You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to common-user@hadoop.apache.org by Ashish Dobhal <do...@gmail.com> on 2014/07/14 18:19:29 UTC

OIV Compatiblity

Hey everyone ;
Could anyone tell me how to use the OIV tool in hadoop 1.0 as there is no
hdfs.sh file there.
Thanks.

Re: clarification on HBASE functionality

Posted by Andrew Purtell <ap...@apache.org>.
HBase will take advantage of HDFS specific features if they are available
but can run on anything that has a Hadoop FileSystem driver. Gluster is an
option. Maybe Lustre and Ceph also.

If you plan on dedicating storage to Cassandra, then you don't have to
worry about managing a distributed filesystem. However, if you plan to
deploy and use a distributed filesystem for useful work already, and want
to run a scale out store on the same infrastructure, then HBase can be
convenient.

You can run into trouble if using a Hadoop FileSystem implementation that
doesn't guarantee you can immediately read what you've written, so don't
use S3.



On Tue, Jul 15, 2014 at 9:20 AM, Jay Vyas <ja...@gmail.com>
wrote:

> Hbase is not harcoded to hdfs: it works on any file system that implements
> the file system interface, we've run it on glusterfs for example.  I assume
> some have also run it on s3 and other alternative file systems .
>
> ** However **
>
> For best performance, direct block io hooks on hdfs can boost high
> throughout applications on hdfs.
>
> Ultimately, the hbase root directory only needs a fully qualified
> FileSystem uri which maps to a FileSystem class.
>
> On Jul 14, 2014, at 5:59 PM, Ted Yu <yu...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Right.
> hbase is different from Cassandra in this regard.
>
>
> On Mon, Jul 14, 2014 at 2:57 PM,
> ​​
> Adaryl "Bob" Wakefield, MBA <ad...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>
>>   Now this is different from Cassandra which does NOT use HDFS correct?
>> (Sorry. Don’t know why that needed two emails.)
>>
>> B.
>>
>>  *From:* Ted Yu <yu...@gmail.com>
>> *Sent:* Monday, July 14, 2014 4:53 PM
>> *To:* mailto:user@hadoop.apache.org <us...@hadoop.apache.org>
>> *Subject:* Re: clarification on HBASE functionality
>>
>>  Yes.
>> See http://hbase.apache.org/book.html#arch.hdfs
>>
>>
>> On Mon, Jul 14, 2014 at 2:52 PM, Adaryl "Bob" Wakefield, MBA <
>> adaryl.wakefield@hotmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> HBASE uses HDFS to store it's data correct?
>>>
>>> B.
>>>
>>
>>
>
>


-- 
Best regards,

   - Andy

Problems worthy of attack prove their worth by hitting back. - Piet Hein
(via Tom White)

Re: clarification on HBASE functionality

Posted by Andrew Purtell <ap...@apache.org>.
HBase will take advantage of HDFS specific features if they are available
but can run on anything that has a Hadoop FileSystem driver. Gluster is an
option. Maybe Lustre and Ceph also.

If you plan on dedicating storage to Cassandra, then you don't have to
worry about managing a distributed filesystem. However, if you plan to
deploy and use a distributed filesystem for useful work already, and want
to run a scale out store on the same infrastructure, then HBase can be
convenient.

You can run into trouble if using a Hadoop FileSystem implementation that
doesn't guarantee you can immediately read what you've written, so don't
use S3.



On Tue, Jul 15, 2014 at 9:20 AM, Jay Vyas <ja...@gmail.com>
wrote:

> Hbase is not harcoded to hdfs: it works on any file system that implements
> the file system interface, we've run it on glusterfs for example.  I assume
> some have also run it on s3 and other alternative file systems .
>
> ** However **
>
> For best performance, direct block io hooks on hdfs can boost high
> throughout applications on hdfs.
>
> Ultimately, the hbase root directory only needs a fully qualified
> FileSystem uri which maps to a FileSystem class.
>
> On Jul 14, 2014, at 5:59 PM, Ted Yu <yu...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Right.
> hbase is different from Cassandra in this regard.
>
>
> On Mon, Jul 14, 2014 at 2:57 PM,
> ​​
> Adaryl "Bob" Wakefield, MBA <ad...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>
>>   Now this is different from Cassandra which does NOT use HDFS correct?
>> (Sorry. Don’t know why that needed two emails.)
>>
>> B.
>>
>>  *From:* Ted Yu <yu...@gmail.com>
>> *Sent:* Monday, July 14, 2014 4:53 PM
>> *To:* mailto:user@hadoop.apache.org <us...@hadoop.apache.org>
>> *Subject:* Re: clarification on HBASE functionality
>>
>>  Yes.
>> See http://hbase.apache.org/book.html#arch.hdfs
>>
>>
>> On Mon, Jul 14, 2014 at 2:52 PM, Adaryl "Bob" Wakefield, MBA <
>> adaryl.wakefield@hotmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> HBASE uses HDFS to store it's data correct?
>>>
>>> B.
>>>
>>
>>
>
>


-- 
Best regards,

   - Andy

Problems worthy of attack prove their worth by hitting back. - Piet Hein
(via Tom White)

Re: clarification on HBASE functionality

Posted by Andrew Purtell <ap...@apache.org>.
HBase will take advantage of HDFS specific features if they are available
but can run on anything that has a Hadoop FileSystem driver. Gluster is an
option. Maybe Lustre and Ceph also.

If you plan on dedicating storage to Cassandra, then you don't have to
worry about managing a distributed filesystem. However, if you plan to
deploy and use a distributed filesystem for useful work already, and want
to run a scale out store on the same infrastructure, then HBase can be
convenient.

You can run into trouble if using a Hadoop FileSystem implementation that
doesn't guarantee you can immediately read what you've written, so don't
use S3.



On Tue, Jul 15, 2014 at 9:20 AM, Jay Vyas <ja...@gmail.com>
wrote:

> Hbase is not harcoded to hdfs: it works on any file system that implements
> the file system interface, we've run it on glusterfs for example.  I assume
> some have also run it on s3 and other alternative file systems .
>
> ** However **
>
> For best performance, direct block io hooks on hdfs can boost high
> throughout applications on hdfs.
>
> Ultimately, the hbase root directory only needs a fully qualified
> FileSystem uri which maps to a FileSystem class.
>
> On Jul 14, 2014, at 5:59 PM, Ted Yu <yu...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Right.
> hbase is different from Cassandra in this regard.
>
>
> On Mon, Jul 14, 2014 at 2:57 PM,
> ​​
> Adaryl "Bob" Wakefield, MBA <ad...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>
>>   Now this is different from Cassandra which does NOT use HDFS correct?
>> (Sorry. Don’t know why that needed two emails.)
>>
>> B.
>>
>>  *From:* Ted Yu <yu...@gmail.com>
>> *Sent:* Monday, July 14, 2014 4:53 PM
>> *To:* mailto:user@hadoop.apache.org <us...@hadoop.apache.org>
>> *Subject:* Re: clarification on HBASE functionality
>>
>>  Yes.
>> See http://hbase.apache.org/book.html#arch.hdfs
>>
>>
>> On Mon, Jul 14, 2014 at 2:52 PM, Adaryl "Bob" Wakefield, MBA <
>> adaryl.wakefield@hotmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> HBASE uses HDFS to store it's data correct?
>>>
>>> B.
>>>
>>
>>
>
>


-- 
Best regards,

   - Andy

Problems worthy of attack prove their worth by hitting back. - Piet Hein
(via Tom White)

Re: clarification on HBASE functionality

Posted by Andrew Purtell <ap...@apache.org>.
HBase will take advantage of HDFS specific features if they are available
but can run on anything that has a Hadoop FileSystem driver. Gluster is an
option. Maybe Lustre and Ceph also.

If you plan on dedicating storage to Cassandra, then you don't have to
worry about managing a distributed filesystem. However, if you plan to
deploy and use a distributed filesystem for useful work already, and want
to run a scale out store on the same infrastructure, then HBase can be
convenient.

You can run into trouble if using a Hadoop FileSystem implementation that
doesn't guarantee you can immediately read what you've written, so don't
use S3.



On Tue, Jul 15, 2014 at 9:20 AM, Jay Vyas <ja...@gmail.com>
wrote:

> Hbase is not harcoded to hdfs: it works on any file system that implements
> the file system interface, we've run it on glusterfs for example.  I assume
> some have also run it on s3 and other alternative file systems .
>
> ** However **
>
> For best performance, direct block io hooks on hdfs can boost high
> throughout applications on hdfs.
>
> Ultimately, the hbase root directory only needs a fully qualified
> FileSystem uri which maps to a FileSystem class.
>
> On Jul 14, 2014, at 5:59 PM, Ted Yu <yu...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Right.
> hbase is different from Cassandra in this regard.
>
>
> On Mon, Jul 14, 2014 at 2:57 PM,
> ​​
> Adaryl "Bob" Wakefield, MBA <ad...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>
>>   Now this is different from Cassandra which does NOT use HDFS correct?
>> (Sorry. Don’t know why that needed two emails.)
>>
>> B.
>>
>>  *From:* Ted Yu <yu...@gmail.com>
>> *Sent:* Monday, July 14, 2014 4:53 PM
>> *To:* mailto:user@hadoop.apache.org <us...@hadoop.apache.org>
>> *Subject:* Re: clarification on HBASE functionality
>>
>>  Yes.
>> See http://hbase.apache.org/book.html#arch.hdfs
>>
>>
>> On Mon, Jul 14, 2014 at 2:52 PM, Adaryl "Bob" Wakefield, MBA <
>> adaryl.wakefield@hotmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> HBASE uses HDFS to store it's data correct?
>>>
>>> B.
>>>
>>
>>
>
>


-- 
Best regards,

   - Andy

Problems worthy of attack prove their worth by hitting back. - Piet Hein
(via Tom White)

Re: clarification on HBASE functionality

Posted by Jay Vyas <ja...@gmail.com>.
Hbase is not harcoded to hdfs: it works on any file system that implements the file system interface, we've run it on glusterfs for example.  I assume some have also run it on s3 and other alternative file systems .

** However ** 

For best performance, direct block io hooks on hdfs can boost high throughout applications on hdfs.

Ultimately, the hbase root directory only needs a fully qualified FileSystem uri which maps to a FileSystem class.

> On Jul 14, 2014, at 5:59 PM, Ted Yu <yu...@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> Right.
> hbase is different from Cassandra in this regard.
> 
> 
>> On Mon, Jul 14, 2014 at 2:57 PM, Adaryl "Bob" Wakefield, MBA <ad...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>> Now this is different from Cassandra which does NOT use HDFS correct?  (Sorry. Don’t know why that needed two emails.)
>>  
>> B.
>>  
>> From: Ted Yu
>> Sent: Monday, July 14, 2014 4:53 PM
>> To: mailto:user@hadoop.apache.org
>> Subject: Re: clarification on HBASE functionality
>>  
>> Yes.
>> See http://hbase.apache.org/book.html#arch.hdfs
>> 
>> 
>>> On Mon, Jul 14, 2014 at 2:52 PM, Adaryl "Bob" Wakefield, MBA <ad...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>>> HBASE uses HDFS to store it's data correct?
>>> 
>>> B.
>

Re: clarification on HBASE functionality

Posted by Jay Vyas <ja...@gmail.com>.
Hbase is not harcoded to hdfs: it works on any file system that implements the file system interface, we've run it on glusterfs for example.  I assume some have also run it on s3 and other alternative file systems .

** However ** 

For best performance, direct block io hooks on hdfs can boost high throughout applications on hdfs.

Ultimately, the hbase root directory only needs a fully qualified FileSystem uri which maps to a FileSystem class.

> On Jul 14, 2014, at 5:59 PM, Ted Yu <yu...@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> Right.
> hbase is different from Cassandra in this regard.
> 
> 
>> On Mon, Jul 14, 2014 at 2:57 PM, Adaryl "Bob" Wakefield, MBA <ad...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>> Now this is different from Cassandra which does NOT use HDFS correct?  (Sorry. Don’t know why that needed two emails.)
>>  
>> B.
>>  
>> From: Ted Yu
>> Sent: Monday, July 14, 2014 4:53 PM
>> To: mailto:user@hadoop.apache.org
>> Subject: Re: clarification on HBASE functionality
>>  
>> Yes.
>> See http://hbase.apache.org/book.html#arch.hdfs
>> 
>> 
>>> On Mon, Jul 14, 2014 at 2:52 PM, Adaryl "Bob" Wakefield, MBA <ad...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>>> HBASE uses HDFS to store it's data correct?
>>> 
>>> B.
>

Re: clarification on HBASE functionality

Posted by Jay Vyas <ja...@gmail.com>.
Hbase is not harcoded to hdfs: it works on any file system that implements the file system interface, we've run it on glusterfs for example.  I assume some have also run it on s3 and other alternative file systems .

** However ** 

For best performance, direct block io hooks on hdfs can boost high throughout applications on hdfs.

Ultimately, the hbase root directory only needs a fully qualified FileSystem uri which maps to a FileSystem class.

