You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to mime4j-dev@james.apache.org by "Stefano Bagnara (JIRA)" <mi...@james.apache.org> on 2011/06/15 17:57:47 UTC
[jira] [Updated] (MIME4J-193) Being able to write a message using
dom api with no dependencies on the message package
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MIME4J-193?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ]
Stefano Bagnara updated MIME4J-193:
-----------------------------------
Fix Version/s: (was: 0.7)
0.8
I still think this should be a goal.
> Being able to write a message using dom api with no dependencies on the message package
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: MIME4J-193
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MIME4J-193
> Project: JAMES Mime4j
> Issue Type: Wish
> Components: dom
> Affects Versions: 0.7
> Reporter: Stefano Bagnara
> Fix For: 0.8
>
>
> While refactoring jDKIM against the latest mime4j trunk I found that the code now depends on "message" package because of MimeWriter.DEFAULT.writeTo calls.
> At the same time I see we now have MessageServiceFactory.newMessageFormatter and MessageFormatter interface that expose a writeTo(Message, OutputStream) method: why don't we expose all of the other writeTo methods from MimeWriter, too? (and maybe MimeWriter should implement MessageFormatter so we don't need the MessageFormatterImpl class at all)
> WDYT?
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira