HBase 1.3.0 release?

[Nick Dimiduk <nd...@gmail.com>]

Hi folks,

Just curious on the status of 1.3 release. We were close but momentum has
slowed? Is there someplace where this is tracked? Looks like the items
listed in HBASE-15341 are wrapped up.

Thanks,
Nick

Re: HBase 1.3.0 release?

[Mikhail Antonov <an...@apache.org>]

So, some update on that (sorry for long delay).

I've posted my results, conclusions and thoughts in the comments
to HBASE-16232, please check it out for details.

TL;DR based on findings and observations outlined there I believe we shall
not consider this one as a release blocker and move with the release.
I'm stabilizing and cleaning up the branch again for the release. Will send
more updates as it goes.

-Mikhail


On Wed, Aug 3, 2016 at 11:34 PM, Mikhail Antonov <ol...@gmail.com>
wrote:

> Lately the only things blocking release have been integration test issues.
>
> First it was HBASE-16074 which took quit some time to address.
> Now HBASE-16232 is the only thing blocking it
> (ITBLL running on sufficiently large cluster with enough regions looses
> data. For the record, I once saw the lost keys
>  on the build off branch-1.2 few weeks ago so not exactly sure yet when
> the regression creeped in).
>
> -Mikhail
>
> On Thu, Aug 4, 2016 at 8:46 AM, Stack <st...@duboce.net> wrote:
>
>> Thanks for asking Nick.
>>
>> Our Mikhail is on holiday and last heard from him, he was trying to track
>> down an ITBLL issue that shows at scale. I've been trying to repro at
>> smaller scale. I think that is what is going on (Mikhail fix me where I
>> have it wrong).
>>
>> St.Ack
>>
>> On Wed, Aug 3, 2016 at 8:58 PM, Nick Dimiduk <nd...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> > Hi folks,
>> >
>> > Just curious on the status of 1.3 release. We were close but momentum
>> has
>> > slowed? Is there someplace where this is tracked? Looks like the items
>> > listed in HBASE-15341 are wrapped up.
>> >
>> > Thanks,
>> > Nick
>> >
>>
>
>
>
> --
> Thanks,
> Michael Antonov
>

Re: HBase 1.3.0 release?

[Mikhail Antonov <ol...@gmail.com>]

Lately the only things blocking release have been integration test issues.

First it was HBASE-16074 which took quit some time to address.
Now HBASE-16232 is the only thing blocking it
(ITBLL running on sufficiently large cluster with enough regions looses
data. For the record, I once saw the lost keys
 on the build off branch-1.2 few weeks ago so not exactly sure yet when the
regression creeped in).

-Mikhail

On Thu, Aug 4, 2016 at 8:46 AM, Stack <st...@duboce.net> wrote:

> Thanks for asking Nick.
>
> Our Mikhail is on holiday and last heard from him, he was trying to track
> down an ITBLL issue that shows at scale. I've been trying to repro at
> smaller scale. I think that is what is going on (Mikhail fix me where I
> have it wrong).
>
> St.Ack
>
> On Wed, Aug 3, 2016 at 8:58 PM, Nick Dimiduk <nd...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > Hi folks,
> >
> > Just curious on the status of 1.3 release. We were close but momentum has
> > slowed? Is there someplace where this is tracked? Looks like the items
> > listed in HBASE-15341 are wrapped up.
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Nick
> >
>



-- 
Thanks,
Michael Antonov

Re: HBase 1.3.0 release?

[Stack <st...@duboce.net>]

Thanks for asking Nick.

Our Mikhail is on holiday and last heard from him, he was trying to track
down an ITBLL issue that shows at scale. I've been trying to repro at
smaller scale. I think that is what is going on (Mikhail fix me where I
have it wrong).

St.Ack

On Wed, Aug 3, 2016 at 8:58 PM, Nick Dimiduk <nd...@gmail.com> wrote:

> Hi folks,
>
> Just curious on the status of 1.3 release. We were close but momentum has
> slowed? Is there someplace where this is tracked? Looks like the items
> listed in HBASE-15341 are wrapped up.
>
> Thanks,
> Nick
>