You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@hbase.apache.org by Julian Zhou <ju...@me.com> on 2013/05/03 13:14:59 UTC
Jetty migration from version 6.1.26 to 9 ??
Is there any plan to migrate Jetty from version 6.1.26 (current version
in trunk) to version 9, which has been moved org.eclipse pkg? There are
lots of refactoring and new APIs for HTTP/Servlet/XML related in version
9, which might be able to benefit future HBase development and testcase.
Thanks~
--
Best Regards, Julian
Re: Jetty migration from version 6.1.26 to 9 ??
Posted by Jean-Marc Spaggiari <je...@spaggiari.org>.
Hi Julian,
Maybe you can open a JIRA for that? If this something you are going to work
on?
JM
2013/5/3 Julian Zhou <ju...@me.com>
> Is there any plan to migrate Jetty from version 6.1.26 (current version
> in trunk) to version 9, which has been moved org.eclipse pkg? There are
> lots of refactoring and new APIs for HTTP/Servlet/XML related in version
> 9, which might be able to benefit future HBase development and testcase.
>
> Thanks~
>
> --
> Best Regards, Julian
>
>
Re: Jetty migration from version 6.1.26 to 9 ??
Posted by Julian Zhou <ju...@me.com>.
δΊ 5/5/2013 2:38 AM, Jonathan Hsieh ει:
> +1. to standing pat.
>
> I know we've found problem in jetty in the past and what we have now is
> solid.
>
>
> On Fri, May 3, 2013 at 1:48 PM, Andrew Purtell <ap...@apache.org> wrote:
>
>> We can move when Hadoop does.
>>
>> HOWEVER, it should be the same version used by downstream or we will have
>> classpath issues.
>>
>> Furthermore, any refactoring from 6 to 7 may well need to be done through
>> shims in hadoop-compat modules unless all branches of Hadoop that we
>> support have a release that moves to Jetty 7 (or 9 or whatever).
>>
>> I think we should wait at least until Hadoop makes a move, or if there is a
>> critical reason to do otherwise on our own initiative.
>>
>>
>> On Fri, May 3, 2013 at 12:36 PM, Jean-Marc Spaggiari <
>> jean-marc@spaggiari.org> wrote:
>>
>>> There is some plans for Hadoop to move to Jetty 7.
>>>
>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-8515
>>>
>>> Will that impact us? Might be the opportunity to move HBase to 9?
>>>
>>> 2013/5/3 Andrew Purtell <ap...@apache.org>
>>>
>>>> I would say there has not been a volunteer yet willing to do that
>>>> refactoring and contribute it? Will updating our Jetty dependency cause
>>>> classpath conflicts with Hadoop core code that also uses jetty? We
>>> inherit
>>>> some of their servlets. Does that mean Hadoop core would also need to
>>>> update and refactor?
>>>>
>>>> On Friday, May 3, 2013, Julian Zhou wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Is there any plan to migrate Jetty from version 6.1.26 (current
>> version
>>>>> in trunk) to version 9, which has been moved org.eclipse pkg? There
>> are
>>>>> lots of refactoring and new APIs for HTTP/Servlet/XML related in
>>> version
>>>>> 9, which might be able to benefit future HBase development and
>>> testcase.
>>>>> Thanks~
>>>>>
>>>>> --
>>>>> Best Regards, Julian
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> Best regards,
>>>>
>>>> - Andy
>>>>
>>>> Problems worthy of attack prove their worth by hitting back. - Piet
>> Hein
>>>> (via Tom White)
>>>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Best regards,
>>
>> - Andy
>>
>> Problems worthy of attack prove their worth by hitting back. - Piet Hein
>> (via Tom White)
>>
>
>
Thanks, Jon, Andrew and Jean's pointing out. Ok, yeah, there seems a
workload if migrating to 7 or 7+ version. Standing pat and keeping eyes
on hadoop's action makes sense.
--
Best Regards, Julian
Re: Jetty migration from version 6.1.26 to 9 ??
Posted by Jonathan Hsieh <jo...@cloudera.com>.
+1. to standing pat.
I know we've found problem in jetty in the past and what we have now is
solid.
On Fri, May 3, 2013 at 1:48 PM, Andrew Purtell <ap...@apache.org> wrote:
> We can move when Hadoop does.
>
> HOWEVER, it should be the same version used by downstream or we will have
> classpath issues.
>
> Furthermore, any refactoring from 6 to 7 may well need to be done through
> shims in hadoop-compat modules unless all branches of Hadoop that we
> support have a release that moves to Jetty 7 (or 9 or whatever).
>
> I think we should wait at least until Hadoop makes a move, or if there is a
> critical reason to do otherwise on our own initiative.
>
>
> On Fri, May 3, 2013 at 12:36 PM, Jean-Marc Spaggiari <
> jean-marc@spaggiari.org> wrote:
>
> > There is some plans for Hadoop to move to Jetty 7.
> >
> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-8515
> >
> > Will that impact us? Might be the opportunity to move HBase to 9?
> >
> > 2013/5/3 Andrew Purtell <ap...@apache.org>
> >
> > > I would say there has not been a volunteer yet willing to do that
> > > refactoring and contribute it? Will updating our Jetty dependency cause
> > > classpath conflicts with Hadoop core code that also uses jetty? We
> > inherit
> > > some of their servlets. Does that mean Hadoop core would also need to
> > > update and refactor?
> > >
> > > On Friday, May 3, 2013, Julian Zhou wrote:
> > >
> > > > Is there any plan to migrate Jetty from version 6.1.26 (current
> version
> > > > in trunk) to version 9, which has been moved org.eclipse pkg? There
> are
> > > > lots of refactoring and new APIs for HTTP/Servlet/XML related in
> > version
> > > > 9, which might be able to benefit future HBase development and
> > testcase.
> > > >
> > > > Thanks~
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > > Best Regards, Julian
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > Best regards,
> > >
> > > - Andy
> > >
> > > Problems worthy of attack prove their worth by hitting back. - Piet
> Hein
> > > (via Tom White)
> > >
> >
>
>
>
> --
> Best regards,
>
> - Andy
>
> Problems worthy of attack prove their worth by hitting back. - Piet Hein
> (via Tom White)
>
--
// Jonathan Hsieh (shay)
// Software Engineer, Cloudera
// jon@cloudera.com
Re: Jetty migration from version 6.1.26 to 9 ??
Posted by Andrew Purtell <ap...@apache.org>.
We can move when Hadoop does.
HOWEVER, it should be the same version used by downstream or we will have
classpath issues.
Furthermore, any refactoring from 6 to 7 may well need to be done through
shims in hadoop-compat modules unless all branches of Hadoop that we
support have a release that moves to Jetty 7 (or 9 or whatever).
I think we should wait at least until Hadoop makes a move, or if there is a
critical reason to do otherwise on our own initiative.
On Fri, May 3, 2013 at 12:36 PM, Jean-Marc Spaggiari <
jean-marc@spaggiari.org> wrote:
> There is some plans for Hadoop to move to Jetty 7.
>
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-8515
>
> Will that impact us? Might be the opportunity to move HBase to 9?
>
> 2013/5/3 Andrew Purtell <ap...@apache.org>
>
> > I would say there has not been a volunteer yet willing to do that
> > refactoring and contribute it? Will updating our Jetty dependency cause
> > classpath conflicts with Hadoop core code that also uses jetty? We
> inherit
> > some of their servlets. Does that mean Hadoop core would also need to
> > update and refactor?
> >
> > On Friday, May 3, 2013, Julian Zhou wrote:
> >
> > > Is there any plan to migrate Jetty from version 6.1.26 (current version
> > > in trunk) to version 9, which has been moved org.eclipse pkg? There are
> > > lots of refactoring and new APIs for HTTP/Servlet/XML related in
> version
> > > 9, which might be able to benefit future HBase development and
> testcase.
> > >
> > > Thanks~
> > >
> > > --
> > > Best Regards, Julian
> > >
> > >
> >
> > --
> > Best regards,
> >
> > - Andy
> >
> > Problems worthy of attack prove their worth by hitting back. - Piet Hein
> > (via Tom White)
> >
>
--
Best regards,
- Andy
Problems worthy of attack prove their worth by hitting back. - Piet Hein
(via Tom White)
Re: Jetty migration from version 6.1.26 to 9 ??
Posted by Jean-Marc Spaggiari <je...@spaggiari.org>.
There is some plans for Hadoop to move to Jetty 7.
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-8515
Will that impact us? Might be the opportunity to move HBase to 9?
2013/5/3 Andrew Purtell <ap...@apache.org>
> I would say there has not been a volunteer yet willing to do that
> refactoring and contribute it? Will updating our Jetty dependency cause
> classpath conflicts with Hadoop core code that also uses jetty? We inherit
> some of their servlets. Does that mean Hadoop core would also need to
> update and refactor?
>
> On Friday, May 3, 2013, Julian Zhou wrote:
>
> > Is there any plan to migrate Jetty from version 6.1.26 (current version
> > in trunk) to version 9, which has been moved org.eclipse pkg? There are
> > lots of refactoring and new APIs for HTTP/Servlet/XML related in version
> > 9, which might be able to benefit future HBase development and testcase.
> >
> > Thanks~
> >
> > --
> > Best Regards, Julian
> >
> >
>
> --
> Best regards,
>
> - Andy
>
> Problems worthy of attack prove their worth by hitting back. - Piet Hein
> (via Tom White)
>
Re: Jetty migration from version 6.1.26 to 9 ??
Posted by Andrew Purtell <ap...@apache.org>.
I would say there has not been a volunteer yet willing to do that
refactoring and contribute it? Will updating our Jetty dependency cause
classpath conflicts with Hadoop core code that also uses jetty? We inherit
some of their servlets. Does that mean Hadoop core would also need to
update and refactor?
On Friday, May 3, 2013, Julian Zhou wrote:
> Is there any plan to migrate Jetty from version 6.1.26 (current version
> in trunk) to version 9, which has been moved org.eclipse pkg? There are
> lots of refactoring and new APIs for HTTP/Servlet/XML related in version
> 9, which might be able to benefit future HBase development and testcase.
>
> Thanks~
>
> --
> Best Regards, Julian
>
>
--
Best regards,
- Andy
Problems worthy of attack prove their worth by hitting back. - Piet Hein
(via Tom White)