> On Jul 14, 2014, at 5:59 PM, Ted Yu <yu...@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> Right.
> hbase is different from Cassandra in this regard.
> 
> 
>> On Mon, Jul 14, 2014 at 2:57 PM, Adaryl "Bob" Wakefield, MBA <ad...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>> Now this is different from Cassandra which does NOT use HDFS correct?  (Sorry. Don’t know why that needed two emails.)
>>  
>> B.
>>  
>> From: Ted Yu
>> Sent: Monday, July 14, 2014 4:53 PM
>> To: mailto:user@hadoop.apache.org
>> Subject: Re: clarification on HBASE functionality
>>  
>> Yes.
>> See http://hbase.apache.org/book.html#arch.hdfs
>> 
>> 
>>> On Mon, Jul 14, 2014 at 2:52 PM, Adaryl "Bob" Wakefield, MBA <ad...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>>> HBASE uses HDFS to store it's data correct?
>>> 
>>> B.
>

Re: clarification on HBASE functionality

Posted by Jay Vyas <ja...@gmail.com>.
Hbase is not harcoded to hdfs: it works on any file system that implements the file system interface, we've run it on glusterfs for example.  I assume some have also run it on s3 and other alternative file systems .

** However ** 

For best performance, direct block io hooks on hdfs can boost high throughout applications on hdfs.

Ultimately, the hbase root directory only needs a fully qualified FileSystem uri which maps to a FileSystem class.

> On Jul 14, 2014, at 5:59 PM, Ted Yu <yu...@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> Right.
> hbase is different from Cassandra in this regard.
> 
> 
>> On Mon, Jul 14, 2014 at 2:57 PM, Adaryl "Bob" Wakefield, MBA <ad...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>> Now this is different from Cassandra which does NOT use HDFS correct?  (Sorry. Don’t know why that needed two emails.)
>>  
>> B.
>>  
>> From: Ted Yu
>> Sent: Monday, July 14, 2014 4:53 PM
>> To: mailto:user@hadoop.apache.org
>> Subject: Re: clarification on HBASE functionality
>>  
>> Yes.
>> See http://hbase.apache.org/book.html#arch.hdfs
>> 
>> 
>>> On Mon, Jul 14, 2014 at 2:52 PM, Adaryl "Bob" Wakefield, MBA <ad...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>>> HBASE uses HDFS to store it's data correct?
>>> 
>>> B.
>

Re: clarification on HBASE functionality

Posted by Ted Yu <yu...@gmail.com>.
Right.
hbase is different from Cassandra in this regard.


On Mon, Jul 14, 2014 at 2:57 PM, Adaryl "Bob" Wakefield, MBA <
adaryl.wakefield@hotmail.com> wrote:

>   Now this is different from Cassandra which does NOT use HDFS correct?
> (Sorry. Don’t know why that needed two emails.)
>
> B.
>
>  *From:* Ted Yu <yu...@gmail.com>
> *Sent:* Monday, July 14, 2014 4:53 PM
> *To:* mailto:user@hadoop.apache.org <us...@hadoop.apache.org>
> *Subject:* Re: clarification on HBASE functionality
>
>  Yes.
> See http://hbase.apache.org/book.html#arch.hdfs
>
>
> On Mon, Jul 14, 2014 at 2:52 PM, Adaryl "Bob" Wakefield, MBA <
> adaryl.wakefield@hotmail.com> wrote:
>
>> HBASE uses HDFS to store it's data correct?
>>
>> B.
>>
>
>

Re: clarification on HBASE functionality

Posted by Ted Yu <yu...@gmail.com>.
Right.
hbase is different from Cassandra in this regard.


On Mon, Jul 14, 2014 at 2:57 PM, Adaryl "Bob" Wakefield, MBA <
adaryl.wakefield@hotmail.com> wrote:

>   Now this is different from Cassandra which does NOT use HDFS correct?
> (Sorry. Don’t know why that needed two emails.)
>
> B.
>
>  *From:* Ted Yu <yu...@gmail.com>
> *Sent:* Monday, July 14, 2014 4:53 PM
> *To:* mailto:user@hadoop.apache.org <us...@hadoop.apache.org>
> *Subject:* Re: clarification on HBASE functionality
>
>  Yes.
> See http://hbase.apache.org/book.html#arch.hdfs
>
>
> On Mon, Jul 14, 2014 at 2:52 PM, Adaryl "Bob" Wakefield, MBA <
> adaryl.wakefield@hotmail.com> wrote:
>
>> HBASE uses HDFS to store it's data correct?
>>
>> B.
>>
>
>

Re: clarification on HBASE functionality

Posted by Ted Yu <yu...@gmail.com>.
Right.
hbase is different from Cassandra in this regard.


On Mon, Jul 14, 2014 at 2:57 PM, Adaryl "Bob" Wakefield, MBA <
adaryl.wakefield@hotmail.com> wrote:

>   Now this is different from Cassandra which does NOT use HDFS correct?
> (Sorry. Don’t know why that needed two emails.)
>
> B.
>
>  *From:* Ted Yu <yu...@gmail.com>
> *Sent:* Monday, July 14, 2014 4:53 PM
> *To:* mailto:user@hadoop.apache.org <us...@hadoop.apache.org>
> *Subject:* Re: clarification on HBASE functionality
>
>  Yes.
> See http://hbase.apache.org/book.html#arch.hdfs
>
>
> On Mon, Jul 14, 2014 at 2:52 PM, Adaryl "Bob" Wakefield, MBA <
> adaryl.wakefield@hotmail.com> wrote:
>
>> HBASE uses HDFS to store it's data correct?
>>
>> B.
>>
>
>

Re: clarification on HBASE functionality

Posted by Ted Yu <yu...@gmail.com>.
Right.
hbase is different from Cassandra in this regard.


On Mon, Jul 14, 2014 at 2:57 PM, Adaryl "Bob" Wakefield, MBA <
adaryl.wakefield@hotmail.com> wrote:

>   Now this is different from Cassandra which does NOT use HDFS correct?
> (Sorry. Don’t know why that needed two emails.)
>
> B.
>
>  *From:* Ted Yu <yu...@gmail.com>
> *Sent:* Monday, July 14, 2014 4:53 PM
> *To:* mailto:user@hadoop.apache.org <us...@hadoop.apache.org>
> *Subject:* Re: clarification on HBASE functionality
>
>  Yes.
> See http://hbase.apache.org/book.html#arch.hdfs
>
>
> On Mon, Jul 14, 2014 at 2:52 PM, Adaryl "Bob" Wakefield, MBA <
> adaryl.wakefield@hotmail.com> wrote:
>
>> HBASE uses HDFS to store it's data correct?
>>
>> B.
>>
>
>

Re: clarification on HBASE functionality

Posted by "Adaryl \"Bob\" Wakefield, MBA" <ad...@hotmail.com>.
Now this is different from Cassandra which does NOT use HDFS correct? (Sorry. Don’t know why that needed two emails.)

B.

