You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to issues@flink.apache.org by pnowojski <gi...@git.apache.org> on 2018/03/23 15:09:55 UTC

[GitHub] flink pull request #5756: [FLINK-8813][flip6] Disallow PARALLELISM_AUTO_MAX ...

GitHub user pnowojski opened a pull request:

    https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/5756

    [FLINK-8813][flip6] Disallow PARALLELISM_AUTO_MAX for flip6

    This deprecates `org.apache.flink.api.common.ExecutionConfig#PARALLELISM_AUTO_MAX`. From now on, with flip6 mode user will be hit with following error message.
    
    ```
    Caused by: org.apache.flink.runtime.client.JobSubmissionException: Could not start JobManager.
    	at org.apache.flink.runtime.dispatcher.Dispatcher.submitJob(Dispatcher.java:299)
    	at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native Method)
    	at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(NativeMethodAccessorImpl.java:62)
    	at sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:43)
    	at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:498)
    	at org.apache.flink.runtime.rpc.akka.AkkaRpcActor.handleRpcInvocation(AkkaRpcActor.java:210)
    	at org.apache.flink.runtime.rpc.akka.AkkaRpcActor.handleMessage(AkkaRpcActor.java:154)
    	at org.apache.flink.runtime.rpc.akka.FencedAkkaRpcActor.handleMessage(FencedAkkaRpcActor.java:66)
    	at org.apache.flink.runtime.rpc.akka.AkkaRpcActor.lambda$onReceive$1(AkkaRpcActor.java:132)
    	at akka.actor.ActorCell$$anonfun$become$1.applyOrElse(ActorCell.scala:544)
    	at akka.actor.Actor$class.aroundReceive(Actor.scala:502)
    	at akka.actor.UntypedActor.aroundReceive(UntypedActor.scala:95)
    	at akka.actor.ActorCell.receiveMessage(ActorCell.scala:526)
    	at akka.actor.ActorCell.invoke(ActorCell.scala:495)
    	at akka.dispatch.Mailbox.processMailbox(Mailbox.scala:257)
    	at akka.dispatch.Mailbox.run(Mailbox.scala:224)
    	at akka.dispatch.Mailbox.exec(Mailbox.scala:234)
    	at scala.concurrent.forkjoin.ForkJoinTask.doExec(ForkJoinTask.java:260)
    	at scala.concurrent.forkjoin.ForkJoinPool$WorkQueue.runTask(ForkJoinPool.java:1339)
    	at scala.concurrent.forkjoin.ForkJoinPool.runWorker(ForkJoinPool.java:1979)
    	at scala.concurrent.forkjoin.ForkJoinWorkerThread.run(ForkJoinWorkerThread.java:107)
    Caused by: org.apache.flink.runtime.client.JobExecutionException: Could not set up JobManager
    	at org.apache.flink.runtime.jobmaster.JobManagerRunner.<init>(JobManagerRunner.java:167)
    	at org.apache.flink.runtime.dispatcher.Dispatcher$DefaultJobManagerRunnerFactory.createJobManagerRunner(Dispatcher.java:762)
    	at org.apache.flink.runtime.dispatcher.Dispatcher.submitJob(Dispatcher.java:254)
    	... 20 more
    Caused by: org.apache.flink.runtime.client.JobSubmissionException: PARALLELISM_AUTO_MAX is no longer supported. Please specify a concrete value for the parallelism.
    	at org.apache.flink.runtime.executiongraph.ExecutionGraphBuilder.buildGraph(ExecutionGraphBuilder.java:206)
    	at org.apache.flink.runtime.jobmaster.JobMaster.<init>(JobMaster.java:290)
    	at org.apache.flink.runtime.jobmaster.JobManagerRunner.<init>(JobManagerRunner.java:147)
    	... 22 more
    ```
    
    Previously it was similar message but ending with: `Caused by: java.lang.IllegalArgumentException: The parallelism must be at least one.`
    
    ## What is the purpose of the change
    
    Both flip6 and old modes are covered by `AutoParallelismITCase`.
    
