You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to issues@hbase.apache.org by "Mikhail Antonov (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2016/10/27 09:37:58 UTC

[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-16743) TestSimpleRpcScheduler#testCoDelScheduling is broke

    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-16743?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15611346#comment-15611346 ] 

Mikhail Antonov commented on HBASE-16743:
-----------------------------------------

that escaped my attention when I looked for thing marked for 1.3. This test is definitely flaky now on 1.3. will look tomorrow.

> TestSimpleRpcScheduler#testCoDelScheduling is broke
> ---------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: HBASE-16743
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-16743
>             Project: HBase
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: rpc
>    Affects Versions: 1.3.0
>            Reporter: stack
>             Fix For: 1.3.0
>
>
> The testCoDelScheduling test is broke. Here are some notes on it. I have disabled it in the HBASE-15638 shading patch.
> {code}
> I don't get this test. When I time this test, the minDelay is > 2 * codel delay from the get go. So we are always overloaded. The test below would seem to complete the queuing of all the CallRunners inside the codel check interval. I don't think we are skipping codel checking. Second, I think this test has been  broken since HBASE-16089 Add on FastPath for CoDel went in. The thread name we were looking for was the name BEFORE we updated: i.e. "RpcServer.CodelBQ.default.handler". But same patch changed the name of the codel  fastpath thread to: new FastPathBalancedQueueRpcExecutor("CodelFPBQ.default", handlerCount, numCallQueues...
> Codel is hard to test. This test is going to be flakey given it all timer-based. Disabling for now till chat
> {code}
> FYI [~mantonov]



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)