From: Ted Yu 
Sent: Monday, July 14, 2014 4:53 PM
To: mailto:user@hadoop.apache.org 
Subject: Re: clarification on HBASE functionality

Yes. 
See http://hbase.apache.org/book.html#arch.hdfs



On Mon, Jul 14, 2014 at 2:52 PM, Adaryl "Bob" Wakefield, MBA <ad...@hotmail.com> wrote:

  HBASE uses HDFS to store it's data correct?

  B.

Re: clarification on HBASE functionality

Posted by "Adaryl \"Bob\" Wakefield, MBA" <ad...@hotmail.com>.
Now this is different from Cassandra which does NOT use HDFS correct? (Sorry. Don’t know why that needed two emails.)

B.

From: Ted Yu 
Sent: Monday, July 14, 2014 4:53 PM
To: mailto:user@hadoop.apache.org 
Subject: Re: clarification on HBASE functionality

Yes. 
See http://hbase.apache.org/book.html#arch.hdfs



On Mon, Jul 14, 2014 at 2:52 PM, Adaryl "Bob" Wakefield, MBA <ad...@hotmail.com> wrote:

  HBASE uses HDFS to store it's data correct?

  B.

Re: clarification on HBASE functionality

Posted by "Adaryl \"Bob\" Wakefield, MBA" <ad...@hotmail.com>.
Now this is different from Cassandra which does NOT use HDFS correct? (Sorry. Don’t know why that needed two emails.)

B.

From: Ted Yu 
Sent: Monday, July 14, 2014 4:53 PM
To: mailto:user@hadoop.apache.org 
Subject: Re: clarification on HBASE functionality

Yes. 
See http://hbase.apache.org/book.html#arch.hdfs



On Mon, Jul 14, 2014 at 2:52 PM, Adaryl "Bob" Wakefield, MBA <ad...@hotmail.com> wrote:

  HBASE uses HDFS to store it's data correct?

  B.

Re: clarification on HBASE functionality

Posted by "Adaryl \"Bob\" Wakefield, MBA" <ad...@hotmail.com>.
Now this is different from Cassandra which does NOT use HDFS correct? (Sorry. Don’t know why that needed two emails.)

B.

From: Ted Yu 
Sent: Monday, July 14, 2014 4:53 PM
To: mailto:user@hadoop.apache.org 
Subject: Re: clarification on HBASE functionality

Yes. 
See http://hbase.apache.org/book.html#arch.hdfs



On Mon, Jul 14, 2014 at 2:52 PM, Adaryl "Bob" Wakefield, MBA <ad...@hotmail.com> wrote:

  HBASE uses HDFS to store it's data correct?

  B.

Re: clarification on HBASE functionality

Posted by Ted Yu <yu...@gmail.com>.
Yes.
See http://hbase.apache.org/book.html#arch.hdfs


On Mon, Jul 14, 2014 at 2:52 PM, Adaryl "Bob" Wakefield, MBA <
adaryl.wakefield@hotmail.com> wrote:

> HBASE uses HDFS to store it's data correct?
>
> B.
>

Re: clarification on HBASE functionality

Posted by Ted Yu <yu...@gmail.com>.
Yes.
See http://hbase.apache.org/book.html#arch.hdfs


On Mon, Jul 14, 2014 at 2:52 PM, Adaryl "Bob" Wakefield, MBA <
adaryl.wakefield@hotmail.com> wrote:

> HBASE uses HDFS to store it's data correct?
>
> B.
>

Re: clarification on HBASE functionality

Posted by Ted Yu <yu...@gmail.com>.
Yes.
See http://hbase.apache.org/book.html#arch.hdfs


On Mon, Jul 14, 2014 at 2:52 PM, Adaryl "Bob" Wakefield, MBA <
adaryl.wakefield@hotmail.com> wrote:

> HBASE uses HDFS to store it's data correct?
>
> B.
>

Re: clarification on HBASE functionality

Posted by Ted Yu <yu...@gmail.com>.
Yes.
See http://hbase.apache.org/book.html#arch.hdfs


On Mon, Jul 14, 2014 at 2:52 PM, Adaryl "Bob" Wakefield, MBA <
adaryl.wakefield@hotmail.com> wrote:

> HBASE uses HDFS to store it's data correct?
>
> B.
>

clarification on HBASE functionality

Posted by "Adaryl \"Bob\" Wakefield, MBA" <ad...@hotmail.com>.
HBASE uses HDFS to store it's data correct?

B.

clarification on HBASE functionality

Posted by "Adaryl \"Bob\" Wakefield, MBA" <ad...@hotmail.com>.
HBASE uses HDFS to store it's data correct?

B.

clarification on HBASE functionality

Posted by "Adaryl \"Bob\" Wakefield, MBA" <ad...@hotmail.com>.
HBASE uses HDFS to store it's data correct?

B.

clarification on HBASE functionality

Posted by "Adaryl \"Bob\" Wakefield, MBA" <ad...@hotmail.com>.
HBASE uses HDFS to store it's data correct?

B.

Re: OIV Compatiblity

Posted by Harsh J <ha...@cloudera.com>.
There shouldn't be any - it basically streams over the existing local
fsimage file.

On Tue, Jul 15, 2014 at 12:21 AM, Ashish Dobhal
<do...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Sir I tried it it works. Are there any issues in downloading the gsimage
> using wget.
>
>
> On Tue, Jul 15, 2014 at 12:17 AM, Harsh J <ha...@cloudera.com> wrote:
>>
>> Sure, you could try that. I've not tested that mix though, and OIV
>> relies on some known formats support, but should hopefully work.
>>
>> On Mon, Jul 14, 2014 at 11:56 PM, Ashish Dobhal
>> <do...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> > Could I download the fsimage of a hadoop 1.0 using wget and then
>> > interpret
>> > it in offline mode using the tool in the hadoop 1.2 or higher
>> > distributions.I guess the structure of fsimage would be same for both
>> > the
>> > distributions.
>> >
>> >
>> > On Mon, Jul 14, 2014 at 11:53 PM, Ashish Dobhal
>> > <do...@gmail.com>
>> > wrote:
>> >>
>> >> Harsh thanks
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> On Mon, Jul 14, 2014 at 11:39 PM, Harsh J <ha...@cloudera.com> wrote:
>> >>>
>> >>> The OIV for 1.x series is available in release 1.2.0 and higher. You
>> >>> can use it from the 'hadoop oiv' command.
>> >>>
>> >>> It is not available in 1.0.x.
>> >>>
>> >>> On Mon, Jul 14, 2014 at 9:49 PM, Ashish Dobhal
>> >>> <do...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> >>> > Hey everyone ;
>> >>> > Could anyone tell me how to use the OIV tool in hadoop 1.0 as there
>> >>> > is
>> >>> > no
>> >>> > hdfs.sh file there.
>> >>> > Thanks.
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>> --
>> >>> Harsh J
>> >>
>> >>
>> >
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Harsh J
>
>



-- 
Harsh J

Re: OIV Compatiblity

Posted by Harsh J <ha...@cloudera.com>.
There shouldn't be any - it basically streams over the existing local
fsimage file.

On Tue, Jul 15, 2014 at 12:21 AM, Ashish Dobhal
<do...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Sir I tried it it works. Are there any issues in downloading the gsimage
> using wget.
>
>
> On Tue, Jul 15, 2014 at 12:17 AM, Harsh J <ha...@cloudera.com> wrote:
>>
>> Sure, you could try that. I've not tested that mix though, and OIV
>> relies on some known formats support, but should hopefully work.
>>
>> On Mon, Jul 14, 2014 at 11:56 PM, Ashish Dobhal
>> <do...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> > Could I download the fsimage of a hadoop 1.0 using wget and then
>> > interpret
>> > it in offline mode using the tool in the hadoop 1.2 or higher
>> > distributions.I guess the structure of fsimage would be same for both
>> > the
>> > distributions.
>> >
>> >
>> > On Mon, Jul 14, 2014 at 11:53 PM, Ashish Dobhal
>> > <do...@gmail.com>
>> > wrote:
>> >>
>> >> Harsh thanks
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> On Mon, Jul 14, 2014 at 11:39 PM, Harsh J <ha...@cloudera.com> wrote:
>> >>>
>> >>> The OIV for 1.x series is available in release 1.2.0 and higher. You
>> >>> can use it from the 'hadoop oiv' command.
>> >>>
>> >>> It is not available in 1.0.x.
>> >>>
>> >>> On Mon, Jul 14, 2014 at 9:49 PM, Ashish Dobhal
>> >>> <do...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> >>> > Hey everyone ;
>> >>> > Could anyone tell me how to use the OIV tool in hadoop 1.0 as there
>> >>> > is
>> >>> > no
>> >>> > hdfs.sh file there.
>> >>> > Thanks.
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>> --
>> >>> Harsh J
>> >>
>> >>
>> >
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Harsh J
>
>



-- 
Harsh J

Re: OIV Compatiblity

Posted by Harsh J <ha...@cloudera.com>.
There shouldn't be any - it basically streams over the existing local
fsimage file.

On Tue, Jul 15, 2014 at 12:21 AM, Ashish Dobhal
<do...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Sir I tried it it works. Are there any issues in downloading the gsimage
> using wget.
>
>
> On Tue, Jul 15, 2014 at 12:17 AM, Harsh J <ha...@cloudera.com> wrote:
>>
>> Sure, you could try that. I've not tested that mix though, and OIV
>> relies on some known formats support, but should hopefully work.
>>
>> On Mon, Jul 14, 2014 at 11:56 PM, Ashish Dobhal
>> <do...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> > Could I download the fsimage of a hadoop 1.0 using wget and then
>> > interpret
>> > it in offline mode using the tool in the hadoop 1.2 or higher
>> > distributions.I guess the structure of fsimage would be same for both
>> > the
>> > distributions.
>> >
>> >
>> > On Mon, Jul 14, 2014 at 11:53 PM, Ashish Dobhal
>> > <do...@gmail.com>
>> > wrote:
>> >>
>> >> Harsh thanks
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> On Mon, Jul 14, 2014 at 11:39 PM, Harsh J <ha...@cloudera.com> wrote:
>> >>>
>> >>> The OIV for 1.x series is available in release 1.2.0 and higher. You
>> >>> can use it from the 'hadoop oiv' command.
>> >>>
>> >>> It is not available in 1.0.x.
>> >>>
>> >>> On Mon, Jul 14, 2014 at 9:49 PM, Ashish Dobhal
>> >>> <do...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> >>> > Hey everyone ;
>> >>> > Could anyone tell me how to use the OIV tool in hadoop 1.0 as there
>> >>> > is
>> >>> > no
>> >>> > hdfs.sh file there.
>> >>> > Thanks.
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>> --
>> >>> Harsh J
>> >>
>> >>
>> >
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Harsh J
>
>



-- 
Harsh J

Re: OIV Compatiblity

Posted by Harsh J <ha...@cloudera.com>.
There shouldn't be any - it basically streams over the existing local
fsimage file.

On Tue, Jul 15, 2014 at 12:21 AM, Ashish Dobhal
<do...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Sir I tried it it works. Are there any issues in downloading the gsimage
> using wget.
>
>
> On Tue, Jul 15, 2014 at 12:17 AM, Harsh J <ha...@cloudera.com> wrote:
>>
>> Sure, you could try that. I've not tested that mix though, and OIV
>> relies on some known formats support, but should hopefully work.
>>
>> On Mon, Jul 14, 2014 at 11:56 PM, Ashish Dobhal
>> <do...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> > Could I download the fsimage of a hadoop 1.0 using wget and then
>> > interpret
>> > it in offline mode using the tool in the hadoop 1.2 or higher
>> > distributions.I guess the structure of fsimage would be same for both
>> > the
>> > distributions.
>> >
>> >
>> > On Mon, Jul 14, 2014 at 11:53 PM, Ashish Dobhal
>> > <do...@gmail.com>
>> > wrote:
>> >>
>> >> Harsh thanks
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> On Mon, Jul 14, 2014 at 11:39 PM, Harsh J <ha...@cloudera.com> wrote:
>> >>>
>> >>> The OIV for 1.x series is available in release 1.2.0 and higher. You
>> >>> can use it from the 'hadoop oiv' command.
>> >>>
>> >>> It is not available in 1.0.x.
>> >>>
>> >>> On Mon, Jul 14, 2014 at 9:49 PM, Ashish Dobhal
>> >>> <do...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> >>> > Hey everyone ;
>> >>> > Could anyone tell me how to use the OIV tool in hadoop 1.0 as there
>> >>> > is
>> >>> > no
>> >>> > hdfs.sh file there.
>> >>> > Thanks.
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>> --
>> >>> Harsh J
>> >>
>> >>
>> >
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Harsh J
>
>



-- 
Harsh J

Re: OIV Compatiblity

Posted by Ashish Dobhal <do...@gmail.com>.
Sir I tried it it works. Are there any issues in downloading the gsimage
using wget.


On Tue, Jul 15, 2014 at 12:17 AM, Harsh J <ha...@cloudera.com> wrote:

> Sure, you could try that. I've not tested that mix though, and OIV
> relies on some known formats support, but should hopefully work.
>
> On Mon, Jul 14, 2014 at 11:56 PM, Ashish Dobhal
> <do...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > Could I download the fsimage of a hadoop 1.0 using wget and then
> interpret
> > it in offline mode using the tool in the hadoop 1.2 or higher
> > distributions.I guess the structure of fsimage would be same for both the
> > distributions.
> >
> >
> > On Mon, Jul 14, 2014 at 11:53 PM, Ashish Dobhal <
> dobhalashish772@gmail.com>
> > wrote:
> >>
> >> Harsh thanks
> >>
> >>
> >> On Mon, Jul 14, 2014 at 11:39 PM, Harsh J <ha...@cloudera.com> wrote:
> >>>
> >>> The OIV for 1.x series is available in release 1.2.0 and higher. You
> >>> can use it from the 'hadoop oiv' command.
> >>>
> >>> It is not available in 1.0.x.
> >>>
> >>> On Mon, Jul 14, 2014 at 9:49 PM, Ashish Dobhal
> >>> <do...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>> > Hey everyone ;
> >>> > Could anyone tell me how to use the OIV tool in hadoop 1.0 as there
> is
> >>> > no
> >>> > hdfs.sh file there.
> >>> > Thanks.
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> --
> >>> Harsh J
> >>
> >>
> >
>
>
>
> --
> Harsh J
>

Re: OIV Compatiblity

Posted by Ashish Dobhal <do...@gmail.com>.
Sir I tried it it works. Are there any issues in downloading the gsimage
using wget.


On Tue, Jul 15, 2014 at 12:17 AM, Harsh J <ha...@cloudera.com> wrote:

> Sure, you could try that. I've not tested that mix though, and OIV
> relies on some known formats support, but should hopefully work.
>
> On Mon, Jul 14, 2014 at 11:56 PM, Ashish Dobhal
> <do...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > Could I download the fsimage of a hadoop 1.0 using wget and then
> interpret
> > it in offline mode using the tool in the hadoop 1.2 or higher
> > distributions.I guess the structure of fsimage would be same for both the
> > distributions.
> >
> >
> > On Mon, Jul 14, 2014 at 11:53 PM, Ashish Dobhal <
> dobhalashish772@gmail.com>
> > wrote:
> >>
> >> Harsh thanks
> >>
> >>
> >> On Mon, Jul 14, 2014 at 11:39 PM, Harsh J <ha...@cloudera.com> wrote:
> >>>
> >>> The OIV for 1.x series is available in release 1.2.0 and higher. You
> >>> can use it from the 'hadoop oiv' command.
> >>>
> >>> It is not available in 1.0.x.
> >>>
> >>> On Mon, Jul 14, 2014 at 9:49 PM, Ashish Dobhal
> >>> <do...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>> > Hey everyone ;
> >>> > Could anyone tell me how to use the OIV tool in hadoop 1.0 as there
> is
> >>> > no
> >>> > hdfs.sh file there.
> >>> > Thanks.
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> --
> >>> Harsh J
> >>
> >>
> >
>
>
>
> --
> Harsh J
>

Re: OIV Compatiblity

Posted by Ashish Dobhal <do...@gmail.com>.
Sir I tried it it works. Are there any issues in downloading the gsimage
using wget.


On Tue, Jul 15, 2014 at 12:17 AM, Harsh J <ha...@cloudera.com> wrote:

> Sure, you could try that. I've not tested that mix though, and OIV
> relies on some known formats support, but should hopefully work.
>
> On Mon, Jul 14, 2014 at 11:56 PM, Ashish Dobhal
> <do...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > Could I download the fsimage of a hadoop 1.0 using wget and then
> interpret
> > it in offline mode using the tool in the hadoop 1.2 or higher
> > distributions.I guess the structure of fsimage would be same for both the
> > distributions.
> >
> >
> > On Mon, Jul 14, 2014 at 11:53 PM, Ashish Dobhal <
> dobhalashish772@gmail.com>
> > wrote:
> >>
> >> Harsh thanks
> >>
> >>
> >> On Mon, Jul 14, 2014 at 11:39 PM, Harsh J <ha...@cloudera.com> wrote:
> >>>
> >>> The OIV for 1.x series is available in release 1.2.0 and higher. You
> >>> can use it from the 'hadoop oiv' command.
> >>>
> >>> It is not available in 1.0.x.
> >>>
> >>> On Mon, Jul 14, 2014 at 9:49 PM, Ashish Dobhal
> >>> <do...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>> > Hey everyone ;
> >>> > Could anyone tell me how to use the OIV tool in hadoop 1.0 as there
> is
> >>> > no
> >>> > hdfs.sh file there.
> >>> > Thanks.
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> --
> >>> Harsh J
> >>
> >>
> >
>
>
>
> --
> Harsh J
>

Re: OIV Compatiblity

Posted by Ashish Dobhal <do...@gmail.com>.
Sir I tried it it works. Are there any issues in downloading the gsimage
using wget.


On Tue, Jul 15, 2014 at 12:17 AM, Harsh J <ha...@cloudera.com> wrote:

> Sure, you could try that. I've not tested that mix though, and OIV
> relies on some known formats support, but should hopefully work.
>
> On Mon, Jul 14, 2014 at 11:56 PM, Ashish Dobhal
> <do...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > Could I download the fsimage of a hadoop 1.0 using wget and then
> interpret
> > it in offline mode using the tool in the hadoop 1.2 or higher
> > distributions.I guess the structure of fsimage would be same for both the
> > distributions.
> >
> >
> > On Mon, Jul 14, 2014 at 11:53 PM, Ashish Dobhal <
> dobhalashish772@gmail.com>
> > wrote:
> >>
> >> Harsh thanks
> >>
> >>
> >> On Mon, Jul 14, 2014 at 11:39 PM, Harsh J <ha...@cloudera.com> wrote:
> >>>
> >>> The OIV for 1.x series is available in release 1.2.0 and higher. You
> >>> can use it from the 'hadoop oiv' command.
> >>>
> >>> It is not available in 1.0.x.
> >>>
> >>> On Mon, Jul 14, 2014 at 9:49 PM, Ashish Dobhal
> >>> <do...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>> > Hey everyone ;
> >>> > Could anyone tell me how to use the OIV tool in hadoop 1.0 as there
> is
> >>> > no
> >>> > hdfs.sh file there.
> >>> > Thanks.
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> --
> >>> Harsh J
> >>
> >>
> >
>
>
>
> --
> Harsh J
>

Re: OIV Compatiblity

Posted by Harsh J <ha...@cloudera.com>.
Sure, you could try that. I've not tested that mix though, and OIV
relies on some known formats support, but should hopefully work.

