You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@ws.apache.org by Sanjiva Weerawarana <sa...@opensource.lk> on 2006/06/02 03:56:11 UTC
Re: [ATTN: Release Managers] 3 binding +1's for a Release from PMC
folks
Guys what's in commons-util? That seems like a redundant naming
strategy .. commons is by definition utility stuff so what's a utility
within commons??
Sanjiva.
On Thu, 2006-06-01 at 08:34 +0200, Jochen Wiedmann wrote:
> Hi, Dims,
>
> Pleading guilty for ws-commons-util 1.0 and ws-commons-java5. Should I run
> the votes now?
>
> Jochen
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@ws.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@ws.apache.org
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@ws.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@ws.apache.org
Re: [ATTN: Release Managers] 3 binding +1's for a Release from PMC folks
Posted by Jochen Wiedmann <jo...@gmail.com>.
On 6/2/06, Henri Yandell <fl...@gmail.com> wrote:
> There was a Jakarta Commons Utils many eons ago, but we threw the name
> out and split it up into Lang, IO, Codec and others. They grew. :)
I have no problem with splitting them when I find *that* there is
something growing. Within the last year, I didn't have that
impression.
Jochen
--
Whenever you find yourself on the side of the
majority, it is time to pause and reflect.
(Mark Twain)
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@ws.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@ws.apache.org
Re: [ATTN: Release Managers] 3 binding +1's for a Release from PMC folks
Posted by Henri Yandell <fl...@gmail.com>.
On 6/1/06, Jochen Wiedmann <jo...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On 6/2/06, Sanjiva Weerawarana <sa...@opensource.lk> wrote:
>
> > Guys what's in commons-util? That seems like a redundant naming
> > strategy .. commons is by definition utility stuff so what's a utility
> > within commons??
>
> It's defined as a set of utilities for XML handling, each of which
> which are too small for a separate project. Included are xs:dateTime
> parses and formatters, serializers, classes for namespace handling,
> and stuff like that. Give me a better name, although I wouldn't be too
> happy to change it after the project is around for 1 year. (And has
> always been since the foundation of the ws-commons.)
There was a Jakarta Commons Utils many eons ago, but we threw the name
out and split it up into Lang, IO, Codec and others. They grew. :)
Hen
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@ws.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@ws.apache.org
Re: [ATTN: Release Managers] 3 binding +1's for a Release from PMC folks
Posted by Jochen Wiedmann <jo...@gmail.com>.
On 6/2/06, Sanjiva Weerawarana <sa...@opensource.lk> wrote:
> Guys what's in commons-util? That seems like a redundant naming
> strategy .. commons is by definition utility stuff so what's a utility
> within commons??
It's defined as a set of utilities for XML handling, each of which
which are too small for a separate project. Included are xs:dateTime
parses and formatters, serializers, classes for namespace handling,
and stuff like that. Give me a better name, although I wouldn't be too
happy to change it after the project is around for 1 year. (And has
always been since the foundation of the ws-commons.)
Jochen
--
Whenever you find yourself on the side of the
majority, it is time to pause and reflect.
(Mark Twain)
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@ws.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@ws.apache.org