You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@avalon.apache.org by Peter Donald <pe...@apache.org> on 2002/03/04 03:49:29 UTC
Re: Excalibur Build Failure in service package in the scratchpad.
On Mon, 4 Mar 2002 13:51, Leif Mortenson wrote:
> Excalibur's build is currently failing with the following:
It looks like something added in JDK1.4. You can either exclude it from
compile unless jdk1.4 is present or alternatively make it extend
CascadingException
--
Cheers,
Pete
----------------------------------------------------------
Which is worse: Ignorance or Apathy? Who knows? Who cares?
----------------------------------------------------------
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: <ma...@jakarta.apache.org>
For additional commands, e-mail: <ma...@jakarta.apache.org>
RE: Excalibur Build Failure in service package in the scratchpad.
Posted by Stephen McConnell <mc...@apache.org>.
I'll fix it so it uses CascadingException.
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Peter Donald [mailto:peter@apache.org]
> Sent: Monday, 04 March, 2002 03:49
> To: Avalon Developers List
> Subject: Re: Excalibur Build Failure in service package in the
> scratchpad.
>
>
> On Mon, 4 Mar 2002 13:51, Leif Mortenson wrote:
> > Excalibur's build is currently failing with the following:
>
> It looks like something added in JDK1.4. You can either exclude it from
> compile unless jdk1.4 is present or alternatively make it extend
> CascadingException
>
> --
> Cheers,
>
> Pete
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------
> Which is worse: Ignorance or Apathy? Who knows? Who cares?
> ----------------------------------------------------------
>
> --
> To unsubscribe, e-mail:
> <ma...@jakarta.apache.org>
> For additional commands, e-mail:
> <ma...@jakarta.apache.org>
>
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: <ma...@jakarta.apache.org>
For additional commands, e-mail: <ma...@jakarta.apache.org>
Re: Excalibur Build Failure in service package in the scratchpad.
Posted by Leif Mortenson <le...@silveregg.co.jp>.
>
>
>Zutt ..... and I'm pumping out stuff left right and centre with the
>flag set in ignorant bliss! So the bottom line is that a canot validate
>against 1.2 without actually having a 1.2 JDK installed ?
>
Builds under 1.3 now thanks.
Leif
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: <ma...@jakarta.apache.org>
For additional commands, e-mail: <ma...@jakarta.apache.org>
Re: Excalibur Build Failure in service package in the scratchpad.
Posted by Peter Donald <pe...@apache.org>.
On Mon, 4 Mar 2002 14:59, Stephen McConnell wrote:
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Peter Donald [mailto:peter@apache.org]
> > Sent: Monday, 04 March, 2002 04:45
> > To: Avalon Developers List
> > Subject: Re: Excalibur Build Failure in service package in the
> > scratchpad.
> >
> > On Mon, 4 Mar 2002 14:24, Stephen McConnell wrote:
> > > Umm, confused - my ant javac directive includes the target attribute -
> > >
> > > <javac debug="off" destdir="${build}/lib" target="1.2">
> > > <classpath>
> > > <path refid="project.classpath" />
> > > </classpath>
> > > <src path="${src}/java" />
> > > </javac>
> > >
> > > Isn't this suposes to flag stuff like this as an error?
> >
> > Nope - the flag does not warn or anything when you use APIs from
> > different JDKs. It just saids that it will generate bytecode that was
> > compatible with
> > 1.2 JDK spec.
>
> Zutt ..... and I'm pumping out stuff left right and centre with the
> flag set in ignorant bliss! So the bottom line is that a canot validate
> against 1.2 without actually having a 1.2 JDK installed ?
correct. However I believe that the nightly builds are done using JDK1.3
which will pick up JDK1.4 isms.
--
Cheers,
Pete
-----------------------------------------------------
First, we shape our tools, thereafter, they shape us.
-----------------------------------------------------
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: <ma...@jakarta.apache.org>
For additional commands, e-mail: <ma...@jakarta.apache.org>
RE: Excalibur Build Failure in service package in the scratchpad.
Posted by Stephen McConnell <mc...@apache.org>.
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Peter Donald [mailto:peter@apache.org]
> Sent: Monday, 04 March, 2002 04:45
> To: Avalon Developers List
> Subject: Re: Excalibur Build Failure in service package in the
> scratchpad.