On Mon, Jul 14, 2014 at 11:56 PM, Ashish Dobhal
<do...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Could I download the fsimage of a hadoop 1.0 using wget and then interpret
> it in offline mode using the tool in the hadoop 1.2 or higher
> distributions.I guess the structure of fsimage would be same for both the
> distributions.
>
>
> On Mon, Jul 14, 2014 at 11:53 PM, Ashish Dobhal <do...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>>
>> Harsh thanks
>>
>>
>> On Mon, Jul 14, 2014 at 11:39 PM, Harsh J <ha...@cloudera.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> The OIV for 1.x series is available in release 1.2.0 and higher. You
>>> can use it from the 'hadoop oiv' command.
>>>
>>> It is not available in 1.0.x.
>>>
>>> On Mon, Jul 14, 2014 at 9:49 PM, Ashish Dobhal
>>> <do...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> > Hey everyone ;
>>> > Could anyone tell me how to use the OIV tool in hadoop 1.0 as there is
>>> > no
>>> > hdfs.sh file there.
>>> > Thanks.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> Harsh J
>>
>>
>



-- 
Harsh J

Re: OIV Compatiblity

Posted by Harsh J <ha...@cloudera.com>.
Sure, you could try that. I've not tested that mix though, and OIV
relies on some known formats support, but should hopefully work.

On Mon, Jul 14, 2014 at 11:56 PM, Ashish Dobhal
<do...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Could I download the fsimage of a hadoop 1.0 using wget and then interpret
> it in offline mode using the tool in the hadoop 1.2 or higher
> distributions.I guess the structure of fsimage would be same for both the
> distributions.
>
>
> On Mon, Jul 14, 2014 at 11:53 PM, Ashish Dobhal <do...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>>
>> Harsh thanks
>>
>>
>> On Mon, Jul 14, 2014 at 11:39 PM, Harsh J <ha...@cloudera.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> The OIV for 1.x series is available in release 1.2.0 and higher. You
>>> can use it from the 'hadoop oiv' command.
>>>
>>> It is not available in 1.0.x.
>>>
>>> On Mon, Jul 14, 2014 at 9:49 PM, Ashish Dobhal
>>> <do...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> > Hey everyone ;
>>> > Could anyone tell me how to use the OIV tool in hadoop 1.0 as there is
>>> > no
>>> > hdfs.sh file there.
>>> > Thanks.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> Harsh J
>>
>>
>



-- 
Harsh J

Re: OIV Compatiblity

Posted by Harsh J <ha...@cloudera.com>.
Sure, you could try that. I've not tested that mix though, and OIV
relies on some known formats support, but should hopefully work.

On Mon, Jul 14, 2014 at 11:56 PM, Ashish Dobhal
<do...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Could I download the fsimage of a hadoop 1.0 using wget and then interpret
> it in offline mode using the tool in the hadoop 1.2 or higher
> distributions.I guess the structure of fsimage would be same for both the
> distributions.
>
>
> On Mon, Jul 14, 2014 at 11:53 PM, Ashish Dobhal <do...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>>
>> Harsh thanks
>>
>>
>> On Mon, Jul 14, 2014 at 11:39 PM, Harsh J <ha...@cloudera.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> The OIV for 1.x series is available in release 1.2.0 and higher. You
>>> can use it from the 'hadoop oiv' command.
>>>
>>> It is not available in 1.0.x.
>>>
>>> On Mon, Jul 14, 2014 at 9:49 PM, Ashish Dobhal
>>> <do...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> > Hey everyone ;
>>> > Could anyone tell me how to use the OIV tool in hadoop 1.0 as there is
>>> > no
>>> > hdfs.sh file there.
>>> > Thanks.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> Harsh J
>>
>>
>



-- 
Harsh J

Re: OIV Compatiblity

Posted by Harsh J <ha...@cloudera.com>.
Sure, you could try that. I've not tested that mix though, and OIV
relies on some known formats support, but should hopefully work.

On Mon, Jul 14, 2014 at 11:56 PM, Ashish Dobhal
<do...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Could I download the fsimage of a hadoop 1.0 using wget and then interpret
> it in offline mode using the tool in the hadoop 1.2 or higher
> distributions.I guess the structure of fsimage would be same for both the
> distributions.
>
>
> On Mon, Jul 14, 2014 at 11:53 PM, Ashish Dobhal <do...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>>
>> Harsh thanks
>>
>>
>> On Mon, Jul 14, 2014 at 11:39 PM, Harsh J <ha...@cloudera.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> The OIV for 1.x series is available in release 1.2.0 and higher. You
>>> can use it from the 'hadoop oiv' command.
>>>
>>> It is not available in 1.0.x.
>>>
>>> On Mon, Jul 14, 2014 at 9:49 PM, Ashish Dobhal
>>> <do...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> > Hey everyone ;
>>> > Could anyone tell me how to use the OIV tool in hadoop 1.0 as there is
>>> > no
>>> > hdfs.sh file there.
>>> > Thanks.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> Harsh J
>>
>>
>



-- 
Harsh J

Re: OIV Compatiblity

Posted by Ashish Dobhal <do...@gmail.com>.
Could I download the fsimage of a hadoop 1.0 using wget and then interpret
it in offline mode using the tool in the hadoop 1.2 or higher
distributions.I guess the structure of fsimage would be same for both the
distributions.


On Mon, Jul 14, 2014 at 11:53 PM, Ashish Dobhal <do...@gmail.com>
wrote:

> Harsh thanks
>
>
> On Mon, Jul 14, 2014 at 11:39 PM, Harsh J <ha...@cloudera.com> wrote:
>
>> The OIV for 1.x series is available in release 1.2.0 and higher. You
>> can use it from the 'hadoop oiv' command.
>>
>> It is not available in 1.0.x.
>>
>> On Mon, Jul 14, 2014 at 9:49 PM, Ashish Dobhal
>> <do...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> > Hey everyone ;
>> > Could anyone tell me how to use the OIV tool in hadoop 1.0 as there is
>> no
>> > hdfs.sh file there.
>> > Thanks.
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Harsh J
>>
>
>

Re: OIV Compatiblity

Posted by Ashish Dobhal <do...@gmail.com>.
Could I download the fsimage of a hadoop 1.0 using wget and then interpret
it in offline mode using the tool in the hadoop 1.2 or higher
distributions.I guess the structure of fsimage would be same for both the
distributions.


On Mon, Jul 14, 2014 at 11:53 PM, Ashish Dobhal <do...@gmail.com>
wrote:

> Harsh thanks
>
>
> On Mon, Jul 14, 2014 at 11:39 PM, Harsh J <ha...@cloudera.com> wrote:
>
>> The OIV for 1.x series is available in release 1.2.0 and higher. You
>> can use it from the 'hadoop oiv' command.
>>
>> It is not available in 1.0.x.
>>
>> On Mon, Jul 14, 2014 at 9:49 PM, Ashish Dobhal
>> <do...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> > Hey everyone ;
>> > Could anyone tell me how to use the OIV tool in hadoop 1.0 as there is
>> no
>> > hdfs.sh file there.
>> > Thanks.
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Harsh J
>>
>
>

Re: OIV Compatiblity

Posted by Ashish Dobhal <do...@gmail.com>.
Could I download the fsimage of a hadoop 1.0 using wget and then interpret
it in offline mode using the tool in the hadoop 1.2 or higher
distributions.I guess the structure of fsimage would be same for both the
distributions.


On Mon, Jul 14, 2014 at 11:53 PM, Ashish Dobhal <do...@gmail.com>
wrote:

> Harsh thanks
>
>
> On Mon, Jul 14, 2014 at 11:39 PM, Harsh J <ha...@cloudera.com> wrote:
>
>> The OIV for 1.x series is available in release 1.2.0 and higher. You
>> can use it from the 'hadoop oiv' command.
>>
>> It is not available in 1.0.x.
>>
>> On Mon, Jul 14, 2014 at 9:49 PM, Ashish Dobhal
>> <do...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> > Hey everyone ;
>> > Could anyone tell me how to use the OIV tool in hadoop 1.0 as there is
>> no
>> > hdfs.sh file there.
>> > Thanks.
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Harsh J
>>
>
>

Re: OIV Compatiblity

Posted by Ashish Dobhal <do...@gmail.com>.
Could I download the fsimage of a hadoop 1.0 using wget and then interpret
it in offline mode using the tool in the hadoop 1.2 or higher
distributions.I guess the structure of fsimage would be same for both the
distributions.


On Mon, Jul 14, 2014 at 11:53 PM, Ashish Dobhal <do...@gmail.com>
wrote:

> Harsh thanks
>
>
> On Mon, Jul 14, 2014 at 11:39 PM, Harsh J <ha...@cloudera.com> wrote:
>
>> The OIV for 1.x series is available in release 1.2.0 and higher. You
>> can use it from the 'hadoop oiv' command.
>>
>> It is not available in 1.0.x.
>>
>> On Mon, Jul 14, 2014 at 9:49 PM, Ashish Dobhal
>> <do...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> > Hey everyone ;
>> > Could anyone tell me how to use the OIV tool in hadoop 1.0 as there is
>> no
>> > hdfs.sh file there.
>> > Thanks.
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Harsh J
>>
>
>

Re: OIV Compatiblity

Posted by Ashish Dobhal <do...@gmail.com>.
Harsh thanks


On Mon, Jul 14, 2014 at 11:39 PM, Harsh J <ha...@cloudera.com> wrote:

> The OIV for 1.x series is available in release 1.2.0 and higher. You
> can use it from the 'hadoop oiv' command.
>
> It is not available in 1.0.x.
>
> On Mon, Jul 14, 2014 at 9:49 PM, Ashish Dobhal
> <do...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > Hey everyone ;
> > Could anyone tell me how to use the OIV tool in hadoop 1.0 as there is no
> > hdfs.sh file there.
> > Thanks.
>
>
>
> --
> Harsh J
>

Re: OIV Compatiblity

Posted by Ashish Dobhal <do...@gmail.com>.
Harsh thanks


On Mon, Jul 14, 2014 at 11:39 PM, Harsh J <ha...@cloudera.com> wrote:

> The OIV for 1.x series is available in release 1.2.0 and higher. You
> can use it from the 'hadoop oiv' command.
>
> It is not available in 1.0.x.
>
> On Mon, Jul 14, 2014 at 9:49 PM, Ashish Dobhal
> <do...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > Hey everyone ;
> > Could anyone tell me how to use the OIV tool in hadoop 1.0 as there is no
> > hdfs.sh file there.
> > Thanks.
>
>
>
> --
> Harsh J
>

Re: OIV Compatiblity

Posted by Ashish Dobhal <do...@gmail.com>.
Harsh thanks


On Mon, Jul 14, 2014 at 11:39 PM, Harsh J <ha...@cloudera.com> wrote:

> The OIV for 1.x series is available in release 1.2.0 and higher. You
> can use it from the 'hadoop oiv' command.
>
> It is not available in 1.0.x.
>
> On Mon, Jul 14, 2014 at 9:49 PM, Ashish Dobhal
> <do...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > Hey everyone ;
> > Could anyone tell me how to use the OIV tool in hadoop 1.0 as there is no
> > hdfs.sh file there.
> > Thanks.
>
>
>
> --
> Harsh J
>

Re: OIV Compatiblity

Posted by Ashish Dobhal <do...@gmail.com>.
Harsh thanks


On Mon, Jul 14, 2014 at 11:39 PM, Harsh J <ha...@cloudera.com> wrote:

> The OIV for 1.x series is available in release 1.2.0 and higher. You
> can use it from the 'hadoop oiv' command.
>
> It is not available in 1.0.x.
>
> On Mon, Jul 14, 2014 at 9:49 PM, Ashish Dobhal
> <do...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > Hey everyone ;
> > Could anyone tell me how to use the OIV tool in hadoop 1.0 as there is no
> > hdfs.sh file there.
> > Thanks.
>
>
>
> --
> Harsh J
>

Re: OIV Compatiblity

Posted by Harsh J <ha...@cloudera.com>.
The OIV for 1.x series is available in release 1.2.0 and higher. You
can use it from the 'hadoop oiv' command.

It is not available in 1.0.x.

On Mon, Jul 14, 2014 at 9:49 PM, Ashish Dobhal
<do...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hey everyone ;
> Could anyone tell me how to use the OIV tool in hadoop 1.0 as there is no
> hdfs.sh file there.
> Thanks.



-- 
Harsh J

Re: OIV Compatiblity

Posted by Harsh J <ha...@cloudera.com>.
The OIV for 1.x series is available in release 1.2.0 and higher. You
can use it from the 'hadoop oiv' command.

It is not available in 1.0.x.

On Mon, Jul 14, 2014 at 9:49 PM, Ashish Dobhal
<do...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hey everyone ;
> Could anyone tell me how to use the OIV tool in hadoop 1.0 as there is no
> hdfs.sh file there.
> Thanks.



-- 
Harsh J

Re: OIV Compatiblity

Posted by Harsh J <ha...@cloudera.com>.
The OIV for 1.x series is available in release 1.2.0 and higher. You
can use it from the 'hadoop oiv' command.

It is not available in 1.0.x.

On Mon, Jul 14, 2014 at 9:49 PM, Ashish Dobhal
<do...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hey everyone ;
> Could anyone tell me how to use the OIV tool in hadoop 1.0 as there is no
> hdfs.sh file there.
> Thanks.



-- 
Harsh J

Re: OIV Compatiblity

Posted by Harsh J <ha...@cloudera.com>.
The OIV for 1.x series is available in release 1.2.0 and higher. You
can use it from the 'hadoop oiv' command.

It is not available in 1.0.x.

On Mon, Jul 14, 2014 at 9:49 PM, Ashish Dobhal
<do...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hey everyone ;
> Could anyone tell me how to use the OIV tool in hadoop 1.0 as there is no
> hdfs.sh file there.
> Thanks.



-- 
Harsh J