You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@struts.apache.org by Ted Husted <hu...@apache.org> on 2007/03/21 21:59:24 UTC
[S2] [VOTE] Struts 2.0.7 Quality
The Struts 2.0.7 test build is now available.
Release notes:
* http://struts.apache.org/2.x/docs/release-notes-207.html
Distribution:
* http://people.apache.org/builds/struts/2.0.7/
The Maven 2 staging repository is not yet available, but when it
is, it will be in the usual location:
* http://people.apache.org/builds/struts/2.0.7/m2-staging-repository/
Once you have had a chance to review the test build, please
respond with a vote on its quality:
[ ] Leave at test build
[ ] Alpha
[ ] Beta
[ ] General Availability (GA)
Everyone who has tested the build is invited to vote. Votes by PMC
members are considered binding. A vote passes if there are at least
three binding +1s and more +1s than -1s.
The vote will remain open for at least 72 hours, longer upon
request. A vote can be amended at any time to upgrade or downgrade the
quality of the release based on future experience. If an initial vote
designates the build as "Beta", the release will be submitted for
mirroring and announced to the user list. Once released as a public
beta, subsequent quality votes on a build may be held on the user
list.
As always, the act of voting carries certain obligations. A
binding vote not only states an opinion, but means that the voter is
agreeing to help do the work
-Ted.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@struts.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@struts.apache.org
Re: [S2] [VOTE] Struts 2.0.7 Quality
Posted by mraible <ma...@raibledesigns.com>.
+1 GA - all tests pass in AppFuse.
Matt
Ted Husted-4 wrote:
>
> The Struts 2.0.7 test build is now available.
>
> Release notes:
>
> * http://struts.apache.org/2.x/docs/release-notes-207.html
>
> Distribution:
>
> * http://people.apache.org/builds/struts/2.0.7/
>
> The Maven 2 staging repository is not yet available, but when it
> is, it will be in the usual location:
>
> *
> http://people.apache.org/builds/struts/2.0.7/m2-staging-repository/
>
> Once you have had a chance to review the test build, please
> respond with a vote on its quality:
>
> [ ] Leave at test build
> [ ] Alpha
> [ ] Beta
> [ ] General Availability (GA)
>
> Everyone who has tested the build is invited to vote. Votes by PMC
> members are considered binding. A vote passes if there are at least
> three binding +1s and more +1s than -1s.
>
> The vote will remain open for at least 72 hours, longer upon
> request. A vote can be amended at any time to upgrade or downgrade the
> quality of the release based on future experience. If an initial vote
> designates the build as "Beta", the release will be submitted for
> mirroring and announced to the user list. Once released as a public
> beta, subsequent quality votes on a build may be held on the user
> list.
>
> As always, the act of voting carries certain obligations. A
> binding vote not only states an opinion, but means that the voter is
> agreeing to help do the work
>
> -Ted.
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@struts.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@struts.apache.org
>
>
>
--
View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/-S2---VOTE--Struts-2.0.7-Quality-tf3443816.html#a9643008
Sent from the Struts - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@struts.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@struts.apache.org
Re: [S2] [VOTE] Struts 2.0.7 Quality
Posted by "David H. DeWolf" <dd...@apache.org>.
Ted Husted wrote:
+1
> [ ] Leave at test build
> [ ] Alpha
> [ ] Beta
> [x] General Availability (GA)
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@struts.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@struts.apache.org
Re: [S2] [VOTE] Struts 2.0.7 Quality
Posted by Dave Newton <ne...@yahoo.com>.
User-boy here, likewise--I have a new gig and won't be
able to look at it until Sunday.
--- Philip Luppens <ph...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Same here .. it would be easier if we could extend
> the period until
> after the weekend, making it easier for those not
> able to work on S2
> during the day/week.
>
> Phil
>
> On 3/23/07, James Mitchell <jm...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> > Unfortunately, I got pulled away on a critical
> issue and was not able
> > to run through this as fully as I would have
> liked.
> >
> > So +0 from me, unless I can find more time before
> the 72 hours runs out.
> >
> >
> > --
> > James Mitchell
> > The Ruby Roundup
> > http://www.rubyroundup.com/
> >
> >
> > On Mar 21, 2007, at 4:59 PM, Ted Husted wrote:
> >
> > > The Struts 2.0.7 test build is now available.
> > >
> > > Release notes:
> > >
> > > *
>
http://struts.apache.org/2.x/docs/release-notes-207.html
> > >
> > > Distribution:
> > >
> > > *
> http://people.apache.org/builds/struts/2.0.7/
> > >
> > > The Maven 2 staging repository is not yet
> available, but when it
> > > is, it will be in the usual location:
> > >
> > > *
>
http://people.apache.org/builds/struts/2.0.7/m2-staging-
> > > repository/
> > >
> > > Once you have had a chance to review the test
> build, please
> > > respond with a vote on its quality:
> > >
> > > [ ] Leave at test build
> > > [ ] Alpha
> > > [ ] Beta
> > > [ ] General Availability (GA)
> > >
> > > Everyone who has tested the build is invited
> to vote. Votes by PMC
> > > members are considered binding. A vote passes if
> there are at least
> > > three binding +1s and more +1s than -1s.
> > >
> > > The vote will remain open for at least 72
> hours, longer upon
> > > request. A vote can be amended at any time to
> upgrade or downgrade the
> > > quality of the release based on future
> experience. If an initial vote
> > > designates the build as "Beta", the release will
> be submitted for
> > > mirroring and announced to the user list. Once
> released as a public
> > > beta, subsequent quality votes on a build may be
> held on the user
> > > list.
> > >
> > > As always, the act of voting carries certain
> obligations. A
> > > binding vote not only states an opinion, but
> means that the voter is
> > > agreeing to help do the work
> > >
> > > -Ted.
> > >
> > >
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > To unsubscribe, e-mail:
> dev-unsubscribe@struts.apache.org
> > > For additional commands, e-mail:
> dev-help@struts.apache.org
> > >
> >
> >
> >
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail:
> dev-unsubscribe@struts.apache.org
> > For additional commands, e-mail:
> dev-help@struts.apache.org
> >
> >
>
>
> --
> iDTV System Engineer
> "Always code as if the guy who ends up maintaining
> your code will be a
> violent psychopath who knows where you live." - John
> F. Woods
>
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail:
> dev-unsubscribe@struts.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail:
> dev-help@struts.apache.org
>
>
____________________________________________________________________________________
Expecting? Get great news right away with email Auto-Check.
Try the Yahoo! Mail Beta.
http://advision.webevents.yahoo.com/mailbeta/newmail_tools.html
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@struts.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@struts.apache.org
Re: [S2] [VOTE] Struts 2.0.7 Quality
Posted by Pedro Herrera <pe...@hotmail.com>.
+1 (GA) too
Herrera
Nate Drake wrote:
>
> +1 (GA)
>
>
>
> On 3/23/07, Ted Husted <hu...@apache.org> wrote:
>> There's not an actual drop-dead date. Like merit, quality votes never
>> expire.
>>
>> The 72-hour clause just means that if we had 3 +1s by then, and
>> nothing seemed awry, we might go ahead and announce it. Hey,
>> elsewhere, I've been known to cast positive quality votes even weeks
>> after the announcement, just as a matter of record. :)
>>
>> Even after we announce a quality grade, the grade is still subject to
>> actual experience. If a serious issue were discovered later, we could
>> change our votes and downgrade the quality, if appropriate.
