You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to muse-dev@ws.apache.org by "Mohammad Fakhar (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2006/08/01 00:15:15 UTC

[jira] Created: (MUSE-50) wsrf faults are not ws-basefaults compliant

wsrf faults are not ws-basefaults compliant
-------------------------------------------

                 Key: MUSE-50
                 URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MUSE-50
             Project: Muse
          Issue Type: Bug
          Components: WSRF WSBF BaseFault
    Affects Versions: 2.0.0 M1
         Environment: all
            Reporter: Mohammad Fakhar
         Assigned To: Dan Jemiolo


WSRF faults returned to muse clients are not ws-basefault compliant.
For example an InvalidResourcePropertyQname fault appears as:

<soap:Fault xmlns:soap="http://www.w3.org/2003/05/soap-envelope" xmlns:tns="http://ws.apache.org/axis2">
  <soap:Code>
    <soap:Value>soap:Receiver</soap:Value>
  </soap:Code>
  <soap:Reason>
    <soap:Text>[ID = 'PropertyNotInSchema'] There is no property named 'first' defined in the schema. A property should not have any operations or metadata applied to it if it is not in the WS-RP document.</soap:Text>
  </soap:Reason>
</soap:Fault>

This can be problematic if a client is trying to determine why an operation failed and doesn't have any specification based codes/text to check for in fault: namely the fault name.

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators: http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/Administrators.jspa
-
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

        

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: muse-dev-unsubscribe@ws.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: muse-dev-help@ws.apache.org

[jira] Commented: (MUSE-50) wsrf faults are not ws-basefaults compliant

Posted by "Mohammad Fakhar (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org>.
    [ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MUSE-50?page=comments#action_12424678 ] 
            
Mohammad Fakhar commented on MUSE-50:
-------------------------------------

this is not a major bug, made it major by mistake

> wsrf faults are not ws-basefaults compliant
> -------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: MUSE-50
>                 URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MUSE-50
>             Project: Muse
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: WSRF WSBF BaseFault
>    Affects Versions: 2.0.0 M1
>         Environment: all
>            Reporter: Mohammad Fakhar
>         Assigned To: Dan Jemiolo
>
> WSRF faults returned to muse clients are not ws-basefault compliant.
> For example an InvalidResourcePropertyQname fault appears as:
> <soap:Fault xmlns:soap="http://www.w3.org/2003/05/soap-envelope" xmlns:tns="http://ws.apache.org/axis2">
>   <soap:Code>
>     <soap:Value>soap:Receiver</soap:Value>
>   </soap:Code>
>   <soap:Reason>
>     <soap:Text>[ID = 'PropertyNotInSchema'] There is no property named 'first' defined in the schema. A property should not have any operations or metadata applied to it if it is not in the WS-RP document.</soap:Text>
>   </soap:Reason>
> </soap:Fault>
> This can be problematic if a client is trying to determine why an operation failed and doesn't have any specification based codes/text to check for in fault: namely the fault name.

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators: http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/Administrators.jspa
-
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

        

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: muse-dev-unsubscribe@ws.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: muse-dev-help@ws.apache.org

[jira] Closed: (MUSE-50) wsrf faults are not ws-basefaults compliant

Posted by "Dan Jemiolo (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org>.
     [ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MUSE-50?page=all ]

Dan Jemiolo closed MUSE-50.
---------------------------

    Fix Version/s: 2.0.0
       Resolution: Fixed

Fixed:  http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=rev&revision=438335

> wsrf faults are not ws-basefaults compliant
> -------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: MUSE-50
>                 URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MUSE-50
>             Project: Muse
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: WSRF WSBF BaseFault
>    Affects Versions: 2.0.0 M1
>         Environment: all
>            Reporter: Mohammad Fakhar
>         Assigned To: Dan Jemiolo
>             Fix For: 2.0.0
>
>
> WSRF faults returned to muse clients are not ws-basefault compliant.
> For example an InvalidResourcePropertyQname fault appears as:
> <soap:Fault xmlns:soap="http://www.w3.org/2003/05/soap-envelope" xmlns:tns="http://ws.apache.org/axis2">
>   <soap:Code>
>     <soap:Value>soap:Receiver</soap:Value>
>   </soap:Code>
>   <soap:Reason>
>     <soap:Text>[ID = 'PropertyNotInSchema'] There is no property named 'first' defined in the schema. A property should not have any operations or metadata applied to it if it is not in the WS-RP document.</soap:Text>
>   </soap:Reason>
> </soap:Fault>
> This can be problematic if a client is trying to determine why an operation failed and doesn't have any specification based codes/text to check for in fault: namely the fault name.

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators: http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/Administrators.jspa
-
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

        

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: muse-dev-unsubscribe@ws.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: muse-dev-help@ws.apache.org