You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to jdo-dev@db.apache.org by Michael Bouschen <mi...@akquinet.de> on 2016/02/04 22:12:53 UTC

JDO TCK Conference Call Friday February 5, 9 AM Pacific Time (PST)

Hi,

We will have our regular meeting Friday, February 5 at 9 AM Pacific Time (PST) to discuss JDO TCK issues and status. 

Dial-in numbers are:
US Toll free: 866 682-4770
Germany Frankfurt +49 69 222 216 106
Germany Munich: +49 89 1430 2323
Germany Toll free: 08006648515
Switzerland Geneva: +41 445804003
Switzerland Toll free: 0800650026
Oracle Conferencing - Operator-Free Global Access Num(Other countries by request)

To place the call:
1. Call the toll free number.
2. Enter the conference number 939-3689#
3. Enter the security code 1111#

We use the conference call for audio and use Google Hangouts for screen sharing and video.
The Google Hangouts URL for the meeting: http://goo.gl/sCKJaS

Agenda:
1. JDO 3.1: Need to go through change lists in JIRA for 3.1 RC1 and 3.1 to prepare JCP Change Log
2. JDO social media properties (see email from Matthew)
3. JDO-749 "Support for java.time types, and querying using associated methods" https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JDO-749
4. New JIRA JDO-751 "Support for Java8 Optional" https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JDO-751
5. JIRA JDO-747 "Behavior of delete() with multiple concurrent Transactions" https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JDO-747 
6. Other issues

Action Items from weeks past:
[Oct 30 2015] AI Craig: File a maintenance review with JCP
[May 15 2015] AI Craig Spec change for roll back an active transaction when closing a persistence manager (JDO-735)  
[Apr 17 2015] AI Craig: Oracle spec page on JDO need to be updated once the JCP Maintenance Release for JDO 3.1 is published
[Oct 17 2014] AI Matthew any updates for "Modify specification to address NoSQL datastores": https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JDO-651?
[Feb 28 2014] AI Everyone: take a look at https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JDO-712
[Feb 28 2014] AI Everyone: take a look at https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JDO-625
[Dec 13 2013] AI Craig file a JIRA for java.sql.Blob and java.sql.Clob as persistent field types
[Aug 24 2012] AI Craig update the JIRAs JDO-689 JDO-690 and JDO-692 about JDOHelper methods. In process.

Regards Michael 

-- 
*Michael Bouschen*
*Prokurist*

akquinet tech@spree GmbH
Bülowstr. 66, D-10783 Berlin

Fon:   +49 30 235 520-33
Fax:   +49 30 217 520-12
Email: michael.bouschen@akquinet.de
Web:   www.akquinet.de <http://www.akquinet.de>

akquinet tech@spree GmbH, Berlin
Geschäftsführung: Martin Weber, Dr. Torsten Fink
Amtsgericht Berlin-Charlottenburg HRB 86780 B
USt.-Id. Nr.: DE 225 964 680

Minutes: JDO TCK Conference Call Friday February 5, 9 AM Pacific Time (PST)

Posted by Craig Russell <cr...@oracle.com>.
Attendees: Michael Bouschen, Craig Russell

Agenda:

1. JDO 3.1: Need to go through change lists in JIRA for 3.1 RC1 and 3.1 to prepare JCP Change Log

2. JDO social media properties (see email from Matthew)

Need volunteers to manage these accounts. If no volunteers, I will assign volunteers. ;-)

3. JDO-749 "Support for java.time types, and querying using associated methods" https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JDO-749

The JIRA needs as much detail as the corresponding JPA specification ( https://java.net/jira/browse/JPA_SPEC-63 )

4. New JIRA JDO-751 "Support for Java8 Optional" https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JDO-751

Does it make sense to support Optional as a persistent type? It would need to map to a nullable datastore value. So Optional<T> can be the type of a persistent field iff T can be the type of a persistent field. Does it make sense to support Optional<T> as a first class object? If an Employee has a field Optional<Department> can the field be treated as first class? 

Could Employee.getDepartment() return an Optional<Department>? 

5. JIRA JDO-747 "Behavior of delete() with multiple concurrent Transactions" https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JDO-747 

We assume that there are no implementation issues now. Once the specification changes are made we can review them and finalize the test cases.

6. Other issues

What do we call the new release that supports type-safe query, Java 8 and the new types? Discuss.

Action Items from weeks past:
[Oct 30 2015] AI Craig: File a maintenance review with JCP
[May 15 2015] AI Craig Spec change for roll back an active transaction when closing a persistence manager (JDO-735)  
[Apr 17 2015] AI Craig: Oracle spec page on JDO need to be updated once the JCP Maintenance Release for JDO 3.1 is published
[Oct 17 2014] AI Matthew any updates for "Modify specification to address NoSQL datastores": https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JDO-651?
[Feb 28 2014] AI Everyone: take a look at https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JDO-712
[Feb 28 2014] AI Everyone: take a look at https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JDO-625
[Dec 13 2013] AI Craig file a JIRA for java.sql.Blob and java.sql.Clob as persistent field types
[Aug 24 2012] AI Craig update the JIRAs JDO-689 JDO-690 and JDO-692 about JDOHelper methods. In process.