You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@geronimo.apache.org by Jason Dillon <ja...@planet57.com> on 2006/02/06 01:11:10 UTC

tranql needed for full build?

Are the tranql sources needed for a full build?

I noticed that new0 and new00 are both for tranql/* but m:checkout  
has the tranql co commented out.

--jason

Re: tranql needed for full build?

Posted by Aaron Mulder <am...@alumni.princeton.edu>.
We haven't considered TranQL source necessary for quite a while.  The
only source that should be regularly checked out is OpenEJB, and we're
considering moving away even from that.

Thanks,
    Aaron

On 2/5/06, Jason Dillon <ja...@planet57.com> wrote:
> By "full build" I mean, the build that should just always work...
> latest stable development... if we had to release it, the same build
> that would be used for that.
>
> On a related note, why don't we use vendor branches for sources that
> are external to our SVN, but are critical for the build?
>
> --jason
>
>
> On Feb 5, 2006, at 5:01 PM, David Jencks wrote:
>
> > tranql and tranql-connector don't change all that often but if you
> > have them checked out you can build them as part of the project.
> > Similarly if you don't check out openejb you can use downloaded
> > jars.  Anytime you do this your risk of mismatched jars increases.
> >
> > So, it depends what you mean by "full build"
> >
> > thanks
> > david jencks
> >
> > On Feb 5, 2006, at 4:11 PM, Jason Dillon wrote:
> >
> >> Are the tranql sources needed for a full build?
> >>
> >> I noticed that new0 and new00 are both for tranql/* but m:checkout
> >> has the tranql co commented out.
> >>
> >> --jason
> >
>
>

Re: tranql needed for full build?

Posted by Jason Dillon <ja...@planet57.com>.
By "full build" I mean, the build that should just always work...  
latest stable development... if we had to release it, the same build  
that would be used for that.

On a related note, why don't we use vendor branches for sources that  
are external to our SVN, but are critical for the build?

--jason


On Feb 5, 2006, at 5:01 PM, David Jencks wrote:

> tranql and tranql-connector don't change all that often but if you  
> have them checked out you can build them as part of the project.   
> Similarly if you don't check out openejb you can use downloaded  
> jars.  Anytime you do this your risk of mismatched jars increases.
>
> So, it depends what you mean by "full build"
>
> thanks
> david jencks
>
> On Feb 5, 2006, at 4:11 PM, Jason Dillon wrote:
>
>> Are the tranql sources needed for a full build?
>>
>> I noticed that new0 and new00 are both for tranql/* but m:checkout  
>> has the tranql co commented out.
>>
>> --jason
>

Re: tranql needed for full build?

Posted by David Jencks <da...@yahoo.com>.
tranql and tranql-connector don't change all that often but if you  
have them checked out you can build them as part of the project.   
Similarly if you don't check out openejb you can use downloaded  
jars.  Anytime you do this your risk of mismatched jars increases.

So, it depends what you mean by "full build"

thanks
david jencks

On Feb 5, 2006, at 4:11 PM, Jason Dillon wrote:

> Are the tranql sources needed for a full build?
>
> I noticed that new0 and new00 are both for tranql/* but m:checkout  
> has the tranql co commented out.
>
> --jason