>
>
> On Mon, 4 Mar 2002 14:24, Stephen McConnell wrote:
> > Umm, confused - my ant javac directive includes the target attribute -
> >
> > <javac debug="off" destdir="${build}/lib" target="1.2">
> > <classpath>
> > <path refid="project.classpath" />
> > </classpath>
> > <src path="${src}/java" />
> > </javac>
> >
> > Isn't this suposes to flag stuff like this as an error?
>
> Nope - the flag does not warn or anything when you use APIs from
> different JDKs. It just saids that it will generate bytecode that was
> compatible with
> 1.2 JDK spec.
Zutt ..... and I'm pumping out stuff left right and centre with the
flag set in ignorant bliss! So the bottom line is that a canot validate
against 1.2 without actually having a 1.2 JDK installed ?
Steve.
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: <ma...@jakarta.apache.org>
For additional commands, e-mail: <ma...@jakarta.apache.org>
Re: Excalibur Build Failure in service package in the scratchpad.
Posted by Peter Donald <pe...@apache.org>.
On Mon, 4 Mar 2002 14:24, Stephen McConnell wrote:
> Umm, confused - my ant javac directive includes the target attribute -
>
> <javac debug="off" destdir="${build}/lib" target="1.2">
> <classpath>
> <path refid="project.classpath" />
> </classpath>
> <src path="${src}/java" />
> </javac>
>
> Isn't this suposes to flag stuff like this as an error?
Nope - the flag does not warn or anything when you use APIs from different
JDKs. It just saids that it will generate bytecode that was compatible with
1.2 JDK spec.
--
Cheers,
Pete
------------------------------------------------------
"If people are good only because they fear punishment,
and hope for reward, then we are a sorry lot indeed."
-Albert Einstein
------------------------------------------------------
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: <ma...@jakarta.apache.org>
For additional commands, e-mail: <ma...@jakarta.apache.org>
Re: Excalibur Build Failure in service package in the scratchpad.
Posted by Berin Loritsch <bl...@apache.org>.
Stephen McConnell wrote:
>
> Umm, confused - my ant javac directive includes the target attribute -
>
> <javac debug="off" destdir="${build}/lib" target="1.2">
> <classpath>
> <path refid="project.classpath" />
> </classpath>
> <src path="${src}/java" />
> </javac>
>
> Isn't this suposes to flag stuff like this as an error?
>
No. All that means is the byte-code generated is compatible with that
JDK. It still compiles to whatever libraries (including the JDK1.4
rt.jar) are in the classpath.
--
"They that give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety
deserve neither liberty nor safety."
- Benjamin Franklin
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: <ma...@jakarta.apache.org>
For additional commands, e-mail: <ma...@jakarta.apache.org>
RE: Excalibur Build Failure in service package in the scratchpad.
Posted by Stephen McConnell <mc...@osm.net>.
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Stephen McConnell [mailto:mcconnell@apache.org]
> Sent: Monday, 04 March, 2002 04:44
> To: Avalon Developers List
> Subject: RE: Excalibur Build Failure in service package in the
> scratchpad.
>
>
>
> Leif:
>
> Ok, in principal the JDK1.4 dependecies have dissapeared along
> with Phoenix dependecies. However, I don't true
^^^^
|
read "trust" (its late)
> the compiler flag for a clean 1.2
> compile. Can you verify is all is building ok.
>
> Cheers, Steve.
>
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Stephen McConnell [mailto:mcconnell@apache.org]
> > Sent: Monday, 04 March, 2002 04:25
> > To: Avalon Developers List
> > Subject: RE: Excalibur Build Failure in service package in the
> > scratchpad.
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > Umm, confused - my ant javac directive includes the target attribute -
> >
> > <javac debug="off" destdir="${build}/lib" target="1.2">
> > <classpath>
> > <path refid="project.classpath" />
> > </classpath>
> > <src path="${src}/java" />
> > </javac>
> >
> > Isn't this suposes to flag stuff like this as an error?
> >
> > Steve.
> >
> >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: Peter Donald [mailto:peter@apache.org]
> > > Sent: Monday, 04 March, 2002 03:49
> > > To: Avalon Developers List
> > > Subject: Re: Excalibur Build Failure in service package in the
> > > scratchpad.
