You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@geronimo.apache.org by Neal Sanche <ne...@nsdev.org> on 2006/06/06 06:10:41 UTC
Trunk or Branch?
Hey guys,
Could you be so kind as to let me know what I should be building today?
I currently have branches\1.1 and am building that. If I want a 1.1
server to play with, do I build from there or from trunk\ ?
Thanks tons.
-Neal
Re: Trunk or Branch?
Posted by David Jencks <da...@yahoo.com>.
On Jun 5, 2006, at 9:29 PM, Neal Sanche wrote:
> David Jencks wrote:
>>
>> On Jun 5, 2006, at 9:10 PM, Neal Sanche wrote:
>>
>>> Hey guys,
>>>
>>> Could you be so kind as to let me know what I should be building
>>> today? I currently have branches\1.1 and am building that. If I
>>> want a 1.1 server to play with, do I build from there or from
>>> trunk\ ?
>>
>> you have 1.1[-SNAPSHOT]. Trunk is 1.2-SNAPSHOT
>>
>> thanks and good luck :-) with all the outages
>>
> Thanks David,
>
> Yeah, I see a distinct lack of snappiness in the build process this
> evening. Many long, drawn out, pauses punctuated by shorter pauses.
> These outages, are they easily explainable? :)
I guess it depends on what you mean by "easily" and "explainable". I
think that all the repos we depend on are underpowered and
overwhelmed. I was actually referring more to the recent sequence of
hardware failures at all the open source repos I know of -
sourceforge, apache, and codehaus. However I'm afraid that the
current maven model of trying to download artifacts from a list of
single remote http servers during a build has reached its limit and
is proving to be essentially broken. There are a lot of obvious
changes most of which would make it considerably more reliable:
-- asynchronous downloads, a process sits there trying to check for
newer snapshots all day and night, so when you actually try to build
you don't look at remote repos
-- bittorrent wagon, so all people who have an artifact participate
in making it available
-- parallel checking of all repos
-- someone paying for a reliable geronimo-only repository.
However I'm not in a position to implement any of these. Hopefully
m2 will be better, maybe they already have (1) with the proxying
solutions.
thanks
david jencks
>
> -Neal
Re: Trunk or Branch?
Posted by Neal Sanche <ne...@nsdev.org>.
David Jencks wrote:
>
> On Jun 5, 2006, at 9:10 PM, Neal Sanche wrote:
>
>> Hey guys,
>>
>> Could you be so kind as to let me know what I should be building
>> today? I currently have branches\1.1 and am building that. If I want
>> a 1.1 server to play with, do I build from there or from trunk\ ?
>
> you have 1.1[-SNAPSHOT]. Trunk is 1.2-SNAPSHOT
>
> thanks and good luck :-) with all the outages
>
Thanks David,
Yeah, I see a distinct lack of snappiness in the build process this
evening. Many long, drawn out, pauses punctuated by shorter pauses.
These outages, are they easily explainable? :)
-Neal
Re: Trunk or Branch?
Posted by David Jencks <da...@yahoo.com>.
On Jun 5, 2006, at 9:10 PM, Neal Sanche wrote:
> Hey guys,
>
> Could you be so kind as to let me know what I should be building
> today? I currently have branches\1.1 and am building that. If I
> want a 1.1 server to play with, do I build from there or from trunk\ ?
you have 1.1[-SNAPSHOT]. Trunk is 1.2-SNAPSHOT
thanks and good luck :-) with all the outages
david jencks
>
> Thanks tons.
>
> -Neal