You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to java-user@axis.apache.org by Gul Onural <on...@nortel.com> on 2007/05/25 18:06:51 UTC
soapAction versus wsaAction
In the wsdl, what is the difference between soapAction and wsaAction ?
Gul
RE: soapAction versus wsaAction
Posted by Ted Jones <Tj...@metamatrix.com>.
The values need to be valid URIs. They may or may not look the same.
Based on what I have seen, the WSDL generated by Axis2 with addressing
engaged will create equivalent values for both SOAP and WSA Actions.
________________________________
From: Gul Onural [mailto:onural@nortel.com]
Sent: Friday, May 25, 2007 12:49 PM
To: axis-user@ws.apache.org
Subject: RE: soapAction versus wsaAction
If you use http (or https) as transport mechanism, are these two
(syntactically) look the same in the wsdl ?
________________________________
From: Ted Jones [mailto:Tjones@metamatrix.com]
Sent: Friday, May 25, 2007 1:42 PM
To: axis-user@ws.apache.org
Subject: RE: soapAction versus wsaAction
One major difference is the wsaAction is transport neutral. If you use
JMS to execute a web service, the soapAction would not available without
some intermediary router logic. As long as you are using WS-Addressing,
the wsaAction will always be available.
Ted
________________________________
From: Gul Onural [mailto:onural@nortel.com]
Sent: Friday, May 25, 2007 11:07 AM
To: axis-user@ws.apache.org
Subject: soapAction versus wsaAction
In the wsdl, what is the difference between soapAction and wsaAction ?
Gul
RE: soapAction versus wsaAction
Posted by Gul Onural <on...@nortel.com>.
If you use http (or https) as transport mechanism, are these two
(syntactically) look the same in the wsdl ?
________________________________
From: Ted Jones [mailto:Tjones@metamatrix.com]
Sent: Friday, May 25, 2007 1:42 PM
To: axis-user@ws.apache.org
Subject: RE: soapAction versus wsaAction
One major difference is the wsaAction is transport neutral. If you use
JMS to execute a web service, the soapAction would not available without
some intermediary router logic. As long as you are using WS-Addressing,
the wsaAction will always be available.
Ted
________________________________
From: Gul Onural [mailto:onural@nortel.com]
Sent: Friday, May 25, 2007 11:07 AM
To: axis-user@ws.apache.org
Subject: soapAction versus wsaAction
In the wsdl, what is the difference between soapAction and wsaAction ?
Gul
RE: soapAction versus wsaAction
Posted by Ted Jones <Tj...@metamatrix.com>.
One major difference is the wsaAction is transport neutral. If you use
JMS to execute a web service, the soapAction would not available without
some intermediary router logic. As long as you are using WS-Addressing,
the wsaAction will always be available.
Ted
________________________________
From: Gul Onural [mailto:onural@nortel.com]
Sent: Friday, May 25, 2007 11:07 AM
To: axis-user@ws.apache.org
Subject: soapAction versus wsaAction
In the wsdl, what is the difference between soapAction and wsaAction ?
Gul