You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@cocoon.apache.org by Reinhard Pötz <re...@gmx.net> on 2003/08/01 11:48:59 UTC
Paginator and ImageReader --> core components?
Quick question:
Is there a reason why the paginator and the image reader are part of
Cocoon core and not put into blocks?
I'm asking because if you call http://localhost:8888/samples/ you get
the impression that they are major parts of Cocoon ...
Reinhard
RE: Paginator and ImageReader --> core components?
Posted by Carsten Ziegeler <cz...@s-und-n.de>.
Reinhard Pötz wrote:
>
> Quick question:
> Is there a reason why the paginator and the image reader are part of
> Cocoon core and not put into blocks?
>
> I'm asking because if you call http://localhost:8888/samples/ you get
> the impression that they are major parts of Cocoon ...
>
I think these are two different issues:
a) why the things are in the core and not a block?
Simply (I guess) because they were moved from the scratchpad into the core.
I think this is not that bad, because having a block for one single
class can't be the way. I still think that we need an "optional" block
for those, but I don't like changing these things before the 2.1 release.
b) why are the samples put very prominently on the main samples page?
I don't know, this is something we could change. And move them into a
different
location. But I think, it's not a big problem.
Carsten
Re: Paginator and ImageReader --> core components?
Posted by Vadim Gritsenko <va...@verizon.net>.
Reinhard Pötz wrote:
>>-----Original Message-----
>>From: Reinhard Pötz [mailto:reinhard_poetz@gmx.net]
>>Sent: Friday, August 01, 2003 4:21 PM
>>To: dev@cocoon.apache.org
>>Subject: RE: Paginator and ImageReader --> core components?
>>
>>
>>Responding to Carsten's mail too:
>>
>>Then (if anybody else is faster) I modify the examples and
>>
>>
>
>uuups, of course *is not* faster ;-)
>
>Reinhard
>
>
>
>>wait with a paginator block.
>>
You mean "optional" block. Paginator is not that big to deserve own block.
Vadim
RE: Paginator and ImageReader --> core components?
Posted by Reinhard Pötz <re...@gmx.net>.
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Reinhard Pötz [mailto:reinhard_poetz@gmx.net]
> Sent: Friday, August 01, 2003 4:21 PM
> To: dev@cocoon.apache.org
> Subject: RE: Paginator and ImageReader --> core components?
>
>
> Responding to Carsten's mail too:
>
> Then (if anybody else is faster) I modify the examples and
uuups, of course *is not* faster ;-)
Reinhard
> wait with a paginator block.
>
> Reinhard
>
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Stefano Mazzocchi [mailto:stefano@apache.org]
> > Sent: Friday, August 01, 2003 1:09 PM
> > To: dev@cocoon.apache.org
> > Subject: Re: Paginator and ImageReader --> core components?
> >
> >
> >
> > On Friday, Aug 1, 2003, at 11:48 Europe/Rome, Reinhard Pötz wrote:
> >
> > >
> > > Quick question:
> > > Is there a reason why the paginator and the image reader
> > are part of
> > > Cocoon core and not put into blocks?
> >
> > lazyness ;-)
> >
> > > I'm asking because if you call
> > http://localhost:8888/samples/ you get
> > > the impression that
> > they are major parts of Cocoon ...
> >
> > Yes, I was going to correct that but forgot.
> >
> > I'm all for moving the sample in a less prominent location,
> > but I would
> > be -1 on moving the imagereader into a block. it's just a
> class after
> > all and a really useful one. for the paginator, I'm +0 on moving it
> > into a block.
> >
> > --
> > Stefano.
> >
>
RE: Paginator and ImageReader --> core components?
Posted by Reinhard Pötz <re...@gmx.net>.
Responding to Carsten's mail too:
Then (if anybody else is faster) I modify the examples and wait with a
paginator block.
Reinhard
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Stefano Mazzocchi [mailto:stefano@apache.org]
> Sent: Friday, August 01, 2003 1:09 PM
> To: dev@cocoon.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Paginator and ImageReader --> core components?
>
>
>
> On Friday, Aug 1, 2003, at 11:48 Europe/Rome, Reinhard Pötz wrote:
>
> >
> > Quick question:
> > Is there a reason why the paginator and the image reader
> are part of
> > Cocoon core and not put into blocks?
>
> lazyness ;-)
>
> > I'm asking because if you call
> http://localhost:8888/samples/ you get
> > the impression that
> they are major parts of Cocoon ...
>
> Yes, I was going to correct that but forgot.
>
> I'm all for moving the sample in a less prominent location,
> but I would
> be -1 on moving the imagereader into a block. it's just a class after
> all and a really useful one. for the paginator, I'm +0 on moving it
> into a block.
>
> --
> Stefano.
>
Re: Paginator and ImageReader --> core components?
Posted by Stefano Mazzocchi <st...@apache.org>.
On Friday, Aug 1, 2003, at 11:48 Europe/Rome, Reinhard Pötz wrote:
>
> Quick question:
> Is there a reason why the paginator and the image reader are part of
> Cocoon core and not put into blocks?
lazyness ;-)
> I'm asking because if you call http://localhost:8888/samples/ you get
> the impression that they are major parts of Cocoon ...
Yes, I was going to correct that but forgot.
I'm all for moving the sample in a less prominent location, but I would
be -1 on moving the imagereader into a block. it's just a class after
all and a really useful one. for the paginator, I'm +0 on moving it
into a block.
--
Stefano.