You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to users@tomcat.apache.org by "Fonken, Jonathan (XTI - Redwood City)" <Jo...@xtime.com> on 2015/11/05 07:49:19 UTC
Can adding workers to worker.list and balance_workers cause an issue?
What would happen if I add workers into worker.list and balance_workers?
Option1:
worker.list=node1,node2,loadbalancer,status
worker.loadbalancer.balance_workers=node1,node2
VS
Option2:
worker.list=loadbalancer,status
worker.loadbalancer.balance_workers=node1,node2
If I went with Option1 will that cause errors with the apache LB like cause blank page loads or perhaps slow down performance?
What I am looking for is, what is the repercussions with going with Option1?
Thank You,
Jonathan Fonken
IT Sys Admin
Office: (605) 508-4359
jonathan.fonken@xtime.com
1400 Bridge Parkway, Suite 200
Redwood City, CA 94065
www.xtime.com
Re: Can adding workers to worker.list and balance_workers cause an
issue?
Posted by Christopher Schultz <ch...@christopherschultz.net>.
Jonathan,
On 11/5/15 1:49 AM, Fonken, Jonathan (XTI - Redwood City) wrote:
> What would happen if I add workers into worker.list and balance_workers?
No problem. It just means that you can mount those workers either using
JkMount directly or via a load-balancer.
> Option1:
> worker.list=node1,node2,loadbalancer,status
>
> worker.loadbalancer.balance_workers=node1,node2
>
>
> VS
>
> Option2:
> worker.list=loadbalancer,status
>
> worker.loadbalancer.balance_workers=node1,node2
>
>
> If I went with Option1 will that cause errors with the apache LB
> like cause blank page loads or perhaps slow down performance?
Not at all.
> What I am looking for is, what is the repercussions with going with Option1?
None at all, except a slightly larger in-memory configuration.
-chris
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@tomcat.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@tomcat.apache.org