> 2
> >>>>>>>>> I stop server1. Only server1-2 = 2 replicated in server 2.
> >>>>>>>>> Now i add a new variable in server2 server2-1 = 1
> >>>>>>>>> Now i start server1
> >>>>>>>>> Now i stop server2
> >>>>>>>>> I should have server1-1=1, server1-2=2 and server2-1=1 in
> > server1
> >>>>>>>>> Instead i have only server2-1=1 in server1
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> I am not sure if i am doing something wrong. I have set
> >>> jvmRoute in
> >>>>>>>>> config.xml, given correct IP address in cluster application
> >>> plan and
> >>>>>>>>> setup workers.properties.
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> I get these messages in server2
> >>>>>>>>> 15:38:37,452 WARN [JvmRouteBinderValve] No engine jvmRoute
> >>>>>>> attribute
> >>>>>>>>> configured!
> >>>>>>>>> and
> >>>>>>>>> 15:30:57,791 INFO [DeltaManager] Manager
> >>>>>>>>> [/servlets-examples-cluster]: skipping state transfer. No
> > members
> >>>>>>>>> active in cluster group.
> >>>>>>>>> though both members of cluster are up and i am able to ping
> > both
> >>>>>>>>> machines. there are in same subnet.
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> Thanks for any pointers...
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> Regards
> >>>>>>>>> Krish
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> **************** CAUTION - Disclaimer *****************
> >>>>>>>>> This e-mail contains PRIVILEGED AND CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION
> >>>>>>> intended
> >>>>>>>>> solely for the use of the addressee(s). If you are not the
> >>> intended
> >>>>>>>>> recipient, please notify the sender by e-mail and delete the
> >>>>>>> original
> >>>>>>>>> message. Further, you are not to copy, disclose, or
> > distribute
> >>> this
> >>>>>>>>> e-mail or its contents to any other person and any such
> >>> actions are
> >>>>>>>>> unlawful. This e-mail may contain viruses. Infosys has taken
> >>> every
> >>>>>>>>> reasonable precaution to minimize this risk, but is not
> > liable
> >>>>>>> for any
> >>>>>>>>> damage you may sustain as a result of any virus in this
> >>> e-mail. You
> >>>>>>>>> should carry out your own virus checks before opening the
> >>> e-mail or
> >>>>>>>>> attachment. Infosys reserves the right to monitor and review
> > the
> >>>>>>>>> content of all messages sent to or from this e-mail address.
> >>>>>>> Messages
> >>>>>>>>> sent to or from this e-mail address may be stored on the
> > Infosys
> >>>>>>>>> e-mail system.
> >>>>>>>>> ***INFOSYS******** End of Disclaimer ********INFOSYS***
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>
> >>
> >>
>
>
Re: Where's the GUI Installer?
Posted by pa...@targetgroup.net.
"No one was interested in updating it for all the changes between 1.0
and 1.1 so we have dropped it at least for now."
Will IBM pick this up at all if they bring out a WAS CE 1.1 version ?
Target
www.targetgroup.net
**********************************************************************
DISCLAIMER.
This message is intended only for the use of the Addressee and may
contain information that is PRIVILEGED and CONFIDENTIAL.
If you are not the intended recipient you must not copy,
distribute or take any action or reliance upon it.
The content of this message may also contain personal
views of an employee of this company and does
not necessarily represent the view of the company.
**********************************************************************
This message has been scanned by Norton Anti-Virus.
It has also been scanned by MAILsweeper to enforce our e-mail
policy. If you have any concerns or comments about the content
of this message, please e-mail support@targetgroup.net.
**********************************************************************
_____________________________________________________________________
This email has been scanned for all viruses by the MessageLabs Email
Security System. For more information on a proactive email security
service working around the clock, around the globe, visit
http://www.messagelabs.com
Re: Where's the GUI Installer?
Posted by David Jencks <da...@yahoo.com>.
On Jul 13, 2006, at 8:46 AM, Zakharov, Vasily M wrote:
> Hi, all,
>
> What's about a GUI installer in G1.1 release? Was it "discontinued" or
> something?
