You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@ranger.apache.org by "Madhan Neethiraj (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2016/04/29 07:52:12 UTC

[jira] [Updated] (RANGER-960) Service-def update does not preserve the order in which permissions are listed

     [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/RANGER-960?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ]

Madhan Neethiraj updated RANGER-960:
------------------------------------
    Attachment: 0001-RANGER-960-service-def-update-should-preserve-the-pe.patch

> Service-def update does not preserve the order in which permissions are listed
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: RANGER-960
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/RANGER-960
>             Project: Ranger
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: admin
>    Affects Versions: 0.5.0, 0.6.0
>            Reporter: Madhan Neethiraj
>            Assignee: Madhan Neethiraj
>         Attachments: 0001-RANGER-960-service-def-update-should-preserve-the-pe.patch
>
>
> Consider a Hive policy - the policy UI lists the permissions in the following order: select, update, create, drop, alter, index, lock, all.
> After an update to Hive service-def (for example to add a custom-condition), the policy UI lists the permission in a different order.
> For a better user experience and consistency, service-def updates should preserve the ordering of the permissions.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)