You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@solr.apache.org by Houston Putman <ho...@apache.org> on 2025/06/09 21:14:24 UTC
[DISCUSS] Solr 9.9 Release
Hey everyone,
It's been a while since the last minor release and the changelog looks
pretty good to get the next one in.
I volunteer to do it probably sometime next week unless anyone objects.
- Houston
Re: [DISCUSS] Solr 9.9 Release
Posted by Jason Gerlowski <ge...@gmail.com>.
I think the ParallelHttpShardHandler bit is worth mentioning, as the
perf-bug we've fixed there was pretty significant. Folks might've
tried PHSH and rejected it for performance, and it's good to signal to
those folks that the situation is much much better now.
I think removing the "V2"-related bullet point is fair; most folks
interacting with v2 will be using a client and so the "Accept" header
is likely an implementation detail from that perspective.
Best,
Jason
On Thu, Jul 24, 2025 at 9:22 AM David Smiley <ds...@apache.org> wrote:
>
> Thanks. I tweaked some wording.
>
> At risk of being the "bad guy", I think a number of those lower Highlights
> aren't highlight-worthy. Like say incremental improvements to V2. Or
> fixing a bug in ParallelHttpShardHandler. Or Jetty graceful shutdown.
>
> On Wed, Jul 23, 2025 at 2:57 PM Houston Putman <ho...@apache.org> wrote:
>
> > This is a bit late, but I have a draft release notes:
> >
> > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/SOLR/ReleaseNote9_9_0
> >
> > Please make any changes you want. There are like 6 months of changes, so I
> > tried to be brief. I probably missed some good stuff.
> >
> > - Houston
> >
> > On Mon, Jul 21, 2025 at 7:24 PM Houston Putman <ho...@apache.org> wrote:
> >
> > > Seriously, awesome debugging!!!
> > >
> > > I saw the lack of logs but was looking too much into the fact that it was
> > > always failing in the smoke tester. Great find!
> > >
> > > If we need to do a respin, this will make it a lot easier haha.
> > >
> > > - Houston
> > >
> > > On Mon, Jul 21, 2025 at 6:29 PM David Smiley <ds...@apache.org> wrote:
> > >
> > >> Way to go Pierre!
> > >>
> > >> On Mon, Jul 21, 2025 at 11:04 AM Pierre Salagnac <
> > >> pierre.salagnac@gmail.com>
> > >> wrote:
> > >>
> > >> > I tried to run smoke tests for 9.9, and they failed several times in a
> > >> row
> > >> > for me because of flaky logging tests. Since we also hit this failure
> > >> > frequently in our CI, I spent some time looking at test execution.
> > >> >
> > >> > I figured out that TestLogWatcher systematically fails when it is
> > >> executed
> > >> > after PackageManagerCLITest *in the same JVM*. By default, gradle is
> > >> likely
> > >> > to spawn several JVMs, and unless you are unlucky, these two tests
> > will
> > >> run
> > >> > in different ones and you won't see any issue. (I can't say whether
> > >> running
> > >> > tests from the python script when validating the release has any
> > impact
> > >> on
> > >> > test ordering and number of JVMs).
> > >> >
> > >> > On branch_9x, I have a good repro rate (50% ?) locally by running the
> > >> > following command. It's still not 100% because gradle can run tests in
> > >> any
> > >> > order. I'm not sure how to force that.
> > >> >
> > >> > ./gradlew test --tests PackageManagerCLITest --tests
> > TestLogWatcher
> > >> > -Ptests.jvms=1
> > >> >
> > >> > (note that's necessary to force the number of forked JVMs to 1 so
> > tests
> > >> are
> > >> > executed in a row in the same process).
> > >> >
> > >> >
> > >> > Now, the root cause seems pretty obvious. Class PackageTool invokes
> > >> > "Configurator.setRootLevel(Level.OFF)" and never reverts that. Any
> > test
> > >> > that later looks at was logged is very likely to fail.
> > >> > Not sure what is the best path for a fix. Shutting down all logging
> > >> (even
> > >> > in a CLI tool) seems to be a bad practice to me...
> > >> >
> > >> >
> > >> > Le mar. 15 juil. 2025 à 23:53, Houston Putman <ho...@apache.org> a
> > >> > écrit :
> > >> >
> > >> > > Hey everyone,
> > >> > >
> > >> > > Update on the 9.9 release.
> > >> > >
> > >> > > There are two issues that popped up after fixing the
> > >> > > ParallelHttpShardHandler bug:
> > >> > >
> > >> > > - https://github.com/apache/solr/pull/3428 (9.x specific,
> > >> unrelated
> > >> > to
> > >> > > the bug, but found while beasting tests)
> > >> > > - https://github.com/apache/solr/pull/3429 (Fixes bug introduced
> > >> into
> > >> > > HttpShardHandler)
> > >> > >
> > >> > > Both should be good to go after quick reviews.
> > >> > >
> > >> > > The other big issue we are facing is regarding the smoke tester and
> > >> > > buildAndPushRelease scripts. Both of these have started having
> > issues
> > >> > > regarding running tests that watch logs. (Like TestLogWatcher and
> > >> > > RankFieldTest). Both of these watch for certain log events, and both
> > >> of
> > >> > > them fail when running the tests via the python scripts. We can see
> > >> this
> > >> > > has been happening since May 9th on the Apache Jenkins instances,
> > but
> > >> > there
> > >> > > is nothing introduced in Solr at the time that would explain it.
> > >> > > https://ci-builds.apache.org/job/Solr/job/Solr-Smoketest-9.x/
> > >> > >
> > >> > > I am having a very hard time replicating this (outside of doing the
> > >> full
> > >> > > release process), but I'll hopefully have it solved by the time
> > those
> > >> 2
> > >> > PRs
> > >> > > are approved, merged, and backported.
> > >> > >
> > >> > > - Houston
> > >> > >
> > >> > > On Mon, Jul 7, 2025 at 10:14 AM Houston Putman <ho...@apache.org>
> > >> > wrote:
> > >> > >
> > >> > > > Fair enough, I was waiting to cut the branch since we weren't
> > ready
> > >> to
> > >> > do
> > >> > > > the release yet. But I'll start that process now.
> > >> > > >
> > >> > > > - Houston
> > >> > > >
> > >> > > > On Mon, Jul 7, 2025 at 6:39 AM David Smiley <ds...@apache.org>
> > >> > wrote:
> > >> > > >
> > >> > > >> I noticed recently there seems to be no release branch
> > separation,
> > >> > which
> > >> > > >> is
> > >> > > >> designed to bring about more stability.
> > >> > > >>
> > >> > > >> I've been waiting on merging
> > >> > > >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-5707
> > >> > > >> (a 4 digit JIRA from 2014), "Lucene Expressions for Solr" because
> > >> the
> > >> > > >> Lucene 9.12.2 bug fix includes a bug fix I worked on that
> > >> > significantly
> > >> > > >> improves the usefulness of SOLR-5707. Notwithstanding a couple
> > >> > ignored
> > >> > > >> tests (waiting for 9.12.2), that PR is ready for review. Even
> > has
> > >> a
> > >> > new
> > >> > > >> ref guide page just for it.
> > >> > > >>
> > >> > > >>
> > >> > > >> On Mon, Jul 7, 2025 at 12:07 AM Houston Putman <
> > houston@apache.org
> > >> >
> > >> > > >> wrote:
> > >> > > >>
> > >> > > >> > This is a big blocker:
> > https://github.com/apache/solr/pull/3398
> > >> > > >> >
> > >> > > >> > And it needs some more eyes, but hopefully we can finish it out
> > >> > early
> > >> > > >> this
> > >> > > >> > week.
> > >> > > >> >
> > >> > > >> > We also need to actually do the lucene upgrade which I can do
> > >> > tomorrow
> > >> > > >> > morning.
> > >> > > >> >
> > >> > > >> > After those two are done, I'll create an RC.
> > >> > > >> >
> > >> > > >> > - Houston
> > >> > > >> >
> > >> > > >> > On Thu, Jul 3, 2025 at 4:26 PM Anshum Gupta <anshum@apache.org
> > >
> > >> > > wrote:
> > >> > > >> >
> > >> > > >> > > Hi everyone,
> > >> > > >> > >
> > >> > > >> > > Now that the Lucene release is done, is there something that
> > is
> > >> > > >> stopping
> > >> > > >> > us
> > >> > > >> > > from moving forward with this release? If not, let's build an
> > >> RC
> > >> > > early
> > >> > > >> > next
> > >> > > >> > > week.
> > >> > > >> > >
> > >> > > >> > > -Anshum
> > >> > > >> > >
> > >> > > >> > > On Wed, Jun 11, 2025 at 4:12 PM David Smiley <
> > >> dsmiley@apache.org>
> > >> > > >> wrote:
> > >> > > >> > >
> > >> > > >> > > > Yes, I _just_ back ported a Lucene fix to 9.12.2 that would
> > >> make
> > >> > > >> > > > finishing/committing
> > >> > > >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-5707
> > >> > > >> > > > (using
> > >> > > >> > > > Lucene Expressions module in Solr) way more useful.