No one was interested in updating it for all the changes between 1.0
and 1.1 so we have dropped it at least for now. I think that with
the new plugin capabilities the concept of how the installer might
work needs to be rethought. We might have a "no-choice" installer
that installs a micro-geronimo and then use the plugin capabilities
to install everything else. However, this would need an entirely new
way to customize the plugins from the installer and also plugin-
ization of many more configurations/modules that go into the current
geronimo pre-built servers.
thanks
david jencks
>
> In M5 it was available on the site, in 1.0 it was built automatically,
> but in 1.1 I couldn't even find an installer jar after build...
>
> Thank you!
>
> Vasily Zakharov
> Intel Middleware Products Division
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Dave Colasurdo [mailto:davecola@earthlink.net]
> Sent: Thursday, July 13, 2006 5:52 PM
> To: user@geronimo.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Geronimo clustering
>
> Krish,
>
> Very strange.. Is it always the last value that you store in the
> session that is available after failover? In other words, when both
> sessions are started, and you are stuck to server1.. If you add five
> different name value pairs to the session (prop1=a, prop2=b, prop3=c,
> prop4=d, prop5=e).. Now stop server1 .. and Add prop6=f to the
> session
> ..Does only prop5 and prop6 show up on server2?
>
> Are you seeing data in the session other than prop6?
>
> Seems that there are are several possibilities as to where the problem
> could happen:
> 1) Session data isn't being properly replicated between the nodes
> (believe this is independent of any mod-jk configuration)
> 2) Failed over request is not finding the original session..
> 3) Failed over request finds the session but not all of the session
> data
>
>
> I do see a few minor differences in our configs
>
> e.g.
> worker.loadbalancer.balanced_workers -vs-
> worker.loadbalancer.balance_workers
>
> I don't use the following properties:
> worker.loadbalancer.sticky_session_force (hmm, may want to remove this
> and see if it has any affect)
> worker.maintain ,socket_timeout, socket_keepalive
>
> Will send you my full configuration.
>
> -Dave-
>
> Krishnakumar B wrote:
>> Hi Dave,
>>
>> Thanks for ur note. I am able to get this to work but still face one
>> issue.I put three values in session in server1. I shutdown server1.
>> When i refresh the browser i get the page from server2 but it has
>> only
>> the last value. I am using the tomcat cluster example [
>> servlets-examples-cluster ]
>>
>> I dont get the No engine jvmRoute attribute configured WARN messages.
>>
>> I have updated the config.xml.
>> <gbean name="TomcatEngine">
>> <attribute name="initParams">name=Geronimo
>> jvmRoute=node2</attribute>
>> </gbean>
>> and
>> <gbean name="TomcatEngine">
>> <attribute name="initParams">name=Geronimo
>> jvmRoute=node1</attribute>
>> </gbean>
>>
>>
>> I have put IPs in plan.
>> I get the same messages as u have listed in the mail
>>
>> My workers.properties
>>
>> worker.list=loadbalancer,status
>> worker.maintain=60
>>
>> worker.node1.type=ajp13
>> worker.node1.host=yy.yy.yy.yy
>> worker.node1.port=8009
>> worker.node1.socket_timeout=60
>> worker.node1.socket_keepalive=true
>> worker.node1.lbfactor=1
>>
>> worker.node2.type=ajp13
>> worker.node2.host=xx.xx.xx.xx
>> worker.node2.port=8009
>> worker.node2.socket_timeout=60
>> worker.node2.socket_keepalive=true
>> worker.node2.lbfactor=1
>>
>> worker.loadbalancer.type=lb
>> worker.loadbalancer.balanced_workers=node1,node2
>> worker.loadbalancer.sticky_session=1
>> worker.loadbalancer.sticky_session_force=0
>> worker.status.type=status
>>
>> and
>>
>> httpd.conf ( Added these lines at end of existing httpd.conf )
>>
>> LoadModule jk_module modules/mod_jk.so
>>
>> #
>> # The following can be added anywhere after the above LoadModule
> statement.
>> #
>> <IfModule mod_jk.c>
>> JkWorkersFile conf/workers.properties
>> JkLogFile logs/mod_jk.log
>> JkLogLevel info
>> JkLogStampFormat "[%a %b %d %H:%M:%S %Y] "
>> JkOptions +ForwardKeySize +ForwardURICompat
>> -ForwardDirectories
>> JkRequestLogFormat "%w %V %T"
>>
>> <Location /*/WEB-INF/*>
>> AllowOverride None
>> deny from all
>> </Location>
>>
>> <Location /*/META-INF/*>
>> AllowOverride None
>> deny from all
>> </Location>
>>
>> # forward ALL web requests to our mod_jk loadbalancer workers
>> JkMount /* loadbalancer
>>
>> </IfModule>
>>
>> Thanks for ur help.
>>
>> Regards
>> Krish
>>
>>
>> n 7/13/06, Dave Colasurdo <da...@earthlink.net> wrote:
>>> Ahh, just remembered one other issue I encountered, extra whitespace
>>> after the IP addresses in config.xml seemed to mess things up. You
>>> should also make sure that is ok in your copy..
>>>
>>> -Dave-
>>>
>>> Dave Colasurdo wrote:
>>>> Also, if you are using your own application .. Do you have the
> webapp
>>>> marked as distributable in web.xml?
>>>>
>>>> -Dave-
>>>>
>>>> Dave Colasurdo wrote:
>>>>> Krish,
>>>>>
>>>>> I downloaded fresh copies of G1.1 and tried clustering again. I
> did
>>>>> not see the behavior you are describing. Failover of session data
>>>>> worked as expected. I suspect the "No engine jvmRoute attribute
>>>>> configured" error in your run is significant. Perhaps this is
> somehow
>>>>> misconfigured... Did you stop the server before updating
> config.xml?
>>>>> Are the IP addresses correct in the each deployment plan and agree
>>>>> with the settings in the webserver configuration?
>>>>>
>>>>> Are you hitting the webserver port 80 and not 8080 ..
>>>>> http://YourHost/servlets-examples-cluster
>>>>>
>>>>> Please attach your config.xml files and deployment plans and
> webserver
>>>>> config.
>>>>>
>>>>> BTW, Here are the logs from my run:
>>>>>
>>>>> Replaced node1 IP address with xx.xx.xx.xx in logs below
>>>>> Replaced node2 IP address with yy.yy.yy.yy in logs below
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> *1)* Starting the first node (node 98 - aka server1)
>>>>>
>>>>> [snip]
>>>>> [*********************> ] 93% 13s Starting
>>>>> geronimo/servlets-examp...14:18:34,5
>>>>> 46 INFO [SimpleTcpCluster] Cluster is about to start
>>>>> 14:18:34,562 INFO [SimpleTcpCluster] Add Default ClusterListener
> at
>>>>> cluster /servlets-examples-cluster
>>>>> 14:18:34,578 INFO [ReplicationTransmitter] Start ClusterSender at
>>>>> cluster geronimo:type=Cluster with name
> geronimo:type=ClusterSender
>>>>> 14:18:34,593 INFO [McastService] Setting multihome multicast
>>>>> interface to:/xx.xx.xx.xx
>>>>> 14:18:34,593 INFO [McastService] Sleeping for 2000 secs to
> establish
>>>>> cluster membership
>>>>> [*********************> ] 93% 15s Starting
>>>>> geronimo/servlets-examp...14:18:36,609 INFO [McastService]
> membership
>>>>> mbean registered (geronimo:type=ClusterMembership)
>>>>> 14:18:36,609 INFO [JvmRouteBinderValve] JvmRouteBinderValve
> started
>>>>> [*********************> ] 93% 16s Starting
>>>>> geronimo/servlets-examp...14:18:36,984 INFO [DeltaManager]
> Register
>>>>> manager /servlets-examples-cluster to cluster element unknown with
>>>>> name /servlets-examples-cluster
>>>>> 14:18:36,984 INFO [DeltaManager] Starting clustering manager at
>>>>> /servlets-examples-cluster
>>>>> 14:18:36,984 INFO [DeltaManager] Manager
>>>>> [/servlets-examples-cluster]: skipping state transfer. No members
>>>>> active in cluster group.
