You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@spamassassin.apache.org by bu...@bugzilla.spamassassin.org on 2016/05/12 22:34:30 UTC

[Bug 7320] New: bad dns

https://bz.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=7320

            Bug ID: 7320
           Summary: bad dns
           Product: Spamassassin
           Version: unspecified
          Hardware: Other
                OS: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: P2
         Component: spamc/spamd
          Assignee: dev@spamassassin.apache.org
          Reporter: letter@openmailbox.org

Command terminal response below

systemctl status spamassassin.service -l
 spamassassin.service - Spamassassin daemon
   Loaded: loaded (/usr/lib/systemd/system/spamassassin.service; enabled;
vendor preset: disabled)
   Active: active (running) since ppp; 1h 50min ago
 Main PID: 487 (spamd)
    Tasks: 3 (limit: 512)
   CGroup: /system.slice/spamassassin.service
           ├─487 /usr/bin/perl -w /usr/bin/vendor_perl/spamd -x -u spamd -g
spamd
           ├─643 spamd chil
           └─644 spamd chil

 spamd[643]: dns: sendto() to [127.0.0.1]:53 failed: Connection refused,
failing over to [::1]:53
 spamd[643]: ERROR: udp recv failed: Connection refused
 spamd[643]: dns: bad dns reply: corrupt wire-format data at
/usr/share/perl5/vendor_perl/Net/DNS/Packet.pm line 118, <GEN46> line 571.
 spamd[643]: ERROR: udp recv failed: Connection refused
 spamd[643]: dns: bad dns reply: corrupt wire-format data at
/usr/share/perl5/vendor_perl/Net/DNS/Packet.pm line 118, <GEN46> line 571.
 spamd[643]: ERROR: udp recv failed: Connection refused
 spamd[643]: dns: bad dns reply: corrupt wire-format data at
/usr/share/perl5/vendor_perl/Net/DNS/Packet.pm line 118, <GEN46> line 571.
 spamd[643]: spamd: clean message (3.1/5.0) for ...:182 in 15.2 seconds, 38359
bytes.
 spamd[643]: spamd: result: . 3 -
BAD_CREDIT,DKIM_SIGNED,HTML_IMAGE_RATIO_08,HTML_MESSAGE,RDNS_NONE,T_DKIM_INVALID,T_SPF_HELO_TEMPERROR,T_SPF_TEMPERROR
scantime=15.2,size=...,user=...,uid=...,required_score=5.0,host=localhost,addr=127.0.0.1,port=...,mid=<.....@....com>,autolearn=no
autolearn_force=no
 spamd[487]: prefork: child states: II

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.

[Bug 7320] bad dns

Posted by bu...@bugzilla.spamassassin.org.
https://bz.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=7320

John Hardin <jh...@impsec.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |jhardin@impsec.org

--- Comment #1 from John Hardin <jh...@impsec.org> ---
(In reply to letter from comment #0)
>  spamd[643]: dns: sendto() to [127.0.0.1]:53 failed: Connection refused,
> failing over to [::1]:53
>  spamd[643]: ERROR: udp recv failed: Connection refused

I assume you're not just reporting "my local DNS service isn't running"?

If you start your local DNS service, do you continue to see problems with SA
DNS queries?

Is this a fresh SA install and it's never worked?

If it was working before, have you upgraded Net::DNS recently? 

In either case, what version of Net::DNS is installed? There were some issues
with it a couple of releases a while back. Search the Users list archives for
Net::DNS for the last six months and you should find the discussion with
mention of the problematic version numbers.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.

[Bug 7320] bad dns

Posted by bu...@bugzilla.spamassassin.org.
https://bz.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=7320

Bill Cole <sa...@billmail.scconsult.com> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEW                         |RESOLVED
         Resolution|---                         |WORKSFORME

--- Comment #2 from Bill Cole <sa...@billmail.scconsult.com> ---
Not reproducible with info provided, reporter never responded to suggestions of
possible (trivial) causes.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.