>>
>> Likewise, we can vote a release alpha or beta, announce it, let others
>> try it, and then upgrade the quality based on positive experience. An
>> ASF release vote is not a political statement or a marketing vehicle.
>> It's our best, ongoing assessment of whether the bits are ready to be
>> deployed by the general public.
>>
>> -Ted.
>>
>> On 3/23/07, Philip Luppens <ph...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> > Same here .. it would be easier if we could extend the period until
>> > after the weekend, making it easier for those not able to work on S2
>> > during the day/week.
>> >
>> > Phil
>> >
>> > On 3/23/07, James Mitchell <jm...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> > > Unfortunately, I got pulled away on a critical issue and was not able
>> > > to run through this as fully as I would have liked.
>> > >
>> > > So +0 from me, unless I can find more time before the 72 hours runs
>> out.
>> > >
>> > >
>> > > --
>> > > James Mitchell
>> > > The Ruby Roundup
>> > > http://www.rubyroundup.com/
>> > >
>> > >
>> > > On Mar 21, 2007, at 4:59 PM, Ted Husted wrote:
>> > >
>> > > > The Struts 2.0.7 test build is now available.
>> > > >
>> > > > Release notes:
>> > > >
>> > > > * http://struts.apache.org/2.x/docs/release-notes-207.html
>> > > >
>> > > > Distribution:
>> > > >
>> > > > * http://people.apache.org/builds/struts/2.0.7/
>> > > >
>> > > > The Maven 2 staging repository is not yet available, but when it
>> > > > is, it will be in the usual location:
>> > > >
>> > > > * http://people.apache.org/builds/struts/2.0.7/m2-staging-
>> > > > repository/
>> > > >
>> > > > Once you have had a chance to review the test build, please
>> > > > respond with a vote on its quality:
>> > > >
>> > > > [ ] Leave at test build
>> > > > [ ] Alpha
>> > > > [ ] Beta
>> > > > [ ] General Availability (GA)
>> > > >
>> > > > Everyone who has tested the build is invited to vote. Votes by
>> PMC
>> > > > members are considered binding. A vote passes if there are at least
>> > > > three binding +1s and more +1s than -1s.
>> > > >
>> > > > The vote will remain open for at least 72 hours, longer upon
>> > > > request. A vote can be amended at any time to upgrade or downgrade
>> the
>> > > > quality of the release based on future experience. If an initial
>> vote
>> > > > designates the build as "Beta", the release will be submitted for
>> > > > mirroring and announced to the user list. Once released as a public
>> > > > beta, subsequent quality votes on a build may be held on the user
>> > > > list.
>> > > >
>> > > > As always, the act of voting carries certain obligations. A
>> > > > binding vote not only states an opinion, but means that the voter
>> is
>> > > > agreeing to help do the work
>> > > >
>> > > > -Ted.
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@struts.apache.org
>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@struts.apache.org
>>
>>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@struts.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@struts.apache.org
>
>
>
--
View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/-S2---VOTE--Struts-2.0.7-Quality-tf3443816.html#a9649366
Sent from the Struts - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@struts.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@struts.apache.org
Re: [S2] [VOTE] Struts 2.0.7 Quality
Posted by Nate Drake <nd...@gmail.com>.
+1 (GA)
On 3/23/07, Ted Husted <hu...@apache.org> wrote:
> There's not an actual drop-dead date. Like merit, quality votes never expire.
>
> The 72-hour clause just means that if we had 3 +1s by then, and
> nothing seemed awry, we might go ahead and announce it. Hey,
> elsewhere, I've been known to cast positive quality votes even weeks
> after the announcement, just as a matter of record. :)
>
> Even after we announce a quality grade, the grade is still subject to
> actual experience. If a serious issue were discovered later, we could
> change our votes and downgrade the quality, if appropriate.
>
> Likewise, we can vote a release alpha or beta, announce it, let others
> try it, and then upgrade the quality based on positive experience. An
> ASF release vote is not a political statement or a marketing vehicle.
> It's our best, ongoing assessment of whether the bits are ready to be
> deployed by the general public.
>
> -Ted.
>
> On 3/23/07, Philip Luppens <ph...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > Same here .. it would be easier if we could extend the period until
> > after the weekend, making it easier for those not able to work on S2
> > during the day/week.
> >
> > Phil
> >
> > On 3/23/07, James Mitchell <jm...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > Unfortunately, I got pulled away on a critical issue and was not able
> > > to run through this as fully as I would have liked.
> > >
> > > So +0 from me, unless I can find more time before the 72 hours runs out.
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > James Mitchell
> > > The Ruby Roundup
> > > http://www.rubyroundup.com/
> > >
> > >
> > > On Mar 21, 2007, at 4:59 PM, Ted Husted wrote:
> > >
> > > > The Struts 2.0.7 test build is now available.
> > > >
> > > > Release notes:
> > > >
> > > > * http://struts.apache.org/2.x/docs/release-notes-207.html
> > > >
> > > > Distribution:
> > > >
> > > > * http://people.apache.org/builds/struts/2.0.7/
> > > >
> > > > The Maven 2 staging repository is not yet available, but when it
> > > > is, it will be in the usual location:
> > > >
> > > > * http://people.apache.org/builds/struts/2.0.7/m2-staging-
> > > > repository/
> > > >
> > > > Once you have had a chance to review the test build, please
> > > > respond with a vote on its quality:
> > > >
> > > > [ ] Leave at test build
> > > > [ ] Alpha
> > > > [ ] Beta
> > > > [ ] General Availability (GA)
> > > >
> > > > Everyone who has tested the build is invited to vote. Votes by PMC
> > > > members are considered binding. A vote passes if there are at least
> > > > three binding +1s and more +1s than -1s.
> > > >
> > > > The vote will remain open for at least 72 hours, longer upon
> > > > request. A vote can be amended at any time to upgrade or downgrade the
> > > > quality of the release based on future experience. If an initial vote
> > > > designates the build as "Beta", the release will be submitted for
> > > > mirroring and announced to the user list. Once released as a public
> > > > beta, subsequent quality votes on a build may be held on the user
> > > > list.
> > > >
> > > > As always, the act of voting carries certain obligations. A
> > > > binding vote not only states an opinion, but means that the voter is
> > > > agreeing to help do the work
> > > >
> > > > -Ted.
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@struts.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@struts.apache.org
>
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@struts.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@struts.apache.org
Re: [S2] [VOTE] Struts 2.0.7 Quality
Posted by Ted Husted <hu...@apache.org>.
There's not an actual drop-dead date. Like merit, quality votes never expire.
The 72-hour clause just means that if we had 3 +1s by then, and
nothing seemed awry, we might go ahead and announce it. Hey,
elsewhere, I've been known to cast positive quality votes even weeks
after the announcement, just as a matter of record. :)
Even after we announce a quality grade, the grade is still subject to
actual experience. If a serious issue were discovered later, we could
change our votes and downgrade the quality, if appropriate.
Likewise, we can vote a release alpha or beta, announce it, let others
try it, and then upgrade the quality based on positive experience. An
ASF release vote is not a political statement or a marketing vehicle.
It's our best, ongoing assessment of whether the bits are ready to be
deployed by the general public.
-Ted.
On 3/23/07, Philip Luppens <ph...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Same here .. it would be easier if we could extend the period until
> after the weekend, making it easier for those not able to work on S2
> during the day/week.
>
> Phil
>
> On 3/23/07, James Mitchell <jm...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > Unfortunately, I got pulled away on a critical issue and was not able
> > to run through this as fully as I would have liked.
