Re: Spamassassin on Solaris 10 x86

[Justin Mason <jm...@jmason.org>]

(a) SpamAssassin is written in perl.  Byte-ordering is not an issue ;)

(b) our core testing infrastructure --
http://buildbot.spamassassin.org:8010/ ,
http://buildbot.spamassassin.org:8011/ -- runs on this:

: jm 1...; uname -a
SunOS spamassassin.zones.apache.org 5.10 Generic_118855-15 i86pc i386 i86pc

looks like x86 to me....

--j.

Sietse van Zanen writes:
> There are profound differences between the SPARC and X86 architectures, even within the Solaris OS. One of these is an endian difference.
> 
> >>From your comment I conclude, that you have not ported spamassassin to X86, but only to SPARC.
> It therefore will likely not work on X86. Anyway you should state that it is unsupported and that if anyone would get it to work on S10-X86 should inform the community about it.
> 
> -Sietse
> 
> 
> 
> From: Theo Van Dinter
> Sent: Wed 06-Sep-06 15:51
> To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Spamassassin on Solaris 10 x86
> 
> 
> On Wed, Sep 06, 2006 at 03:38:33PM +0200, Pascal Maes wrote:
> > Anybody else is using Spamassassin on a solaris 10 x86 box ?
> 
> What you showed was a bunch of Amavis debug output.  Run a message through
> "spamassassin" or "spamd" and see if there's an issue.
> 
> In development, we're running SA on Solaris 10 (SPARC, not x86) and it works
> fine.
> 
> -- 
> Randomly Generated Tagline:
> "I came here to eat carrots and kick butt, and I'm all out of carrots."
>                       - One Must Fall:2097

Re: Spamassassin on Solaris 10 x86

[Theo Van Dinter <fe...@apache.org>]

On Wed, Sep 06, 2006 at 03:32:10PM +0100, Justin Mason wrote:
> : jm 1...; uname -a
> SunOS spamassassin.zones.apache.org 5.10 Generic_118855-15 i86pc i386 i86pc
> 
> looks like x86 to me....

Oh crap, it's x86?!?   I would have sworn it was a SPARC! :(
/me will have to run 'uname -m' before responding next time.

-- 
Randomly Generated Tagline:
life, n.:
 	Learning about people the hard way -- by being one.