What's the procedure for reporting false negatives these days?

[Bart Schaefer <ba...@gmail.com>]

I received a fairly obvious spam today that hits only the spamcop
network test in 3.0 RC2.  Even after bayes training it doesn't score
anywhere near 5 points, because BAYES_99 is scored so low in the 3.00
network scoreset.

I haven't been following SA dev as closely since it moved to the
apache foundation, largely because I haven't made the time to install
SVN on my antiquated home machine.  Should I just post the message
here, or do the developers still want bugzillas for stuff like this? 
Or just lump it and increase the BAYES_99 score in my local.cf?

Re: What's the procedure for reporting false negatives these days?

[Theo Van Dinter <fe...@kluge.net>]

On Sun, Aug 29, 2004 at 06:50:01PM -0700, Bart Schaefer wrote:
> SVN on my antiquated home machine.  Should I just post the message
> here, or do the developers still want bugzillas for stuff like this? 
> Or just lump it and increase the BAYES_99 score in my local.cf?

http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/DoYouWantMySpam

-- 
Randomly Generated Tagline:
Dying is the leading cause of death in the world.