You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to users@cocoon.apache.org by Ferda <fe...@cox.net> on 2007/10/18 21:10:12 UTC
RE: Performance problems with 2.1.10 using FOM JavaScript cocoon.load()
* The problem is that when upgrading to Cocoon 2.1.10 for
* one of our software packages to make use of all the
improvements
* in 2.1.10, we're hitting an enormous performance hit. We
* basically see that requests which would normally take 10ths
* to 100thms of microseconds now takes seconds up to a minute
* to execute, where the processor is fully used.
Has there been any solution to this issue? I am rather desperate to for
this to be solved because I have upgraded a production system that supports
50 simultaneous video stream feeds and response time has degraded to between
5 to 10 minutes after around 20 feeds have started up.
Thank you,
Ferda
RE: Performance problems with 2.1.10 using FOM JavaScript cocoon.load()
Posted by Ferda <fe...@cox.net>.
Hello Ard,
Thank you for this suggestion. The loadPackage vs. loadClass is the detail
I was missing. I will try this.
Thank you again,
Ferda
_____
From: Ard Schrijvers [mailto:a.schrijvers@hippo.nl]
Sent: Monday, October 22, 2007 8:24 AM
To: users@cocoon.apache.org; ferda@cox.net
Subject: RE: Performance problems with 2.1.10 using FOM JavaScript
cocoon.load()
Hello Ferda,
we have experienced similar problems. We upgraded to the last rhino version
(At that moment the trunk, but there might be a new release which you can
use) and replaced in all flowscript files all loadPackage declarations with
loadClass (and then only the classes you need). Something changed regarding
the classloader making the loadPackage very slow for 2.1.10 and higher.
For using the rhino trunk, we also needed some cocoon 2.1.11 revision, but I
do not remember which revision number. You might want to try the trunk
Regards Ard
_____
From: Ferda [mailto:ferda@cox.net]
Posted At: Thursday, October 18, 2007 9:10 PM
Posted To: Cocoon User List
Conversation: Performance problems with 2.1.10 using FOM JavaScript
cocoon.load()
Subject: RE: Performance problems with 2.1.10 using FOM JavaScript
cocoon.load()
* The problem is that when upgrading to Cocoon 2.1.10 for
* one of our software packages to make use of all the
improvements
* in 2.1.10, we're hitting an enormous performance hit. We
* basically see that requests which would normally take 10ths
* to 100thms of microseconds now takes seconds up to a minute
* to execute, where the processor is fully used.
Has there been any solution to this issue? I am rather desperate to for
this to be solved because I have upgraded a production system that supports
50 simultaneous video stream feeds and response time has degraded to between
5 to 10 minutes after around 20 feeds have started up.
Thank you,
Ferda
RE: Performance problems with 2.1.10 using FOM JavaScript cocoon.load()
Posted by Ard Schrijvers <a....@hippo.nl>.
Hello Ferda,
we have experienced similar problems. We upgraded to the last rhino
version (At that moment the trunk, but there might be a new release
which you can use) and replaced in all flowscript files all loadPackage
declarations with loadClass (and then only the classes you need).
Something changed regarding the classloader making the loadPackage very
slow for 2.1.10 and higher.
For using the rhino trunk, we also needed some cocoon 2.1.11 revision,
but I do not remember which revision number. You might want to try the
trunk
Regards Ard
________________________________
From: Ferda [mailto:ferda@cox.net]
Posted At: Thursday, October 18, 2007 9:10 PM
Posted To: Cocoon User List
Conversation: Performance problems with 2.1.10 using FOM
JavaScript cocoon.load()
Subject: RE: Performance problems with 2.1.10 using FOM
JavaScript cocoon.load()
* The problem is that when upgrading to Cocoon
2.1.10 for
* one of our software packages to make use of all
the improvements
* in 2.1.10, we're hitting an enormous performance
hit. We
* basically see that requests which would normally
take 10ths
* to 100thms of microseconds now takes seconds up
to a minute
* to execute, where the processor is fully used.
Has there been any solution to this issue? I am rather
desperate to for this to be solved because I have upgraded a production
system that supports 50 simultaneous video stream feeds and response
time has degraded to between 5 to 10 minutes after around 20 feeds have
started up.
Thank you,
Ferda