>>>>> [***********************] 100% 16s Startup complete
>>>>>
>>>>> [snip]
>>>>>
>>>>> *2)* Starting the second node (node 99 - aka server 2)
>>>>>
>>>>> [snip]
>>>>> Starting Geronimo Application Server v1.1
>>>>> [*********************> ] 93% 22s Starting
>>>>> geronimo/servlets-examp...14:19:27,220 INFO [SimpleTcpCluster]
>>>>> Cluster is about to start
>>>>> 14:19:27,236 INFO [SimpleTcpCluster] Add Default ClusterListener
> at
>>>>> cluster /servlets-examples-cluster
>>>>> 14:19:27,267 INFO [ReplicationTransmitter] Start ClusterSender at
>>>>> cluster geronimo:type=Cluster with name
> geronimo:type=ClusterSender
>>>>> 14:19:27,283 INFO [McastService] Setting multihome multicast
>>>>> interface to:/yy.yy.yy.yy
>>>>> 14:19:27,298 INFO [McastService] Sleeping for 2000 secs to
> establish
>>>>> cluster membership
>>>>> [*********************> ] 93% 23s Starting
>>>>> geronimo/servlets-examp...14:19:27,454 INFO [SimpleTcpCluster]
>>>>> Replication member
>>>>>
>>>
> added:org.apache.catalina.cluster.mcast.McastMember[tcp://
> xx.xx.xx.xx:40
> 01,catalina,xx.xx.xx.xx,4001,
>>>
>>>>> alive=50500]
>>>>> [*********************> ] 93% 24s Starting
>>>>> geronimo/servlets-examp...14:19:29,2
>>>>> 98 INFO [McastService] membership mbean registered
>>>>> (geronimo:type=ClusterMembership)
>>>>> 14:19:29,314 INFO [JvmRouteBinderValve] JvmRouteBinderValve
> started
>>>>> 14:19:29,423 INFO [DeltaManager] Register manager
>>>>> /servlets-examples-cluster to cluster element unknown with name
>>>>> /servlets-examples-cluster
>>>>> 14:19:29,423 INFO [DeltaManager] Starting clustering manager at
>>>>> /servlets-examples-cluster
>>>>> [*********************> ] 93% 25s Starting
>>>>> geronimo/servlets-examp...14:19:29,454 WARN [DeltaManager]
> Manager
>>>>> [/servlets-examples-cluster], requesting session state from
>>>>>
>>>
> org.apache.catalina.cluster.mcast.McastMember[tcp://xx.xx.xx.xx:
> 4001,cat
> alina,xx.xx.xx.xx,4001,
>>>
>>>>> alive=52000]. This operation will timeout if no session state has
> been
>>>>> received within 60 seconds.
>>>>> [*********************> ] 93% 25s Starting
>>>>> geronimo/servlets-examp...14:19:30,001 INFO [DeltaManager]
> Manager
>>>>> [/servlets-examples-cluster]; session state send
>>>>> at 7/12/06 2:19 PM received in 578 ms.
>>>>> [***********************] 100% 25s Startup complete
>>>>> [snip]
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> *3)* Added to Node1 console log when node2 is started
>>>>>
>>>>> 14:19:28,953 INFO [SimpleTcpCluster] Replication member
>>>>>
>>>
> added:org.apache.catalina.cluster.mcast.McastMember[tcp://
> yy.yy.yy.yy:40
> 01,catalina,yy.yy.yy.yy,4001,
>>>
>>>>> alive=0]
>>>>>
>>>>> *4)* Nothing is reflected in the console log when when adding
> values
>>>>> to the session via the servlet.
>>>>>
>>>>> *5)* This gets added to node2 console when node1 is stopped..
>>>>>
>>>>> 14:24:40,720 INFO [SimpleTcpCluster] Received member
>>>>>
>>>
> disappeared:org.apache.caalina.cluster.mcast.McastMember[tcp://
> xx.xx.xx.
> xx:4001,catalina,xx.xx.xx.xx,4
>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> 01, alive=360688]
>>>>>
>>>>> *6)* Failover of session data works as expected..