> > >> > > >> > > >
> > >> > > >> > > > On Wed, Jun 11, 2025 at 5:54 PM Houston Putman <
> > >> > > houston@apache.org>
> > >> > > >> > > wrote:
> > >> > > >> > > >
> > >> > > >> > > > > We might also want to wait for the next Lucene 9.12.2
> > >> release,
> > >> > > >> which
> > >> > > >> > > > should
> > >> > > >> > > > > hopefully happen soon?
> > >> > > >> > > > >
> > >> > > >> > > > > - Houston
> > >> > > >> > > > >
> > >> > > >> > > > > On Wed, Jun 11, 2025 at 8:51 AM Bruno Roustant <
> > >> > > >> > > bruno.roustant@gmail.com
> > >> > > >> > > > >
> > >> > > >> > > > > wrote:
> > >> > > >> > > > >
> > >> > > >> > > > > > +1 Thanks Houston!
> > >> > > >> > > > > >
> > >> > > >> > > > > > Le mer. 11 juin 2025 à 00:29, Jan Høydahl <
> > >> > > >> jan.asf@cominvent.com>
> > >> > > >> > a
> > >> > > >> > > > > écrit
> > >> > > >> > > > > > :
> > >> > > >> > > > > >
> > >> > > >> > > > > > > Great plan. +1
> > >> > > >> > > > > > >
> > >> > > >> > > > > > > > 9. juni 2025 kl. 23:14 skrev Houston Putman <
> > >> > > >> > houston@apache.org
> > >> > > >> > > >:
> > >> > > >> > > > > > > >
> > >> > > >> > > > > > > > Hey everyone,
> > >> > > >> > > > > > > >
> > >> > > >> > > > > > > > It's been a while since the last minor release and
> > >> the
> > >> > > >> > changelog
> > >> > > >> > > > > looks
> > >> > > >> > > > > > > > pretty good to get the next one in.
> > >> > > >> > > > > > > >
> > >> > > >> > > > > > > > I volunteer to do it probably sometime next week
> > >> unless
> > >> > > >> anyone
> > >> > > >> > > > > objects.
> > >> > > >> > > > > > > >
> > >> > > >> > > > > > > > - Houston
> > >> > > >> > > > > > >
> > >> > > >> > > > > > >
> > >> > > >> > > > > > >
> > >> > > >> > >
> > >> > >
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > >> > > >> > > > > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail:
> > >> dev-unsubscribe@solr.apache.org
> > >> > > >> > > > > > > For additional commands, e-mail:
> > >> dev-help@solr.apache.org
> > >> > > >> > > > > > >
> > >> > > >> > > > > > >
> > >> > > >> > > > > >
> > >> > > >> > > > >
> > >> > > >> > > >
> > >> > > >> > >
> > >> > > >> >
> > >> > > >>
> > >> > > >
> > >> > >
> > >> >
> > >>
> > >
> >
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@solr.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@solr.apache.org
Re: [DISCUSS] Solr 9.9 Release
Posted by David Smiley <ds...@apache.org>.
Thanks. I tweaked some wording.
At risk of being the "bad guy", I think a number of those lower Highlights
aren't highlight-worthy. Like say incremental improvements to V2. Or
fixing a bug in ParallelHttpShardHandler. Or Jetty graceful shutdown.
On Wed, Jul 23, 2025 at 2:57 PM Houston Putman <ho...@apache.org> wrote:
> This is a bit late, but I have a draft release notes:
>
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/SOLR/ReleaseNote9_9_0
>
> Please make any changes you want. There are like 6 months of changes, so I
> tried to be brief. I probably missed some good stuff.
>
> - Houston
>
> On Mon, Jul 21, 2025 at 7:24 PM Houston Putman <ho...@apache.org> wrote:
>
> > Seriously, awesome debugging!!!
> >
> > I saw the lack of logs but was looking too much into the fact that it was
> > always failing in the smoke tester. Great find!
> >
> > If we need to do a respin, this will make it a lot easier haha.
> >
> > - Houston
> >
> > On Mon, Jul 21, 2025 at 6:29 PM David Smiley <ds...@apache.org> wrote:
> >
> >> Way to go Pierre!
> >>
> >> On Mon, Jul 21, 2025 at 11:04 AM Pierre Salagnac <
> >> pierre.salagnac@gmail.com>
> >> wrote:
> >>
> >> > I tried to run smoke tests for 9.9, and they failed several times in a
> >> row
> >> > for me because of flaky logging tests. Since we also hit this failure
> >> > frequently in our CI, I spent some time looking at test execution.
> >> >
> >> > I figured out that TestLogWatcher systematically fails when it is
> >> executed
> >> > after PackageManagerCLITest *in the same JVM*. By default, gradle is
> >> likely
> >> > to spawn several JVMs, and unless you are unlucky, these two tests
> will
> >> run
> >> > in different ones and you won't see any issue. (I can't say whether
> >> running
> >> > tests from the python script when validating the release has any
> impact
> >> on
> >> > test ordering and number of JVMs).
> >> >
> >> > On branch_9x, I have a good repro rate (50% ?) locally by running the
> >> > following command. It's still not 100% because gradle can run tests in
> >> any
> >> > order. I'm not sure how to force that.
> >> >
> >> > ./gradlew test --tests PackageManagerCLITest --tests
> TestLogWatcher
> >> > -Ptests.jvms=1
> >> >
> >> > (note that's necessary to force the number of forked JVMs to 1 so
> tests
> >> are
> >> > executed in a row in the same process).
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > Now, the root cause seems pretty obvious. Class PackageTool invokes
> >> > "Configurator.setRootLevel(Level.OFF)" and never reverts that. Any
> test
> >> > that later looks at was logged is very likely to fail.
> >> > Not sure what is the best path for a fix. Shutting down all logging
> >> (even
> >> > in a CLI tool) seems to be a bad practice to me...
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > Le mar. 15 juil. 2025 à 23:53, Houston Putman <ho...@apache.org> a
> >> > écrit :
> >> >
> >> > > Hey everyone,
> >> > >
> >> > > Update on the 9.9 release.
> >> > >
> >> > > There are two issues that popped up after fixing the
> >> > > ParallelHttpShardHandler bug:
> >> > >
> >> > > - https://github.com/apache/solr/pull/3428 (9.x specific,
> >> unrelated
> >> > to
> >> > > the bug, but found while beasting tests)
> >> > > - https://github.com/apache/solr/pull/3429 (Fixes bug introduced
> >> into
> >> > > HttpShardHandler)
> >> > >
> >> > > Both should be good to go after quick reviews.
> >> > >
> >> > > The other big issue we are facing is regarding the smoke tester and
> >> > > buildAndPushRelease scripts. Both of these have started having
> issues
> >> > > regarding running tests that watch logs. (Like TestLogWatcher and
> >> > > RankFieldTest). Both of these watch for certain log events, and both
> >> of
> >> > > them fail when running the tests via the python scripts. We can see
> >> this
> >> > > has been happening since May 9th on the Apache Jenkins instances,
> but
> >> > there
> >> > > is nothing introduced in Solr at the time that would explain it.
> >> > > https://ci-builds.apache.org/job/Solr/job/Solr-Smoketest-9.x/
> >> > >
> >> > > I am having a very hard time replicating this (outside of doing the
> >> full
> >> > > release process), but I'll hopefully have it solved by the time
> those
> >> 2
> >> > PRs
> >> > > are approved, merged, and backported.
> >> > >
> >> > > - Houston
> >> > >
> >> > > On Mon, Jul 7, 2025 at 10:14 AM Houston Putman <ho...@apache.org>
> >> > wrote:
> >> > >
> >> > > > Fair enough, I was waiting to cut the branch since we weren't
> ready
> >> to
> >> > do
> >> > > > the release yet. But I'll start that process now.
> >> > > >
> >> > > > - Houston
> >> > > >
> >> > > > On Mon, Jul 7, 2025 at 6:39 AM David Smiley <ds...@apache.org>
> >> > wrote:
> >> > > >
> >> > > >> I noticed recently there seems to be no release branch
> separation,
> >> > which
> >> > > >> is
> >> > > >> designed to bring about more stability.
> >> > > >>
> >> > > >> I've been waiting on merging
> >> > > >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-5707
> >> > > >> (a 4 digit JIRA from 2014), "Lucene Expressions for Solr" because
> >> the
> >> > > >> Lucene 9.12.2 bug fix includes a bug fix I worked on that
> >> > significantly
> >> > > >> improves the usefulness of SOLR-5707. Notwithstanding a couple
> >> > ignored
> >> > > >> tests (waiting for 9.12.2), that PR is ready for review. Even
> has
> >> a
> >> > new
> >> > > >> ref guide page just for it.
> >> > > >>
> >> > > >>
> >> > > >> On Mon, Jul 7, 2025 at 12:07 AM Houston Putman <
> houston@apache.org
> >> >
> >> > > >> wrote:
> >> > > >>
> >> > > >> > This is a big blocker:
> https://github.com/apache/solr/pull/3398
> >> > > >> >
> >> > > >> > And it needs some more eyes, but hopefully we can finish it out
> >> > early
> >> > > >> this
> >> > > >> > week.
> >> > > >> >
> >> > > >> > We also need to actually do the lucene upgrade which I can do
> >> > tomorrow
> >> > > >> > morning.
> >> > > >> >
> >> > > >> > After those two are done, I'll create an RC.