> >
> > So +0 from me, unless I can find more time before the 72 hours runs out.
> >
> >
> > --
> > James Mitchell
> > The Ruby Roundup
> > http://www.rubyroundup.com/
> >
> >
> > On Mar 21, 2007, at 4:59 PM, Ted Husted wrote:
> >
> > > The Struts 2.0.7 test build is now available.
> > >
> > > Release notes:
> > >
> > > * http://struts.apache.org/2.x/docs/release-notes-207.html
> > >
> > > Distribution:
> > >
> > > * http://people.apache.org/builds/struts/2.0.7/
> > >
> > > The Maven 2 staging repository is not yet available, but when it
> > > is, it will be in the usual location:
> > >
> > > * http://people.apache.org/builds/struts/2.0.7/m2-staging-
> > > repository/
> > >
> > > Once you have had a chance to review the test build, please
> > > respond with a vote on its quality:
> > >
> > > [ ] Leave at test build
> > > [ ] Alpha
> > > [ ] Beta
> > > [ ] General Availability (GA)
> > >
> > > Everyone who has tested the build is invited to vote. Votes by PMC
> > > members are considered binding. A vote passes if there are at least
> > > three binding +1s and more +1s than -1s.
> > >
> > > The vote will remain open for at least 72 hours, longer upon
> > > request. A vote can be amended at any time to upgrade or downgrade the
> > > quality of the release based on future experience. If an initial vote
> > > designates the build as "Beta", the release will be submitted for
> > > mirroring and announced to the user list. Once released as a public
> > > beta, subsequent quality votes on a build may be held on the user
> > > list.
> > >
> > > As always, the act of voting carries certain obligations. A
> > > binding vote not only states an opinion, but means that the voter is
> > > agreeing to help do the work
> > >
> > > -Ted.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@struts.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@struts.apache.org
Re: [S2] [VOTE] Struts 2.0.7 Quality
Posted by Philip Luppens <ph...@gmail.com>.
Same here .. it would be easier if we could extend the period until
after the weekend, making it easier for those not able to work on S2
during the day/week.
Phil
On 3/23/07, James Mitchell <jm...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Unfortunately, I got pulled away on a critical issue and was not able
> to run through this as fully as I would have liked.
>
> So +0 from me, unless I can find more time before the 72 hours runs out.
>
>
> --
> James Mitchell
> The Ruby Roundup
> http://www.rubyroundup.com/
>
>
> On Mar 21, 2007, at 4:59 PM, Ted Husted wrote:
>
> > The Struts 2.0.7 test build is now available.
> >
> > Release notes:
> >
> > * http://struts.apache.org/2.x/docs/release-notes-207.html
> >
> > Distribution:
> >
> > * http://people.apache.org/builds/struts/2.0.7/
> >
> > The Maven 2 staging repository is not yet available, but when it
> > is, it will be in the usual location:
> >
> > * http://people.apache.org/builds/struts/2.0.7/m2-staging-
> > repository/
> >
> > Once you have had a chance to review the test build, please
> > respond with a vote on its quality:
> >
> > [ ] Leave at test build
> > [ ] Alpha
> > [ ] Beta
> > [ ] General Availability (GA)
> >
> > Everyone who has tested the build is invited to vote. Votes by PMC
> > members are considered binding. A vote passes if there are at least
> > three binding +1s and more +1s than -1s.
> >
> > The vote will remain open for at least 72 hours, longer upon
> > request. A vote can be amended at any time to upgrade or downgrade the
> > quality of the release based on future experience. If an initial vote
> > designates the build as "Beta", the release will be submitted for
> > mirroring and announced to the user list. Once released as a public
> > beta, subsequent quality votes on a build may be held on the user
> > list.
> >
> > As always, the act of voting carries certain obligations. A
> > binding vote not only states an opinion, but means that the voter is
> > agreeing to help do the work
> >
> > -Ted.
> >
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@struts.apache.org
> > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@struts.apache.org
> >
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@struts.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@struts.apache.org
>
>
--
iDTV System Engineer
"Always code as if the guy who ends up maintaining your code will be a
violent psychopath who knows where you live." - John F. Woods
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@struts.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@struts.apache.org
Re: [S2] [VOTE] Struts 2.0.7 Quality
Posted by James Mitchell <jm...@gmail.com>.
Unfortunately, I got pulled away on a critical issue and was not able
to run through this as fully as I would have liked.
So +0 from me, unless I can find more time before the 72 hours runs out.
--
James Mitchell
The Ruby Roundup
http://www.rubyroundup.com/
On Mar 21, 2007, at 4:59 PM, Ted Husted wrote:
> The Struts 2.0.7 test build is now available.
>
> Release notes:
>
> * http://struts.apache.org/2.x/docs/release-notes-207.html
>
> Distribution:
>
> * http://people.apache.org/builds/struts/2.0.7/
>
> The Maven 2 staging repository is not yet available, but when it
> is, it will be in the usual location:
>
> * http://people.apache.org/builds/struts/2.0.7/m2-staging-
> repository/
>
> Once you have had a chance to review the test build, please
> respond with a vote on its quality:
>
> [ ] Leave at test build
> [ ] Alpha
> [ ] Beta
> [ ] General Availability (GA)
>
> Everyone who has tested the build is invited to vote. Votes by PMC
> members are considered binding. A vote passes if there are at least
> three binding +1s and more +1s than -1s.
>
> The vote will remain open for at least 72 hours, longer upon
> request. A vote can be amended at any time to upgrade or downgrade the
> quality of the release based on future experience. If an initial vote
> designates the build as "Beta", the release will be submitted for
> mirroring and announced to the user list. Once released as a public
> beta, subsequent quality votes on a build may be held on the user
> list.
>
> As always, the act of voting carries certain obligations. A
> binding vote not only states an opinion, but means that the voter is
> agreeing to help do the work
>
> -Ted.
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@struts.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@struts.apache.org
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@struts.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@struts.apache.org
Re: [S2] [VOTE] Struts 2.0.7 Quality
Posted by Pedro Herrera <pe...@hotmail.com>.
Ok,
I´be testing this new release..
Herrera
husted wrote:
>
> The Struts 2.0.7 test build is now available.
>
> Release notes:
>
> * http://struts.apache.org/2.x/docs/release-notes-207.html
>
> Distribution:
>
> * http://people.apache.org/builds/struts/2.0.7/
>
> The Maven 2 staging repository is not yet available, but when it
> is, it will be in the usual location:
>
> *
> http://people.apache.org/builds/struts/2.0.7/m2-staging-repository/
>
> Once you have had a chance to review the test build, please
> respond with a vote on its quality:
>
> [ ] Leave at test build
> [ ] Alpha
> [ ] Beta
> [ ] General Availability (GA)
>
> Everyone who has tested the build is invited to vote. Votes by PMC
> members are considered binding. A vote passes if there are at least
> three binding +1s and more +1s than -1s.
>
> The vote will remain open for at least 72 hours, longer upon
> request. A vote can be amended at any time to upgrade or downgrade the
> quality of the release based on future experience. If an initial vote
> designates the build as "Beta", the release will be submitted for
> mirroring and announced to the user list. Once released as a public
> beta, subsequent quality votes on a build may be held on the user
> list.
>
> As always, the act of voting carries certain obligations. A
> binding vote not only states an opinion, but means that the voter is
> agreeing to help do the work
>
> -Ted.
