You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.

Posted to dev@sling.apache.org by Robert Munteanu <ro...@apache.org> on 2018/01/31 15:03:10 UTC

Sling docker image

Hi,

Related to the ongoing github.com/apache/sling landing page discussion,
I'd like to discuss our docker setup.

Currently we provide an apachelsling/sling [1] image, which is OK. I
investigated setting up a build under the more official apache account,
but unfortunately the automated docker builds picks up the image name
from the repository, so we ended up with apache/sling-org-apache-sling-
starter-docker, which is quite ugly.

If we choose automated builds, getting back the 'sling' repository is
something we should consider.

Thanks,

Robert

[1]: https://hub.docker.com/r/apachesling/sling/
[2]: https://hub.docker.com/r/apache/sling-org-apache-sling-starter-doc
ker/

Re: Sling docker image

Posted by Robert Munteanu <ro...@apache.org>.

Hi Eugen,

On Fri, 2018-02-02 at 10:28 +0200, Ioan Eugen Stan wrote:
> Hello Robert,
> 
> 
> I think taking back the name is a good idea. Maybe we could ask
> Docker
> hub if we can somehow change the name.
> 
> I would like to support deploying Sling with Docker.

Apparently this is possible, we got apache/sling

  https://hub.docker.com/r/apache/sling/

But I'm still working out the details of automated builds. In the
meantime, there is 

  https://hub.docker.com/r/apachesling/sling/

Not as nice, but just as functional :-)

Robert

> 
> 
> Regards,
> 
> 
> On 31.01.2018 17:03, Robert Munteanu wrote:
> > Hi,
> > 
> > Related to the ongoing github.com/apache/sling landing page
> > discussion,
> > I'd like to discuss our docker setup.
> > 
> > Currently we provide an apachelsling/sling [1] image, which is OK.
> > I
> > investigated setting up a build under the more official apache
> > account,
> > but unfortunately the automated docker builds picks up the image
> > name
> > from the repository, so we ended up with apache/sling-org-apache-
> > sling-
> > starter-docker, which is quite ugly.
> > 
> > If we choose automated builds, getting back the 'sling' repository
> > is
> > something we should consider.
> > 
> > Thanks,
> > 
> > Robert
> > 
> > [1]: https://hub.docker.com/r/apachesling/sling/
> > [2]: https://hub.docker.com/r/apache/sling-org-apache-sling-starter
> > -doc
> > ker/
> 
>

Re: Sling docker image

Posted by Ioan Eugen Stan <ie...@netdava.com>.

Hello Robert,


I think taking back the name is a good idea. Maybe we could ask Docker
hub if we can somehow change the name.

I would like to support deploying Sling with Docker.


Regards,


On 31.01.2018 17:03, Robert Munteanu wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Related to the ongoing github.com/apache/sling landing page discussion,
> I'd like to discuss our docker setup.
>
> Currently we provide an apachelsling/sling [1] image, which is OK. I
> investigated setting up a build under the more official apache account,
> but unfortunately the automated docker builds picks up the image name
> from the repository, so we ended up with apache/sling-org-apache-sling-
> starter-docker, which is quite ugly.
>
> If we choose automated builds, getting back the 'sling' repository is
> something we should consider.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Robert
>
> [1]: https://hub.docker.com/r/apachesling/sling/
> [2]: https://hub.docker.com/r/apache/sling-org-apache-sling-starter-doc
> ker/