You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@cocoon.apache.org by "Morrison, John" <Jo...@uk.experian.com> on 2002/08/15 09:58:48 UTC
RE: [VOTE] new cvs modules/lists (was RE: [PROPOSAL] Cocoon-apps
CVS module)
> From: Carsten Ziegeler [mailto:cziegeler@s-und-n.de]
>
> BTW, John, you started this vote in a very clever way: You give
> two alternatives for a vote, but vote for one of them with a
> binding "-1" - so actually, with that "-1" we would have no
> choice ;-) That's a great idea, I will try this, too.
Oops, that wasn't intended :)
I thought that votes were majority rules rather than veto...
J.
PS, so far everyone agrees with me :D (I like this) - are we
missing anybody significant or is this a sign to ask Sam (or
whoever) to create the repros?
=======================================================================
Information in this email and any attachments are confidential, and may
not be copied or used by anyone other than the addressee, nor disclosed
to any third party without our permission. There is no intention to
create any legally binding contract or other commitment through the use
of this email.
Experian Limited (registration number 653331).
Registered office: Talbot House, Talbot Street, Nottingham NG1 5HF
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: cocoon-dev-unsubscribe@xml.apache.org
For additional commands, email: cocoon-dev-help@xml.apache.org
RE: [VOTE] new cvs modules/lists (was RE: [PROPOSAL] Cocoon-apps CVS module)
Posted by Carsten Ziegeler <cz...@s-und-n.de>.
Morrison, John wrote:
>
> > From: Carsten Ziegeler [mailto:cziegeler@s-und-n.de]
> >
> > BTW, John, you started this vote in a very clever way: You give
> > two alternatives for a vote, but vote for one of them with a
> > binding "-1" - so actually, with that "-1" we would have no
> > choice ;-) That's a great idea, I will try this, too.
>
> Oops, that wasn't intended :)
>
> I thought that votes were majority rules rather than veto...
>
> J.
>
> PS, so far everyone agrees with me :D (I like this) - are we
> missing anybody significant or is this a sign to ask Sam (or
> whoever) to create the repros?
>
I think we can now give Sam a sign - there were enough +1s and no
-1...
Carsten
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: cocoon-dev-unsubscribe@xml.apache.org
For additional commands, email: cocoon-dev-help@xml.apache.org