You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@community.apache.org by sebb <se...@gmail.com> on 2023/09/07 11:24:02 UTC
Valid languages for projects.apache.org
There are currently a few project DOAPs which use languages not in the
current valid list.
These are:
BASH/Bash
Freemarker
Haxe
JDBC
ODBC
SQL
XML
Whilst we could add Bash, we might then need to add all the other
Shell languages.
Freemarker is a templating language; could be added
Haxe is a valid language; could perhaps be added
JDBC and ODBC are not languages; I think they should be dropped from
the classification.
SQL and XML can perhaps be considered languages
WDYT?
Sebb
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@community.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@community.apache.org
Re: Valid languages for projects.apache.org
Posted by Dave Fisher <wa...@comcast.net>.
I agree too. Mxml has been around for sometime but it is specific to certain PMCs and is more a file format like Yaml.
I wonder more about how we classify projects and project product based on whether or not the system consists of components and/or a service. Language makes more sense for describing components. But this a different discussion.
Best,
Dave
Sent from my iPhone
> On Sep 7, 2023, at 7:52 AM, Gary Gregory <ga...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> I agree with Sebb, MXML is an XML _vocabulary_.
>
> Gary
>
>> On Thu, Sep 7, 2023, 9:55 AM sebb <se...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> On Thu, 7 Sept 2023 at 13:36, Andrew Wetmore <co...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> Apache Royale uses significant numbers of MXML files in applications. Is
>>> that sufficiently different from XML that we should add it?
>>
>> AFAICT MXML is a domain-specific superset of XML.
>> I don't think that deserves a separate language category.
>>
>>> <
>> https://www.avast.com/sig-email?utm_medium=email&utm_source=link&utm_campaign=sig-email&utm_content=webmail
>>>
>>> Virus-free.www.avast.com
>>> <
>> https://www.avast.com/sig-email?utm_medium=email&utm_source=link&utm_campaign=sig-email&utm_content=webmail
>>>
>>> <#DAB4FAD8-2DD7-40BB-A1B8-4E2AA1F9FDF2>
>>>
>>> On Thu, Sep 7, 2023 at 8:31 AM Gary Gregory <ga...@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> ODBC and JDBC are APIs, not languages, I hope we can all agree on that.
>>>>
>>>> The "L" in XML and SQL stand for Language, so... ;-)
>>>>
>>>> Gary
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Thu, Sep 7, 2023, 7:24 AM sebb <se...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> There are currently a few project DOAPs which use languages not in
>> the
>>>>> current valid list.
>>>>>
>>>>> These are:
>>>>>
>>>>> BASH/Bash
>>>>> Freemarker
>>>>> Haxe
>>>>> JDBC
>>>>> ODBC
>>>>> SQL
>>>>> XML
>>>>>
>>>>> Whilst we could add Bash, we might then need to add all the other
>>>>> Shell languages.
>>>>> Freemarker is a templating language; could be added
>>>>> Haxe is a valid language; could perhaps be added
>>>>> JDBC and ODBC are not languages; I think they should be dropped from
>>>>> the classification.
>>>>> SQL and XML can perhaps be considered languages
>>>>>
>>>>> WDYT?
>>>>>
>>>>> Sebb
>>>>>
>>>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@community.apache.org
>>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@community.apache.org
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> Andrew Wetmore
>>>
>>> Editor, Moose House Publications <https://moosehousepress.com/>
>>> Editor-Writer, The Apache Software Foundation <https://apache.org/>
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@community.apache.org
>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@community.apache.org
>>
>>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@community.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@community.apache.org
Re: Valid languages for projects.apache.org
Posted by Gary Gregory <ga...@gmail.com>.
I agree with Sebb, MXML is an XML _vocabulary_.
Gary
On Thu, Sep 7, 2023, 9:55 AM sebb <se...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Thu, 7 Sept 2023 at 13:36, Andrew Wetmore <co...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > Apache Royale uses significant numbers of MXML files in applications. Is
> > that sufficiently different from XML that we should add it?
>
> AFAICT MXML is a domain-specific superset of XML.
> I don't think that deserves a separate language category.
>
> > <
> https://www.avast.com/sig-email?utm_medium=email&utm_source=link&utm_campaign=sig-email&utm_content=webmail
> >
> > Virus-free.www.avast.com
> > <
> https://www.avast.com/sig-email?utm_medium=email&utm_source=link&utm_campaign=sig-email&utm_content=webmail
> >
> > <#DAB4FAD8-2DD7-40BB-A1B8-4E2AA1F9FDF2>
> >
> > On Thu, Sep 7, 2023 at 8:31 AM Gary Gregory <ga...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> >
> > > ODBC and JDBC are APIs, not languages, I hope we can all agree on that.
> > >
> > > The "L" in XML and SQL stand for Language, so... ;-)
> > >
> > > Gary
> > >
> > >
> > > On Thu, Sep 7, 2023, 7:24 AM sebb <se...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > > There are currently a few project DOAPs which use languages not in
> the
> > > > current valid list.
> > > >
> > > > These are:
> > > >
> > > > BASH/Bash
> > > > Freemarker
> > > > Haxe
> > > > JDBC
> > > > ODBC
> > > > SQL
> > > > XML
> > > >
> > > > Whilst we could add Bash, we might then need to add all the other
> > > > Shell languages.