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> -Dave-
>>>>>
>>>>> Krishnakumar B wrote:
>>>>>> hi Dave,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Thanks for ur note.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I have done these checks. I get these messages in second cluster
>>>>>> member where failover occurs.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> 14:53:21,003 INFO [DeltaManager] Manager
>>>>>> [/servlets-examples-cluster]: skipping state transfer. No members
>>>>>> active in cluster group.
>>>>>> 15:10:34,700 WARN [JvmRouteBinderValve] No engine jvmRoute
> attribute
>>>>>> configured
>>>>>> 15:10:34,720 WARN [JvmRouteBinderValve] No engine jvmRoute
> attribute
>>>>>> configured
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Does this mean something is wrong? I get one session value
>>> failover to
>>>>>> second server. All cluster members are active.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Regards
>>>>>> Krish
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I have configured jvmRoute
>>>>>> On 7/11/06, Dave Colasurdo <da...@earthlink.net> wrote:
>>>>>>> Krish,
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> A few things to check..
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> 1) jvmRoute is unique for each node
>>>>>>> 2) The value used in jvmRoute agrees with the value set in the
>>> mod-jk
>>>>>>> configuration (e.g. jvmRoute=node1, jvmRoute=node2, and
>>>>>>> worker.loadbalancer.balance_workers=node1,node2,
>>>>>>> worker.node1.port=8009,
>>>>>>> etc.)
>>>>>>> 3) Deployment plan for each node has the correct IP address for
> each
>>>>>>> node (in 2 spots in the xml)
>>>>>>> 4) You are using the most recent deployment *5.5.15* deployment
> plan
>>>>>>> that includes JVMRouteBinderValve... Latest plan and
> instructions
>>>>>>> available at: http://cwiki.apache.org/GMOxDOC11/clustering.html
>>>>>>> 5) Verify that both machines are truly on the same subnet..
> Both
>>>>>>> machines should use the same subnet mask. The network portion
> of
>>> the
>>>>>>> addresses should be identical when the subnet mask is bitwise
> ANDed
>>>>>>> with
>>>>>>> each of the individual IP addresses.
>>>>>>> 6) You are using the same browser instance for the whole test.
>>> Clear
>>>>>>> the cookie cache in the browser before the test.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> -Dave-
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Krishnakumar B wrote:
>>>>>>>> hi,
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Have set the required properties in app, jvmRoute etc..
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> The log shows this
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> 16:46:03,810 INFO [JvmRouteBinderValve] JvmRouteBinderValve
>>> started
>>>>>>>> 16:46:04,175 INFO [DeltaManager] Register manager
>>>>>>>> /servlet-examples-cluster to cluster element unknown with name
>>>>>>>> /servlet-examples-cluster
>>>>>>>> 16:46:04,176 INFO [DeltaManager] Starting clustering manager
> at
>>>>>>>> /servlet-examples-cluster
>>>>>>>> 16:46:04,176 INFO [DeltaManager] Manager
>>>>>>> [/servlet-examples-cluster]:
>>>>>>>> skipping state transfer. No members active in cluster group.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Does this message mean something is not correct.
>>>>>>>> 16:46:04,176 INFO [DeltaManager] Manager
>>>>>>> [/servlet-examples-cluster]:
>>>>>>>> skipping state transfer. No members active in cluster group.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> I still get only 1 value replicated.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Regards
>>>>>>>> Krish
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On 7/10/06, Santosh Koti <Sa...@infosys.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Hi Krishna,
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Well , can u do this way:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> 1) Stop both ur servers
>>>>>>>>> 2) Start server server1
>>>>>>>>> 3) Aftter server server1 is up, start ur server 2
>>>>>>>>> 4) in ur server2 startup console, u should something like
>>>>>>>>> deltamanager[/contextroot]...
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> 5)Chk ur app...?
>>>>>>>>> 6) Have u set jvmroute in config.xml of server2..?
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> PS: U shd not get smething like jvmRoute2 bind /whatever
>>> else...?!!
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>>>>>> Santosh.
