[jira] [Commented] (TOREE-264) Support multiple sessions in the kernel each with their own isolated interpreters

["Chip Senkbeil (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org>]

    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TOREE-264?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15153397#comment-15153397 ] 

Chip Senkbeil commented on TOREE-264:
-------------------------------------

Relevant to this would be [~nimbusgo] discussion of dynamic namespaces: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TOREE-157

My comments to sandboxing here: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TOREE-131?focusedCommentId=15104488&page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#comment-15104488

Also, [~nimbusgo] code snippet and branch of sandboxed magics here: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TOREE-146?focusedCommentId=15104536&page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#comment-15104536

I'll give it some thought and come back to you later.

> Support multiple sessions in the kernel each with their own isolated interpreters
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: TOREE-264
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TOREE-264
>             Project: TOREE
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>            Reporter: Gino Bustelo
>
> Many folks are very interested in having multiple users connecting to one Kernel/Toree process and sharing the same SparkContext. 
> I've always considered us already supporting thins use-case, but with the caveat that all users also share the same interpreter and can lead to lots of race-conditions.
> I'm thinking that we could more sanely support multiple users by routing them to isolated interpreters that share the SparkContext but have independent variable namespace.
> Thoughs?



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)