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@struts.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@struts.apache.org
>
>
>
--
View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/-S2---VOTE--Struts-2.0.7-Quality-tf3443816.html#a9611778
Sent from the Struts - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@struts.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@struts.apache.org
Re: [S2] [VOTE] Struts 2.0.7 Quality
Posted by Piero Sartini <li...@pierosartini.de>.
Am Freitag, 23. März 2007 schrieb Ted Husted:
> Actually, that's perfect :)
+1 (GA) then :)
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@struts.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@struts.apache.org
Re: [S2] [VOTE] Struts 2.0.7 Quality
Posted by Ted Husted <hu...@apache.org>.
Actually, that's perfect :)
On 3/23/07, Piero Sartini <li...@pierosartini.de> wrote:
> I am using 2.0.7 since it became available to develop my application.
> Everything works fine and there are no problems. But I am not sure if this is
> enough to make a vote or if more extensive testing is expected.
>
> Piero
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@struts.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@struts.apache.org
Re: [S2] [VOTE] Struts 2.0.7 Quality
Posted by Piero Sartini <li...@pierosartini.de>.
I am using 2.0.7 since it became available to develop my application.
Everything works fine and there are no problems. But I am not sure if this is
enough to make a vote or if more extensive testing is expected.
Piero
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@struts.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@struts.apache.org
Re: [S2] [VOTE] Struts 2.0.7 Quality
Posted by Rene Gielen <gi...@it-neering.net>.
Update: the corresponding S2 issue [1] should be fixed now too (crosscheck
highly appreciated). This introduced the need to update XW dependencies to
2.0.2-SNAPSHOT. I've talked with Rainer about the release schedule for XW
- if everything works as planned, this weekend a release can be expected.
Nevertheless, I seeing another issue now: In Tomcat 5.5.20, a given S2 app
refuses to serialize because of ContainerImpl$ConstructorInjector not
being serializable (and probably won't ever be...). This issue seems to
not have been introduced by the TextProvider stuff (afaics). I suspect
that a ref to the container is held where it is not indicated to do so.
Can someone confirm this issue?
At last, for the protocol, my vote for 2.0.7
> [x] Leave at test build
> [ ] Alpha
> [ ] Beta
> [ ] General Availability (GA)
- Rene
[1] https://issues.apache.org/struts/browse/WW-1856
Am Mi, 28.03.2007, 01:18, schrieb Rene Gielen:
> I should have fixed the according XWork issue [1] for XW 2.0.2-SNAPSHOT.
> To fix WW-1856, we have to upgrade XWork dependency.
>
> Unfortunately, the conditions under which this issue shows up are far
> from rare. Any use of the i18n tag is likely to cause troubles. I can
> reproduce various cases where a simple POST with an Action.execute()
> target produces unreadable pages due to inproper text resolving.
>
> Therefore I would consider this issue as blocker for making 2.0.7 a GA
> release. Thoughts?
>
> Regards,
> - Rene
>
> [1] http://jira.opensymphony.com/browse/XW-487
>
> Rene Gielen schrieb:
>> I seem to have the same issue here in a customer project, but since it
>> is portlet environment, I was not sure yet whether it was a porlet
>> related issue...
>>
>> - Rene
>>
>> On Tue, 27 Mar 2007 10:55:27 +0200 (CEST), "Rainer Hermanns"
>> <he...@aixcept.de> wrote:
>>> James,
>>>
>>> there is a blocking error for xwork 2.0.2 [1] that seems to be related.
>>> I am trying to work on this the coming weekend and release xw 2.0.2
>>> ASAP with this and other fixes.
>>>
>>> +1 for beta
>>>
>>> cheers,
>>> Rainer
>>>
>>> [1] http://jira.opensymphony.com/browse/XW-487
>>>
>>>> In trying to fix a few insignificant items in the the mailreader, and
>>>> I'm seeing some weirdness in the i18n tag....by weirdness, I mean
>>>> that it's broke.
>>>>
>>>> Can someone confirm?
>>>>
>>>> If so, my vote goes to +1 for beta.
>>>>
>>>>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@struts.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@struts.apache.org
Re: [S2] [VOTE] Struts 2.0.7 Quality
Posted by Ted Husted <hu...@apache.org>.
On 3/28/07, Dave Newton <ne...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> Is this in the
> http://people.apache.org/builds/struts/2.0.7/ build?
No, the patch hasn't been applied to either the 2.0.x branch or the HEAD.
-T.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@struts.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@struts.apache.org
Re: [S2] [VOTE] Struts 2.0.7 Quality
Posted by Dave Newton <ne...@yahoo.com>.
--- Ted Husted <hu...@apache.org> wrote:
> It'd be especially jiggy if one or two people using
> annotations could
> look at WW-1796 and confirm that it's a good thing.
>
> * https://issues.apache.org/struts/browse/WW-1796
Is this in the
http://people.apache.org/builds/struts/2.0.7/ build?
d.
____________________________________________________________________________________
Now that's room service! Choose from over 150,000 hotels
in 45,000 destinations on Yahoo! Travel to find your fit.
http://farechase.yahoo.com/promo-generic-14795097
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@struts.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@struts.apache.org
Re: [S2] [VOTE] Struts 2.0.7 Quality
Posted by Ted Husted <hu...@apache.org>.
You could check the MailReader WIP into the Sandbox first,
* http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/struts/sandbox/trunk/
and when it's done, then we can decide what to do.
One way to do that would be to use SVN copy, checkout the copy, and
then paste over any files you've already changed, and check that in.
That way, we keep the history too.
There's also MailReader version in the archive that uses Wildcards to
the fullest extent.
* http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/struts/archive/struts-sandbox/struts2/apps/mailreader-wildone/
-Ted.
On 3/28/07, Dave Newton <ne...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> --- Ted Husted <hu...@apache.org> wrote:
> > You might check what you have into the sandbox, as a
> > call for other volunteers. Seeing the blow by blow
> in
> > the Subversion logs might also be instructive for
> > anyone thinking of doing the same thing with
> > another application.
>
> Oh, I didn't know (a) I could do that and (b) we
> wanted to *replace* the existing MailReader. (Do we?!
> Showcase seems pretty big for ppl to digest all at
> once, but I dunno.)
>
> d.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@struts.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@struts.apache.org
Re: [S2] [VOTE] Struts 2.0.7 Quality
Posted by Dave Newton <ne...@yahoo.com>.
--- Ted Husted <hu...@apache.org> wrote:
> You might check what you have into the sandbox, as a
> call for other volunteers. Seeing the blow by blow
in
> the Subversion logs might also be instructive for
> anyone thinking of doing the same thing with
> another application.
Oh, I didn't know (a) I could do that and (b) we
wanted to *replace* the existing MailReader. (Do we?!
Showcase seems pretty big for ppl to digest all at
once, but I dunno.)
d.
____________________________________________________________________________________
Bored stiff? Loosen up...
Download and play hundreds of games for free on Yahoo! Games.
http://games.yahoo.com/games/front
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@struts.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@struts.apache.org
Re: [S2] [VOTE] Struts 2.0.7 Quality
Posted by Ted Husted <hu...@apache.org>.
You might check what you have into the sandbox, as a call for other
volunteers. Seeing the blow by blow in the Subversion logs might also
be instructive for anyone thinking of doing the same thing with
another application.
On 3/28/07, Dave Newton <ne...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> --- James Mitchell <jm...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > Are you working on a zero-config mailreader?
>
> I had started a conversion after the first call and
> had asked about dealing with its interceptors :/ I
> didn't have the annotation patches yet.
>
> d.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@struts.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@struts.apache.org
Re: [S2] [VOTE] Struts 2.0.7 Quality
Posted by Dave Newton <ne...@yahoo.com>.
--- James Mitchell <jm...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Are you working on a zero-config mailreader?
I had started a conversion after the first call and
had asked about dealing with its interceptors :/ I
didn't have the annotation patches yet.
d.
____________________________________________________________________________________
It's here! Your new message!
Get new email alerts with the free Yahoo! Toolbar.
http://tools.search.yahoo.com/toolbar/features/mail/
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@struts.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@struts.apache.org
Re: [S2] [VOTE] Struts 2.0.7 Quality
Posted by James Mitchell <jm...@gmail.com>.
Are you working on a zero-config mailreader?
--
James Mitchell
The Ruby Roundup
http://www.rubyroundup.com/
On Mar 28, 2007, at 4:59 AM, Dave Newton wrote:
> --- Ted Husted <hu...@apache.org> wrote:
>> It'd be especially jiggy if one or two people using
>> annotations could look at WW-1796 and confirm that
>> it's a good thing.
>>
>> * https://issues.apache.org/struts/browse/WW-1796
>
> I'll lend a pair of user-eyes to that as part of my
> zero-config mailreader stuff.
>
> d.
>
>
>
>
> ______________________________________________________________________
> ______________
> Now that's room service! Choose from over 150,000 hotels
> in 45,000 destinations on Yahoo! Travel to find your fit.
> http://farechase.yahoo.com/promo-generic-14795097
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@struts.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@struts.apache.org
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@struts.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@struts.apache.org
Re: [S2] [VOTE] Struts 2.0.7 Quality
Posted by Dave Newton <ne...@yahoo.com>.
--- Ted Husted <hu...@apache.org> wrote:
> It'd be especially jiggy if one or two people using
> annotations could look at WW-1796 and confirm that
> it's a good thing.
>
> * https://issues.apache.org/struts/browse/WW-1796
I'll lend a pair of user-eyes to that as part of my
zero-config mailreader stuff.
d.
____________________________________________________________________________________
Now that's room service! Choose from over 150,000 hotels
in 45,000 destinations on Yahoo! Travel to find your fit.
http://farechase.yahoo.com/promo-generic-14795097
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@struts.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@struts.apache.org
Re: [S2] [VOTE] Struts 2.0.7 Quality
Posted by Ted Husted <hu...@apache.org>.
The build is final, and people following this thread can use it if
they choose. The grade is a matter of votes. Mine's +1 for a
test-build, since I don't believe the changes made here warrant
explaining why it's only a beta, or explaining that the i18n tag
doesn't work. But, other PMC members might have different opinions. I
doubt that we will have long to wait for a new XW2.
In the meantime, if there's anything anyone wants to apply for 2.0.8,
there's your sign.
It'd be especially jiggy if one or two people using annotations could
look at WW-1796 and confirm that it's a good thing.
* https://issues.apache.org/struts/browse/WW-1796
-Ted.
On 3/27/07, David H. DeWolf <dd...@apache.org> wrote:
> Agreed, but that doesn't prevent us from finalizing 2.0.7 as beta though
> does it? Since most of the work is already done, it seems worth putting
> out there for those that prefer the other 2.0.7 fixes to the i18n tag?
>
> Ted Husted wrote:
> > I doubt that there will be enough binding GA votes for the release
> > when the i18n tag is broken. We'll just have to go on to 2.0.8 as soon
> > as a new XW release is available.
> >
> > -Ted.
> >
> > On 3/27/07, Rene Gielen <gi...@it-neering.net> wrote:
> >> I should have fixed the according XWork issue [1] for XW 2.0.2-SNAPSHOT.
> >> To fix WW-1856, we have to upgrade XWork dependency.
> >>
> >> Unfortunately, the conditions under which this issue shows up are far
> >> from rare. Any use of the i18n tag is likely to cause troubles. I can
> >> reproduce various cases where a simple POST with an Action.execute()
> >> target produces unreadable pages due to inproper text resolving.
> >>
> >> Therefore I would consider this issue as blocker for making 2.0.7 a GA
> >> release. Thoughts?
> >>
> >> Regards,
> >> - Rene
> >>
> >> [1] http://jira.opensymphony.com/browse/XW-487
> >>
> >> Rene Gielen schrieb:
> >> > I seem to have the same issue here in a customer project, but since
> >> it is portlet environment, I was not sure yet whether it was a porlet
> >> related issue...
> >> >
> >> > - Rene
> >> >
> >> > On Tue, 27 Mar 2007 10:55:27 +0200 (CEST), "Rainer Hermanns"
> >> <he...@aixcept.de> wrote:
> >> >> James,
> >> >>
> >> >> there is a blocking error for xwork 2.0.2 [1] that seems to be
> >> related.
> >> >> I am trying to work on this the coming weekend and release xw 2.0.2
> >> >> ASAP with this and other fixes.
> >> >>
> >> >> +1 for beta
> >> >>
> >> >> cheers,
> >> >> Rainer
> >> >>
> >> >> [1] http://jira.opensymphony.com/browse/XW-487
> >> >>
> >> >>> In trying to fix a few insignificant items in the the mailreader, and
> >> >>> I'm seeing some weirdness in the i18n tag....by weirdness, I mean
> >> >>> that it's broke.
> >> >>>
> >> >>> Can someone confirm?
> >> >>>
> >> >>> If so, my vote goes to +1 for beta.
> >> >>>
> >> >>>
> >> >>> --
> >> >>> James Mitchell
> >> >>> The Ruby Roundup
> >> >>> http://www.rubyroundup.com/
> >> >>>
> >> >>>
> >> >>> On Mar 21, 2007, at 4:59 PM, Ted Husted wrote:
> >> >>>
> >> >>>> The Struts 2.0.7 test build is now available.
> >> >>>>
> >> >>>> Release notes:
> >> >>>>
> >> >>>> * http://struts.apache.org/2.x/docs/release-notes-207.html
> >> >>>>
> >> >>>> Distribution:
> >> >>>>
> >> >>>> * http://people.apache.org/builds/struts/2.0.7/
> >> >>>>
> >> >>>> The Maven 2 staging repository is not yet available, but when it
> >> >>>> is, it will be in the usual location:
> >> >>>>
> >> >>>> * http://people.apache.org/builds/struts/2.0.7/m2-staging-
> >> >>>> repository/
> >> >>>>
> >> >>>> Once you have had a chance to review the test build, please
> >> >>>> respond with a vote on its quality:
> >> >>>>
> >> >>>> [ ] Leave at test build
> >> >>>> [ ] Alpha
> >> >>>> [ ] Beta
> >> >>>> [ ] General Availability (GA)
> >> >>>>
> >> >>>> Everyone who has tested the build is invited to vote. Votes by
> >> PMC
> >> >>>> members are considered binding. A vote passes if there are at least
> >> >>>> three binding +1s and more +1s than -1s.
> >> >>>>
> >> >>>> The vote will remain open for at least 72 hours, longer upon
> >> >>>> request. A vote can be amended at any time to upgrade or
> >> downgrade the
> >> >>>> quality of the release based on future experience. If an initial
> >> vote
> >> >>>> designates the build as "Beta", the release will be submitted for
> >> >>>> mirroring and announced to the user list. Once released as a public
> >> >>>> beta, subsequent quality votes on a build may be held on the user
> >> >>>> list.
