You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@cordova.apache.org by Shazron <sh...@gmail.com> on 2012/12/13 20:37:00 UTC
Who runs http://cordova-filetransfer.jitsu.com
It's erroring out for mobile-spec testing.
I'm wondering if we could just run a local server for the FileTransfer
tests instead - if the server was in python we could just invoke this on
the mobile-spec folder:
python -m SimpleHTTPServer
Re: Who runs http://cordova-filetransfer.jitsu.com
Posted by Filip Maj <fi...@adobe.com>.
Marcel, that would be useful, but we also have to be mindful of Windows
committers on this project.
I will explore the VM option and get back to this thread once I figure out
what's-what.
On 12/14/12 9:05 AM, "Marcel Kinard" <cm...@gmail.com> wrote:
>Would something like this be useful as a utility in the mobile-spec repo?
>
>file: testUploadService
>
># This shell script is meant to run on OSX/Linux/Unix to test that the
>online
># service required for the FileTransfer tests is actually up and running
>ok.
># This is not meant to run on a handset device.
>
>set -o xtrace
>set -o errexit
>
>SUCCESFUL=0
>trap on_exit EXIT
>
>CONTENT=upload-content.txt
>HEADERS=upload-headers.txt
>OUTPUT=upload-output.txt
>
>function on_exit() {
> if [ $SUCCESFUL -ne 1 ]
> then
> echo "Encountered an error. Look above. Not removing data files."
>1>&2
> else
> rm $CONTENT
> rm $HEADERS
> rm $OUTPUT
> echo "Successful."
> fi
>}
>
>echo "Checking upload service on cordova-filetransfer.jitsu.com..."
>date >> $CONTENT
>/usr/bin/curl --form "file=@${CONTENT};filename=${CONTENT}" \
> --dump-header $HEADERS --output $OUTPUT \
> http://cordova-filetransfer.jitsu.com/upload
>grep 'HTTP/1.1 200 OK' $HEADERS
>grep 'received upload:' $OUTPUT
>grep "name: '$CONTENT'" $OUTPUT
>SUCCESFUL=1
>exit 0
Re: Who runs http://cordova-filetransfer.jitsu.com
Posted by Marcel Kinard <cm...@gmail.com>.
Would something like this be useful as a utility in the mobile-spec repo?
file: testUploadService
# This shell script is meant to run on OSX/Linux/Unix to test that the
online
# service required for the FileTransfer tests is actually up and running ok.
# This is not meant to run on a handset device.
set -o xtrace
set -o errexit
SUCCESFUL=0
trap on_exit EXIT
CONTENT=upload-content.txt
HEADERS=upload-headers.txt
OUTPUT=upload-output.txt
function on_exit() {
if [ $SUCCESFUL -ne 1 ]
then
echo "Encountered an error. Look above. Not removing data files."
1>&2
else
rm $CONTENT
rm $HEADERS
rm $OUTPUT
echo "Successful."
fi
}
echo "Checking upload service on cordova-filetransfer.jitsu.com..."
date >> $CONTENT
/usr/bin/curl --form "file=@${CONTENT};filename=${CONTENT}" \
--dump-header $HEADERS --output $OUTPUT \
http://cordova-filetransfer.jitsu.com/upload
grep 'HTTP/1.1 200 OK' $HEADERS
grep 'received upload:' $OUTPUT
grep "name: '$CONTENT'" $OUTPUT
SUCCESFUL=1
exit 0
Re: Who runs http://cordova-filetransfer.jitsu.com
Posted by Filip Maj <fi...@adobe.com>.
Thanks for your quick reply Don, really appreciate it.
On 12/13/12 1:35 PM, "Don Coleman" <do...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
>
>I restarted that server.
>
>I'm working with Fil to get other people admin access on the server until
>we get a better solution.
>
>
>On Thu, Dec 13, 2012 at 4:19 PM, Filip Maj
><fi...@adobe.com> wrote:
>
>CC'ing Don. Don, any chance you can hook our committers up with the jitsu
>instance creds so we can fix some stuff? Might be a good idea to post this
>as a direct reply to me, or the cordova-private list.
>
>On 12/13/12 1:16 PM, "Braden Shepherdson" <br...@chromium.org> wrote:
>
>>-1 to local servers.
>>
>>I don't know about everyone else, but Google's wireless network setup
>>makes
>>hitting a server running on your laptop from a phone hard or impossible.
>>Getting the existing server back up until Apache INFRA can host it for us
>>sounds better to me.
>>
>>Braden
>>
>>
>>On Thu, Dec 13, 2012 at 3:24 PM, Shazron <sh...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> I suppose we could use node. Ideally to test locally the Apache
>>>instance
>>> should run node and the same node script as well.... (another hurdle?)
>>>
>>>
>>> On Thu, Dec 13, 2012 at 12:12 PM, Filip Maj <fi...@adobe.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> > Use node?
>>> >
>>> > On 12/13/12 12:08 PM, "Shazron" <sh...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> >
>>> > >Precisely your last comment about INFRA being open ;) Don't know if
>>>we
>>> can
>>> > >wait that long...
>>> > >
>>> > >If the server scripts are in mobile-spec already, running the python
>>> > >server
>>> > >wouldn't be (much of) a problem as a backup method, but then I
>>>suppose
>>> on
>>> > >Windows you would need to install python also. I can see the hassle
>>>but
>>> at
>>> > >least its only once...
>>> > >
>>> > >
>>> > >On Thu, Dec 13, 2012 at 11:54 AM, Filip Maj <fi...@adobe.com> wrote:
>>> > >
>>> > >> Yeah, but asking testers to run a server every time they run
>>> mobile-spec
>>> > >> might be a bit much. If a constant server is run on apache infra
>>>that
>>> > >>will
>>> > >> respond to HTTP requests that would probably be better.
>>> > >>
>>> > >> The INFRA folk are starting to loathe me, I think, with my
>>>constant
>>> > >> pestering and offhand critiques, so we'll see how open they are to
>>> this
>>> > >> idea :)
>>> > >>
>>> > >> On 12/13/12 11:50 AM, "Shazron" <sh...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> > >>
>>> > >> >That would be great. I suppose if we could run it locally in the
>>> > >>meantime
>>> > >> >off the same server scripts, the better (who knows if a server
>>>goes
>>> > >>down).
>>> > >> >One less dependency I suppose
>>> > >> >
>>> > >> >
>>> > >> >On Thu, Dec 13, 2012 at 11:43 AM, Filip Maj <fi...@adobe.com>
>>>wrote:
>>> > >> >
>>> > >> >> Why don't we get Apache INFRA to set up a simple instance like
>>>this
>>> > >>for
>>> > >> >> us? This way it's not tied to any one person. I can ask INFRA
>>>about
>>> > >>it.
>>> > >> >>
>>> > >> >> On 12/13/12 11:37 AM, "Shazron" <sh...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> > >> >>
>>> > >> >> >It's erroring out for mobile-spec testing.
>>> > >> >> >
>>> > >> >> >I'm wondering if we could just run a local server for the
>>> > >>FileTransfer
>>> > >> >> >tests instead - if the server was in python we could just
>>>invoke
>>> > >>this
>>> > >> >>on
>>> > >> >> >the mobile-spec folder:
>>> > >> >> >
>>> > >> >> >python -m SimpleHTTPServer
>>> > >> >>
>>> > >> >>
>>> > >>
>>> > >>
>>> >
>>> >
>>>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
Re: Who runs http://cordova-filetransfer.jitsu.com
Posted by Don Coleman <do...@gmail.com>.
I restarted that server.
I'm working with Fil to get other people admin access on the server until
we get a better solution.
