You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@spamassassin.apache.org by da...@chaosreigns.com on 2011/11/21 17:02:41 UTC
T_ rules being published?
Aren't these not supposed to be published via sa-update?
meta T_DKIM_INVALID __DKIM_EXISTS && !DKIM_VALID
mimeheader T_DOS_ZIP_HARDCORE Content-Type =~ /^application\/zip;\sname="hardcore\.zip"$/
body T_EMRCP /\bExcess Maximum Return Capital Profit\b/i
meta T_FILL_THIS_FORM_SHORT __FILL_THIS_FORM_SHORT && !__VIA_ML && !__MSGID_JAVAMAIL
meta T_FORGED_TBIRD_IMG_SIZE __FORGED_TBIRD_IMG && __ONE_IMG && __IMG_LE_300K
meta T_FRM_SILVER_GOLD (__FRT_SILVER && __FRT_GOLD)
body T_FRT_ADULT2 /<inter W0><post P2>\b(?!adult)<A><D><UX><L><TX>/i
$ host -t txt 1.3.3.updates.spamassassin.org
1.3.3.updates.spamassassin.org descriptive text "1195874"
$ head -n 1 ../updates_spamassassin_org.cf
# UPDATE version 1195874
This stuff is showing up in the rules currently being published for SA
v3.3.1. Right?
--
"The most elementary and valuable statement in science, the beginning
of wisdom is: 'I do not know'." - Data, ST:TNG 2x2 Where Silence Has Lease
http://www.ChaosReigns.com
Re: T_ rules being published?
Posted by Axb <ax...@gmail.com>.
On 2011-11-21 18:14, darxus@chaosreigns.com wrote:
> On 11/21, Kevin A. McGrail wrote:
>> Are they being used in a meta rule that auto promotes them?
>
> Doesn't look like it. T_DKIM_INVALID, T_DOS_ZIP_HARDCORE,
> T_FILL_THIS_FORM_SHORT, T_FORGED_TBIRD_IMG_SIZE, T_FRM_SILVER_GOLD,
> T_FRT_ADULT2 are not used in any meta rule.
>
no T_* rules are in last 10_force_active.cf nor in 72_scores.cf so I
assume we're lacking an sa-update
Re: T_ rules being published?
Posted by da...@chaosreigns.com.
On 11/21, Kevin A. McGrail wrote:
> Are they being used in a meta rule that auto promotes them?
Doesn't look like it. T_DKIM_INVALID, T_DOS_ZIP_HARDCORE,
T_FILL_THIS_FORM_SHORT, T_FORGED_TBIRD_IMG_SIZE, T_FRM_SILVER_GOLD,
T_FRT_ADULT2 are not used in any meta rule.
--
"Speed is a metaphor for freedom."
http://www.ChaosReigns.com
Re: T_ rules being published?
Posted by "Kevin A. McGrail" <KM...@PCCC.com>.
Are they being used in a meta rule that auto promotes them?
On 11/21/2011 11:02 AM, darxus@chaosreigns.com wrote:
> Aren't these not supposed to be published via sa-update?
>
> meta T_DKIM_INVALID __DKIM_EXISTS&& !DKIM_VALID
> mimeheader T_DOS_ZIP_HARDCORE Content-Type =~ /^application\/zip;\sname="hardcore\.zip"$/
> body T_EMRCP /\bExcess Maximum Return Capital Profit\b/i
> meta T_FILL_THIS_FORM_SHORT __FILL_THIS_FORM_SHORT&& !__VIA_ML&& !__MSGID_JAVAMAIL
> meta T_FORGED_TBIRD_IMG_SIZE __FORGED_TBIRD_IMG&& __ONE_IMG&& __IMG_LE_300K
> meta T_FRM_SILVER_GOLD (__FRT_SILVER&& __FRT_GOLD)
> body T_FRT_ADULT2 /<inter W0><post P2>\b(?!adult)<A><D><UX><L><TX>/i
>
>
> $ host -t txt 1.3.3.updates.spamassassin.org
> 1.3.3.updates.spamassassin.org descriptive text "1195874"
>
> $ head -n 1 ../updates_spamassassin_org.cf
> # UPDATE version 1195874
>
> This stuff is showing up in the rules currently being published for SA
> v3.3.1. Right?
>