> >> > > >> >
> >> > > >> > - Houston
> >> > > >> >
> >> > > >> > On Thu, Jul 3, 2025 at 4:26 PM Anshum Gupta <anshum@apache.org
> >
> >> > > wrote:
> >> > > >> >
> >> > > >> > > Hi everyone,
> >> > > >> > >
> >> > > >> > > Now that the Lucene release is done, is there something that
> is
> >> > > >> stopping
> >> > > >> > us
> >> > > >> > > from moving forward with this release? If not, let's build an
> >> RC
> >> > > early
> >> > > >> > next
> >> > > >> > > week.
> >> > > >> > >
> >> > > >> > > -Anshum
> >> > > >> > >
> >> > > >> > > On Wed, Jun 11, 2025 at 4:12 PM David Smiley <
> >> dsmiley@apache.org>
> >> > > >> wrote:
> >> > > >> > >
> >> > > >> > > > Yes, I _just_ back ported a Lucene fix to 9.12.2 that would
> >> make
> >> > > >> > > > finishing/committing
> >> > > >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-5707
> >> > > >> > > > (using
> >> > > >> > > > Lucene Expressions module in Solr) way more useful.
> >> > > >> > > >
> >> > > >> > > > On Wed, Jun 11, 2025 at 5:54 PM Houston Putman <
> >> > > houston@apache.org>
> >> > > >> > > wrote:
> >> > > >> > > >
> >> > > >> > > > > We might also want to wait for the next Lucene 9.12.2
> >> release,
> >> > > >> which
> >> > > >> > > > should
> >> > > >> > > > > hopefully happen soon?
> >> > > >> > > > >
> >> > > >> > > > > - Houston
> >> > > >> > > > >
> >> > > >> > > > > On Wed, Jun 11, 2025 at 8:51 AM Bruno Roustant <
> >> > > >> > > bruno.roustant@gmail.com
> >> > > >> > > > >
> >> > > >> > > > > wrote:
> >> > > >> > > > >
> >> > > >> > > > > > +1 Thanks Houston!
> >> > > >> > > > > >
> >> > > >> > > > > > Le mer. 11 juin 2025 à 00:29, Jan Høydahl <
> >> > > >> jan.asf@cominvent.com>
> >> > > >> > a
> >> > > >> > > > > écrit
> >> > > >> > > > > > :
> >> > > >> > > > > >
> >> > > >> > > > > > > Great plan. +1
> >> > > >> > > > > > >
> >> > > >> > > > > > > > 9. juni 2025 kl. 23:14 skrev Houston Putman <
> >> > > >> > houston@apache.org
> >> > > >> > > >:
> >> > > >> > > > > > > >
> >> > > >> > > > > > > > Hey everyone,
> >> > > >> > > > > > > >
> >> > > >> > > > > > > > It's been a while since the last minor release and
> >> the
> >> > > >> > changelog
> >> > > >> > > > > looks
> >> > > >> > > > > > > > pretty good to get the next one in.
> >> > > >> > > > > > > >
> >> > > >> > > > > > > > I volunteer to do it probably sometime next week
> >> unless
> >> > > >> anyone
> >> > > >> > > > > objects.
> >> > > >> > > > > > > >
> >> > > >> > > > > > > > - Houston
> >> > > >> > > > > > >
> >> > > >> > > > > > >
> >> > > >> > > > > > >
> >> > > >> > >
> >> > >
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> >> > > >> > > > > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail:
> >> dev-unsubscribe@solr.apache.org
> >> > > >> > > > > > > For additional commands, e-mail:
> >> dev-help@solr.apache.org
> >> > > >> > > > > > >
> >> > > >> > > > > > >
> >> > > >> > > > > >
> >> > > >> > > > >
> >> > > >> > > >
> >> > > >> > >
> >> > > >> >
> >> > > >>
> >> > > >
> >> > >
> >> >
> >>
> >
>
Re: [DISCUSS] Solr 9.9 Release
Posted by Houston Putman <ho...@apache.org>.
This is a bit late, but I have a draft release notes:
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/SOLR/ReleaseNote9_9_0
Please make any changes you want. There are like 6 months of changes, so I
tried to be brief. I probably missed some good stuff.
- Houston
On Mon, Jul 21, 2025 at 7:24 PM Houston Putman <ho...@apache.org> wrote:
> Seriously, awesome debugging!!!
>
> I saw the lack of logs but was looking too much into the fact that it was
> always failing in the smoke tester. Great find!
>
> If we need to do a respin, this will make it a lot easier haha.
>
> - Houston
>
> On Mon, Jul 21, 2025 at 6:29 PM David Smiley <ds...@apache.org> wrote:
>
>> Way to go Pierre!
>>
>> On Mon, Jul 21, 2025 at 11:04 AM Pierre Salagnac <
>> pierre.salagnac@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>> > I tried to run smoke tests for 9.9, and they failed several times in a
>> row
>> > for me because of flaky logging tests. Since we also hit this failure
>> > frequently in our CI, I spent some time looking at test execution.
>> >
>> > I figured out that TestLogWatcher systematically fails when it is
>> executed
>> > after PackageManagerCLITest *in the same JVM*. By default, gradle is
>> likely
>> > to spawn several JVMs, and unless you are unlucky, these two tests will
>> run
>> > in different ones and you won't see any issue. (I can't say whether
>> running
>> > tests from the python script when validating the release has any impact
>> on
>> > test ordering and number of JVMs).
>> >
>> > On branch_9x, I have a good repro rate (50% ?) locally by running the
>> > following command. It's still not 100% because gradle can run tests in
>> any
>> > order. I'm not sure how to force that.
>> >
>> > ./gradlew test --tests PackageManagerCLITest --tests TestLogWatcher
>> > -Ptests.jvms=1
>> >
>> > (note that's necessary to force the number of forked JVMs to 1 so tests
>> are
>> > executed in a row in the same process).
>> >
>> >
>> > Now, the root cause seems pretty obvious. Class PackageTool invokes
>> > "Configurator.setRootLevel(Level.OFF)" and never reverts that. Any test
>> > that later looks at was logged is very likely to fail.
>> > Not sure what is the best path for a fix. Shutting down all logging
>> (even
>> > in a CLI tool) seems to be a bad practice to me...
>> >
>> >
>> > Le mar. 15 juil. 2025 à 23:53, Houston Putman <ho...@apache.org> a
>> > écrit :
>> >
>> > > Hey everyone,
>> > >
>> > > Update on the 9.9 release.
>> > >
>> > > There are two issues that popped up after fixing the
>> > > ParallelHttpShardHandler bug:
>> > >
>> > > - https://github.com/apache/solr/pull/3428 (9.x specific,
>> unrelated
>> > to
>> > > the bug, but found while beasting tests)
>> > > - https://github.com/apache/solr/pull/3429 (Fixes bug introduced
>> into
>> > > HttpShardHandler)
>> > >
>> > > Both should be good to go after quick reviews.
>> > >
>> > > The other big issue we are facing is regarding the smoke tester and
>> > > buildAndPushRelease scripts. Both of these have started having issues
>> > > regarding running tests that watch logs. (Like TestLogWatcher and
>> > > RankFieldTest). Both of these watch for certain log events, and both
>> of
>> > > them fail when running the tests via the python scripts. We can see
>> this
>> > > has been happening since May 9th on the Apache Jenkins instances, but
>> > there
>> > > is nothing introduced in Solr at the time that would explain it.
>> > > https://ci-builds.apache.org/job/Solr/job/Solr-Smoketest-9.x/
>> > >
>> > > I am having a very hard time replicating this (outside of doing the
>> full
>> > > release process), but I'll hopefully have it solved by the time those
>> 2
>> > PRs
>> > > are approved, merged, and backported.
>> > >
>> > > - Houston
>> > >
>> > > On Mon, Jul 7, 2025 at 10:14 AM Houston Putman <ho...@apache.org>
>> > wrote:
>> > >
>> > > > Fair enough, I was waiting to cut the branch since we weren't ready
>> to
>> > do
>> > > > the release yet. But I'll start that process now.
>> > > >
>> > > > - Houston
>> > > >
>> > > > On Mon, Jul 7, 2025 at 6:39 AM David Smiley <ds...@apache.org>
>> > wrote:
>> > > >
>> > > >> I noticed recently there seems to be no release branch separation,
>> > which
>> > > >> is
>> > > >> designed to bring about more stability.
>> > > >>
>> > > >> I've been waiting on merging
>> > > >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-5707
>> > > >> (a 4 digit JIRA from 2014), "Lucene Expressions for Solr" because
>> the
>> > > >> Lucene 9.12.2 bug fix includes a bug fix I worked on that
>> > significantly
>> > > >> improves the usefulness of SOLR-5707. Notwithstanding a couple
>> > ignored
>> > > >> tests (waiting for 9.12.2), that PR is ready for review. Even has
>> a
>> > new
>> > > >> ref guide page just for it.
>> > > >>
>> > > >>
>> > > >> On Mon, Jul 7, 2025 at 12:07 AM Houston Putman <houston@apache.org
>> >
>> > > >> wrote:
>> > > >>
>> > > >> > This is a big blocker: https://github.com/apache/solr/pull/3398
>> > > >> >
>> > > >> > And it needs some more eyes, but hopefully we can finish it out
>> > early
>> > > >> this
>> > > >> > week.
