You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@nifi.apache.org by Gunjan Dave <gu...@gmail.com> on 2016/08/30 01:50:09 UTC
Re: Request for enhancement
Seems like below didnot get delivered.
On Mon, Aug 29, 2016, 12:30 PM Gunjan Dave <gu...@gmail.com>
wrote:
> Hi Team,
> I would like to propose if the following enhacement if seen feasible can
> be incorporated in the provenance graph.
>
> Current graph only shows the type, rather i would like to suggest if we
> can actually put in the component name along with processor type. That
> would make the graph more unique to each flow and more visually intuitive.
>
> just a suggestion, not mandatory.
>
Re: Request for enhancement
Posted by Gunjan Dave <gu...@gmail.com>.
Hi Joe, I dont seem to have access to nifi jira to create one. Can it be
given? Or if not, could someone help raising it.
On Tue, Aug 30, 2016, 7:49 AM Joe Percivall <jo...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> - Moving users list to BCC
>
> Hello Gunjan,
>
> This seems like a good potential idea. The proper place to submit the
> suggestion is through the Apache NiFi Jira[1]. It can more easily be
> discussed and worked on there.
>
> [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NIFI
>
>
> Suggestions/ideas from users are always welcome!
>
> Joe
> - - - - - -
> Joseph Percivall
> linkedin.com/in/Percivall
> e: joepercivall@yahoo.com
>
>
>
> On Tuesday, August 30, 2016 12:06 PM, Gunjan Dave <
> gunjanpiyushdave@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
>
> Seems like below didnot get delivered.
>
>
> On Mon, Aug 29, 2016, 12:30 PM Gunjan Dave <gu...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> > Hi Team,
> > I would like to propose if the following enhacement if seen feasible can
> > be incorporated in the provenance graph.
> >
> > Current graph only shows the type, rather i would like to suggest if we
> > can actually put in the component name along with processor type. That
> > would make the graph more unique to each flow and more visually
> intuitive.
> >
> > just a suggestion, not mandatory.
> >
>
Re: Request for enhancement
Posted by Gunjan Dave <gu...@gmail.com>.
Hi Joe, I dont seem to have access to nifi jira to create one. Can it be
given? Or if not, could someone help raising it.
On Tue, Aug 30, 2016, 7:49 AM Joe Percivall <jo...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> - Moving users list to BCC
>
> Hello Gunjan,
>
> This seems like a good potential idea. The proper place to submit the
> suggestion is through the Apache NiFi Jira[1]. It can more easily be
> discussed and worked on there.
>
> [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NIFI
>
>
> Suggestions/ideas from users are always welcome!
>
> Joe
> - - - - - -
> Joseph Percivall
> linkedin.com/in/Percivall
> e: joepercivall@yahoo.com
>
>
>
> On Tuesday, August 30, 2016 12:06 PM, Gunjan Dave <
> gunjanpiyushdave@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
>
> Seems like below didnot get delivered.
>
>
> On Mon, Aug 29, 2016, 12:30 PM Gunjan Dave <gu...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> > Hi Team,
> > I would like to propose if the following enhacement if seen feasible can
> > be incorporated in the provenance graph.
> >
> > Current graph only shows the type, rather i would like to suggest if we
> > can actually put in the component name along with processor type. That
> > would make the graph more unique to each flow and more visually
> intuitive.
> >
> > just a suggestion, not mandatory.
> >
>
Re: Request for enhancement
Posted by Joe Percivall <jo...@yahoo.com>.
- Moving users list to BCC
Hello Gunjan,
This seems like a good potential idea. The proper place to submit the suggestion is through the Apache NiFi Jira[1]. It can more easily be discussed and worked on there.
[1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NIFI
Suggestions/ideas from users are always welcome!
Joe
- - - - - -
Joseph Percivall
linkedin.com/in/Percivall
e: joepercivall@yahoo.com
On Tuesday, August 30, 2016 12:06 PM, Gunjan Dave <gu...@gmail.com> wrote:
Seems like below didnot get delivered.
On Mon, Aug 29, 2016, 12:30 PM Gunjan Dave <gu...@gmail.com>
wrote:
> Hi Team,
> I would like to propose if the following enhacement if seen feasible can
> be incorporated in the provenance graph.
>
> Current graph only shows the type, rather i would like to suggest if we
> can actually put in the component name along with processor type. That
> would make the graph more unique to each flow and more visually intuitive.
>
> just a suggestion, not mandatory.
>
Re: Request for enhancement
Posted by Joe Percivall <jo...@yahoo.com.INVALID>.
- Moving users list to BCC
Hello Gunjan,
This seems like a good potential idea. The proper place to submit the suggestion is through the Apache NiFi Jira[1]. It can more easily be discussed and worked on there.
[1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NIFI
Suggestions/ideas from users are always welcome!
Joe
- - - - - -
Joseph Percivall
linkedin.com/in/Percivall
e: joepercivall@yahoo.com
On Tuesday, August 30, 2016 12:06 PM, Gunjan Dave <gu...@gmail.com> wrote:
Seems like below didnot get delivered.
On Mon, Aug 29, 2016, 12:30 PM Gunjan Dave <gu...@gmail.com>
wrote:
> Hi Team,
> I would like to propose if the following enhacement if seen feasible can
> be incorporated in the provenance graph.
>
> Current graph only shows the type, rather i would like to suggest if we
> can actually put in the component name along with processor type. That
> would make the graph more unique to each flow and more visually intuitive.
>
> just a suggestion, not mandatory.
>