> > > > Freemarker is a templating language; could be added
> > > > Haxe is a valid language; could perhaps be added
> > > > JDBC and ODBC are not languages; I think they should be dropped from
> > > > the classification.
> > > > SQL and XML can perhaps be considered languages
> > > >
> > > > WDYT?
> > > >
> > > > Sebb
> > > >
> > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@community.apache.org
> > > > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@community.apache.org
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Andrew Wetmore
> >
> > Editor, Moose House Publications <https://moosehousepress.com/>
> > Editor-Writer, The Apache Software Foundation <https://apache.org/>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@community.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@community.apache.org
>
>
Re: Valid languages for projects.apache.org
Posted by sebb <se...@gmail.com>.
On Thu, 7 Sept 2023 at 13:36, Andrew Wetmore <co...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Apache Royale uses significant numbers of MXML files in applications. Is
> that sufficiently different from XML that we should add it?
AFAICT MXML is a domain-specific superset of XML.
I don't think that deserves a separate language category.
> <https://www.avast.com/sig-email?utm_medium=email&utm_source=link&utm_campaign=sig-email&utm_content=webmail>
> Virus-free.www.avast.com
> <https://www.avast.com/sig-email?utm_medium=email&utm_source=link&utm_campaign=sig-email&utm_content=webmail>
> <#DAB4FAD8-2DD7-40BB-A1B8-4E2AA1F9FDF2>
>
> On Thu, Sep 7, 2023 at 8:31 AM Gary Gregory <ga...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > ODBC and JDBC are APIs, not languages, I hope we can all agree on that.
> >
> > The "L" in XML and SQL stand for Language, so... ;-)
> >
> > Gary
> >
> >
> > On Thu, Sep 7, 2023, 7:24 AM sebb <se...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > > There are currently a few project DOAPs which use languages not in the
> > > current valid list.
> > >
> > > These are:
> > >
> > > BASH/Bash
> > > Freemarker
> > > Haxe
> > > JDBC
> > > ODBC
> > > SQL
> > > XML
> > >
> > > Whilst we could add Bash, we might then need to add all the other
> > > Shell languages.
> > > Freemarker is a templating language; could be added
> > > Haxe is a valid language; could perhaps be added
> > > JDBC and ODBC are not languages; I think they should be dropped from
> > > the classification.
> > > SQL and XML can perhaps be considered languages
> > >
> > > WDYT?
> > >
> > > Sebb
> > >
> > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@community.apache.org
> > > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@community.apache.org
> > >
> > >
> >
>
>
> --
> Andrew Wetmore
>
> Editor, Moose House Publications <https://moosehousepress.com/>
> Editor-Writer, The Apache Software Foundation <https://apache.org/>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@community.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@community.apache.org
Re: Valid languages for projects.apache.org
Posted by Andrew Wetmore <co...@gmail.com>.
Apache Royale uses significant numbers of MXML files in applications. Is
that sufficiently different from XML that we should add it?
<https://www.avast.com/sig-email?utm_medium=email&utm_source=link&utm_campaign=sig-email&utm_content=webmail>
Virus-free.www.avast.com
<https://www.avast.com/sig-email?utm_medium=email&utm_source=link&utm_campaign=sig-email&utm_content=webmail>
<#DAB4FAD8-2DD7-40BB-A1B8-4E2AA1F9FDF2>
On Thu, Sep 7, 2023 at 8:31 AM Gary Gregory <ga...@gmail.com> wrote:
> ODBC and JDBC are APIs, not languages, I hope we can all agree on that.
>
> The "L" in XML and SQL stand for Language, so... ;-)
>
> Gary
>
>
> On Thu, Sep 7, 2023, 7:24 AM sebb <se...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > There are currently a few project DOAPs which use languages not in the
> > current valid list.
> >
> > These are:
> >
> > BASH/Bash
> > Freemarker
> > Haxe
> > JDBC
> > ODBC
> > SQL
> > XML
> >
> > Whilst we could add Bash, we might then need to add all the other
> > Shell languages.
> > Freemarker is a templating language; could be added
> > Haxe is a valid language; could perhaps be added
> > JDBC and ODBC are not languages; I think they should be dropped from
> > the classification.
> > SQL and XML can perhaps be considered languages
> >
> > WDYT?
> >
> > Sebb
> >
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@community.apache.org
> > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@community.apache.org
> >
> >
>
--
Andrew Wetmore
Editor, Moose House Publications <https://moosehousepress.com/>
Editor-Writer, The Apache Software Foundation <https://apache.org/>
Re: Valid languages for projects.apache.org
Posted by Gary Gregory <ga...@gmail.com>.
ODBC and JDBC are APIs, not languages, I hope we can all agree on that.
The "L" in XML and SQL stand for Language, so... ;-)
Gary
On Thu, Sep 7, 2023, 7:24 AM sebb <se...@gmail.com> wrote:
> There are currently a few project DOAPs which use languages not in the
> current valid list.
>
> These are:
>
> BASH/Bash
> Freemarker
> Haxe
> JDBC
> ODBC
> SQL
> XML
>
> Whilst we could add Bash, we might then need to add all the other
> Shell languages.
> Freemarker is a templating language; could be added
> Haxe is a valid language; could perhaps be added
> JDBC and ODBC are not languages; I think they should be dropped from
> the classification.
> SQL and XML can perhaps be considered languages
>
> WDYT?
>
> Sebb
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@community.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@community.apache.org
>
>