> >> >>>>
> >> >>>> As always, the act of voting carries certain obligations. A
> >> >>>> binding vote not only states an opinion, but means that the voter is
> >> >>>> agreeing to help do the work
> >> >>>>
> >> >>>> -Ted.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@struts.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@struts.apache.org
Re: [S2] [VOTE] Struts 2.0.7 Quality
Posted by "David H. DeWolf" <dd...@apache.org>.
Agreed, but that doesn't prevent us from finalizing 2.0.7 as beta though
does it? Since most of the work is already done, it seems worth putting
out there for those that prefer the other 2.0.7 fixes to the i18n tag?
Ted Husted wrote:
> I doubt that there will be enough binding GA votes for the release
> when the i18n tag is broken. We'll just have to go on to 2.0.8 as soon
> as a new XW release is available.
>
> -Ted.
>
> On 3/27/07, Rene Gielen <gi...@it-neering.net> wrote:
>> I should have fixed the according XWork issue [1] for XW 2.0.2-SNAPSHOT.
>> To fix WW-1856, we have to upgrade XWork dependency.
>>
>> Unfortunately, the conditions under which this issue shows up are far
>> from rare. Any use of the i18n tag is likely to cause troubles. I can
>> reproduce various cases where a simple POST with an Action.execute()
>> target produces unreadable pages due to inproper text resolving.
>>
>> Therefore I would consider this issue as blocker for making 2.0.7 a GA
>> release. Thoughts?
>>
>> Regards,
>> - Rene
>>
>> [1] http://jira.opensymphony.com/browse/XW-487
>>
>> Rene Gielen schrieb:
>> > I seem to have the same issue here in a customer project, but since
>> it is portlet environment, I was not sure yet whether it was a porlet
>> related issue...
>> >
>> > - Rene
>> >
>> > On Tue, 27 Mar 2007 10:55:27 +0200 (CEST), "Rainer Hermanns"
>> <he...@aixcept.de> wrote:
>> >> James,
>> >>
>> >> there is a blocking error for xwork 2.0.2 [1] that seems to be
>> related.
>> >> I am trying to work on this the coming weekend and release xw 2.0.2
>> >> ASAP with this and other fixes.
>> >>
>> >> +1 for beta
>> >>
>> >> cheers,
>> >> Rainer
>> >>
>> >> [1] http://jira.opensymphony.com/browse/XW-487
>> >>
>> >>> In trying to fix a few insignificant items in the the mailreader, and
>> >>> I'm seeing some weirdness in the i18n tag....by weirdness, I mean
>> >>> that it's broke.
>> >>>
>> >>> Can someone confirm?
>> >>>
>> >>> If so, my vote goes to +1 for beta.
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>> --
>> >>> James Mitchell
>> >>> The Ruby Roundup
>> >>> http://www.rubyroundup.com/
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>> On Mar 21, 2007, at 4:59 PM, Ted Husted wrote:
>> >>>
>> >>>> The Struts 2.0.7 test build is now available.
>> >>>>
>> >>>> Release notes:
>> >>>>
>> >>>> * http://struts.apache.org/2.x/docs/release-notes-207.html
>> >>>>
>> >>>> Distribution:
>> >>>>
>> >>>> * http://people.apache.org/builds/struts/2.0.7/
>> >>>>
>> >>>> The Maven 2 staging repository is not yet available, but when it
>> >>>> is, it will be in the usual location:
>> >>>>
>> >>>> * http://people.apache.org/builds/struts/2.0.7/m2-staging-
>> >>>> repository/
>> >>>>
>> >>>> Once you have had a chance to review the test build, please
>> >>>> respond with a vote on its quality:
>> >>>>
>> >>>> [ ] Leave at test build
>> >>>> [ ] Alpha
>> >>>> [ ] Beta
>> >>>> [ ] General Availability (GA)
>> >>>>
>> >>>> Everyone who has tested the build is invited to vote. Votes by
>> PMC
>> >>>> members are considered binding. A vote passes if there are at least
>> >>>> three binding +1s and more +1s than -1s.
>> >>>>
>> >>>> The vote will remain open for at least 72 hours, longer upon
>> >>>> request. A vote can be amended at any time to upgrade or
>> downgrade the
>> >>>> quality of the release based on future experience. If an initial
>> vote
>> >>>> designates the build as "Beta", the release will be submitted for
>> >>>> mirroring and announced to the user list. Once released as a public
>> >>>> beta, subsequent quality votes on a build may be held on the user
>> >>>> list.
>> >>>>
>> >>>> As always, the act of voting carries certain obligations. A
>> >>>> binding vote not only states an opinion, but means that the voter is
>> >>>> agreeing to help do the work
>> >>>>
>> >>>> -Ted.
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@struts.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@struts.apache.org
>
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@struts.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@struts.apache.org
Re: [S2] [VOTE] Struts 2.0.7 Quality
Posted by Ted Husted <hu...@apache.org>.
I doubt that there will be enough binding GA votes for the release
when the i18n tag is broken. We'll just have to go on to 2.0.8 as soon
as a new XW release is available.
-Ted.
On 3/27/07, Rene Gielen <gi...@it-neering.net> wrote:
> I should have fixed the according XWork issue [1] for XW 2.0.2-SNAPSHOT.
> To fix WW-1856, we have to upgrade XWork dependency.
>
> Unfortunately, the conditions under which this issue shows up are far
> from rare. Any use of the i18n tag is likely to cause troubles. I can
> reproduce various cases where a simple POST with an Action.execute()
> target produces unreadable pages due to inproper text resolving.
>
> Therefore I would consider this issue as blocker for making 2.0.7 a GA
> release. Thoughts?
>
> Regards,
> - Rene
>
> [1] http://jira.opensymphony.com/browse/XW-487
>
> Rene Gielen schrieb:
> > I seem to have the same issue here in a customer project, but since it is portlet environment, I was not sure yet whether it was a porlet related issue...
> >
> > - Rene
> >
> > On Tue, 27 Mar 2007 10:55:27 +0200 (CEST), "Rainer Hermanns" <he...@aixcept.de> wrote:
> >> James,
> >>
> >> there is a blocking error for xwork 2.0.2 [1] that seems to be related.
> >> I am trying to work on this the coming weekend and release xw 2.0.2
> >> ASAP with this and other fixes.
> >>
> >> +1 for beta
> >>
> >> cheers,
> >> Rainer
> >>
> >> [1] http://jira.opensymphony.com/browse/XW-487
> >>
> >>> In trying to fix a few insignificant items in the the mailreader, and
> >>> I'm seeing some weirdness in the i18n tag....by weirdness, I mean
> >>> that it's broke.
> >>>
> >>> Can someone confirm?
> >>>
> >>> If so, my vote goes to +1 for beta.
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> --
> >>> James Mitchell
> >>> The Ruby Roundup
> >>> http://www.rubyroundup.com/
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> On Mar 21, 2007, at 4:59 PM, Ted Husted wrote:
> >>>
> >>>> The Struts 2.0.7 test build is now available.
> >>>>
> >>>> Release notes:
> >>>>
> >>>> * http://struts.apache.org/2.x/docs/release-notes-207.html
> >>>>
> >>>> Distribution:
> >>>>
> >>>> * http://people.apache.org/builds/struts/2.0.7/
> >>>>
> >>>> The Maven 2 staging repository is not yet available, but when it
> >>>> is, it will be in the usual location:
> >>>>
> >>>> * http://people.apache.org/builds/struts/2.0.7/m2-staging-
> >>>> repository/
> >>>>
> >>>> Once you have had a chance to review the test build, please
> >>>> respond with a vote on its quality:
> >>>>
> >>>> [ ] Leave at test build
> >>>> [ ] Alpha
> >>>> [ ] Beta
> >>>> [ ] General Availability (GA)
> >>>>
> >>>> Everyone who has tested the build is invited to vote. Votes by PMC
> >>>> members are considered binding. A vote passes if there are at least
> >>>> three binding +1s and more +1s than -1s.
