You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@qpid.apache.org by Carl Trieloff <cc...@redhat.com> on 2009/01/05 14:24:08 UTC
M4 status?
Rafi, Rajith, Aidan,
What needs to be done on M4? is it done, just needing a build, is it
time to build
another and branch it now?
Anyone involved, please chime in.
Carl.
Re: M4 status?
Posted by Carl Trieloff <cc...@redhat.com>.
Aidan Skinner wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 5, 2009 at 1:24 PM, Carl Trieloff <cc...@redhat.com> wrote:
>
>
>> What needs to be done on M4? is it done, just needing a build, is it time to
>> build
>> another and branch it now?
>>
>> Anyone involved, please chime in.
>>
>
> I asked the same question just before the holidays:
> http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/qpid-dev/200812.mbox/%3Ca4265f2a0812240652y550f390bn98f9269972fe6262@mail.gmail.com%3E
>
> I believe there is some work to do, but I am extremely confused about
> which Jiras actually need to be fixed, there are 20 targetted for it
> currently. None of them are anything to do with WCF AFAICT though,
> which is what I thought was holding it up...
>
> - Aidan
>
>
Here is my view of the JIRA list, those implicated please comment. (my
view in first column.)
6 possible blockers
1 blocker.
4 done?
Carl.
*Key* *Summary* *Assignee* *Reporter* *Pr* [Descending order -
Click to sort in ascending order] *Status* *Res* *Created* *Updated*
Possibly <http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-1544>
QPID-1544 <http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-1544> Java client
tries to resume a session that was terminated due to an error
<http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-1544> Unassigned Rajith
Attapattu Critical Open Open UNRESOLVED 18/Dec/08 18/Dec/08
<http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-739>Possibly
<http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-1544> QPID-739
<http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-739> When using an AMQP
destination, the queue routing key is not set correctly
<http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-739> Rajith Attapattu
Arnaud Simon Major Reopened Reopened UNRESOLVED 16/Jan/08 22/Aug/08
<http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-741>Possibly
<http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-1544> QPID-741
<http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-741> The BindingURL format
is incorrect <http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-741> Rajith
Attapattu Rajith Attapattu Major Open Open UNRESOLVED 16/Jan/08
22/Aug/08
no <http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-991> QPID-991
<http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-991> Qpid Junit Toolkit Ant
Plugin (Ant Task) <http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-991>
Rafael H. Schloming Senaka Fernando Major Open Open UNRESOLVED
30/Apr/08 22/Aug/08
no
<http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-675> QPID-675
<http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-675> Content / Message
distinction is a mismatch for other APIs
<http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-675> Rafael H. Schloming
Jonathan Robie Major Open Open UNRESOLVED 03/Nov/07 22/Aug/08
done? <http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-1257> QPID-1257
<http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-1257> Allow individual
broker and client binary packages to be built
<http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-1257> Rafael H. Schloming
Martin Ritchie Major Ready To Review Ready To Review UNRESOLVED
21/Aug/08 13/Oct/08
done?
<http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-1027> QPID-1027
<http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-1027> verify script is
sensitive to shell in use
<http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-1027> Alan Conway Senaka
Fernando Major Open Open UNRESOLVED 05/May/08 29/Oct/08
not blocker
<http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-1412> QPID-1412
<http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-1412> C++ Implementation of
QMF Console <http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-1412> Ted Ross
Ted Ross Major In Progress In Progress UNRESOLVED 29/Oct/08 29/Oct/08
possibly <http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-1296> QPID-1296
<http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-1296> Add SSL support to
java client <http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-1296> Rafael H.
Schloming Rajith Attapattu Major Open Open UNRESOLVED 26/Sep/08
04/Nov/08
no <http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-1198> QPID-1198
<http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-1198> Changes for the
solaris port <http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-1198> Andrew
Stitcher Manuel Teira Major Open Open UNRESOLVED 24/Jul/08 04/Dec/08
possibly
<http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-812> QPID-812
<http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-812> Session message
dispatcher Threading issue
<http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-812> Rafael H. Schloming
Arnaud Simon Major Open Open UNRESOLVED 25/Feb/08 05/Dec/08
done? <http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-1030> QPID-1030
<http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-1030> Making JMS easier for
users <http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-1030> Rajith
Attapattu Arnaud Simon Major Ready To Review Ready To Review
UNRESOLVED 06/May/08 05/Dec/08
done? <http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-1106> QPID-1106
<http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-1106> Make message
acknowledgment synchronous
<http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-1106> Rajith Attapattu
Arnaud Simon Major Ready To Review Ready To Review UNRESOLVED
30/May/08 05/Dec/08
yes
<http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-1521> QPID-1521
<http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-1521> msbuild scripts no
longer build <http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-1521> Robert
Greig Robert Greig Major Open Open UNRESOLVED 08/Dec/08 08/Dec/08
no
<http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-1133> QPID-1133
<http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-1133> Poller implementation
based on the Solaris Event Completion Framework
<http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-1133> Andrew Stitcher
Manuel Teira Minor Open Open UNRESOLVED 11/Jun/08 22/Aug/08
no <http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-1132> QPID-1132
<http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-1132> Add support for Sun
Studio compiler suite detection
<http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-1132> Andrew Stitcher
Manuel Teira Minor Open Open UNRESOLVED 11/Jun/08 22/Aug/08
no
<http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-650> QPID-650
<http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-650> Document the qpidd.conf
file format <http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-650> Alan
Conway Nuno Santos Minor Open Open UNRESOLVED 18/Oct/07 22/Aug/08
possibly <http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-1051>
QPID-1051 <http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-1051> The C++
examples contain some typos and other mistakes that will confuse users.
These are usability errors
<http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-1051> Alan Conway William
Henry Minor Open Open UNRESOLVED 12/May/08 30/Oct/08
no
<http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-1500> QPID-1500
<http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-1500> Create Mac OS X Build
of the JMX Management Console
<http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-1500> Martin Ritchie Martin
Ritchie Minor Ready To Review Ready To Review UNRESOLVED 02/Dec/08
21/Dec/08
no
<http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-1555> QPID-1555
<http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-1555> When run with -d
option, C++ broker dies with "No Such Transport (tcp)" error
<http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-1555> Unassigned Joshua
Kramer Minor Open Open UNRESOLVED 03/Jan/09 05/Jan/09
Re: M4 status?
Posted by Robert Greig <ro...@gmail.com>.
2009/1/5 Rafael Schloming <ra...@redhat.com>:
> Oops, this should be 12, and as rajith points out QPID-1552 is the WCF one.
> I've marked QPID-1552 as fix for M4 so it will show up in the lists, but
> unless we get some info on it soon, I don't think we should hold up the
> release for it.
I've done some work on the WCF/0-10 client so that it builds and the
simple examples at least run now. However, I wouldn't say I'm exactly
confident in it and I think that there will be plenty more issues in
it (the tests just cover some basic "happy paths").
I'll check in my changes right now, and I don't think this should
necessarily hold up M4 but we should be clear I think that the .NET
stuff is really a beta release.
RG
Re: M4 status?
Posted by Rafael Schloming <ra...@redhat.com>.
Rafael Schloming wrote:
> Gordon Sim wrote:
>> Aidan Skinner wrote:
>>> On Mon, Jan 5, 2009 at 1:24 PM, Carl Trieloff <cc...@redhat.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> What needs to be done on M4? is it done, just needing a build, is it
>>>> time to
>>>> build
>>>> another and branch it now?
>>>>
>>>> Anyone involved, please chime in.
>>>
>>> I asked the same question just before the holidays:
>>> http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/qpid-dev/200812.mbox/%3Ca4265f2a0812240652y550f390bn98f9269972fe6262@mail.gmail.com%3E
>>>
>>>
>>> I believe there is some work to do, but I am extremely confused about
>>> which Jiras actually need to be fixed, there are 20 targetted for it
>>> currently. None of them are anything to do with WCF AFAICT though,
>>> which is what I thought was holding it up...
>>
>> I've gone through the remaining c++ and python issues and either
>> closed them or removed the M4 target as I don't believe any of them
>> are in any way blockers.
>
> I now see 11 remaining M4 issues including the WCF one (QPID-1521). None
> of these are currently marked as blockers. If you believe any should be,
> please update them to blocker priority. If there are no M4 JIRAs of
> blocker priority at the end of the day then I will generate another RC.
Oops, this should be 12, and as rajith points out QPID-1552 is the WCF
one. I've marked QPID-1552 as fix for M4 so it will show up in the
lists, but unless we get some info on it soon, I don't think we should
hold up the release for it.
--Rafael
Re: M4 status?
Posted by Rafael Schloming <ra...@redhat.com>.
Gordon Sim wrote:
> Aidan Skinner wrote:
>> On Mon, Jan 5, 2009 at 1:24 PM, Carl Trieloff <cc...@redhat.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> What needs to be done on M4? is it done, just needing a build, is it
>>> time to
>>> build
>>> another and branch it now?
>>>
>>> Anyone involved, please chime in.
>>
>> I asked the same question just before the holidays:
>> http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/qpid-dev/200812.mbox/%3Ca4265f2a0812240652y550f390bn98f9269972fe6262@mail.gmail.com%3E
>>
>>
>> I believe there is some work to do, but I am extremely confused about
>> which Jiras actually need to be fixed, there are 20 targetted for it
>> currently. None of them are anything to do with WCF AFAICT though,
>> which is what I thought was holding it up...
>
> I've gone through the remaining c++ and python issues and either closed
> them or removed the M4 target as I don't believe any of them are in any
> way blockers.
I now see 11 remaining M4 issues including the WCF one (QPID-1521). None
of these are currently marked as blockers. If you believe any should be,
please update them to blocker priority. If there are no M4 JIRAs of
blocker priority at the end of the day then I will generate another RC.
--Rafael
Re: M4 status?
Posted by Gordon Sim <gs...@redhat.com>.
Aidan Skinner wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 5, 2009 at 1:24 PM, Carl Trieloff <cc...@redhat.com> wrote:
>
>> What needs to be done on M4? is it done, just needing a build, is it time to
>> build
>> another and branch it now?
>>
>> Anyone involved, please chime in.
>
> I asked the same question just before the holidays:
> http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/qpid-dev/200812.mbox/%3Ca4265f2a0812240652y550f390bn98f9269972fe6262@mail.gmail.com%3E
>
> I believe there is some work to do, but I am extremely confused about
> which Jiras actually need to be fixed, there are 20 targetted for it
> currently. None of them are anything to do with WCF AFAICT though,
> which is what I thought was holding it up...
I've gone through the remaining c++ and python issues and either closed
them or removed the M4 target as I don't believe any of them are in any
way blockers.
Re: M4 status?
Posted by Rajith Attapattu <ra...@gmail.com>.
On Mon, Jan 5, 2009 at 8:45 AM, Aidan Skinner <ai...@gmail.com>wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 5, 2009 at 1:24 PM, Carl Trieloff <cc...@redhat.com>
> wrote:
>
> > What needs to be done on M4? is it done, just needing a build, is it time
> to
> > build
> > another and branch it now?
> >
> > Anyone involved, please chime in.
>
> I asked the same question just before the holidays:
>
> http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/qpid-dev/200812.mbox/%3Ca4265f2a0812240652y550f390bn98f9269972fe6262@mail.gmail.com%3E
>
Appologies for not replying before going on holidays.
>
> I believe there is some work to do, but I am extremely confused about
> which Jiras actually need to be fixed, there are 20 targetted for it
> currently. None of them are anything to do with WCF AFAICT though,
> which is what I thought was holding it up...
The JIRA opened by Steve for the vc++ project file issue has been resolved.
The JIRA for the WCF issue is
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-1552
Rajith
>
> - Aidan
>
> --
> Apache Qpid - World Domination through Advanced Message Queueing
> http://qpid.apache.org
>
--
Regards,
Rajith Attapattu
Red Hat
http://rajith.2rlabs.com/
Re: M4 status?
Posted by Aidan Skinner <ai...@gmail.com>.
On Mon, Jan 5, 2009 at 1:24 PM, Carl Trieloff <cc...@redhat.com> wrote:
> What needs to be done on M4? is it done, just needing a build, is it time to
> build
> another and branch it now?
>
> Anyone involved, please chime in.
I asked the same question just before the holidays:
http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/qpid-dev/200812.mbox/%3Ca4265f2a0812240652y550f390bn98f9269972fe6262@mail.gmail.com%3E
I believe there is some work to do, but I am extremely confused about
which Jiras actually need to be fixed, there are 20 targetted for it
currently. None of them are anything to do with WCF AFAICT though,
which is what I thought was holding it up...
- Aidan
--
Apache Qpid - World Domination through Advanced Message Queueing
http://qpid.apache.org