You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to commits@bloodhound.apache.org by Apache Bloodhound <bl...@incubator.apache.org> on 2012/11/07 07:34:09 UTC
Re: [Apache Bloodhound] #194: Examine workflow for Bloodhound site
#194: Examine workflow for Bloodhound site
------------------------+--------------------
Reporter: gjm | Owner: gjm
Type: task | Status: review
Priority: major | Milestone:
Component: siteadmin | Version:
Resolution: | Keywords:
------------------------+--------------------
Comment (by olemis):
Recently I noticed some weird transitions while using new workflow .
Sequence was
1. #195 put into needsinfo status owner => jdreimann
2. #195 put into assigned status owner => <empty>
(even if input box = olemis)
3. #195 put into assigned status owner => olemis
(review action not available :'( ... )
4. #195 put into review status owner => jdreimann
The issue is somewhere between transitions (2) or (3) . I was hoping to be
do it like this
1. #195 put into needsinfo status owner => jdreimann
2. #195 put into assigned status owner => olemis
3. #195 put into review status owner => jdreimann
what d'u think ?
'''PS:''' the same comment has been posted to bh-dev ML ... I just thought
this had to be mentioned here instead ... jftr
--
Ticket URL: <https://issues.apache.org/bloodhound/ticket/194#comment:17>
Apache Bloodhound <https://issues.apache.org/bloodhound/>
The Apache Bloodhound (incubating) issue tracker
Re: [Apache Bloodhound] #194: Examine workflow for Bloodhound site
Posted by Olemis Lang <ol...@gmail.com>.
On 11/8/12, Joachim Dreimann <jo...@wandisco.com> wrote:
> On 7 November 2012 06:34, Apache Bloodhound <
> bloodhound-dev@incubator.apache.org> wrote:
>
[...]
>>
>> Recently I noticed some weird transitions while using new workflow .
>> Sequence was
>>
>> 1. #195 put into needsinfo status owner => jdreimann
>> 2. #195 put into assigned status owner => <empty>
>> (even if input box = olemis)
>> 3. #195 put into assigned status owner => olemis
>> (review action not available :'( ... )
>> 4. #195 put into review status owner => jdreimann
>>
>
> Your suggestion seems reasonable to me, what stops this from working that
> way currently?
>
AFAICS in step (2) username in the input box is ignored and ticket
owner field is set to an empty string once action is applied . Hence
the need for redundant step (3) above .
Besides ... I wonder ... is review action available for ticket owner only ?
--
Regards,
Olemis.
Blog ES: http://simelo-es.blogspot.com/
Blog EN: http://simelo-en.blogspot.com/
Featured article:
Re: [Apache Bloodhound] #194: Examine workflow for Bloodhound site
Posted by Joachim Dreimann <jo...@wandisco.com>.
Your suggestion seems reasonable to me, what stops this from working that
way currently?
- Joe
On 7 November 2012 06:34, Apache Bloodhound <
bloodhound-dev@incubator.apache.org> wrote:
> #194: Examine workflow for Bloodhound site
> ------------------------+--------------------
> Reporter: gjm | Owner: gjm
> Type: task | Status: review
> Priority: major | Milestone:
> Component: siteadmin | Version:
> Resolution: | Keywords:
> ------------------------+--------------------
>
> Comment (by olemis):
>
> Recently I noticed some weird transitions while using new workflow .
> Sequence was
>
> 1. #195 put into needsinfo status owner => jdreimann
> 2. #195 put into assigned status owner => <empty>
> (even if input box = olemis)
> 3. #195 put into assigned status owner => olemis
> (review action not available :'( ... )
> 4. #195 put into review status owner => jdreimann
>
> The issue is somewhere between transitions (2) or (3) . I was hoping to be
> do it like this
>
> 1. #195 put into needsinfo status owner => jdreimann
> 2. #195 put into assigned status owner => olemis
> 3. #195 put into review status owner => jdreimann
>
> what d'u think ?
>
> '''PS:''' the same comment has been posted to bh-dev ML ... I just thought
> this had to be mentioned here instead ... jftr
>
> --
> Ticket URL: <https://issues.apache.org/bloodhound/ticket/194#comment:17>
> Apache Bloodhound <https://issues.apache.org/bloodhound/>
> The Apache Bloodhound (incubating) issue tracker
>
--
Joe Dreimann
UX Designer | WANdisco <http://www.wandisco.com/>
*
*
*Transform your software development department. Register for a free SVN
HealthCheck <http://go.wandisco.com/HealthCheck-Sig.html> *