You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to issues@commons.apache.org by "Mark Thomas (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2016/03/02 09:57:18 UTC

[jira] [Commented] (POOL-303) GenericObjectPool's borrowObject may stuck if create() always fail

    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/POOL-303?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15175290#comment-15175290 ] 

Mark Thomas commented on POOL-303:
----------------------------------

The description of the issue looks valid.

The patch needs a test case that demonstrates the problem.

> GenericObjectPool's borrowObject may stuck if create() always fail
> ------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: POOL-303
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/POOL-303
>             Project: Commons Pool
>          Issue Type: Bug
>            Reporter: Phil Yang
>         Attachments: 303.txt
>
>
> If GenericObjectPool's user use borrowObject() to get the object. The pool will try to pollFirst() first and if there is no idle object it will try to create it. In create()  if createCount > maxTotal, it will not create any object and wait on idleObjects.takeFirst() or idleObjects.pollFirst(borrowMaxWaitMillis, TimeUnit.MILLISECONDS) for other thread return an object. 
> If there are many threads (the number is more than maxTotal) to borrowObject concurrently, there will only maxTotal threads go to create the object, the others will wait on the queue. However, if the factory has some problem that makeObject() always throw Exception, there will not be any object created so no thread will return the object that should send a signal to one waiting thread. The thread wait on idleObjects.takeFirst()  will stuck forever because it has no timeout.
> I think it can be fixed by adding a idleObjects.interuptTakeWaiters(); in create() before it throws the exception and let the waiting threads interrupted and retry to create.  
> It seems that all 2.x version affected?



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)