    ## Does this pull request potentially affect one of the following parts:
    
      - Dependencies (does it add or upgrade a dependency): (yes / **no**)
      - The public API, i.e., is any changed class annotated with `@Public(Evolving)`: (**yes** / no) - deprecates `org.apache.flink.api.common.ExecutionConfig#PARALLELISM_AUTO_MAX`
      - The serializers: (yes / **no** / don't know)
      - The runtime per-record code paths (performance sensitive): (yes / **no** / don't know)
      - Anything that affects deployment or recovery: JobManager (and its components), Checkpointing, Yarn/Mesos, ZooKeeper: (yes / **no** / don't know)
      - The S3 file system connector: (yes / **no** / don't know)
    
    ## Documentation
    
      - Does this pull request introduce a new feature? (yes / **no**)
      - If yes, how is the feature documented? (not applicable / docs / **JavaDocs** / not documented)


You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running:

    $ git pull https://github.com/pnowojski/flink f8813

Alternatively you can review and apply these changes as the patch at:

    https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/5756.patch

To close this pull request, make a commit to your master/trunk branch
with (at least) the following in the commit message:

    This closes #5756
    
----
commit e31a90b45619517dba7c0832cfcd1c697d0a8b0f
Author: Piotr Nowojski <pi...@...>
Date:   2018-03-23T15:01:57Z

    [FLINK-8813][flip6] Disallow PARALLELISM_AUTO_MAX for flip6

----


---

[GitHub] flink issue #5756: [FLINK-8813][flip6] Disallow PARALLELISM_AUTO_MAX for fli...

Posted by pnowojski <gi...@git.apache.org>.
Github user pnowojski commented on the issue:

    https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/5756
  
    Thanks :)


---

[GitHub] flink pull request #5756: [FLINK-8813][flip6] Disallow PARALLELISM_AUTO_MAX ...

Posted by kl0u <gi...@git.apache.org>.
Github user kl0u commented on a diff in the pull request:

    https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/5756#discussion_r177775838
  
    --- Diff: flink-test-utils-parent/flink-test-utils/src/main/java/org/apache/flink/test/util/MiniClusterResource.java ---
    @@ -93,6 +93,10 @@ private MiniClusterResource(
     		this.enableClusterClient = enableClusterClient;
     	}
     
    +	public MiniClusterType getMiniClusterType() {
    --- End diff --
    
    Why not renaming it to sth like `isLegacyDeployment()` and return a `boolean` this will also allow to make the `MiniClusterType` a private class which is also better pattern.


---

[GitHub] flink pull request #5756: [FLINK-8813][flip6] Disallow PARALLELISM_AUTO_MAX ...

Posted by kl0u <gi...@git.apache.org>.
Github user kl0u commented on a diff in the pull request:

    https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/5756#discussion_r178030866
  
    --- Diff: flink-test-utils-parent/flink-test-utils/src/main/java/org/apache/flink/test/util/MiniClusterResource.java ---
    @@ -93,6 +93,10 @@ private MiniClusterResource(
     		this.enableClusterClient = enableClusterClient;
     	}
     
    +	public MiniClusterType getMiniClusterType() {
    --- End diff --
    
    This is definitely not a big issue. I will merge. 


---

[GitHub] flink pull request #5756: [FLINK-8813][flip6] Disallow PARALLELISM_AUTO_MAX ...

Posted by pnowojski <gi...@git.apache.org>.
Github user pnowojski commented on a diff in the pull request:

    https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/5756#discussion_r178029070
  
    --- Diff: flink-test-utils-parent/flink-test-utils/src/main/java/org/apache/flink/test/util/MiniClusterResource.java ---
    @@ -93,6 +93,10 @@ private MiniClusterResource(
     		this.enableClusterClient = enableClusterClient;
     	}
     
    +	public MiniClusterType getMiniClusterType() {
    --- End diff --
    
    I would prefer to keep the enum. Name `isLegacyDeployment` would deprecate faster then the enum type. Also enums are more flexible (adding/removing more values in the future).
    
    Regardless there is no big advantage of one over the other, so if you want, I can change it either way.


---

[GitHub] flink pull request #5756: [FLINK-8813][flip6] Disallow PARALLELISM_AUTO_MAX ...

Posted by asfgit <gi...@git.apache.org>.
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:

    https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/5756


---

[GitHub] flink issue #5756: [FLINK-8813][flip6] Disallow PARALLELISM_AUTO_MAX for fli...

Posted by pnowojski <gi...@git.apache.org>.
Github user pnowojski commented on the issue:

    https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/5756
  
    Rebased and solved conflict.


---

[GitHub] flink pull request #5756: [FLINK-8813][flip6] Disallow PARALLELISM_AUTO_MAX ...

Posted by tillrohrmann <gi...@git.apache.org>.
Github user tillrohrmann commented on a diff in the pull request:

    https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/5756#discussion_r178019320
  
    --- Diff: flink-test-utils-parent/flink-test-utils/src/main/java/org/apache/flink/test/util/MiniClusterResource.java ---
    @@ -93,6 +93,10 @@ private MiniClusterResource(
     		this.enableClusterClient = enableClusterClient;
     	}
     
    +	public MiniClusterType getMiniClusterType() {
    --- End diff --
    
    I think enums are preferably over booleans.


---