> > >
> > >
> > > On Mon, 4 Mar 2002 13:51, Leif Mortenson wrote:
> > > > Excalibur's build is currently failing with the following:
> > >
> > > It looks like something added in JDK1.4. You can either
> exclude it from
> > > compile unless jdk1.4 is present or alternatively make it extend
> > > CascadingException
> > >
> > > --
> > > Cheers,
> > >
> > > Pete
> > >
> > > ----------------------------------------------------------
> > > Which is worse: Ignorance or Apathy? Who knows? Who cares?
> > > ----------------------------------------------------------
> > >
> > > --
> > > To unsubscribe, e-mail:
> > > <ma...@jakarta.apache.org>
> > > For additional commands, e-mail:
> > > <ma...@jakarta.apache.org>
> > >
> >
> > --
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail:
> <ma...@jakarta.apache.org>
> For additional commands, e-mail:
<ma...@jakarta.apache.org>
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: <ma...@jakarta.apache.org>
For additional commands, e-mail: <ma...@jakarta.apache.org>
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: <ma...@jakarta.apache.org>
For additional commands, e-mail: <ma...@jakarta.apache.org>
RE: Excalibur Build Failure in service package in the scratchpad.
Posted by Stephen McConnell <mc...@apache.org>.
Leif:
Ok, in principal the JDK1.4 dependecies have dissapeared along with Phoenix
dependecies. However, I don't true the compiler flag for a clean 1.2
compile. Can you verify is all is building ok.
Cheers, Steve.
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Stephen McConnell [mailto:mcconnell@apache.org]
> Sent: Monday, 04 March, 2002 04:25
> To: Avalon Developers List
> Subject: RE: Excalibur Build Failure in service package in the
> scratchpad.
>
>
>
>
> Umm, confused - my ant javac directive includes the target attribute -
>
> <javac debug="off" destdir="${build}/lib" target="1.2">
> <classpath>
> <path refid="project.classpath" />
> </classpath>
> <src path="${src}/java" />
> </javac>
>
> Isn't this suposes to flag stuff like this as an error?
>
> Steve.
>
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Peter Donald [mailto:peter@apache.org]
> > Sent: Monday, 04 March, 2002 03:49
> > To: Avalon Developers List
> > Subject: Re: Excalibur Build Failure in service package in the
> > scratchpad.
> >
> >
> > On Mon, 4 Mar 2002 13:51, Leif Mortenson wrote:
> > > Excalibur's build is currently failing with the following:
> >
> > It looks like something added in JDK1.4. You can either exclude it from
> > compile unless jdk1.4 is present or alternatively make it extend
> > CascadingException
> >
> > --
> > Cheers,
> >
> > Pete
> >
> > ----------------------------------------------------------
> > Which is worse: Ignorance or Apathy? Who knows? Who cares?
> > ----------------------------------------------------------
> >
> > --
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail:
> > <ma...@jakarta.apache.org>
> > For additional commands, e-mail:
> > <ma...@jakarta.apache.org>
> >
>
> --
> To unsubscribe, e-mail:
<ma...@jakarta.apache.org>
For additional commands, e-mail: <ma...@jakarta.apache.org>
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: <ma...@jakarta.apache.org>
For additional commands, e-mail: <ma...@jakarta.apache.org>
RE: Excalibur Build Failure in service package in the scratchpad.
Posted by Stephen McConnell <mc...@apache.org>.
Umm, confused - my ant javac directive includes the target attribute -
<javac debug="off" destdir="${build}/lib" target="1.2">
<classpath>
<path refid="project.classpath" />
</classpath>
<src path="${src}/java" />
</javac>
Isn't this suposes to flag stuff like this as an error?
Steve.
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Peter Donald [mailto:peter@apache.org]
> Sent: Monday, 04 March, 2002 03:49
> To: Avalon Developers List
> Subject: Re: Excalibur Build Failure in service package in the
> scratchpad.
>
>
> On Mon, 4 Mar 2002 13:51, Leif Mortenson wrote:
> > Excalibur's build is currently failing with the following:
>
> It looks like something added in JDK1.4. You can either exclude it from
> compile unless jdk1.4 is present or alternatively make it extend
> CascadingException
>
> --
> Cheers,
>
> Pete
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------
> Which is worse: Ignorance or Apathy? Who knows? Who cares?
> ----------------------------------------------------------
>
> --
> To unsubscribe, e-mail:
> <ma...@jakarta.apache.org>
> For additional commands, e-mail:
> <ma...@jakarta.apache.org>
>
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: <ma...@jakarta.apache.org>
For additional commands, e-mail: <ma...@jakarta.apache.org>