You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@ignite.apache.org by ALEKSEY KUZNETSOV <al...@gmail.com> on 2017/02/16 12:31:11 UTC
IGNITE-2626 is cloned?
Hi! about https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-2626. Im sure this
ticket is cloned from https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-3191,
because it was implemented there. And im confused with code status : fields
order is somehow deprecated. This ticket -
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-4695 must have covered fields
order.
--
*Best Regards,*
*Kuznetsov Aleksey*
Re: IGNITE-2626 is cloned?
Posted by Vladimir Ozerov <vo...@gridgain.com>.
Yes, IGNITE-3191 resolves the problem mentioned in IGNITE-2626. No
configuration parameter needed. We have system property to control this,
but only for compatibility reasons - without it users might have lost
ability to migrate from [1.x] to 1.[x+1] if they persist objects outside of
Ignite.
On Fri, Feb 17, 2017 at 7:11 AM, Denis Magda <dm...@apache.org> wrote:
> Taras, Vovan,
>
> Did IGNITE-3191 [1] automatically solve the problem described in [2]? If
> it’s so I would close [2].
>
> BTW, did we add a new configuration parameter as a part of [1] dev
> activity?
>
> [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-3191
> [2] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-2626
>
> —
> Denis
>
> > On Feb 16, 2017, at 4:31 AM, ALEKSEY KUZNETSOV <al...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> >
> > Hi! about https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-2626. Im sure
> this
> > ticket is cloned from https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-3191,
> > because it was implemented there. And im confused with code status :
> fields
> > order is somehow deprecated. This ticket -
> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-4695 must have covered
> fields
> > order.
> > --
> >
> > *Best Regards,*
> >
> > *Kuznetsov Aleksey*
>
>
Re: IGNITE-2626 is cloned?
Posted by Denis Magda <dm...@apache.org>.
Taras, Vovan,
Did IGNITE-3191 [1] automatically solve the problem described in [2]? If it’s so I would close [2].
BTW, did we add a new configuration parameter as a part of [1] dev activity?
[1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-3191
[2] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-2626
—
Denis
> On Feb 16, 2017, at 4:31 AM, ALEKSEY KUZNETSOV <al...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Hi! about https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-2626. Im sure this
> ticket is cloned from https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-3191,
> because it was implemented there. And im confused with code status : fields
> order is somehow deprecated. This ticket -
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-4695 must have covered fields
> order.
> --
>
> *Best Regards,*
>
> *Kuznetsov Aleksey*