> >>>>
> >>>> The vote will remain open for at least 72 hours, longer upon
> >>>> request. A vote can be amended at any time to upgrade or downgrade the
> >>>> quality of the release based on future experience. If an initial vote
> >>>> designates the build as "Beta", the release will be submitted for
> >>>> mirroring and announced to the user list. Once released as a public
> >>>> beta, subsequent quality votes on a build may be held on the user
> >>>> list.
> >>>>
> >>>> As always, the act of voting carries certain obligations. A
> >>>> binding vote not only states an opinion, but means that the voter is
> >>>> agreeing to help do the work
> >>>>
> >>>> -Ted.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@struts.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@struts.apache.org
Re: [S2] [VOTE] Struts 2.0.7 Quality
Posted by Rene Gielen <gi...@it-neering.net>.
I should have fixed the according XWork issue [1] for XW 2.0.2-SNAPSHOT.
To fix WW-1856, we have to upgrade XWork dependency.
Unfortunately, the conditions under which this issue shows up are far
from rare. Any use of the i18n tag is likely to cause troubles. I can
reproduce various cases where a simple POST with an Action.execute()
target produces unreadable pages due to inproper text resolving.
Therefore I would consider this issue as blocker for making 2.0.7 a GA
release. Thoughts?
Regards,
- Rene
[1] http://jira.opensymphony.com/browse/XW-487
Rene Gielen schrieb:
> I seem to have the same issue here in a customer project, but since it is portlet environment, I was not sure yet whether it was a porlet related issue...
>
> - Rene
>
> On Tue, 27 Mar 2007 10:55:27 +0200 (CEST), "Rainer Hermanns" <he...@aixcept.de> wrote:
>> James,
>>
>> there is a blocking error for xwork 2.0.2 [1] that seems to be related.
>> I am trying to work on this the coming weekend and release xw 2.0.2
>> ASAP with this and other fixes.
>>
>> +1 for beta
>>
>> cheers,
>> Rainer
>>
>> [1] http://jira.opensymphony.com/browse/XW-487
>>
>>> In trying to fix a few insignificant items in the the mailreader, and
>>> I'm seeing some weirdness in the i18n tag....by weirdness, I mean
>>> that it's broke.
>>>
>>> Can someone confirm?
>>>
>>> If so, my vote goes to +1 for beta.
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> James Mitchell
>>> The Ruby Roundup
>>> http://www.rubyroundup.com/
>>>
>>>
>>> On Mar 21, 2007, at 4:59 PM, Ted Husted wrote:
>>>
>>>> The Struts 2.0.7 test build is now available.
>>>>
>>>> Release notes:
>>>>
>>>> * http://struts.apache.org/2.x/docs/release-notes-207.html
>>>>
>>>> Distribution:
>>>>
>>>> * http://people.apache.org/builds/struts/2.0.7/
>>>>
>>>> The Maven 2 staging repository is not yet available, but when it
>>>> is, it will be in the usual location:
>>>>
>>>> * http://people.apache.org/builds/struts/2.0.7/m2-staging-
>>>> repository/
>>>>
>>>> Once you have had a chance to review the test build, please
>>>> respond with a vote on its quality:
>>>>
>>>> [ ] Leave at test build
>>>> [ ] Alpha
>>>> [ ] Beta
>>>> [ ] General Availability (GA)
>>>>
>>>> Everyone who has tested the build is invited to vote. Votes by PMC
>>>> members are considered binding. A vote passes if there are at least
>>>> three binding +1s and more +1s than -1s.
>>>>
>>>> The vote will remain open for at least 72 hours, longer upon
>>>> request. A vote can be amended at any time to upgrade or downgrade the
>>>> quality of the release based on future experience. If an initial vote
>>>> designates the build as "Beta", the release will be submitted for
>>>> mirroring and announced to the user list. Once released as a public
>>>> beta, subsequent quality votes on a build may be held on the user
>>>> list.
>>>>
>>>> As always, the act of voting carries certain obligations. A
>>>> binding vote not only states an opinion, but means that the voter is
>>>> agreeing to help do the work
>>>>
>>>> -Ted.
>>>>
>>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@struts.apache.org
>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@struts.apache.org
>>>>
>>>
>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@struts.apache.org
>>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@struts.apache.org
>>>
>>>
>>
>> --
>> Rainer Hermanns
>> aixcept
>> Neupforte 16
>> 52062 Aachen - Germany
>> w: http://aixcept.de/
>> t: +49-241-4012247
>> m: +49-170-3432912
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@struts.apache.org
>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@struts.apache.org
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@struts.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@struts.apache.org
>
--
Rene Gielen | http://it-neering.net/
Aachen | PGP-ID: BECB785A
Germany | gielen at it-neering.net
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@struts.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@struts.apache.org
Re: [S2] [VOTE] Struts 2.0.7 Quality
Posted by Rene Gielen <gi...@it-neering.net>.
I seem to have the same issue here in a customer project, but since it is portlet environment, I was not sure yet whether it was a porlet related issue...
- Rene
On Tue, 27 Mar 2007 10:55:27 +0200 (CEST), "Rainer Hermanns" <he...@aixcept.de> wrote:
> James,
>
> there is a blocking error for xwork 2.0.2 [1] that seems to be related.
> I am trying to work on this the coming weekend and release xw 2.0.2
> ASAP with this and other fixes.
>
> +1 for beta
>
> cheers,
> Rainer
>
> [1] http://jira.opensymphony.com/browse/XW-487
>
>> In trying to fix a few insignificant items in the the mailreader, and
>> I'm seeing some weirdness in the i18n tag....by weirdness, I mean
>> that it's broke.
>>
>> Can someone confirm?
>>
>> If so, my vote goes to +1 for beta.
>>
>>
>> --
>> James Mitchell
>> The Ruby Roundup
>> http://www.rubyroundup.com/
>>
>>
>> On Mar 21, 2007, at 4:59 PM, Ted Husted wrote:
>>
>>> The Struts 2.0.7 test build is now available.
>>>
>>> Release notes:
>>>
>>> * http://struts.apache.org/2.x/docs/release-notes-207.html
>>>
>>> Distribution:
>>>
>>> * http://people.apache.org/builds/struts/2.0.7/
>>>
>>> The Maven 2 staging repository is not yet available, but when it
>>> is, it will be in the usual location:
>>>
>>> * http://people.apache.org/builds/struts/2.0.7/m2-staging-
>>> repository/
>>>
>>> Once you have had a chance to review the test build, please
>>> respond with a vote on its quality:
>>>
>>> [ ] Leave at test build
>>> [ ] Alpha
>>> [ ] Beta
>>> [ ] General Availability (GA)
>>>
>>> Everyone who has tested the build is invited to vote. Votes by PMC
>>> members are considered binding. A vote passes if there are at least
>>> three binding +1s and more +1s than -1s.
>>>
>>> The vote will remain open for at least 72 hours, longer upon
>>> request. A vote can be amended at any time to upgrade or downgrade the
>>> quality of the release based on future experience. If an initial vote
>>> designates the build as "Beta", the release will be submitted for
>>> mirroring and announced to the user list. Once released as a public
>>> beta, subsequent quality votes on a build may be held on the user
>>> list.