>> > > >> >
>> > > >> > We also need to actually do the lucene upgrade which I can do
>> > tomorrow
>> > > >> > morning.
>> > > >> >
>> > > >> > After those two are done, I'll create an RC.
>> > > >> >
>> > > >> > - Houston
>> > > >> >
>> > > >> > On Thu, Jul 3, 2025 at 4:26 PM Anshum Gupta <an...@apache.org>
>> > > wrote:
>> > > >> >
>> > > >> > > Hi everyone,
>> > > >> > >
>> > > >> > > Now that the Lucene release is done, is there something that is
>> > > >> stopping
>> > > >> > us
>> > > >> > > from moving forward with this release? If not, let's build an
>> RC
>> > > early
>> > > >> > next
>> > > >> > > week.
>> > > >> > >
>> > > >> > > -Anshum
>> > > >> > >
>> > > >> > > On Wed, Jun 11, 2025 at 4:12 PM David Smiley <
>> dsmiley@apache.org>
>> > > >> wrote:
>> > > >> > >
>> > > >> > > > Yes, I _just_ back ported a Lucene fix to 9.12.2 that would
>> make
>> > > >> > > > finishing/committing
>> > > >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-5707
>> > > >> > > > (using
>> > > >> > > > Lucene Expressions module in Solr) way more useful.
>> > > >> > > >
>> > > >> > > > On Wed, Jun 11, 2025 at 5:54 PM Houston Putman <
>> > > houston@apache.org>
>> > > >> > > wrote:
>> > > >> > > >
>> > > >> > > > > We might also want to wait for the next Lucene 9.12.2
>> release,
>> > > >> which
>> > > >> > > > should
>> > > >> > > > > hopefully happen soon?
>> > > >> > > > >
>> > > >> > > > > - Houston
>> > > >> > > > >
>> > > >> > > > > On Wed, Jun 11, 2025 at 8:51 AM Bruno Roustant <
>> > > >> > > bruno.roustant@gmail.com
>> > > >> > > > >
>> > > >> > > > > wrote:
>> > > >> > > > >
>> > > >> > > > > > +1 Thanks Houston!
>> > > >> > > > > >
>> > > >> > > > > > Le mer. 11 juin 2025 à 00:29, Jan Høydahl <
>> > > >> jan.asf@cominvent.com>
>> > > >> > a
>> > > >> > > > > écrit
>> > > >> > > > > > :
>> > > >> > > > > >
>> > > >> > > > > > > Great plan. +1
>> > > >> > > > > > >
>> > > >> > > > > > > > 9. juni 2025 kl. 23:14 skrev Houston Putman <
>> > > >> > houston@apache.org
>> > > >> > > >:
>> > > >> > > > > > > >
>> > > >> > > > > > > > Hey everyone,
>> > > >> > > > > > > >
>> > > >> > > > > > > > It's been a while since the last minor release and
>> the
>> > > >> > changelog
>> > > >> > > > > looks
>> > > >> > > > > > > > pretty good to get the next one in.
>> > > >> > > > > > > >
>> > > >> > > > > > > > I volunteer to do it probably sometime next week
>> unless
>> > > >> anyone
>> > > >> > > > > objects.
>> > > >> > > > > > > >
>> > > >> > > > > > > > - Houston
>> > > >> > > > > > >
>> > > >> > > > > > >
>> > > >> > > > > > >
>> > > >> > >
>> > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> > > >> > > > > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail:
>> dev-unsubscribe@solr.apache.org
>> > > >> > > > > > > For additional commands, e-mail:
>> dev-help@solr.apache.org
>> > > >> > > > > > >
>> > > >> > > > > > >
>> > > >> > > > > >
>> > > >> > > > >
>> > > >> > > >
>> > > >> > >
>> > > >> >
>> > > >>
>> > > >
>> > >
>> >
>>
>
Re: [DISCUSS] Solr 9.9 Release
Posted by Houston Putman <ho...@apache.org>.
Seriously, awesome debugging!!!
I saw the lack of logs but was looking too much into the fact that it was
always failing in the smoke tester. Great find!
If we need to do a respin, this will make it a lot easier haha.
- Houston
On Mon, Jul 21, 2025 at 6:29 PM David Smiley <ds...@apache.org> wrote:
> Way to go Pierre!
>
> On Mon, Jul 21, 2025 at 11:04 AM Pierre Salagnac <
> pierre.salagnac@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> > I tried to run smoke tests for 9.9, and they failed several times in a
> row
> > for me because of flaky logging tests. Since we also hit this failure
> > frequently in our CI, I spent some time looking at test execution.
> >
> > I figured out that TestLogWatcher systematically fails when it is
> executed
> > after PackageManagerCLITest *in the same JVM*. By default, gradle is
> likely
> > to spawn several JVMs, and unless you are unlucky, these two tests will
> run
> > in different ones and you won't see any issue. (I can't say whether
> running
> > tests from the python script when validating the release has any impact
> on
> > test ordering and number of JVMs).
> >
> > On branch_9x, I have a good repro rate (50% ?) locally by running the
> > following command. It's still not 100% because gradle can run tests in
> any
> > order. I'm not sure how to force that.
> >
> > ./gradlew test --tests PackageManagerCLITest --tests TestLogWatcher
> > -Ptests.jvms=1
> >
> > (note that's necessary to force the number of forked JVMs to 1 so tests
> are
> > executed in a row in the same process).
> >
> >
> > Now, the root cause seems pretty obvious. Class PackageTool invokes
> > "Configurator.setRootLevel(Level.OFF)" and never reverts that. Any test
> > that later looks at was logged is very likely to fail.
> > Not sure what is the best path for a fix. Shutting down all logging (even
> > in a CLI tool) seems to be a bad practice to me...
> >
> >
> > Le mar. 15 juil. 2025 à 23:53, Houston Putman <ho...@apache.org> a
> > écrit :
> >
> > > Hey everyone,
> > >
> > > Update on the 9.9 release.
> > >
> > > There are two issues that popped up after fixing the
> > > ParallelHttpShardHandler bug:
> > >
> > > - https://github.com/apache/solr/pull/3428 (9.x specific, unrelated
> > to
> > > the bug, but found while beasting tests)
> > > - https://github.com/apache/solr/pull/3429 (Fixes bug introduced
> into
> > > HttpShardHandler)
> > >
> > > Both should be good to go after quick reviews.
> > >
> > > The other big issue we are facing is regarding the smoke tester and
> > > buildAndPushRelease scripts. Both of these have started having issues
> > > regarding running tests that watch logs. (Like TestLogWatcher and
> > > RankFieldTest). Both of these watch for certain log events, and both of
> > > them fail when running the tests via the python scripts. We can see
> this
> > > has been happening since May 9th on the Apache Jenkins instances, but
> > there
> > > is nothing introduced in Solr at the time that would explain it.
> > > https://ci-builds.apache.org/job/Solr/job/Solr-Smoketest-9.x/
> > >
> > > I am having a very hard time replicating this (outside of doing the
> full
> > > release process), but I'll hopefully have it solved by the time those 2
> > PRs
> > > are approved, merged, and backported.
> > >
> > > - Houston
> > >
> > > On Mon, Jul 7, 2025 at 10:14 AM Houston Putman <ho...@apache.org>
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > > Fair enough, I was waiting to cut the branch since we weren't ready
> to
> > do
> > > > the release yet. But I'll start that process now.
> > > >
> > > > - Houston
> > > >
> > > > On Mon, Jul 7, 2025 at 6:39 AM David Smiley <ds...@apache.org>
> > wrote:
> > > >
> > > >> I noticed recently there seems to be no release branch separation,
> > which
> > > >> is
> > > >> designed to bring about more stability.
> > > >>
> > > >> I've been waiting on merging
> > > >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-5707
> > > >> (a 4 digit JIRA from 2014), "Lucene Expressions for Solr" because
> the
> > > >> Lucene 9.12.2 bug fix includes a bug fix I worked on that
> > significantly
> > > >> improves the usefulness of SOLR-5707. Notwithstanding a couple
> > ignored
> > > >> tests (waiting for 9.12.2), that PR is ready for review. Even has a
> > new
> > > >> ref guide page just for it.
> > > >>
> > > >>
> > > >> On Mon, Jul 7, 2025 at 12:07 AM Houston Putman <ho...@apache.org>
> > > >> wrote:
> > > >>
> > > >> > This is a big blocker: https://github.com/apache/solr/pull/3398
> > > >> >
> > > >> > And it needs some more eyes, but hopefully we can finish it out
> > early
> > > >> this
> > > >> > week.
> > > >> >
> > > >> > We also need to actually do the lucene upgrade which I can do
> > tomorrow
> > > >> > morning.
> > > >> >
> > > >> > After those two are done, I'll create an RC.
> > > >> >
> > > >> > - Houston
> > > >> >
> > > >> > On Thu, Jul 3, 2025 at 4:26 PM Anshum Gupta <an...@apache.org>
> > > wrote:
> > > >> >
> > > >> > > Hi everyone,
> > > >> > >
> > > >> > > Now that the Lucene release is done, is there something that is
> > > >> stopping
> > > >> > us
> > > >> > > from moving forward with this release? If not, let's build an RC
> > > early
> > > >> > next
> > > >> > > week.
> > > >> > >
> > > >> > > -Anshum
> > > >> > >
> > > >> > > On Wed, Jun 11, 2025 at 4:12 PM David Smiley <
> dsmiley@apache.org>
> > > >> wrote:
> > > >> > >
> > > >> > > > Yes, I _just_ back ported a Lucene fix to 9.12.2 that would
> make
> > > >> > > > finishing/committing
> > > >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-5707
> > > >> > > > (using
> > > >> > > > Lucene Expressions module in Solr) way more useful.
> > > >> > > >
> > > >> > > > On Wed, Jun 11, 2025 at 5:54 PM Houston Putman <
> > > houston@apache.org>
> > > >> > > wrote:
> > > >> > > >
> > > >> > > > > We might also want to wait for the next Lucene 9.12.2
> release,
> > > >> which
> > > >> > > > should
> > > >> > > > > hopefully happen soon?
> > > >> > > > >
> > > >> > > > > - Houston
> > > >> > > > >
> > > >> > > > > On Wed, Jun 11, 2025 at 8:51 AM Bruno Roustant <
> > > >> > > bruno.roustant@gmail.com
> > > >> > > > >
> > > >> > > > > wrote:
> > > >> > > > >
> > > >> > > > > > +1 Thanks Houston!
> > > >> > > > > >
> > > >> > > > > > Le mer. 11 juin 2025 à 00:29, Jan Høydahl <
> > > >> jan.asf@cominvent.com>
> > > >> > a
> > > >> > > > > écrit
> > > >> > > > > > :
> > > >> > > > > >
> > > >> > > > > > > Great plan. +1
> > > >> > > > > > >
> > > >> > > > > > > > 9. juni 2025 kl. 23:14 skrev Houston Putman <
> > > >> > houston@apache.org
> > > >> > > >:
> > > >> > > > > > > >
> > > >> > > > > > > > Hey everyone,
> > > >> > > > > > > >
> > > >> > > > > > > > It's been a while since the last minor release and the
> > > >> > changelog
> > > >> > > > > looks
> > > >> > > > > > > > pretty good to get the next one in.
> > > >> > > > > > > >
> > > >> > > > > > > > I volunteer to do it probably sometime next week
> unless
> > > >> anyone
> > > >> > > > > objects.
> > > >> > > > > > > >
> > > >> > > > > > > > - Houston
> > > >> > > > > > >
> > > >> > > > > > >
> > > >> > > > > > >
> > > >> > >
> > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > >> > > > > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@solr.apache.org
> > > >> > > > > > > For additional commands, e-mail:
> dev-help@solr.apache.org
> > > >> > > > > > >
> > > >> > > > > > >
> > > >> > > > > >
> > > >> > > > >
> > > >> > > >
> > > >> > >
> > > >> >
> > > >>
> > > >
> > >
> >
>
Re: [DISCUSS] Solr 9.9 Release
Posted by David Smiley <ds...@apache.org>.
Way to go Pierre!
On Mon, Jul 21, 2025 at 11:04 AM Pierre Salagnac <pi...@gmail.com>
wrote:
> I tried to run smoke tests for 9.9, and they failed several times in a row
> for me because of flaky logging tests. Since we also hit this failure
> frequently in our CI, I spent some time looking at test execution.
>
> I figured out that TestLogWatcher systematically fails when it is executed
> after PackageManagerCLITest *in the same JVM*. By default, gradle is likely
> to spawn several JVMs, and unless you are unlucky, these two tests will run
> in different ones and you won't see any issue. (I can't say whether running
> tests from the python script when validating the release has any impact on
> test ordering and number of JVMs).
>
> On branch_9x, I have a good repro rate (50% ?) locally by running the
> following command. It's still not 100% because gradle can run tests in any
> order. I'm not sure how to force that.
>
> ./gradlew test --tests PackageManagerCLITest --tests TestLogWatcher
> -Ptests.jvms=1
>
> (note that's necessary to force the number of forked JVMs to 1 so tests are
> executed in a row in the same process).
>
>
> Now, the root cause seems pretty obvious. Class PackageTool invokes
> "Configurator.setRootLevel(Level.OFF)" and never reverts that. Any test
> that later looks at was logged is very likely to fail.
> Not sure what is the best path for a fix. Shutting down all logging (even
> in a CLI tool) seems to be a bad practice to me...
>
>
> Le mar. 15 juil. 2025 à 23:53, Houston Putman <ho...@apache.org> a
> écrit :
>
> > Hey everyone,
> >
> > Update on the 9.9 release.
> >
> > There are two issues that popped up after fixing the
> > ParallelHttpShardHandler bug:
> >
> > - https://github.com/apache/solr/pull/3428 (9.x specific, unrelated
> to
> > the bug, but found while beasting tests)
> > - https://github.com/apache/solr/pull/3429 (Fixes bug introduced into
> > HttpShardHandler)
> >
> > Both should be good to go after quick reviews.
> >
> > The other big issue we are facing is regarding the smoke tester and
> > buildAndPushRelease scripts. Both of these have started having issues
> > regarding running tests that watch logs. (Like TestLogWatcher and
> > RankFieldTest). Both of these watch for certain log events, and both of
> > them fail when running the tests via the python scripts. We can see this
> > has been happening since May 9th on the Apache Jenkins instances, but
> there
> > is nothing introduced in Solr at the time that would explain it.
> > https://ci-builds.apache.org/job/Solr/job/Solr-Smoketest-9.x/
> >
> > I am having a very hard time replicating this (outside of doing the full
> > release process), but I'll hopefully have it solved by the time those 2
> PRs
> > are approved, merged, and backported.
> >
> > - Houston
> >
> > On Mon, Jul 7, 2025 at 10:14 AM Houston Putman <ho...@apache.org>
> wrote:
> >
> > > Fair enough, I was waiting to cut the branch since we weren't ready to
> do
> > > the release yet. But I'll start that process now.
> > >
> > > - Houston
> > >
> > > On Mon, Jul 7, 2025 at 6:39 AM David Smiley <ds...@apache.org>
> wrote:
> > >
> > >> I noticed recently there seems to be no release branch separation,
> which
> > >> is
> > >> designed to bring about more stability.
> > >>
> > >> I've been waiting on merging
> > >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-5707
> > >> (a 4 digit JIRA from 2014), "Lucene Expressions for Solr" because the
> > >> Lucene 9.12.2 bug fix includes a bug fix I worked on that
> significantly
> > >> improves the usefulness of SOLR-5707. Notwithstanding a couple
> ignored
> > >> tests (waiting for 9.12.2), that PR is ready for review. Even has a
> new
> > >> ref guide page just for it.
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> On Mon, Jul 7, 2025 at 12:07 AM Houston Putman <ho...@apache.org>
> > >> wrote:
> > >>
> > >> > This is a big blocker: https://github.com/apache/solr/pull/3398
> > >> >
> > >> > And it needs some more eyes, but hopefully we can finish it out
> early
> > >> this
> > >> > week.
> > >> >
> > >> > We also need to actually do the lucene upgrade which I can do
> tomorrow
> > >> > morning.
> > >> >
> > >> > After those two are done, I'll create an RC.
> > >> >
> > >> > - Houston
> > >> >
> > >> > On Thu, Jul 3, 2025 at 4:26 PM Anshum Gupta <an...@apache.org>
> > wrote:
> > >> >
> > >> > > Hi everyone,
> > >> > >
> > >> > > Now that the Lucene release is done, is there something that is
> > >> stopping
> > >> > us
> > >> > > from moving forward with this release? If not, let's build an RC
> > early
> > >> > next
> > >> > > week.
> > >> > >
> > >> > > -Anshum
> > >> > >
> > >> > > On Wed, Jun 11, 2025 at 4:12 PM David Smiley <ds...@apache.org>
> > >> wrote:
> > >> > >
> > >> > > > Yes, I _just_ back ported a Lucene fix to 9.12.2 that would make
> > >> > > > finishing/committing
> > >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-5707
> > >> > > > (using
> > >> > > > Lucene Expressions module in Solr) way more useful.
> > >> > > >
> > >> > > > On Wed, Jun 11, 2025 at 5:54 PM Houston Putman <
> > houston@apache.org>
> > >> > > wrote:
> > >> > > >
> > >> > > > > We might also want to wait for the next Lucene 9.12.2 release,
> > >> which
> > >> > > > should
> > >> > > > > hopefully happen soon?
> > >> > > > >
> > >> > > > > - Houston
> > >> > > > >
> > >> > > > > On Wed, Jun 11, 2025 at 8:51 AM Bruno Roustant <
> > >> > > bruno.roustant@gmail.com
> > >> > > > >
> > >> > > > > wrote:
> > >> > > > >
> > >> > > > > > +1 Thanks Houston!
> > >> > > > > >
> > >> > > > > > Le mer. 11 juin 2025 à 00:29, Jan Høydahl <
> > >> jan.asf@cominvent.com>
> > >> > a
> > >> > > > > écrit
> > >> > > > > > :
> > >> > > > > >
> > >> > > > > > > Great plan. +1
> > >> > > > > > >
> > >> > > > > > > > 9. juni 2025 kl. 23:14 skrev Houston Putman <
> > >> > houston@apache.org
> > >> > > >:
> > >> > > > > > > >
> > >> > > > > > > > Hey everyone,
> > >> > > > > > > >
> > >> > > > > > > > It's been a while since the last minor release and the
> > >> > changelog
> > >> > > > > looks
> > >> > > > > > > > pretty good to get the next one in.
> > >> > > > > > > >
> > >> > > > > > > > I volunteer to do it probably sometime next week unless
> > >> anyone
> > >> > > > > objects.
> > >> > > > > > > >
> > >> > > > > > > > - Houston
> > >> > > > > > >
> > >> > > > > > >
> > >> > > > > > >
> > >> > >
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > >> > > > > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@solr.apache.org
> > >> > > > > > > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@solr.apache.org
> > >> > > > > > >
> > >> > > > > > >
> > >> > > > > >
> > >> > > > >
> > >> > > >
> > >> > >
> > >> >
> > >>
> > >
> >
>
Re: [DISCUSS] Solr 9.9 Release
Posted by Pierre Salagnac <pi...@gmail.com>.
I tried to run smoke tests for 9.9, and they failed several times in a row
for me because of flaky logging tests. Since we also hit this failure
frequently in our CI, I spent some time looking at test execution.
I figured out that TestLogWatcher systematically fails when it is executed
after PackageManagerCLITest *in the same JVM*. By default, gradle is likely
to spawn several JVMs, and unless you are unlucky, these two tests will run
in different ones and you won't see any issue. (I can't say whether running
tests from the python script when validating the release has any impact on
test ordering and number of JVMs).
On branch_9x, I have a good repro rate (50% ?) locally by running the
following command. It's still not 100% because gradle can run tests in any
order. I'm not sure how to force that.
./gradlew test --tests PackageManagerCLITest --tests TestLogWatcher
-Ptests.jvms=1
(note that's necessary to force the number of forked JVMs to 1 so tests are
executed in a row in the same process).
Now, the root cause seems pretty obvious. Class PackageTool invokes
"Configurator.setRootLevel(Level.OFF)" and never reverts that. Any test
that later looks at was logged is very likely to fail.
Not sure what is the best path for a fix. Shutting down all logging (even
in a CLI tool) seems to be a bad practice to me...
Le mar. 15 juil. 2025 à 23:53, Houston Putman <ho...@apache.org> a écrit :
> Hey everyone,
>
> Update on the 9.9 release.
>
> There are two issues that popped up after fixing the
> ParallelHttpShardHandler bug:
>
> - https://github.com/apache/solr/pull/3428 (9.x specific, unrelated to
> the bug, but found while beasting tests)
> - https://github.com/apache/solr/pull/3429 (Fixes bug introduced into
> HttpShardHandler)
>
> Both should be good to go after quick reviews.
>
> The other big issue we are facing is regarding the smoke tester and
> buildAndPushRelease scripts. Both of these have started having issues
> regarding running tests that watch logs. (Like TestLogWatcher and
> RankFieldTest). Both of these watch for certain log events, and both of
> them fail when running the tests via the python scripts. We can see this
> has been happening since May 9th on the Apache Jenkins instances, but there
> is nothing introduced in Solr at the time that would explain it.
> https://ci-builds.apache.org/job/Solr/job/Solr-Smoketest-9.x/
>
> I am having a very hard time replicating this (outside of doing the full
> release process), but I'll hopefully have it solved by the time those 2 PRs
> are approved, merged, and backported.
>
> - Houston
>
> On Mon, Jul 7, 2025 at 10:14 AM Houston Putman <ho...@apache.org> wrote:
>
> > Fair enough, I was waiting to cut the branch since we weren't ready to do
> > the release yet. But I'll start that process now.
> >
> > - Houston
> >
> > On Mon, Jul 7, 2025 at 6:39 AM David Smiley <ds...@apache.org> wrote:
> >
> >> I noticed recently there seems to be no release branch separation, which
> >> is
> >> designed to bring about more stability.
> >>
> >> I've been waiting on merging
> >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-5707
> >> (a 4 digit JIRA from 2014), "Lucene Expressions for Solr" because the
> >> Lucene 9.12.2 bug fix includes a bug fix I worked on that significantly
> >> improves the usefulness of SOLR-5707. Notwithstanding a couple ignored
> >> tests (waiting for 9.12.2), that PR is ready for review. Even has a new
> >> ref guide page just for it.
> >>
> >>
> >> On Mon, Jul 7, 2025 at 12:07 AM Houston Putman <ho...@apache.org>
> >> wrote:
> >>
> >> > This is a big blocker: https://github.com/apache/solr/pull/3398
> >> >
> >> > And it needs some more eyes, but hopefully we can finish it out early
> >> this
> >> > week.
> >> >
> >> > We also need to actually do the lucene upgrade which I can do tomorrow
> >> > morning.
> >> >
> >> > After those two are done, I'll create an RC.
> >> >
> >> > - Houston
> >> >
> >> > On Thu, Jul 3, 2025 at 4:26 PM Anshum Gupta <an...@apache.org>
> wrote:
> >> >
> >> > > Hi everyone,
> >> > >
> >> > > Now that the Lucene release is done, is there something that is
> >> stopping
> >> > us
> >> > > from moving forward with this release? If not, let's build an RC
> early
> >> > next
> >> > > week.
> >> > >
> >> > > -Anshum
> >> > >
> >> > > On Wed, Jun 11, 2025 at 4:12 PM David Smiley <ds...@apache.org>
> >> wrote:
> >> > >
> >> > > > Yes, I _just_ back ported a Lucene fix to 9.12.2 that would make
> >> > > > finishing/committing
> >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-5707
> >> > > > (using
> >> > > > Lucene Expressions module in Solr) way more useful.
> >> > > >
> >> > > > On Wed, Jun 11, 2025 at 5:54 PM Houston Putman <
> houston@apache.org>
> >> > > wrote:
> >> > > >
> >> > > > > We might also want to wait for the next Lucene 9.12.2 release,
> >> which
> >> > > > should
> >> > > > > hopefully happen soon?
> >> > > > >
> >> > > > > - Houston
> >> > > > >
> >> > > > > On Wed, Jun 11, 2025 at 8:51 AM Bruno Roustant <
> >> > > bruno.roustant@gmail.com
> >> > > > >
> >> > > > > wrote:
> >> > > > >
> >> > > > > > +1 Thanks Houston!
> >> > > > > >
> >> > > > > > Le mer. 11 juin 2025 à 00:29, Jan Høydahl <
> >> jan.asf@cominvent.com>
> >> > a
> >> > > > > écrit
> >> > > > > > :
> >> > > > > >
> >> > > > > > > Great plan. +1
> >> > > > > > >
> >> > > > > > > > 9. juni 2025 kl. 23:14 skrev Houston Putman <
> >> > houston@apache.org
> >> > > >:
> >> > > > > > > >
> >> > > > > > > > Hey everyone,
> >> > > > > > > >
> >> > > > > > > > It's been a while since the last minor release and the
> >> > changelog
> >> > > > > looks
> >> > > > > > > > pretty good to get the next one in.
> >> > > > > > > >
> >> > > > > > > > I volunteer to do it probably sometime next week unless
> >> anyone
> >> > > > > objects.
> >> > > > > > > >
> >> > > > > > > > - Houston
> >> > > > > > >
> >> > > > > > >
> >> > > > > > >
> >> > >
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> >> > > > > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@solr.apache.org
> >> > > > > > > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@solr.apache.org
> >> > > > > > >
> >> > > > > > >
> >> > > > > >
> >> > > > >
> >> > > >
> >> > >
> >> >
> >>
> >
>
Re: [DISCUSS] Solr 9.9 Release
Posted by Houston Putman <ho...@apache.org>.
Hey everyone,
Update on the 9.9 release.
There are two issues that popped up after fixing the
ParallelHttpShardHandler bug:
- https://github.com/apache/solr/pull/3428 (9.x specific, unrelated to
the bug, but found while beasting tests)
- https://github.com/apache/solr/pull/3429 (Fixes bug introduced into
HttpShardHandler)
Both should be good to go after quick reviews.
The other big issue we are facing is regarding the smoke tester and
buildAndPushRelease scripts. Both of these have started having issues
regarding running tests that watch logs. (Like TestLogWatcher and
RankFieldTest). Both of these watch for certain log events, and both of
them fail when running the tests via the python scripts. We can see this
has been happening since May 9th on the Apache Jenkins instances, but there
is nothing introduced in Solr at the time that would explain it.
https://ci-builds.apache.org/job/Solr/job/Solr-Smoketest-9.x/
I am having a very hard time replicating this (outside of doing the full
release process), but I'll hopefully have it solved by the time those 2 PRs
are approved, merged, and backported.
- Houston
On Mon, Jul 7, 2025 at 10:14 AM Houston Putman <ho...@apache.org> wrote:
> Fair enough, I was waiting to cut the branch since we weren't ready to do
> the release yet. But I'll start that process now.
>
> - Houston
>
> On Mon, Jul 7, 2025 at 6:39 AM David Smiley <ds...@apache.org> wrote:
>
>> I noticed recently there seems to be no release branch separation, which
>> is
>> designed to bring about more stability.
>>
>> I've been waiting on merging
>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-5707
>> (a 4 digit JIRA from 2014), "Lucene Expressions for Solr" because the
>> Lucene 9.12.2 bug fix includes a bug fix I worked on that significantly
>> improves the usefulness of SOLR-5707. Notwithstanding a couple ignored
>> tests (waiting for 9.12.2), that PR is ready for review. Even has a new
>> ref guide page just for it.
>>
>>
>> On Mon, Jul 7, 2025 at 12:07 AM Houston Putman <ho...@apache.org>
>> wrote:
>>
>> > This is a big blocker: https://github.com/apache/solr/pull/3398
>> >
>> > And it needs some more eyes, but hopefully we can finish it out early
>> this
>> > week.
>> >
>> > We also need to actually do the lucene upgrade which I can do tomorrow
>> > morning.
>> >
>> > After those two are done, I'll create an RC.
>> >
>> > - Houston
>> >
>> > On Thu, Jul 3, 2025 at 4:26 PM Anshum Gupta <an...@apache.org> wrote:
>> >
>> > > Hi everyone,
>> > >
>> > > Now that the Lucene release is done, is there something that is
>> stopping
>> > us
>> > > from moving forward with this release? If not, let's build an RC early
>> > next
>> > > week.
>> > >
>> > > -Anshum
>> > >
>> > > On Wed, Jun 11, 2025 at 4:12 PM David Smiley <ds...@apache.org>
>> wrote:
>> > >
>> > > > Yes, I _just_ back ported a Lucene fix to 9.12.2 that would make
>> > > > finishing/committing
>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-5707
>> > > > (using
>> > > > Lucene Expressions module in Solr) way more useful.
>> > > >
>> > > > On Wed, Jun 11, 2025 at 5:54 PM Houston Putman <ho...@apache.org>
>> > > wrote:
>> > > >
>> > > > > We might also want to wait for the next Lucene 9.12.2 release,
>> which
>> > > > should
>> > > > > hopefully happen soon?
>> > > > >
>> > > > > - Houston
>> > > > >
>> > > > > On Wed, Jun 11, 2025 at 8:51 AM Bruno Roustant <
>> > > bruno.roustant@gmail.com
>> > > > >
>> > > > > wrote:
>> > > > >
>> > > > > > +1 Thanks Houston!
>> > > > > >
>> > > > > > Le mer. 11 juin 2025 à 00:29, Jan Høydahl <
>> jan.asf@cominvent.com>
>> > a
>> > > > > écrit
>> > > > > > :
>> > > > > >
>> > > > > > > Great plan. +1
>> > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > > 9. juni 2025 kl. 23:14 skrev Houston Putman <
>> > houston@apache.org
>> > > >:
>> > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > > Hey everyone,
>> > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > > It's been a while since the last minor release and the
>> > changelog
>> > > > > looks
>> > > > > > > > pretty good to get the next one in.
>> > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > > I volunteer to do it probably sometime next week unless
>> anyone
>> > > > > objects.
>> > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > > - Houston
>> > > > > > >
>> > > > > > >
>> > > > > > >
>> > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> > > > > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@solr.apache.org
>> > > > > > > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@solr.apache.org
>> > > > > > >
>> > > > > > >
>> > > > > >
>> > > > >
>> > > >
>> > >
>> >
>>
>
Re: [DISCUSS] Solr 9.9 Release
Posted by Houston Putman <ho...@apache.org>.
Fair enough, I was waiting to cut the branch since we weren't ready to do
the release yet. But I'll start that process now.
- Houston
On Mon, Jul 7, 2025 at 6:39 AM David Smiley <ds...@apache.org> wrote:
> I noticed recently there seems to be no release branch separation, which is
> designed to bring about more stability.
>
> I've been waiting on merging
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-5707
> (a 4 digit JIRA from 2014), "Lucene Expressions for Solr" because the
> Lucene 9.12.2 bug fix includes a bug fix I worked on that significantly
> improves the usefulness of SOLR-5707. Notwithstanding a couple ignored
> tests (waiting for 9.12.2), that PR is ready for review. Even has a new
> ref guide page just for it.
>
>
> On Mon, Jul 7, 2025 at 12:07 AM Houston Putman <ho...@apache.org> wrote:
>
> > This is a big blocker: https://github.com/apache/solr/pull/3398
> >
> > And it needs some more eyes, but hopefully we can finish it out early
> this
> > week.
> >
> > We also need to actually do the lucene upgrade which I can do tomorrow
> > morning.
> >
> > After those two are done, I'll create an RC.
> >
> > - Houston
> >
> > On Thu, Jul 3, 2025 at 4:26 PM Anshum Gupta <an...@apache.org> wrote:
> >
> > > Hi everyone,
> > >
> > > Now that the Lucene release is done, is there something that is
> stopping
> > us
> > > from moving forward with this release? If not, let's build an RC early
> > next
> > > week.
> > >
> > > -Anshum
> > >
> > > On Wed, Jun 11, 2025 at 4:12 PM David Smiley <ds...@apache.org>
> wrote:
> > >
> > > > Yes, I _just_ back ported a Lucene fix to 9.12.2 that would make
> > > > finishing/committing https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-5707
> > > > (using
> > > > Lucene Expressions module in Solr) way more useful.
> > > >
> > > > On Wed, Jun 11, 2025 at 5:54 PM Houston Putman <ho...@apache.org>
> > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > We might also want to wait for the next Lucene 9.12.2 release,
> which
> > > > should
> > > > > hopefully happen soon?
> > > > >
> > > > > - Houston
> > > > >
> > > > > On Wed, Jun 11, 2025 at 8:51 AM Bruno Roustant <
> > > bruno.roustant@gmail.com
> > > > >
> > > > > wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > > +1 Thanks Houston!
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Le mer. 11 juin 2025 à 00:29, Jan Høydahl <jan.asf@cominvent.com
> >
> > a
> > > > > écrit
> > > > > > :
> > > > > >
> > > > > > > Great plan. +1
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > 9. juni 2025 kl. 23:14 skrev Houston Putman <
> > houston@apache.org
> > > >:
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Hey everyone,
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > It's been a while since the last minor release and the
> > changelog
> > > > > looks
> > > > > > > > pretty good to get the next one in.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > I volunteer to do it probably sometime next week unless
> anyone
> > > > > objects.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > - Houston
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > > > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@solr.apache.org
> > > > > > > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@solr.apache.org
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
>
Re: [DISCUSS] Solr 9.9 Release
Posted by David Smiley <ds...@apache.org>.
I noticed recently there seems to be no release branch separation, which is
designed to bring about more stability.
I've been waiting on merging https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-5707
(a 4 digit JIRA from 2014), "Lucene Expressions for Solr" because the
Lucene 9.12.2 bug fix includes a bug fix I worked on that significantly
improves the usefulness of SOLR-5707. Notwithstanding a couple ignored
tests (waiting for 9.12.2), that PR is ready for review. Even has a new
ref guide page just for it.
On Mon, Jul 7, 2025 at 12:07 AM Houston Putman <ho...@apache.org> wrote:
> This is a big blocker: https://github.com/apache/solr/pull/3398
>
> And it needs some more eyes, but hopefully we can finish it out early this
> week.
>
> We also need to actually do the lucene upgrade which I can do tomorrow
> morning.
>
> After those two are done, I'll create an RC.
>
> - Houston
>
> On Thu, Jul 3, 2025 at 4:26 PM Anshum Gupta <an...@apache.org> wrote:
>
> > Hi everyone,
> >
> > Now that the Lucene release is done, is there something that is stopping
> us
> > from moving forward with this release? If not, let's build an RC early
> next
> > week.
> >
> > -Anshum
> >
> > On Wed, Jun 11, 2025 at 4:12 PM David Smiley <ds...@apache.org> wrote:
> >
> > > Yes, I _just_ back ported a Lucene fix to 9.12.2 that would make
> > > finishing/committing https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-5707
> > > (using
> > > Lucene Expressions module in Solr) way more useful.
> > >
> > > On Wed, Jun 11, 2025 at 5:54 PM Houston Putman <ho...@apache.org>
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > > We might also want to wait for the next Lucene 9.12.2 release, which
> > > should
> > > > hopefully happen soon?
> > > >
> > > > - Houston
> > > >
> > > > On Wed, Jun 11, 2025 at 8:51 AM Bruno Roustant <
> > bruno.roustant@gmail.com
> > > >
> > > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > +1 Thanks Houston!
> > > > >
> > > > > Le mer. 11 juin 2025 à 00:29, Jan Høydahl <ja...@cominvent.com>
> a
> > > > écrit
> > > > > :
> > > > >
> > > > > > Great plan. +1
> > > > > >
> > > > > > > 9. juni 2025 kl. 23:14 skrev Houston Putman <
> houston@apache.org
> > >:
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Hey everyone,
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > It's been a while since the last minor release and the
> changelog
> > > > looks
> > > > > > > pretty good to get the next one in.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > I volunteer to do it probably sometime next week unless anyone
> > > > objects.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > - Houston
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@solr.apache.org
> > > > > > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@solr.apache.org
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
>
Re: [DISCUSS] Solr 9.9 Release
Posted by Houston Putman <ho...@apache.org>.
This is a big blocker: https://github.com/apache/solr/pull/3398
And it needs some more eyes, but hopefully we can finish it out early this
week.
We also need to actually do the lucene upgrade which I can do tomorrow
morning.
After those two are done, I'll create an RC.
- Houston
On Thu, Jul 3, 2025 at 4:26 PM Anshum Gupta <an...@apache.org> wrote:
> Hi everyone,
>
> Now that the Lucene release is done, is there something that is stopping us
> from moving forward with this release? If not, let's build an RC early next
> week.
>
> -Anshum
>
> On Wed, Jun 11, 2025 at 4:12 PM David Smiley <ds...@apache.org> wrote:
>
> > Yes, I _just_ back ported a Lucene fix to 9.12.2 that would make
> > finishing/committing https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-5707
> > (using
> > Lucene Expressions module in Solr) way more useful.
> >
> > On Wed, Jun 11, 2025 at 5:54 PM Houston Putman <ho...@apache.org>
> wrote:
> >
> > > We might also want to wait for the next Lucene 9.12.2 release, which
> > should
> > > hopefully happen soon?
> > >
> > > - Houston
> > >
> > > On Wed, Jun 11, 2025 at 8:51 AM Bruno Roustant <
> bruno.roustant@gmail.com
> > >
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > > > +1 Thanks Houston!
> > > >
> > > > Le mer. 11 juin 2025 à 00:29, Jan Høydahl <ja...@cominvent.com> a
> > > écrit
> > > > :
> > > >
> > > > > Great plan. +1
> > > > >
> > > > > > 9. juni 2025 kl. 23:14 skrev Houston Putman <houston@apache.org
> >:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Hey everyone,
> > > > > >
> > > > > > It's been a while since the last minor release and the changelog
> > > looks
> > > > > > pretty good to get the next one in.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > I volunteer to do it probably sometime next week unless anyone
> > > objects.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > - Houston
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@solr.apache.org
> > > > > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@solr.apache.org
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
>
Re: [DISCUSS] Solr 9.9 Release
Posted by Anshum Gupta <an...@apache.org>.
Hi everyone,
Now that the Lucene release is done, is there something that is stopping us
from moving forward with this release? If not, let's build an RC early next
week.
-Anshum
On Wed, Jun 11, 2025 at 4:12 PM David Smiley <ds...@apache.org> wrote:
> Yes, I _just_ back ported a Lucene fix to 9.12.2 that would make
> finishing/committing https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-5707
> (using
> Lucene Expressions module in Solr) way more useful.
>
> On Wed, Jun 11, 2025 at 5:54 PM Houston Putman <ho...@apache.org> wrote:
>
> > We might also want to wait for the next Lucene 9.12.2 release, which
> should
> > hopefully happen soon?
> >
> > - Houston
> >
> > On Wed, Jun 11, 2025 at 8:51 AM Bruno Roustant <bruno.roustant@gmail.com
> >
> > wrote:
> >
> > > +1 Thanks Houston!
> > >
> > > Le mer. 11 juin 2025 à 00:29, Jan Høydahl <ja...@cominvent.com> a
> > écrit
> > > :
> > >
> > > > Great plan. +1
> > > >
> > > > > 9. juni 2025 kl. 23:14 skrev Houston Putman <ho...@apache.org>:
> > > > >
> > > > > Hey everyone,
> > > > >
> > > > > It's been a while since the last minor release and the changelog
> > looks
> > > > > pretty good to get the next one in.
> > > > >
> > > > > I volunteer to do it probably sometime next week unless anyone
> > objects.
> > > > >
> > > > > - Houston
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@solr.apache.org
> > > > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@solr.apache.org
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
>
Re: [DISCUSS] Solr 9.9 Release
Posted by David Smiley <ds...@apache.org>.
Yes, I _just_ back ported a Lucene fix to 9.12.2 that would make
finishing/committing https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-5707 (using
Lucene Expressions module in Solr) way more useful.
On Wed, Jun 11, 2025 at 5:54 PM Houston Putman <ho...@apache.org> wrote:
> We might also want to wait for the next Lucene 9.12.2 release, which should
> hopefully happen soon?
>
> - Houston
>
> On Wed, Jun 11, 2025 at 8:51 AM Bruno Roustant <br...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> > +1 Thanks Houston!
> >
> > Le mer. 11 juin 2025 à 00:29, Jan Høydahl <ja...@cominvent.com> a
> écrit
> > :
> >
> > > Great plan. +1
> > >
> > > > 9. juni 2025 kl. 23:14 skrev Houston Putman <ho...@apache.org>:
> > > >
> > > > Hey everyone,
> > > >
> > > > It's been a while since the last minor release and the changelog
> looks
> > > > pretty good to get the next one in.
> > > >
> > > > I volunteer to do it probably sometime next week unless anyone
> objects.
> > > >
> > > > - Houston
> > >
> > >
> > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@solr.apache.org
> > > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@solr.apache.org
> > >
> > >
> >
>
Re: [DISCUSS] Solr 9.9 Release
Posted by Houston Putman <ho...@apache.org>.
We might also want to wait for the next Lucene 9.12.2 release, which should
hopefully happen soon?
- Houston
On Wed, Jun 11, 2025 at 8:51 AM Bruno Roustant <br...@gmail.com>
wrote:
> +1 Thanks Houston!
>
> Le mer. 11 juin 2025 à 00:29, Jan Høydahl <ja...@cominvent.com> a écrit
> :
>
> > Great plan. +1
> >
> > > 9. juni 2025 kl. 23:14 skrev Houston Putman <ho...@apache.org>:
> > >
> > > Hey everyone,
> > >
> > > It's been a while since the last minor release and the changelog looks
> > > pretty good to get the next one in.
> > >
> > > I volunteer to do it probably sometime next week unless anyone objects.
> > >
> > > - Houston
> >
> >
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@solr.apache.org
> > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@solr.apache.org
> >
> >
>
Re: [DISCUSS] Solr 9.9 Release
Posted by Bruno Roustant <br...@gmail.com>.
+1 Thanks Houston!
Le mer. 11 juin 2025 à 00:29, Jan Høydahl <ja...@cominvent.com> a écrit :
> Great plan. +1
>
> > 9. juni 2025 kl. 23:14 skrev Houston Putman <ho...@apache.org>:
> >
> > Hey everyone,
> >
> > It's been a while since the last minor release and the changelog looks
> > pretty good to get the next one in.
> >
> > I volunteer to do it probably sometime next week unless anyone objects.
> >
> > - Houston
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@solr.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@solr.apache.org
>
>
Re: [DISCUSS] Solr 9.9 Release
Posted by Jan Høydahl <ja...@cominvent.com>.
Great plan. +1
> 9. juni 2025 kl. 23:14 skrev Houston Putman <ho...@apache.org>:
>
> Hey everyone,
>
> It's been a while since the last minor release and the changelog looks
> pretty good to get the next one in.
>
> I volunteer to do it probably sometime next week unless anyone objects.
>
> - Houston
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@solr.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@solr.apache.org
Re: [DISCUSS] Solr 9.9 Release
Posted by Houston Putman <ho...@apache.org>.
Thanks, happy to get those in. I'm targeting early next week, so hopefully
that works for y'all!
- Houston
On Tue, Jun 10, 2025 at 10:07 AM Alessandro Benedetti <a....@sease.io>
wrote:
> +1 Houston and thanks for volunteering, I think it's the right time!
>
> We might be able to squeeze in a couple of bug fixes with my team as well,
> let's see how it goes with our mutual timing.
>
> Cheers
> --------------------------
> *Alessandro Benedetti*
> Director @ Sease Ltd.
> *Apache Lucene/Solr Committer*
> *Apache Solr Chair of PMC*
>
> e-mail: a.benedetti@sease.io
>
>
> *Sease* - Information Retrieval Applied
> Consulting | Training | Open Source
>
> Website: Sease.io <http://sease.io/>
> LinkedIn <https://linkedin.com/company/sease-ltd> | Twitter
> <https://twitter.com/seaseltd> | Youtube
> <https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCDx86ZKLYNpI3gzMercM7BQ> | Github
> <https://github.com/seaseltd>
>
>
> On Mon, 9 Jun 2025 at 22:44, Houston Putman <ho...@apache.org> wrote:
>
> > Hey everyone,
> >
> > It's been a while since the last minor release and the changelog looks
> > pretty good to get the next one in.
> >
> > I volunteer to do it probably sometime next week unless anyone objects.
> >
> > - Houston
> >
>
Re: [DISCUSS] Solr 9.9 Release
Posted by Alessandro Benedetti <a....@sease.io>.
+1 Houston and thanks for volunteering, I think it's the right time!
We might be able to squeeze in a couple of bug fixes with my team as well,
let's see how it goes with our mutual timing.
Cheers
--------------------------
*Alessandro Benedetti*
Director @ Sease Ltd.
*Apache Lucene/Solr Committer*
*Apache Solr Chair of PMC*
e-mail: a.benedetti@sease.io
*Sease* - Information Retrieval Applied
Consulting | Training | Open Source
Website: Sease.io <http://sease.io/>
LinkedIn <https://linkedin.com/company/sease-ltd> | Twitter
<https://twitter.com/seaseltd> | Youtube
<https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCDx86ZKLYNpI3gzMercM7BQ> | Github
<https://github.com/seaseltd>
On Mon, 9 Jun 2025 at 22:44, Houston Putman <ho...@apache.org> wrote:
> Hey everyone,
>
> It's been a while since the last minor release and the changelog looks
> pretty good to get the next one in.
>
> I volunteer to do it probably sometime next week unless anyone objects.
>
> - Houston
>