>>>>>>>>> "Don't talk about yourself; it will be done when you leave. "
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> -----Original Message-----
>>>>>>>>> From: Krishnakumar B [mailto:www.bkk@gmail.com]
>>>>>>>>> Sent: Monday, July 10, 2006 3:55 PM
>>>>>>>>> To: user@geronimo.apache.org
>>>>>>>>> Subject: Geronimo clustering
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> I am trying out geronimo clustering example. I seem to have a
>>>>>>> problem
>>>>>>>>> with Session Failover.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> I am using Apache HTTP server 2.0.58 and mod_jk 1.2.15 and
>>>>>>> geronimo 1.1
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> I create two session variables in server 1 - server1-1 = 1 &
>>>>>>> server1-2 =
>>>>>>>>> 2
>>>>>>>>> I stop server1. Only server1-2 = 2 replicated in server 2.
>>>>>>>>> Now i add a new variable in server2 server2-1 = 1
>>>>>>>>> Now i start server1
>>>>>>>>> Now i stop server2
>>>>>>>>> I should have server1-1=1, server1-2=2 and server2-1=1 in
> server1
>>>>>>>>> Instead i have only server2-1=1 in server1
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> I am not sure if i am doing something wrong. I have set
>>> jvmRoute in
>>>>>>>>> config.xml, given correct IP address in cluster application
>>> plan and
>>>>>>>>> setup workers.properties.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> I get these messages in server2
>>>>>>>>> 15:38:37,452 WARN [JvmRouteBinderValve] No engine jvmRoute
>>>>>>> attribute
>>>>>>>>> configured!
>>>>>>>>> and
>>>>>>>>> 15:30:57,791 INFO [DeltaManager] Manager
>>>>>>>>> [/servlets-examples-cluster]: skipping state transfer. No
> members
>>>>>>>>> active in cluster group.
>>>>>>>>> though both members of cluster are up and i am able to ping
> both
>>>>>>>>> machines. there are in same subnet.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Thanks for any pointers...
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Regards
>>>>>>>>> Krish
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> **************** CAUTION - Disclaimer *****************
>>>>>>>>> This e-mail contains PRIVILEGED AND CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION
>>>>>>> intended
>>>>>>>>> solely for the use of the addressee(s). If you are not the
>>> intended
>>>>>>>>> recipient, please notify the sender by e-mail and delete the
>>>>>>> original
>>>>>>>>> message. Further, you are not to copy, disclose, or
> distribute
>>> this
>>>>>>>>> e-mail or its contents to any other person and any such
>>> actions are
>>>>>>>>> unlawful. This e-mail may contain viruses. Infosys has taken
>>> every
>>>>>>>>> reasonable precaution to minimize this risk, but is not
> liable
>>>>>>> for any
>>>>>>>>> damage you may sustain as a result of any virus in this
>>> e-mail. You
>>>>>>>>> should carry out your own virus checks before opening the
>>> e-mail or
>>>>>>>>> attachment. Infosys reserves the right to monitor and review
> the
>>>>>>>>> content of all messages sent to or from this e-mail address.
>>>>>>> Messages
>>>>>>>>> sent to or from this e-mail address may be stored on the
> Infosys
>>>>>>>>> e-mail system.
>>>>>>>>> ***INFOSYS******** End of Disclaimer ********INFOSYS***
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>
>>
Re: Where's the GUI Installer?
Posted by Paul McMahan <pa...@gmail.com>.
Hi Vasily, the installer GUI came a long way during 1.1 but did not
make the release and is not under active development right now (at
least not that I am personally aware of). The source code is still
available in the assemblies directory. Hopefully this work can be
picked back up soon, possibly for 1.2 or later.
Best wishes,
Paul
On 7/13/06, Zakharov, Vasily M <va...@intel.com> wrote:
> Hi, all,
>
> What's about a GUI installer in G1.1 release? Was it "discontinued" or
> something?
>
> In M5 it was available on the site, in 1.0 it was built automatically,
> but in 1.1 I couldn't even find an installer jar after build...
>
> Thank you!
>
> Vasily Zakharov
> Intel Middleware Products Division
>