>>>
>>> As always, the act of voting carries certain obligations. A
>>> binding vote not only states an opinion, but means that the voter is
>>> agreeing to help do the work
>>>
>>> -Ted.
>>>
>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@struts.apache.org
>>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@struts.apache.org
>>>
>>
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@struts.apache.org
>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@struts.apache.org
>>
>>
>
>
> --
> Rainer Hermanns
> aixcept
> Neupforte 16
> 52062 Aachen - Germany
> w: http://aixcept.de/
> t: +49-241-4012247
> m: +49-170-3432912
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@struts.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@struts.apache.org
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@struts.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@struts.apache.org
Re: [S2] [VOTE] Struts 2.0.7 Quality
Posted by Rainer Hermanns <he...@aixcept.de>.
James,
there is a blocking error for xwork 2.0.2 [1] that seems to be related.
I am trying to work on this the coming weekend and release xw 2.0.2
ASAP with this and other fixes.
+1 for beta
cheers,
Rainer
[1] http://jira.opensymphony.com/browse/XW-487
> In trying to fix a few insignificant items in the the mailreader, and
> I'm seeing some weirdness in the i18n tag....by weirdness, I mean
> that it's broke.
>
> Can someone confirm?
>
> If so, my vote goes to +1 for beta.
>
>
> --
> James Mitchell
> The Ruby Roundup
> http://www.rubyroundup.com/
>
>
> On Mar 21, 2007, at 4:59 PM, Ted Husted wrote:
>
>> The Struts 2.0.7 test build is now available.
>>
>> Release notes:
>>
>> * http://struts.apache.org/2.x/docs/release-notes-207.html
>>
>> Distribution:
>>
>> * http://people.apache.org/builds/struts/2.0.7/
>>
>> The Maven 2 staging repository is not yet available, but when it
>> is, it will be in the usual location:
>>
>> * http://people.apache.org/builds/struts/2.0.7/m2-staging-
>> repository/
>>
>> Once you have had a chance to review the test build, please
>> respond with a vote on its quality:
>>
>> [ ] Leave at test build
>> [ ] Alpha
>> [ ] Beta
>> [ ] General Availability (GA)
>>
>> Everyone who has tested the build is invited to vote. Votes by PMC
>> members are considered binding. A vote passes if there are at least
>> three binding +1s and more +1s than -1s.
>>
>> The vote will remain open for at least 72 hours, longer upon
>> request. A vote can be amended at any time to upgrade or downgrade the
>> quality of the release based on future experience. If an initial vote
>> designates the build as "Beta", the release will be submitted for
>> mirroring and announced to the user list. Once released as a public
>> beta, subsequent quality votes on a build may be held on the user
>> list.
>>
>> As always, the act of voting carries certain obligations. A
>> binding vote not only states an opinion, but means that the voter is
>> agreeing to help do the work
>>
>> -Ted.
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@struts.apache.org
>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@struts.apache.org
>>
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@struts.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@struts.apache.org
>
>
--
Rainer Hermanns
aixcept
Neupforte 16
52062 Aachen - Germany
w: http://aixcept.de/
t: +49-241-4012247
m: +49-170-3432912
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@struts.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@struts.apache.org
Re: [S2] [VOTE] Struts 2.0.7 Quality
Posted by Ted Husted <hu...@apache.org>.
Confirmed.
https://issues.apache.org/struts/browse/WW-1856
On 3/26/07, James Mitchell <jm...@gmail.com> wrote:
> In trying to fix a few insignificant items in the the mailreader, and
Feel free to fix the significant items too. :)
The data access layers uses several anti-patterns, like using
business-domain tokens as keys, not providing zero-argument
constructors (so, technically, MailReader does not use JavaBeans), and
creating objects with immutable keys.
Though, maybe it's time to do a canonical, zero-configuration,
code-behind Petstore :)
> I'm seeing some weirdness in the i18n tag....by weirdness, I mean
> that it's broke.
>
> Can someone confirm?
>
> If so, my vote goes to +1 for beta.
>
>
> --
> James Mitchell
> The Ruby Roundup
> http://www.rubyroundup.com/
>
>
> On Mar 21, 2007, at 4:59 PM, Ted Husted wrote:
>
> > The Struts 2.0.7 test build is now available.
> >
> > Release notes:
> >
> > * http://struts.apache.org/2.x/docs/release-notes-207.html
> >
> > Distribution:
> >
> > * http://people.apache.org/builds/struts/2.0.7/
> >
> > The Maven 2 staging repository is not yet available, but when it
> > is, it will be in the usual location:
> >
> > * http://people.apache.org/builds/struts/2.0.7/m2-staging-
> > repository/
> >
> > Once you have had a chance to review the test build, please
> > respond with a vote on its quality:
> >
> > [ ] Leave at test build
> > [ ] Alpha
> > [ ] Beta
> > [ ] General Availability (GA)
> >
> > Everyone who has tested the build is invited to vote. Votes by PMC
> > members are considered binding. A vote passes if there are at least
> > three binding +1s and more +1s than -1s.
> >
> > The vote will remain open for at least 72 hours, longer upon
> > request. A vote can be amended at any time to upgrade or downgrade the
> > quality of the release based on future experience. If an initial vote
> > designates the build as "Beta", the release will be submitted for
> > mirroring and announced to the user list. Once released as a public
> > beta, subsequent quality votes on a build may be held on the user
> > list.
> >
> > As always, the act of voting carries certain obligations. A
> > binding vote not only states an opinion, but means that the voter is
> > agreeing to help do the work
> >
> > -Ted.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@struts.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@struts.apache.org
Re: [S2] [VOTE] Struts 2.0.7 Quality
Posted by James Mitchell <jm...@gmail.com>.
In trying to fix a few insignificant items in the the mailreader, and
I'm seeing some weirdness in the i18n tag....by weirdness, I mean
that it's broke.
Can someone confirm?
If so, my vote goes to +1 for beta.
--
James Mitchell
The Ruby Roundup
http://www.rubyroundup.com/
On Mar 21, 2007, at 4:59 PM, Ted Husted wrote:
> The Struts 2.0.7 test build is now available.
>
> Release notes:
>
> * http://struts.apache.org/2.x/docs/release-notes-207.html
>
> Distribution:
>
> * http://people.apache.org/builds/struts/2.0.7/
>
> The Maven 2 staging repository is not yet available, but when it
> is, it will be in the usual location:
>
> * http://people.apache.org/builds/struts/2.0.7/m2-staging-
> repository/
>
> Once you have had a chance to review the test build, please
> respond with a vote on its quality:
>
> [ ] Leave at test build
> [ ] Alpha
> [ ] Beta
> [ ] General Availability (GA)
>
> Everyone who has tested the build is invited to vote. Votes by PMC
> members are considered binding. A vote passes if there are at least
> three binding +1s and more +1s than -1s.
>
> The vote will remain open for at least 72 hours, longer upon
> request. A vote can be amended at any time to upgrade or downgrade the
> quality of the release based on future experience. If an initial vote
> designates the build as "Beta", the release will be submitted for
> mirroring and announced to the user list. Once released as a public
> beta, subsequent quality votes on a build may be held on the user
> list.
>
> As always, the act of voting carries certain obligations. A
> binding vote not only states an opinion, but means that the voter is
> agreeing to help do the work
>
> -Ted.
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@struts.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@struts.apache.org
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@struts.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@struts.apache.org