You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to mime4j-dev@james.apache.org by "Stefano Bagnara (JIRA)" <mi...@james.apache.org> on 2011/06/15 17:57:47 UTC

[jira] [Updated] (MIME4J-193) Being able to write a message using dom api with no dependencies on the message package

     [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MIME4J-193?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ]

Stefano Bagnara updated MIME4J-193:
-----------------------------------

    Fix Version/s:     (was: 0.7)
                   0.8

I still think this should be a goal.

> Being able to write a message using dom api with no dependencies on the message package
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: MIME4J-193
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MIME4J-193
>             Project: JAMES Mime4j
>          Issue Type: Wish
>          Components: dom
>    Affects Versions: 0.7
>            Reporter: Stefano Bagnara
>             Fix For: 0.8
>
>
> While refactoring jDKIM against the latest mime4j trunk I found that the code now depends on "message" package because of MimeWriter.DEFAULT.writeTo calls.
> At the same time I see we now have MessageServiceFactory.newMessageFormatter and MessageFormatter interface that expose a writeTo(Message, OutputStream) method: why don't we expose all of the other writeTo methods from MimeWriter, too? (and maybe MimeWriter should implement MessageFormatter so we don't need the MessageFormatterImpl class at all)
> WDYT?

--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira