You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@hbase.apache.org by "Michael Stack (Jira)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2021/03/18 18:49:00 UTC
[jira] [Resolved] (HBASE-25677) Server+table counters on each scan
#nextRaw invocation becomes a bottleneck when heavy load
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-25677?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ]
Michael Stack resolved HBASE-25677.
-----------------------------------
Hadoop Flags: Reviewed
Resolution: Fixed
Merged to branch-2.3+.
> Server+table counters on each scan #nextRaw invocation becomes a bottleneck when heavy load
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: HBASE-25677
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-25677
> Project: HBase
> Issue Type: Sub-task
> Components: metrics
> Affects Versions: 2.3.2
> Reporter: Michael Stack
> Assignee: Michael Stack
> Priority: Major
> Fix For: 3.0.0-alpha-1, 2.5.0, 2.3.5, 2.4.3
>
>
> On a heavily loaded server mostly doing reads/scan, I saw that 90+% of handlers were BLOCKED in this fashion in thread dumps:
> {code}
> "RpcServer.default.FPBQ.Fifo.handler=117,queue=17,port=16020" #161 daemon prio=5 os_prio=0 tid=0x00007f748757f000 nid=0x73e9 waiting for monitor entry [0x00007f74783e0000]
> java.lang.Thread.State: BLOCKED (on object monitor)
> at java.util.concurrent.ConcurrentHashMap.computeIfAbsent(ConcurrentHashMap.java:1674)
> - waiting to lock <0x00007f7647e3cc38> (a java.util.concurrent.ConcurrentHashMap$Node)
> at org.apache.hadoop.hbase.regionserver.MetricsTableQueryMeterImpl.getOrCreateTableMeter(MetricsTableQueryMeterImpl.java:80)
> at org.apache.hadoop.hbase.regionserver.MetricsTableQueryMeterImpl.updateTableReadQueryMeter(MetricsTableQueryMeterImpl.java:90)
> at org.apache.hadoop.hbase.regionserver.RegionServerTableMetrics.updateTableReadQueryMeter(RegionServerTableMetrics.java:89)
> at org.apache.hadoop.hbase.regionserver.MetricsRegionServer.updateReadQueryMeter(MetricsRegionServer.java:274)
> at org.apache.hadoop.hbase.regionserver.HRegion$RegionScannerImpl.nextRaw(HRegion.java:6742)
> at org.apache.hadoop.hbase.regionserver.RSRpcServices.scan(RSRpcServices.java:3319)
> - locked <0x00007f896c0165a0> (a org.apache.hadoop.hbase.regionserver.HRegion$RegionScannerImpl)
> at org.apache.hadoop.hbase.regionserver.RSRpcServices.scan(RSRpcServices.java:3566)
> at org.apache.hadoop.hbase.shaded.protobuf.generated.ClientProtos$ClientService$2.callBlockingMethod(ClientProtos.java:44858)
> at org.apache.hadoop.hbase.ipc.RpcServer.call(RpcServer.java:393)
> at org.apache.hadoop.hbase.ipc.CallRunner.run(CallRunner.java:133)
> at org.apache.hadoop.hbase.ipc.RpcExecutor$Handler.run(RpcExecutor.java:338)
> at org.apache.hadoop.hbase.ipc.RpcExecutor$Handler.run(RpcExecutor.java:318)
> {code}
> It kept up for good periods of time.
> I saw it to a leser extent on other servers, with less load.
> These RS had 400+ Regions a good few of which were serving out scan reads; the server was doing ~1M hits a second. In this scenario, I saw the above bottleneck.
> Looking at it, it came in w/ when the parent issue feature was added. There are these read counts and then there were also write counts. The write counts are mostly batch-based. Let me do same thing here for the read.... update the central server+table count after scan is done rather than per invocation of #nextRaw.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.3.4#803005)