On Thu, Dec 13, 2012 at 4:19 PM, Filip Maj <fi...@adobe.com> wrote:
> CC'ing Don. Don, any chance you can hook our committers up with the jitsu
> instance creds so we can fix some stuff? Might be a good idea to post this
> as a direct reply to me, or the cordova-private list.
>
> On 12/13/12 1:16 PM, "Braden Shepherdson" <br...@chromium.org> wrote:
>
> >-1 to local servers.
> >
> >I don't know about everyone else, but Google's wireless network setup
> >makes
> >hitting a server running on your laptop from a phone hard or impossible.
> >Getting the existing server back up until Apache INFRA can host it for us
> >sounds better to me.
> >
> >Braden
> >
> >
> >On Thu, Dec 13, 2012 at 3:24 PM, Shazron <sh...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> >> I suppose we could use node. Ideally to test locally the Apache instance
> >> should run node and the same node script as well.... (another hurdle?)
> >>
> >>
> >> On Thu, Dec 13, 2012 at 12:12 PM, Filip Maj <fi...@adobe.com> wrote:
> >>
> >> > Use node?
> >> >
> >> > On 12/13/12 12:08 PM, "Shazron" <sh...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> >
> >> > >Precisely your last comment about INFRA being open ;) Don't know if
> >>we
> >> can
> >> > >wait that long...
> >> > >
> >> > >If the server scripts are in mobile-spec already, running the python
> >> > >server
> >> > >wouldn't be (much of) a problem as a backup method, but then I
> >>suppose
> >> on
> >> > >Windows you would need to install python also. I can see the hassle
> >>but
> >> at
> >> > >least its only once...
> >> > >
> >> > >
> >> > >On Thu, Dec 13, 2012 at 11:54 AM, Filip Maj <fi...@adobe.com> wrote:
> >> > >
> >> > >> Yeah, but asking testers to run a server every time they run
> >> mobile-spec
> >> > >> might be a bit much. If a constant server is run on apache infra
> >>that
> >> > >>will
> >> > >> respond to HTTP requests that would probably be better.
> >> > >>
> >> > >> The INFRA folk are starting to loathe me, I think, with my constant
> >> > >> pestering and offhand critiques, so we'll see how open they are to
> >> this
> >> > >> idea :)
> >> > >>
> >> > >> On 12/13/12 11:50 AM, "Shazron" <sh...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> > >>
> >> > >> >That would be great. I suppose if we could run it locally in the
> >> > >>meantime
> >> > >> >off the same server scripts, the better (who knows if a server
> >>goes
> >> > >>down).
> >> > >> >One less dependency I suppose
> >> > >> >
> >> > >> >
> >> > >> >On Thu, Dec 13, 2012 at 11:43 AM, Filip Maj <fi...@adobe.com>
> wrote:
> >> > >> >
> >> > >> >> Why don't we get Apache INFRA to set up a simple instance like
> >>this
> >> > >>for
> >> > >> >> us? This way it's not tied to any one person. I can ask INFRA
> >>about
> >> > >>it.
> >> > >> >>
> >> > >> >> On 12/13/12 11:37 AM, "Shazron" <sh...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> > >> >>
> >> > >> >> >It's erroring out for mobile-spec testing.
> >> > >> >> >
> >> > >> >> >I'm wondering if we could just run a local server for the
> >> > >>FileTransfer
> >> > >> >> >tests instead - if the server was in python we could just
> >>invoke
> >> > >>this
> >> > >> >>on
> >> > >> >> >the mobile-spec folder:
> >> > >> >> >
> >> > >> >> >python -m SimpleHTTPServer
> >> > >> >>
> >> > >> >>
> >> > >>
> >> > >>
> >> >
> >> >
> >>
>
>
Re: Who runs http://cordova-filetransfer.jitsu.com
Posted by Filip Maj <fi...@adobe.com>.
CC'ing Don. Don, any chance you can hook our committers up with the jitsu
instance creds so we can fix some stuff? Might be a good idea to post this
as a direct reply to me, or the cordova-private list.
On 12/13/12 1:16 PM, "Braden Shepherdson" <br...@chromium.org> wrote:
>-1 to local servers.
>
>I don't know about everyone else, but Google's wireless network setup
>makes
>hitting a server running on your laptop from a phone hard or impossible.
>Getting the existing server back up until Apache INFRA can host it for us
>sounds better to me.
>
>Braden
>
>
>On Thu, Dec 13, 2012 at 3:24 PM, Shazron <sh...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> I suppose we could use node. Ideally to test locally the Apache instance
>> should run node and the same node script as well.... (another hurdle?)
>>
>>
>> On Thu, Dec 13, 2012 at 12:12 PM, Filip Maj <fi...@adobe.com> wrote:
>>
>> > Use node?
>> >
>> > On 12/13/12 12:08 PM, "Shazron" <sh...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> >
>> > >Precisely your last comment about INFRA being open ;) Don't know if
>>we
>> can
>> > >wait that long...
>> > >
>> > >If the server scripts are in mobile-spec already, running the python
>> > >server
>> > >wouldn't be (much of) a problem as a backup method, but then I
>>suppose
>> on
>> > >Windows you would need to install python also. I can see the hassle
>>but
>> at
>> > >least its only once...
>> > >
>> > >
>> > >On Thu, Dec 13, 2012 at 11:54 AM, Filip Maj <fi...@adobe.com> wrote:
>> > >
>> > >> Yeah, but asking testers to run a server every time they run
>> mobile-spec
>> > >> might be a bit much. If a constant server is run on apache infra
>>that
>> > >>will
>> > >> respond to HTTP requests that would probably be better.
>> > >>
>> > >> The INFRA folk are starting to loathe me, I think, with my constant
>> > >> pestering and offhand critiques, so we'll see how open they are to
>> this
>> > >> idea :)
>> > >>
>> > >> On 12/13/12 11:50 AM, "Shazron" <sh...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> > >>
>> > >> >That would be great. I suppose if we could run it locally in the
>> > >>meantime
>> > >> >off the same server scripts, the better (who knows if a server
>>goes
>> > >>down).
>> > >> >One less dependency I suppose
>> > >> >
>> > >> >
>> > >> >On Thu, Dec 13, 2012 at 11:43 AM, Filip Maj <fi...@adobe.com> wrote:
>> > >> >
>> > >> >> Why don't we get Apache INFRA to set up a simple instance like
>>this
>> > >>for
>> > >> >> us? This way it's not tied to any one person. I can ask INFRA
>>about
>> > >>it.
>> > >> >>
>> > >> >> On 12/13/12 11:37 AM, "Shazron" <sh...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> > >> >>
>> > >> >> >It's erroring out for mobile-spec testing.
>> > >> >> >
>> > >> >> >I'm wondering if we could just run a local server for the
>> > >>FileTransfer
>> > >> >> >tests instead - if the server was in python we could just
>>invoke
>> > >>this
>> > >> >>on
>> > >> >> >the mobile-spec folder:
>> > >> >> >
>> > >> >> >python -m SimpleHTTPServer
>> > >> >>
>> > >> >>
>> > >>
>> > >>
>> >
>> >
>>
Re: Who runs http://cordova-filetransfer.jitsu.com
Posted by Braden Shepherdson <br...@chromium.org>.
-1 to local servers.
I don't know about everyone else, but Google's wireless network setup makes
hitting a server running on your laptop from a phone hard or impossible.
Getting the existing server back up until Apache INFRA can host it for us
sounds better to me.
Braden
On Thu, Dec 13, 2012 at 3:24 PM, Shazron <sh...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I suppose we could use node. Ideally to test locally the Apache instance
> should run node and the same node script as well.... (another hurdle?)
>
>
> On Thu, Dec 13, 2012 at 12:12 PM, Filip Maj <fi...@adobe.com> wrote:
>
> > Use node?
> >
> > On 12/13/12 12:08 PM, "Shazron" <sh...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > >Precisely your last comment about INFRA being open ;) Don't know if we
> can
> > >wait that long...
> > >
> > >If the server scripts are in mobile-spec already, running the python
> > >server
> > >wouldn't be (much of) a problem as a backup method, but then I suppose
> on
> > >Windows you would need to install python also. I can see the hassle but
> at
> > >least its only once...
> > >
> > >
> > >On Thu, Dec 13, 2012 at 11:54 AM, Filip Maj <fi...@adobe.com> wrote:
> > >
> > >> Yeah, but asking testers to run a server every time they run
> mobile-spec
> > >> might be a bit much. If a constant server is run on apache infra that
> > >>will
> > >> respond to HTTP requests that would probably be better.
> > >>
> > >> The INFRA folk are starting to loathe me, I think, with my constant
> > >> pestering and offhand critiques, so we'll see how open they are to
> this
> > >> idea :)
> > >>
> > >> On 12/13/12 11:50 AM, "Shazron" <sh...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > >>
> > >> >That would be great. I suppose if we could run it locally in the
> > >>meantime
> > >> >off the same server scripts, the better (who knows if a server goes
> > >>down).
> > >> >One less dependency I suppose
> > >> >
> > >> >
> > >> >On Thu, Dec 13, 2012 at 11:43 AM, Filip Maj <fi...@adobe.com> wrote:
> > >> >
> > >> >> Why don't we get Apache INFRA to set up a simple instance like this
> > >>for
> > >> >> us? This way it's not tied to any one person. I can ask INFRA about
> > >>it.
> > >> >>
> > >> >> On 12/13/12 11:37 AM, "Shazron" <sh...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > >> >>
> > >> >> >It's erroring out for mobile-spec testing.
> > >> >> >
> > >> >> >I'm wondering if we could just run a local server for the
> > >>FileTransfer
> > >> >> >tests instead - if the server was in python we could just invoke
> > >>this
> > >> >>on
> > >> >> >the mobile-spec folder:
> > >> >> >
> > >> >> >python -m SimpleHTTPServer
> > >> >>
> > >> >>
> > >>
> > >>
> >
> >
>
Re: Who runs http://cordova-filetransfer.jitsu.com
Posted by Shazron <sh...@gmail.com>.
I suppose we could use node. Ideally to test locally the Apache instance
should run node and the same node script as well.... (another hurdle?)
On Thu, Dec 13, 2012 at 12:12 PM, Filip Maj <fi...@adobe.com> wrote:
> Use node?
>
> On 12/13/12 12:08 PM, "Shazron" <sh...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> >Precisely your last comment about INFRA being open ;) Don't know if we can
> >wait that long...
> >
> >If the server scripts are in mobile-spec already, running the python
> >server
> >wouldn't be (much of) a problem as a backup method, but then I suppose on
> >Windows you would need to install python also. I can see the hassle but at
> >least its only once...
> >
> >
> >On Thu, Dec 13, 2012 at 11:54 AM, Filip Maj <fi...@adobe.com> wrote:
> >
> >> Yeah, but asking testers to run a server every time they run mobile-spec
> >> might be a bit much. If a constant server is run on apache infra that
> >>will
> >> respond to HTTP requests that would probably be better.
> >>
> >> The INFRA folk are starting to loathe me, I think, with my constant
> >> pestering and offhand critiques, so we'll see how open they are to this
> >> idea :)
> >>
> >> On 12/13/12 11:50 AM, "Shazron" <sh...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>
> >> >That would be great. I suppose if we could run it locally in the
> >>meantime
> >> >off the same server scripts, the better (who knows if a server goes
> >>down).
> >> >One less dependency I suppose
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >On Thu, Dec 13, 2012 at 11:43 AM, Filip Maj <fi...@adobe.com> wrote:
> >> >
> >> >> Why don't we get Apache INFRA to set up a simple instance like this
> >>for
> >> >> us? This way it's not tied to any one person. I can ask INFRA about
> >>it.
> >> >>
> >> >> On 12/13/12 11:37 AM, "Shazron" <sh...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> >>
> >> >> >It's erroring out for mobile-spec testing.
> >> >> >
> >> >> >I'm wondering if we could just run a local server for the
> >>FileTransfer
> >> >> >tests instead - if the server was in python we could just invoke
> >>this
> >> >>on
> >> >> >the mobile-spec folder:
> >> >> >
> >> >> >python -m SimpleHTTPServer
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >>
> >>
>
>
Re: Who runs http://cordova-filetransfer.jitsu.com
Posted by Filip Maj <fi...@adobe.com>.
Use node?
On 12/13/12 12:08 PM, "Shazron" <sh...@gmail.com> wrote:
>Precisely your last comment about INFRA being open ;) Don't know if we can
>wait that long...
>
>If the server scripts are in mobile-spec already, running the python
>server
>wouldn't be (much of) a problem as a backup method, but then I suppose on
>Windows you would need to install python also. I can see the hassle but at
>least its only once...
>
>
>On Thu, Dec 13, 2012 at 11:54 AM, Filip Maj <fi...@adobe.com> wrote:
>
>> Yeah, but asking testers to run a server every time they run mobile-spec
>> might be a bit much. If a constant server is run on apache infra that
>>will
>> respond to HTTP requests that would probably be better.
>>
>> The INFRA folk are starting to loathe me, I think, with my constant
>> pestering and offhand critiques, so we'll see how open they are to this
>> idea :)
>>
>> On 12/13/12 11:50 AM, "Shazron" <sh...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> >That would be great. I suppose if we could run it locally in the
>>meantime
>> >off the same server scripts, the better (who knows if a server goes
>>down).
>> >One less dependency I suppose
>> >
>> >
>> >On Thu, Dec 13, 2012 at 11:43 AM, Filip Maj <fi...@adobe.com> wrote:
>> >
>> >> Why don't we get Apache INFRA to set up a simple instance like this
>>for
>> >> us? This way it's not tied to any one person. I can ask INFRA about
>>it.
>> >>
>> >> On 12/13/12 11:37 AM, "Shazron" <sh...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> >>
>> >> >It's erroring out for mobile-spec testing.
>> >> >
>> >> >I'm wondering if we could just run a local server for the
>>FileTransfer
>> >> >tests instead - if the server was in python we could just invoke
>>this
>> >>on
>> >> >the mobile-spec folder:
>> >> >
>> >> >python -m SimpleHTTPServer
>> >>
>> >>
>>
>>
Re: Who runs http://cordova-filetransfer.jitsu.com
Posted by Shazron <sh...@gmail.com>.
Precisely your last comment about INFRA being open ;) Don't know if we can
wait that long...
If the server scripts are in mobile-spec already, running the python server
wouldn't be (much of) a problem as a backup method, but then I suppose on
Windows you would need to install python also. I can see the hassle but at
least its only once...
On Thu, Dec 13, 2012 at 11:54 AM, Filip Maj <fi...@adobe.com> wrote:
> Yeah, but asking testers to run a server every time they run mobile-spec
> might be a bit much. If a constant server is run on apache infra that will
> respond to HTTP requests that would probably be better.
>
> The INFRA folk are starting to loathe me, I think, with my constant
> pestering and offhand critiques, so we'll see how open they are to this
> idea :)
>
> On 12/13/12 11:50 AM, "Shazron" <sh...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> >That would be great. I suppose if we could run it locally in the meantime
> >off the same server scripts, the better (who knows if a server goes down).
> >One less dependency I suppose
> >
> >
> >On Thu, Dec 13, 2012 at 11:43 AM, Filip Maj <fi...@adobe.com> wrote:
> >
> >> Why don't we get Apache INFRA to set up a simple instance like this for
> >> us? This way it's not tied to any one person. I can ask INFRA about it.
> >>
> >> On 12/13/12 11:37 AM, "Shazron" <sh...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>
> >> >It's erroring out for mobile-spec testing.
> >> >
> >> >I'm wondering if we could just run a local server for the FileTransfer
> >> >tests instead - if the server was in python we could just invoke this
> >>on
> >> >the mobile-spec folder:
> >> >
> >> >python -m SimpleHTTPServer
> >>
> >>
>
>
Re: Who runs http://cordova-filetransfer.jitsu.com
Posted by Filip Maj <fi...@adobe.com>.
Yeah, but asking testers to run a server every time they run mobile-spec
might be a bit much. If a constant server is run on apache infra that will
respond to HTTP requests that would probably be better.
The INFRA folk are starting to loathe me, I think, with my constant
pestering and offhand critiques, so we'll see how open they are to this
idea :)
On 12/13/12 11:50 AM, "Shazron" <sh...@gmail.com> wrote:
>That would be great. I suppose if we could run it locally in the meantime
>off the same server scripts, the better (who knows if a server goes down).
>One less dependency I suppose
>
>
>On Thu, Dec 13, 2012 at 11:43 AM, Filip Maj <fi...@adobe.com> wrote:
>
>> Why don't we get Apache INFRA to set up a simple instance like this for
>> us? This way it's not tied to any one person. I can ask INFRA about it.
>>
>> On 12/13/12 11:37 AM, "Shazron" <sh...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> >It's erroring out for mobile-spec testing.
>> >
>> >I'm wondering if we could just run a local server for the FileTransfer
>> >tests instead - if the server was in python we could just invoke this
>>on
>> >the mobile-spec folder:
>> >
>> >python -m SimpleHTTPServer
>>
>>
Re: Who runs http://cordova-filetransfer.jitsu.com
Posted by Shazron <sh...@gmail.com>.
That would be great. I suppose if we could run it locally in the meantime
off the same server scripts, the better (who knows if a server goes down).
One less dependency I suppose
On Thu, Dec 13, 2012 at 11:43 AM, Filip Maj <fi...@adobe.com> wrote:
> Why don't we get Apache INFRA to set up a simple instance like this for
> us? This way it's not tied to any one person. I can ask INFRA about it.
>
> On 12/13/12 11:37 AM, "Shazron" <sh...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> >It's erroring out for mobile-spec testing.
> >
> >I'm wondering if we could just run a local server for the FileTransfer
> >tests instead - if the server was in python we could just invoke this on
> >the mobile-spec folder:
> >
> >python -m SimpleHTTPServer
>
>
Re: Who runs http://cordova-filetransfer.jitsu.com
Posted by Brian M Dube <bd...@apache.org>.
On 12/13/2012 11:43 AM, Filip Maj wrote:
> Why don't we get Apache INFRA to set up a simple instance like this for
> us? This way it's not tied to any one person. I can ask INFRA about it.
I think a project VM (FreeBSD jail [1]) could work well for this.
Projects have root access on such virtual servers and thus don't need to
make a request of infra for every little detail.
-Brian
[1] http://www.apache.org/dev/freebsd-jails
> On 12/13/12 11:37 AM, "Shazron" <sh...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> It's erroring out for mobile-spec testing.
>>
>> I'm wondering if we could just run a local server for the FileTransfer
>> tests instead - if the server was in python we could just invoke this on
>> the mobile-spec folder:
>>
>> python -m SimpleHTTPServer
>
Re: Who runs http://cordova-filetransfer.jitsu.com
Posted by Filip Maj <fi...@adobe.com>.
Why don't we get Apache INFRA to set up a simple instance like this for
us? This way it's not tied to any one person. I can ask INFRA about it.
On 12/13/12 11:37 AM, "Shazron" <sh...@gmail.com> wrote:
>It's erroring out for mobile-spec testing.
>
>I'm wondering if we could just run a local server for the FileTransfer
>tests instead - if the server was in python we could just invoke this on
>the mobile-spec folder:
>
>python -m SimpleHTTPServer