[PR] [FLINK-38709][table][python] Fix ScalarFunctionSplitter to allow PythonFunction & AsyncFunction work when taking the recursive field of composite type as input [flink]

["dianfu (via GitHub)" <gi...@apache.org>]

dianfu opened a new pull request, #27259:
URL: https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/27259

   ## What is the purpose of the change
   
   *(For example: This pull request makes task deployment go through the blob server, rather than through RPC. That way we avoid re-transferring them on each deployment (during recovery).)*
   
   
   ## Brief change log
   
   *(for example:)*
     - *The TaskInfo is stored in the blob store on job creation time as a persistent artifact*
     - *Deployments RPC transmits only the blob storage reference*
     - *TaskManagers retrieve the TaskInfo from the blob cache*
   
   
   ## Verifying this change
   
   Please make sure both new and modified tests in this PR follow [the conventions for tests defined in our code quality guide](https://flink.apache.org/how-to-contribute/code-style-and-quality-common/#7-testing).
   
   *(Please pick either of the following options)*
   
   This change is a trivial rework / code cleanup without any test coverage.
   
   *(or)*
   
   This change is already covered by existing tests, such as *(please describe tests)*.
   
   *(or)*
   
   This change added tests and can be verified as follows:
   
   *(example:)*
     - *Added integration tests for end-to-end deployment with large payloads (100MB)*
     - *Extended integration test for recovery after master (JobManager) failure*
     - *Added test that validates that TaskInfo is transferred only once across recoveries*
     - *Manually verified the change by running a 4 node cluster with 2 JobManagers and 4 TaskManagers, a stateful streaming program, and killing one JobManager and two TaskManagers during the execution, verifying that recovery happens correctly.*
   
   ## Does this pull request potentially affect one of the following parts:
   
     - Dependencies (does it add or upgrade a dependency): (yes / no)
     - The public API, i.e., is any changed class annotated with `@Public(Evolving)`: (yes / no)
     - The serializers: (yes / no / don't know)
     - The runtime per-record code paths (performance sensitive): (yes / no / don't know)
     - Anything that affects deployment or recovery: JobManager (and its components), Checkpointing, Kubernetes/Yarn, ZooKeeper: (yes / no / don't know)
     - The S3 file system connector: (yes / no / don't know)
   
   ## Documentation
   
     - Does this pull request introduce a new feature? (yes / no)
     - If yes, how is the feature documented? (not applicable / docs / JavaDocs / not documented)
   


-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscribe@flink.apache.org

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
users@infra.apache.org

Re: [PR] [FLINK-38709][table][python] Fix ScalarFunctionSplitter to allow PythonFunction & AsyncFunction work when taking the recursive field of composite type as input [flink]

["dianfu (via GitHub)" <gi...@apache.org>]

dianfu closed pull request #27259: [FLINK-38709][table][python] Fix ScalarFunctionSplitter to allow PythonFunction & AsyncFunction work when taking the recursive field of composite type as input
URL: https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/27259


-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscribe@flink.apache.org

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
users@infra.apache.org

Re: [PR] [FLINK-38709][table][python] Fix ScalarFunctionSplitter to allow PythonFunction & AsyncFunction work when taking the recursive field of composite type as input [flink]

["flinkbot (via GitHub)" <gi...@apache.org>]

flinkbot commented on PR #27259:
URL: https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/27259#issuecomment-3562095405

   <!--
   Meta data
   {
     "version" : 1,
     "metaDataEntries" : [ {
       "hash" : "3f1b403c902d90865db5390651b68f5c2dd9287f",
       "status" : "UNKNOWN",
       "url" : "TBD",
       "triggerID" : "3f1b403c902d90865db5390651b68f5c2dd9287f",
       "triggerType" : "PUSH"
     } ]
   }-->
   ## CI report:
   
   * 3f1b403c902d90865db5390651b68f5c2dd9287f UNKNOWN
   
   <details>
   <summary>Bot commands</summary>
     The @flinkbot bot supports the following commands:
   
    - `@flinkbot run azure` re-run the last Azure build
   </details>


-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscribe@flink.apache.org

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
users@infra.apache.org