You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@tomee.apache.org by David Blevins <da...@visi.com> on 2007/01/26 09:32:55 UTC

Packages for jaxb (Re: svn commit: r500064 - in /geronimo/server/trunk/modules: geronimo-openejb-builder)

Jacek, replying on OpenEJB Dev.

On Jan 25, 2007, at 11:19 PM, Jacek Laskowski wrote:

> On 1/26/07, dblevins@apache.org <db...@apache.org> wrote:
>> Author: dblevins
>> Date: Thu Jan 25 15:56:05 2007
>> New Revision: 500064
>>
>> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=rev&rev=500064
>> Log:
>> Updates for repackaging in openejb
>
>> +import org.apache.openejb.jee.oejb3.EjbDeployment;
>
> I asked about it while Dave J. was crafting the configs for Java EE
> packages and am asking about it now. Could we settle on javaee as a
> shortcut for Java EE 5 rather than using jee (pronounciation's better,
> though)? And what are the reasons for oejb3? Couldn't ejb3 be used
> instead?
>
> I'm not tied to these name change proposals, so good reasons to leave
> it as they're now will do the trick. Without them I can't understand
> why such mystic names are better than their longer counterparts?

We don't use ejb3 is it's the descriptor objects for openejb3,  
specifically the v3 version of the openejb-jar.

If people like openejb-javaee as the module name and package better  
than openejb-jee that's cool with me.

-David